Tuesday, 31 January 2012


By Lasha Darkmoon
RED : Higher IQs of 100 or more. GREEN : Lower IQs of under 80
1 Afghanistan 83 2 Albania 90 3 Algeria 84 4 Angola 69 5 Antigua & Barbuda 75 6 Argentina 96 7 Armenia 93 8 Australia 98 9 Austria 102 10 Azerbaijan 87
11 Bahamas 78 12 Bahrain 83 13 Bangladesh 81 14 Barbados 78 15 Belarus 96 16 Belgium 100 17 Belize 83 18 Benin 69 19 Bhutan 78 20 Bolivia 85 21 Botswana 72 22 Brazil 87 23 Brunei 92 24 Bulgaria 93 25 Burkina Faso 66 26 Burma (Myanmar) 86 27 Burundi 70
28 Cambodia 89 29 Cameroon 70 30 Canada 97 31 Cape Verde 78 32 Central African Rep. 68 33 Chad 72 34 Chile 93 35 China 100 36 Colombia 88 37 Comoros 79 38 Congo (Braz) 73 39 Congo (Zaire) 65 40 Costa Rica 91 41 C te d Ivoire 42 Croatia 90 43 Cuba 85 44 Cyprus 92 45 Czech Republic 97
46 Denmark 98 47 Djibouti 68 48 Dominica 75 49 Dominican Republic 84
50 Ecuador 80 51 Egypt 83 52 El Salvador 84 53 Equatorial Guinea 59 54 Eritrea 68 55 Estonia 97 56 Ethiopia 63
57 Fiji 84 58 Finland 97 59 France 98
60 Gabon 66 61 Gambia 64 62 Georgia 93 63 Germany 102 64 Ghana 71 65 Greece 92 66 Grenada 75 67 Guatemala 79 68 Guinea 63 69 Guinea-Bissau 63 70 Guyana 84 71 Haiti 72 72 Honduras 84 73 Hong Kong 107 74 Hungary 99
75 Iceland 98 76 India 81 77 Indonesia 89 78 Iran 84 79 Iraq 87 80 Ireland 93 81 Israel 94 (Ashkenazi Jews = 117.
See endnote on Jewish IQ)
82 Italy 102
83 Jamaica 72 84 Japan 105 85 Jordan 87
86 Kazakhstan 93 87 Kenya 72 88 Kiribati 84 89 Korea, North 105 90 Korea, South 106 91 Kuwait 83 92 Kyrgyzstan 87
With the single exception of Ashkenazi Jews (see Endnote), the yellow races enjoy the highest IQs in the world, with the Hong Kong Chinese scoring most (107), South Koreans (106), North Koreans (105), Japanese (105). In comparison, the average Caucasian has an IQ of 100 or less.

93 Laos 89 94 Latvia 97 95 Lebanon 86 96 Lesotho 72 97 Liberia 64 98 Libya 84 99 Lithuania 97* 100 Luxembourg 101
101 Macedonia 93 102 Madagascar 79 103 Malawi 71 104 Malaysia 92 105 Maldives 81 106 Mali 68 107 Malta 95 108 Marshall Islands 84 109 Mauritania 73 110 Mauritius 81 111 Mexico 87 112 Micronesia 84 113 Moldova 95 114 Mongolia 98 115 Morocco 85 116 Mosambique 72
117 Namibia 72 118 Nepal 78 119 Netherlands 102 120 New Zealand 100 121 Nicaragua 84 122 Niger 67 123 Nigeria 67 124 Norway 98 125 Oman 83 126 Pakistan 81 127 Panama 84 128 Papua New Guinea 84 129 Paraguay 85 130 Peru 90 131 Philippines 86 132 Poland 99 133 Portugal 95 134 Puerto Rico 84
135 Qatar 78
136 Romania 94 137 Russia 96 138 Rwanda 70
139 Samoa (Western) 87 140 Sao Tome/Principe 59 141 Saudi Arabia 83 142 Senegal 64 143 Seychelles 81 144 Sierra Leone 64 145 Singapore 100 146 Slovakia 96 147 Slovenia 95 148 Solomon Islands 84 149 Somalia 68 150 South Africa 72 151 Spain 99 152 Sri Lanka 81 153 St. Kitts & Nevis 75 154 St. Lucia 75 155 St.Vincent/Grenadines 75 156 Sudan 72 157 Suriname 89 158 Swaziland 72 159 Sweden 101 160 Switzerland 101 161 Syria 87
162 Taiwan 104 163 Tajikistan 87 164 Tanzania 72 165 Thailand 91 166 Togo 69 167 Tonga 87 168 Trinidad & Tobago 80 169 Tunisia 84 170 Turkey 90 171 Turkmenistan 87
172 Uganda 73 173 Ukraine 96 174 United Arab Emirates 83 175 United Kingdom 100 176 United States 98 177 Uruguay 96 178 Uzbekistan 87
179 Vanuatu 84 180 Venezuela 88 181 Vietnam 96 182 Yemen 83 183 Yugoslavia 93
184 Zambia 77 185 Zimbabwe 66
Endnote on Jewish IQ :
ASHKENAZI JEWS : Unlike the average Jew in Israel whose IQ is given above as 94, the Ashkenazi Jew is said to have an average IQ of 117: 10 points above the Hong Kong Chinese (107), 20 points above the Canadians (97), 30 points above the Mexicans (87), and 50 points above the Nigerians (67).
The 2005 paper Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence by Cochran , Hardy, and Harpending , argued on the basis of inherited diseases and the peculiar economic situation of Ashkenazi Jews in medieval Europe , that Ashkenazi Jews as a group now inherit a cognitive profile that includes higher verbal and mathematical intelligence than other ethnic groups, along with lower spatial intelligence .
One observational basis for inferring that Ashkenazi Jews have high intelligence is their prevalence in intellectually demanding fields. From 1901 2010, 21.5% of Nobel Prize winners were Jewish, while Jews make up a much smaller fraction of the population of the countries represented. For example, 36% of Nobel Prize winners from the United States have been Jewish, while Jews make up 2.1% of the U.S. population.
G. Cochran, J. Hardy and H. Harpending additionally cite the disproportionately high percentage of Ashkenazi Chess Grandmasters and Fields Medalists in mathematics, as well as winners of the Turing Award in computer science.
Their median IQ is calculated at 117 in From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice (2000), published by Cambridge University Press. This is 10 points higher than the generally-accepted IQ of their closest rivals Northeast Asians and almost 20% higher than the global average.
Other researchers who study the Ashkenazim have asserted an IQ number a bit lower than 117, but all have agreed that these children of Abraham are on top of the IQ chart. Plus, contemplate this astounding tidbit: Ashkenazi visual-spatial test scores are typically lower than the norm; this means their abilities in the other two categories, language and math, are absolutely astounding.
Nobel Prizes: Since 1950, 29% of the awards have gone to Ashkenazim, even though they represent only 0.25% of humanity. Ashkenazi achievement in this arena is 117 times greater than their population.
Hungary in the 1930s: Ashkenazim were 6% of the population, but they comprised 55.7% of physicians, 49.2% of attorneys, 30.4% of engineers, and 59.4% of bank officers; plus, they owned 49.4% of the metallurgy industry, 41.6% of machine manufacturing, 72.8% of clothing manufacturing, and, as housing owners, they received 45.1% of Budapest rental income. Jews were similarly successful in nearby nations, like Poland and Germany.
USA (today): Ashkenazi Jews comprise 2.2% of the USA population, but they represent 30% of faculty at elite colleges, 21% of Ivy League students, 25% of the Turing Award winners, 23% of the wealthiest Americans, and 38% of the Oscar-winning film directors.
Israel: In 1922, this swamp and desert land was inhabited by an impoverished population of 752,000. Today there are 7,746,000 residents, with an Ashkenazi majority that have elevated it into a high-tech entrepreneurial nation with the highest per capita income in the region.
The simplest explanation for the huge IQ difference between the fair-skinned Ashkenazi Jews and swarthier Jews of Semitic appearance (e.g., Sephardic Jews) is a so-called conspiracy theory known as the Khazarian thesis .
Popularized by Arthur Koestler in The Thirtheenth Tribe and accepted by notable Jewish scholars themselves (e.g. Prof. Shlomo Sand), this basically states that the Ashkenazi Jews are false Jews or aliens of an entirely different race masquerading as Semitic Jews.
Originating in a region known as Khazaria , these Turko-Tartaric tribes converted to Judaism in the 8th century. So they were Jews only by religious conversion, not by blood. As such, being essentially false Jews , they have no historic link to the Holy Land and no Biblical claim whatever to Palestine.

Descended from the Khazars , a Turkic race originally from Central Asia and related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes, the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews had settled in Khazaria in the Black Sea/Caspian Sea area at some point in the Dark Ages.
Of wholly Asiatic origin, they became Jews later only by religious conversion in the 8th century.
This is controversial. Because, if true, it means that Ahhkenazi Jews have no ancestral links with the Holy Land. Abraham and Moses were NOT their ancestors. Any claim made to Palestine on Biblical grounds by Ashkenazi Jews ~ who comprise the bulk of Israel s population today ~ would therefore be a spurious claim.
The Khazarian thesis of Koestler has been rejected by other notable scholars. Prof. Kevin MacDonald is one of these. He states categorically:

Modern population genetic studies show conclusively that Jews are indeed an ethnic entity and that widely dispersed Jewish groups are more similar to each other than to the peoples they have lived among for hundreds or thousands of years. (See here ).
The are two significant weaknesses with this anti-Khazarian thesis, i.e., with the idea that Ashkenazi Jews and other Jews are pretty much the same and originate from the same Semitic race that produced Abraham and Moses.
Studies that show genetic similarities between Ashkenazi Jews and other widely dispersed Jewish groups do not necessarily disprove the Khazarian thesis. This is because intermarriage between the Ashkenazis and the non-Askenazi or Semitic Jews was frequent in Khazaria from the 8th century onward, and indeed anywhere else in the world where the fair-skinned Khazarian Jews (= Jews by conversion) mingled with and married the darker Semitic Jews.
The huge gap of 23 points between the IQ levels of Israeli Jews (94) and Ashkenazi Jews (117) cannot be satisfactorily explained if we believe, as MacDonald states,
that Jews are indeed an ethnic entity and that widely dispersed Jewish groups are more similar to each other than to the peoples they have lived among for hundreds or thousands of years.
If we examine the IQs of the Northeast Asians, for example, we note that these genetically related races all have very similar IQs: Hong Kong Chinese (107), South Koreans (106), North Koreans (105), Japanese (105), Taiwanese (104), Mainland Chinese (100). None of these genetically related races is 23 points higher than any of the others, though taken as a whole they are 23 points higher than most of the African races. The conclusion is obvious: the fact that the Northeast Asians and the Africans have such a huge difference in their IQs is a proof, if any were needed, that these races are genetically unrelated .
If we take the European or Caucasian races, we note exactly the same thing: a striking similarity of IQs: Germany (102), Austria (102), Italy (102), Netherlands (102), Sweden (101), Switzerland (101), Belgium (100), UK (100), Spain (99), Hungary (99), Poland (99), France (98), Denmark (98), Norway (98).
Note that not one of these European races is 23 points higher in IQ than any of the others, though taken as a whole they are 23 pints higher than the African nations. The conclusion is again obvious: the fact that the Europeans and the Africans have such a huge difference in their IQs is a proof, if any were needed, that Europeans and Africans are genetically unrelated .
From this we arrive at the indisputable conclusion that huge differences in IQ between one group and another group essentially means that the groups belong to different races. If, for example, every Caucasian nation mentioned above had similar IQs of around 100, but ONE European nation, Ruritania, had an average IQ of 123, one would have to conclude that the Ruritarians did not really belong to the same Caucasian race as all the others.
It is this that gives credence to Koestler s Khazarian thesis: that the Ashkenazi Jews are not really Jews, and that they are Jews only by conversion to Judaism.
CONCLUSION: The 23 point difference in IQs between Ashkenazis and non-Ashkenazis would seem to demonstrate conclusively that these people belong to entirely different races . If they belonged to the same Semitic race, they would follow the general rule of having similar IQs.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, Koestler was to write that it was based on a misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims.
The story of the Khazar Empire, he went on to add, gave an entirely new twist to the distorted view that all Jews were genetically related and belonged to the same Semitic race.
This began to look, he concluded controversially, like the cruelest hoax which history has ever perpetrated.
~ See The Thirteenth Tribe , Part 2, The Heritage

Penny for your thoughts: Berlin: Ukraine s Last Ally Standing?

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Berlin: Ukraine s Last Ally Standing?

EU Council on Foreign Relations Notice that the Oligarch Kolomoisky got a bit of come uppance . Undoubtedly not enough of one, but it s at least something. I ll bold it in red. If you are unfamiliar with Kolomoisky, I ll relink some previous posts regarding this thug! And put a picture of the Jewish Oligarch wearing his Nazi Tshirt?!

“Russian advance and US withdrawal could see Ukraine ever more dependent on continued German support. Since 2014, Berlin has become the most frequently visited capital for Ukrainian politicians. President Petro Poroshenko, prime ministers Arseniy Yatsenyuk and Volodymyr Groysman, as well as members of the Rada, top officials from government ministries, civil society activists and policy experts: there has been a constant to-and-fro at all levels. The activity has covered everything from domestic reforms and the Minsk process to visa liberalisation and implementation of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. For Germany, supporting Ukraine has become routine. But Poroshenko\’s visit to Berlin on 29 January was different.

The meeting was overshadowed by renewed hostilities in Donbas. On the day of Poroshenko s arrival, Avdiivka, an industrial suburb north-west of Donetsk, suffered heavy shelling. Although it is not yet clear exactly what happened, it appeared to be the first combined arms assault conducted by Russian-backed insurgents since the offensive on Mariinka in June 2015. The assault was repelled, but the increasing escalation is seen as a probing attack to test whether the US would react and make the escalation a subject of the first formal call between the two presidents. If a new d tente between the Kremlin and the White House is in the making, Russia might use this opportunity to increase the military pressure on Kyiv, to force it to make further concessions at the negotiating table.

In just the two weeks since he took office it has become obvious that Donald Trump will neither be tamed by institutions, traditions, nor Congress. And with Steve Bannon, a Putinversteher, claiming a central role in the administration, a Russian-American special deal throwing Ukraine under the bus is to be expected. And such a case would considerably complicate Germany\’s policies on Ukraine. Could Germany fill the void that a US withdrawal from Ukraine would leave behind?

Were the US to step back from Ukraine, the European Union, or its member states acting bilaterally, would find it difficult to plug the gap.?

In the military realm, the United States is the country most active in training and equipping the Ukrainian army. However, even the US efforts are limited: no lethal goods have been on offer, and the training and exercises are on a very small scale. Still, in case of an escalation, Ukraine would be able to put up considerable resistance without US support, slowing any Russian advance and inflicting considerable numbers of casualties on the Russian side. Would Putin take the domestic risk? How would several thousand deaths impact on Russia\’s domestic politics? Nevertheless, few in Ukraine actually want to put this theory to a test. And it is important to observe that even limited US engagement had a considerable deterrence effect on Russia.

But, despite the United States limited train and equip role, were it to step back, the European Union, or its member states acting bilaterally, would find it difficult to plug this gap, not least in a tough election year and facing multiple populist insurgencies.

On many reform projects and policies particularly anti-corruption reforms, decentralisation, and financial sector reforms t he US has worked in tandem with the EU. Many support programmes are complementary, and if the US pulled out this would leave many EU programmes in limbo, as they rest on the assumption that part of their burden is shared by the US. Furthermore, USAID has many more operative personnel on the ground in Ukraine than the EU has . Often they work with EU money or in EU programmes, so their departure would leave too few programme officers on the ground to actually implement the EU s projects, even if the finances remained covered.

And even more importantly, at various points over the last few years, US interventions were critical to making reform happen. Former vice-president Joe Biden in particular was very vocal where he saw shortcomings or reforms being watered down, and at times his criticism caused Kyiv to change course. Now this voice has fallen silent. Germany, usually very restrained when commenting on the domestic politics of other countries, can hardly fill this void.

If the international situation were not already dire enough, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, also faces domestic criticism for her support for Ukraine. Russian propaganda is busy describing Ukraine as a lost cause that can never reform and will never change . This point of view is propounded not only by parties favourable to Russia like Die Linke, but is also spreading across the political mainstream in Germany. West Germans in particular tend to underestimate the magnitude of Ukraine s challenge in transforming from a post-Soviet kleptocracy into a competitive open democracy. Hence they easily fall prey to negative news. In fact, Ukraine is making progress. After long domestic squabbles, key legislation on judiciary reform entered into force in October 2016. Lustration of judges is in a critical phase. And, despite being bogged down by inter-service rivalries, Ukraine\’s national anti-corruption bureau is progressing on investigations against corrupt top-tier officials and lawmakers.

I\’m not impressed with Moscow\’s disinfo campaign being a total negative particularly when it comes to Kolomoisky the Oligarch/Warlord Thug

I n Ukraine itself, Moscow\’s disinformation campaign ha s won an unusual ally . The recent nationalisation of PrivatBank, Ukraine\’s largest bank, was a severe blow to oligarch Igor Kolomoisky\’s political and financial influence within the country .

Like many other oligarchic banks, it was used for transferring the bank\’s money into private pockets with the expectation of being reimbursed by the national bank\’s rescue fund. But the N ational Bank of Ukraine (NBU) held firm on clamping down on these practices. Since 2014, more than 80 out of 180 banks have been shut. And even though PrivatBank was too big to fail given the number of Ukrainians who receive their salaries through it (and so it could not be simply closed down), its nationalisation put an end to these practices. However, in response Kolomoiskiy launched a campaign to discredit NBU governor Valeriya Hontareva in the hope of attracting international pressure to force Kyiv to make changes. Rada member Serhiy Taruta for the time serves as Kolomiski\’s mouthpiece in that institution. But Taruta s close connections to the Bundestag he chairs the Ukrainian-German parliamentary group saw the smear campaign carried into Germany\’s domestic debate on Ukraine, reinforcing resistance to Merkel”

Kolomoisky was double dipping and got the clamp down!

“With American support for Ukraine hanging by a thread, Germany\’s continued backing for both sanctions and EU assistance to Ukraine has become more critical than ever. Resistance to both is growing on the international as well as domestic front. For Merkel, it is important to remind Poroshenko that only success on reforms in Ukraine can shore up the necessary support in Europe. And for Poroshenko, Merkel is one of his few allies still standing. W hen in 2014 Germany reluctantly engaged in the diplomatic struggle for the new Ukraine, few thought that within a couple of years the effort would come to rest almost entirely on Berlin. But as the war in Donbas and the cause for self-determination in Kyiv became a litmus-test for the survival of the European order, Berlin will have to carry this burden one way or the other”

Just what Germany and the Germans need… to carry the burden of a broken Ukraine

Kolomoisky and his Nazi t- fashionable

Strategic Culture Previous Posts…

From Earlier:

Kazakhstan Confirms New Astana Meeting February 6/17

Posted in Uncategorized


Saturday, 29 October 2016


Lyrics at bottom. Enjoy. This is fun.
I really have very little to say this week. It is way late and I had a lot of trouble loading the material and I am soooo tired. Please enjoy.



You mean this man CAN tell the truth once in awhile?
This truly is the general overall Canadian attitude. Dear Lord, have mercy on us Canucks.
Integrity of a sort might be found after this latest investigation into HRC. I actually watched Rachel Maddow almost cry over the news. I watched Blitzer fight it with all his might as it broke. Oh it was so lovely to watch! And all HRC could say was, “Blame the FBI for bad timing. Vote NOW before I am indicted.”
Someone has noticed that CNN seems to poll things… differently…
The only Scree I have heard came from HRC… confidence does not screech.
Actually, Trump was hilarious and truthful and very entertaining. I listened to Hillary and she put me to sleep….
Ooooh la! The fun is just beginning, HRC.
Oh, just go find someone from BLM and you will have found someone…
American media
I drew your attention to Saul Alinsky last week…
It was very nice of YouTube to completely remove this young man\’s account and ban him, is it not?
Seriously, could you MAKE this stuff up?
Doubly owned because she is a true Israel firster and owned by the Rothschilds.

Katy Perry endorses nude voting for Hillary. Femen anyone?
Back to that vampire squid….

Recently I read a description of Gloria Steinhem. The person was discussing feminism mentioning that Hillary and Gloria were both “ice cold feminist bitches”.

This is a typical cartoon in the JMSM showing a definite Clinton bias. The Veritas Project has proven these conspirac ies of rigging and fraud are very real. But THIS is a relatively non -offensive anti-Trump cartoon i could find; most are beyond vicious and equally misleading.
Two stories regarding married couples… One amusing, one totally awesome…
Nasty Woman in a Mao Dress
Hillary s campaign s going down Heard it from the FBI Foundation s a bed of corruption And evidence is piling high

Huma s at Hillary s bedside While Weiner, he s been doing wrong Just about to make a transition plan When Weiner s dong got em schlonged

She was out of lies when she opened her eyes She s seeing her own demise

She was a nasty woman in a Mao dress Just-a heading up her own cabal November 9 she ll have a bad mess Cause that nasty woman s bout to fall

There s nothing that s not on the table For a dirty dealing sewer rat We know what happens to witnesses goy, You can be very sure of that

She thought everything was going to plan Til Donald decided to run He ain t no Jeb or John Kasich And she knew that he had already won

Well his VP was pumping his left hand And Melania was holding his right Said Hill, you better be scared Cause you re gonna be in jail
And I cannot be forgivin if I wanna go on livin

With a nasty woman in a Mao dress Just-a heading up her own cabal
On November 9 she ll have a bad mess Cause that nasty woman s gonna fall Gonna fall Gonna fall
Posted in Uncategorized


Monday, 30 September 2013


An Iranian woman walks past a mural showing a gun painted with an interpretation of the American flag on the wall of the former US embassy in Tehran on 25 September 2013. (Photo: AFP ~ Atta Kenare)

September 30, 2013
Many attribute Iran s recent charm offensive toward the West to the election of President Hassan Rouhani. Upon closer look, it appears that the intransigent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the uncompromising Ali Khamenei were in fact the ones who opened the way for the current breakthrough.
Perhaps the most superficial analysis of the positive turn that US-Iranian relations have taken says that the oppressed Iranian people threw off the yolk of the conservatives and voted a moderate, reformist into office who is willing to deal with Washington.
In fact, well before President Hassan Rouhani decided to run for elections, in a 21 March 2013 speech, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei began to draw the outlines of a more flexible stance on his country s nuclear program.
Khamenei called this new approach revolutionary flexibility or heroic flexibility, saying that flexibility is useful ~ and sometimes necessary.
In the course of his speech, the supreme leader expressed the Islamic Republic s willingness to place the country s nuclear activities under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in return for recognizing Iran s right to enrich uranium and carry on with its peaceful nuclear program.
Khamenei called this new approach revolutionary flexibility or heroic flexibility, saying that flexibility is useful ~ and sometimes necessary. Such a turn would not have been possible during Mahmoud Ahmadinejad s term ~ not as a result of the former president s uncompromising disposition toward the West, but circumstances at the time simply did not allow any kind of rapprochement between the two sides.
George W. Bush and the neocons still had the upper hand in Washington when Ahmadinejad came into office, with no option before the incoming president than to stand strong in the face of Western pressure or submit as his predecessor Mohammad Khatami had done without extracting any concessions in return.
With the blessings of Khamenei, Tehran at the time decided to take a harder line, forging ahead with its nuclear program in the face of mounting threats from Israel and the West. When Ahmadinejad came into office, for example, Iran possessed but a few hundred centrifuges of the first generation. At the end of his term, the country was operating around 17,000, with another thousand, second-generation centrifuges about to be put into service.
Ahmadinejad s offensive succeeded, particularly in light of Washington s growing difficulties in the region and the onset of a debilitating financial crisis in 2008. As the 2013 elections approached, Khamenei determined that it was time for a more flexible approach that would nevertheless remain firm on the core principles, specifically Iran s right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.
There is no doubt that Ahmadinejad s personality was amenable to the task at hand, just as Rouhani s is also suitable for the course Tehran has decided to take today.
But at the end of the day, what determines the policies adopted on a matter as important as Iran s nuclear program are the given circumstances, the outlook of state institutions, and the predisposition of the supreme leader.
The question remains: Has Iran pushed forth with its nuclear achievements in order to take a step back in return for international recognition of its right to develop nuclear energy?
That is, did it reach 20 percent enrichment only to concede in return for 5 percent enrichment?
Or does it seek full recognition of all its nuclear activities in return for concessions in other files, like Syria?
The coming weeks and months will tell.


Basically, this poster contains the scrip to the video.

Sunday, 29 September 2013


Just listen to this man. His excellent English, cultured delivery, his depth. This is truly a must-listen interview.Bashar shies away from nothing in this no-hold-barred interview. He is asked the difficult questions and he gives the honest detailed answers that are so very needed. In light of the demonization of this an over the past years, the comparisons to that ultimate bad boy Hitler, are laid to waste as you listen to him. Indeed, if standing up to the JWO/NWO Zionist controlled elite is one powerful stand both great men must be honoured for.

Saturday, 28 September 2013


SOURCE: Canadian blog Xymphora

Events in Syria Spark Latest Round Of Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories”
AIPAC Gets Ready For War With Obama” ” Now s The Time To Strip Israel of its WMDs” (Atzmon) ” Nazis offered to leave western Europe in exchange for free hand to attack USSR ” (my emphasis in green):
“Mr Padfield, who has previously written a biography of Hess as well as ones of Karl D nitz and Heinrich Himmler, believes the treaty was suppressed at the time, because it would have scuppered Churchill s efforts to get the USA into the war , destroyed his coalition of exiled European governments, and weakened his position domestically, as it would have been seized on by what the author believes was a sizeable negotiated peace faction in Britain at that time. At the same time, since the mission had failed, it also suited Hitler to dismiss Hess as a rogue agent.
There is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Mr Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures.”
“One nun puts entire US intel community to shame over \’stage-managed\’ Syria footage” It is undeniable that the video is hinky. ” Somebody Stole 7 Milliseconds from the Federal Reserve” I wonder if this connects to the NSA scandal. ” New NSA Revelations Are Breaking Every Day” The attempted mass slaughter of Syrians allowed for considerable scandal to slip by. ” US intelligence chiefs urge Congress to preserve surveillance programs”:
“Asked by Udall whether it was the NSA\’s aim to collect the records of all Americans, Alexander replied: “I believe it is in the nation\’s best interest to put all the phone records into a lockbox ~ yes.””
“Jeremy Freeman Crocker ” ” Albanian Subversion” “Jon Stewart s Older Brother, Larry Leibowitz , Is COO Of The NYSE”


ED Noor: Want an eye-opener to David Icke? Then read on. Arrogance personified.But worst of all, promotion of deliberate disinformation and then using those tired hasbarat techniques to avoid truthful response. Oh, Mr. Icke, where once I supported you, LONG AGO, now I see indeed as I suspected, you are an agent of sorts, a gateway.

By Arthur Topham
September 27, 2013
We call them Nazis just to piss them off. ~ Friedrich Hollaender, from the 2003 CBC mini-series, Hitler ~ The Rise of Evil [thanks to ]

Exposing the evil of Nazism. Absolutely. ~ David Icke, in an email to Radical Press publisher Arthur Topham, Sept. 24, 2013


On September 22nd, 2013 I ran an article on which I received via email from David Icke. It concerned efforts on the part of Icke and his supporters to start a television station called The People s Voice * . The email was basically a promotional advertisement video designed to increase donations and solicit funding for his project.
Having promoted Icke off and on over the past fifteen years, beginning with my now defunct newspaper The Radical , (circa 1998 2002), in which I ran ads for his upcoming tours here in Canada as well as articles plus a front page spread covering his 2002 spring speaking tour that I attending in Vancouver on March 25th of 2002, I was fairly well versed in the materials which David was speaking and writing about. .
But, as the old adage goes, life is for learning and evolving and over the ensuing years I slowly began to realize the depth to which our society and our Canadian culture in general had been overshadowed, manipulated and deceived by the Zionist Jew forces who then, as now, control the vast majority of the mainstream media and the publishing houses and who ve worked in concert with the US dominated movie industry since its inception in order to create a milieu of mind-control that for the most part still goes unrecognized by the average Canadian, especially that segment of our classless society known euphemistically as the intelligentsia .
When I first began publishing The Radical in June of 1998, even though I had been writing and challenging many of the mores of my time for decades, I was still heavily under the influence of my cultural upbringing where, from the moment of my birth, I had been conditioned, like all Canadians, into believing that there was no greater evil on the face of the earth than Adolf Hitler and the Nazis .
The endless articles in the newspapers; the slanderous, denigrating and hateful portrayals of the German people and their leader Adolf Hitler in books, movies and on TV, plus the myriad mountains of comic books from my early childhood, had all worked their clandestine, black magic way into my subconscious to the point where the whole background gestalt of what I consciously perceived to be actual history was simply taken for granted unquestioningly even though in most other matters of a political nature I was relatively, as the old Hippie saying went, hipped to the scene .

Typical anti-Hitler war propaganda appearing in Canadian news magazines

As the years passed and I researched more and more into the history of the 20th century, particularly the first half of it, the light slowly began to increase and the truth about what had taken place with respect to the German nation and the rise of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist party and World War II became more and more glaringly obvious to me.
I was also assisted by Providence in this process of re-awakening to the actualities of Germany and its history through the medium of the Letters to the Editor section that I ran in my monthly tabloid. It was there that the first promptings of what would eventually become my long and at times arduous mental journey back to historical reality began when one of my subscribers to the newspaper from out in Ontario started sending letters informing me that some of my articles, which at the time still reflected my ingrained ignorance of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist party, were not necessarily factual.
I can only thank God that they brought the error of my ways to my attention for ever since that time, like a recovering alcoholic, I ve been forced to recognize daily my addiction to the deception that I had been unconsciously brainwashed into believing.
For some time it seemed that my recovery was traveling at a snail s pace but when another associate and friend of mine sent me Douglas Reed s classic 1950s work on the origins and nature of political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion , my fate was finally sealed and I experienced an epiphany of political realization that has since steadfastly remained and continues to wax in fullness with each passing day.
It was now clearly obvious to me that the history of the 20th century had been tampered with to such a degree that none of its political and/or historical orthodoxies could be taken for granted any longer included the greatest, most massively pervasive deception of all, that of the true nature of National Socialist Germany and its illustrious and loved leader, Adolf Hitler. .
After the physical war ended then came the Greatest Lie of the 20th century
It may have become obvious to me perhaps but not, as it turns out, to David Icke, who in the meanwhile had continued to advance in prestige and notoriety as the Internet and his periodic world tours enhanced his position in the growing alternative truth movement of which Icke had been one of the initial protagonists.
As my efforts increased to inform my readership about the true nature of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement in Germany so did the harassment from the Zionist Jews who perceived my truth telling to be extremely detrimental to their ongoing program of mind control which, up until the advent of the Internet, had been so successful in brainwashing the population on most levels of reality ranging from history and culture to religion and spirituality and much that lay in between those broad-ranging parameters.
By the end of 2007 I was facing my first serious attack by world Jewry in the form of a sec. 13(1) hate crime complaint registered against my person and my website by B nai Brith International s Canadian cell known as B nai Brith Canada. That attack is still ongoing and now exacerbated by a second assault by the same forces, one which occurred in May of 2012 when I was arrested and charged with a second Criminal Code of Canada Sec. 319(2) hate crime soon after publishing the article Israel Must Perish! , a spoof based upon an actual book originally published back in 1941 called, Germany Must Perish! .
Over the past few years of endless litigation and all the accompanying hardships that ensue when a person is forced into a defensive position by a government too heavily influenced by lobby groups such as B nai Brith Canada, I drifted away from having the time to frequent Icke s website. Occasionally David would publish an article of mine if it was related to his ongoing legal battles with Richard Warman but other than that there was little communication between the two of us.
At one point a few years ago I had already ran into some minor hassles with David when I inadvertently and innocently ran one of his articles which he sends out to his exclusive list of paying subscribers. His reaction, given the fact that I was only publishing the story in order to bring him more subscribers, was overly heavy and I basically backed off at that point from printing his work.
ED Noor: I had wondered why these wonderful newsletters from David suddenly ceased being available at Radical Press. Now I know. Icke raised a stink about it because the information was supposed to be for exclusive paying readers.
But as time went by the memory of that incident also faded and when I received David s email informing me of his new initiative in the form of a television station to broadcast to the alternative truth movement I was moved once again to put my shoulder to the common wheel of resistance in an effort to assist others in the battle against the dark forces now wreaking havoc around the world. And so I ran his promo ad for him as a gesture of good will.
Soon afterwards though I began receiving feedback from readers explaining to me why they were not willing to support Icke and his planned television station. They referred to him as someone who was spreading the usual Zionist Jew disinformation about National Socialist Germany and Adolf Hitler and also that his recent willing collusion with Alex Jones was another example of why they couldn t trust what Icke might do if his television show went on the air.
Following that a friend of mine sent me an email containing a number of poster type graphics that Icke normally runs on his website. Most of them were standard anti-government, anti-corporate style images that we see on Facebook and other social media sites but as I scrolled down the list I came upon one that I found quite disturbing and, by coincidence, also in keeping with the recent emails I had received on this very topic. Here it is: .

After reading the caption there was little doubt left in my mind as to what Icke s intent was in running such an image; one containing such a clearly blatant and direct attack upon the German nation and their ability to discern truth. .

Disappointed, I said to myself, that s not the caption that ought to be on an image such as that and so I re-did the graphic making it read what should have been there in the first place. And this is how it came out. .
I then decided to sent the newly, revised image to David along with a personal message which is republished here verbatim. It reads:
Dear David,
If you are even to achieve the aims of global peace, love, harmony and understanding you first must overcome your ignorance regarding National Socialist Germany, Adolf Hitler and the German nation as a whole.
Your Germanophobic behaviour is unbecoming of someone who professes to understand the true nature of the Zionist New World Order agenda. All you are achieving by this anti-Hitler, anti-German propaganda is creating greater dissension and confusion amongst the growing number of truth-seekers who are fast coming to the realization that the west erred greatly in declaring war on Germany and in truth should have joined forces with the German nation and put a stop to the Zionist/Communist Bolshevik forces, led by Marxist Jews.
You should rightly be going after the Communists and Marxists and Zionists for they are the unholy trinity that formed by stealth in order to wreak devastation and terror upon the world throughout the 20th century and into the 21st. Why you haven t realized this a long time ago has always been a great disappointment and a mystery to me.
If this is what you plan to do with the People s Voice , i.e spread greater misinformation and yes, hatred, toward the German people and the ultimate sacrifice they made in their gargantuan effort to stop the Zionist juggernaut then I will not be able to do anything further to assist you in your efforts and will in fact have to resist all that you have thus far accomplished. Please [ underlined in the original for emphasis. ed. ] try to reconsider your position on Hitler and Germany and realize that it was world Jewry who first declared war upon that great nation because they broke away from the Rothschild cartel and their central banking system. It was the Jews who laid all the devious schemes that created that great conflict and all the other major conflicts since that time.
You have got to connect those dots David or else the full truth will never come out and all that you ve worked for over the past quarter of a century will have been for naught.
I pray that you will reconsider your position on this vital matter.
Sincerely and in gratitude for all the other good work that you ve accomplished,
Arthur Topham Publisher & Editor The Radical Press Canada s Radical News Network Digging to the root of the issues since 1998
Well, it didn t take long to get a reaction. Less than three hours later I received the following email reply from David Icke. It s reproduced here in full.
From: David Icke < > Subject: Re: Personal appeal to you David re: your anti-German disinformation emanating from your website Date: 24 September, 2013 10:33:22 PM PDT
To: Radical Press
Why don t you grow up, Arthur, eh? How old are you?
My God.
It doesn t matter the scale of effort or risk or abuse that someone takes to make a difference and give people a voice worldwide you won t support it because your personal belief system is far more important.
Then don t, don t . Go on living in your self-obsessed, self-indulgent bubble that is changing nothing.
And a few people can t control the world? It s a piece of piss.
Promoting hatred of German people? Bollocks.
Exposing the evil of Nazism. Absolutely.
Evil v Evil = Double Evil.
You call yourself radical , Arthur? You must be joking.
[no signature]
I read it over a couple of times giving it some thought and then replied to David with the following email:
Dear David,
I m 66 years old and well aware of how the world works and have for a much longer time than you obviously.
I can t say that I appreciate your insolent response. It s so typically Jewish. A non-response soaked in epithets and chutzpah. Oi veh. Rather reminiscent of Jeff Rense and his ilk.
What a sad indictment David. The evils of Nazism you say. Someday you must do a program on all those evils and show the world, as the Jews have been doing incessantly since 1933, just what they truly were. Oh, and don t forget the 6 Million as well. It would be a shame to leave that one out wouldn t it?
And no, I don t joke about being a radical. I ve been at it since 1967. That s 46 years. You ve got another 21 to go.
God grant that you come to a fuller understanding of the Jewish Question by that time. For your sake and for the world s as well.
I see now why you ve colluded with the likes of Alex Jones.
I guess I won t have to invest in a telly after all. Pity.
Arthur Topham Publisher & Editor The Radical Press
And so that s how things now stand with respect to David Icke and the Radical Press. For David, it appears that the shape-shifting reptilian lizards are still at the root of our global problems and that Adolf Hitler and the German nation must have all been taken over by these alien creatures prior to the Nazis committing their horrendous horrors against the rest of humanity.
As for me I m willing to place my bet on the fact that it was the dark, evil, Satanic spirit of world Jewry that shape-shifted into the visible form of political Zionism in 1897 who has since been the primary instigator of global war, poverty, debt, environmental destruction and disease throughout the 20th century and right up to the present moment.
As always, time will reveal the truth in due course.
I would like at this point to extend an apology to those readers on my list who I may have insulted by sending them Icke s article. That wasn t my intention. In retrospect it appears it was, once again, Providence s way of giving me a further shake and making me aware of what others within our challenged community of New World Order resisters are doing to hinder that inevitable wide-scale awakening which we are all labouring so hard to accomplish.
* An interesting side note regarding the choice of this name. Here in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada there is a communist newspaper that s been around for a number of years and its name is you guessed it The People s Voice .


\’Gaddafi\’ has many mansions in Harare.

September 28, 2013 On 27 September 2013, The Daily Telegraph reveals the MI6 plot to help Gaddafi escape from Libya

According to The Telegraph: .
1. The plan was drawn up at the highest levels of the British Government.
2. Andrew Mitchell, a UK government minister, was sent to make certain contacts with the government of Equatorial Guinea.

3. There has always been speculation that Gaddafi left Libya around October 2011, the time when Gaddafi was allegedly killed.

4. Matthew d\’Ancona, a top journalist at The Telegraph, interviewed key UK government figures.

“CIA agent Edwin P. Wilson recruited Qaddafi in 1977, and the CIA shipped Libya over 2000 pounds of explosives,” says former CIA agent Lester Coleman. ( DIA Agent\’s Book, Trail of the Octopus ~ From Beirut To Lockerbie. )

According to The Telegraph:
5. In 2011, MI6 prepared to move Gaddafi to Equatorial Guinea, which does not recognise the International Criminal Court.
6. The Cabinet Office and MI6 “prepared an exit strategy for Gaddafi in case it was necessary to strike a deal and to end the conflict.” 7. UK cabinet minister Andrew Mitchell “was able to assist the officials tasked with these delicate contingency plans , helping make the necessary contacts in the capital, Malabo, and elsewhere”. Equatorial Guinea “was chosen as a prospective retirement home”.
According to The Telegraph: 8. In 2004, Old Etonian Simon Mann made an unsuccessful coup attempt in Equatorial Guinea.
The \’Wonga Coup\’ failed after the mercenaries were arrested in Zimbabwe. 9. It is believed that some of the mercenaries involved in the Equatorial Guinea coup were also involved in the attempt to help Gaddafi escape. MI6 plot to help Gaddafi escape from Libya

A Mansion in Harare. “Sibanengi Dube … is … adamant that Zimbabwe s air force, in August 2011, flew Muammar Gaddafi into Zimbabwe and that Gaddafi was seen in a Harare Gunhill suburb house.”

( MDC journalist still claims Gaddafi went to Zimbabwe ) “Gaddafi staged a nocturnal entry into Zimbabwe aboard a Zimbabwe Air force jet that landed at Suri-Suri Airbase in Chegutu…. Left: Qaddafi with David Berg whose name has been linked to pedophilia and the CIA\’s MK ULTRA brainwashing. ( RELIGIOUS MIND-CONTROL CULTS ) “Gaddafi was quickly whisked to a sprawling mansion in Harare s Gunhill suburb under the cover of darkness with members of MDC VAA in a secret pursuit. “We kept a hawk s eye on the house … and we don t doubt even for a second that the fallen despot is now a unique guest to Robert Mugabe. “The house is encircled by uniformed army personnel of the Zimbabwe National Army and is swarming with plain clothes policemen and dreaded CIO operatives. “They said all indications were confirming what they saw, including heavily armed female blonde body guards of Libyan origin patrolling around the house where the former despot is holed up…
Saddam reportedly had 12. To this day, it\’s not clear if he or a double was executed.
Gaddafi also had them. Was one of them killed, not him?
Above ~ a body from the so called \’bin Laden\’ house in Abbottabad.

Same body used by the CIA to represent Gaddafi.
2. On October 21, headlined, “Qaddafi Not Dead,” saying:

Washington, Britain and France desperately needed something resembling victory, even if fake, not real. .

The real Gaddafi with his son Saif. The man seen in the \’Gaddafi capture videos\’ is not Gaddafi. The man in the videos is Ali Majid Al Andalus. The person you were shown was not Muammar Al-Gaddafi /Originally published here

Gaddafi Double .

“According to reports reaching us, the person presented as Gaddafi, in the recent \’capture\’ videos, has been identified as Ali Majid Al Andalus . “Ali Majid Al Andalus was an inhabitant of Sirte and was famous for his resemblance to Gaddafi. “The man in the photo with the bullet hole in the head was not Muammar al Gaddafi, but his double. “The psychopathic criminals … used this innocent man solely for their psychological operation by having him lynched by armed thugs of the TNC before the cameras .”

Mystery man Gaddafi ~ Website for this image . Gaddafi was apparently put into power by MI6 and the CIA. The CIA and its friends controlled many people in Gaddafi\’s Libya. From The Africa Report ( Libya: Who owns the revolution? ~ The Africa Report ): The CIA\’s clandestine supporters made it easy for NATO to take over Tripoli. “According to Brigadier General Abdulsalam Alhasi, who commanded the rebel\’s headquarters in Benghazi, the role of the clandestine supporters ~ soldiers, policemen, intelligence officers and even ministers who had been working for Gaddafi ~ was critical in taking Tripoli.” In other words, it wasn\’t just Gaddafi, or his double, who had worked for the CIA and MI6.
The CIA\’s Marty Martin, who had a plan for Gaddafi to leave Libya, reportedly. The CIA\’s Marty Martin led the CIA\’s Qaeda department from 2002 to 2004 The CIA\’s Marty Martin was part of a US group that offered Gaddafi a $10m deal to flee Libya The group included a Belgian named Dirk Borgers, Neil C Livingstone a terrorism specialist who wants to be governor of Montana, Neil S. Alpert who has worked for the Republican National Committee and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and Randell K. Wood, a Kansas City lawyer . GADDAFI DOUBLE WAS KILLED / WHERE\’S GADDAFI? .

Gaddafi The CIA put Nasser into power in Egypt and put Saddam into power in Iraq and put the Ayatollahs into power in Iran.
( GADDAFI, SADDAM AND THE CIA / NASSER OF THE CIA / IRAN IS RUN BY THE CIA ) There is a belief that it was the CIA and Britain\’s MI6 who put Gaddafi into power in 1969. According to the article entitled: Was Britain Behind Gadaffi\’s Coup in 1969? : A secret 1960 US National Security Council Report explained:

“There is little loyalty to him (British puppet King Idris) among the younger urban elements who do not have significant political power now, but who will have such power in the future.”

The US and UK needed a replacement for King Idris and apparently chose Gaddafi.

Reportedly, this is a Gaddafi mansion in New Jersey in the USA

In 1965, Britain\’s Colonel Ted Lough reportedly made a series of reports on Gadaffi for British intelligence. In 1966, Gaddafi spent four months in Britain, training with the British military. In 1969, Gaddafi carried out a peaceful coup, apparently with the blessing of the USA and UK. Gaddafi turned Libya from being the poorest country in the world into being the most prosperous country in Africa. But, he did not always cooperate with his CIA backers.

Preziosi and Gaddafi Does Gaddafi have Corsican roots?: Voice of Russia Muammar Gaddafi may be the son of French Air Force officer Albert Preziosi. There is a close likeness between Albert Preziosi and a young Muammar Gaddafi. In 1941, pilot Albert Preziosi made an emergency landing in a Libyan desert. He came across a tribe of Bedouins. Reportedly, after Preziosi had a relationship with a woman of the tribe, Muammar Gaddafi was born on 19 June 1942. The French airbase used for recent operations against Libya is officially called BA-126 Captain Preziosi. Located in Upper Corsica, it is named after Captain Albert Preziosi. WAS KHOMEINI BRITISH, AND AN AGENT OF THE US AND UK.

Posted in Uncategorized


Friday, 24 February 2017


This is possibly the most relevant cartoon of the week ~ in these days of social media assassinations when one misspoken phrase can be tweeted around the world by an enemy and can result in the ruination of a life\’s dedicated work. Read the tragic story of 72-year old British scientist Nobel Laureate Sir Tim Hunt , destroyed by vicious feminazis. Seriously, no mercy with these madwomen.
These are not facts you will ever find in the JMSM. And certainly Anderson or Wolf would never speak of such matters.

by Tony Olson

If you re like me . . . it s probably been an entertaining year

Full of liberal lunacy, hypocrisy, and fear.

There s been so many episodes , it s easy to forget.
Luckily, they ve all been logged upon the internet.

The circus added one more ring when Donald got the nod

To represent the GOP . . . the libs cried Oh my God.

The media assured them there s no way that Trump could win
So they sat back on their parent s couch, enamored by the spin.

Election Day was coming . . . entertainment getting slow,

Thank God the folks in Hollywood maintained the status quo.

A host of A-list wannabes began to trickle forth,
And told us that if Trump should win . . . they d all be headed north.

When Donald passed two-seventy . . . and victory was at hand,

A Trump-induced psychosis sprouted up in Liberal land.

The fireworks were cancelled, and purveyors of fake news
Were left to invent reasons why their candidate would lose.

They blamed it all on Comey, then they blamed a Russian hack

A dog that ate their homework, and of course . . . the men in black.

A unicorn, a sasquatch, and a faulty Gallup Poll
Next . . . they ll blame the shooter who was on the grassy knoll.

Those celebs that promised egress . . . failed to adhere

We waited for the moving trucks, which never did appear.

Yes, not a star left Hollywood, although we wished it so,
Despite the fact that Rush and Sean would pay for them to go.

So now we re stuck with Miley, and we re stuck with Barbra too,

Several washed-up actors . . . and the women of The View.

We still have Maddow s meltdowns, and Sharpton s brand of hate.
And, we still have Lena Dunham . . . though she s lost a little weight.

In Congress, you can bet there s more than one defective gene.

Just climb on board the crazy train with Nancy and Maxine.

They often make me wonder just how awesome it would be,
If parts of California could just slide into the sea.

I m watching Liberal journalists like Cooper, Wolf, and Tapper, Spew the Leftist mantra . . . as their careers go down the crapper.

Deplorables will have their fun with Liberal rank and file,

Watching rats abandon ship when Clinton goes on trial.

When Debbie left the DNC, I thought we d lost our clown.

Then, from the state of Idaho, came Sally Boynton Brown.

The DNC will be reborn, no matter what it takes.
And the mix will look like cereal . . . with fruit loops, nuts, and flakes.

Then, I saw the women s march, a feministic treat.

I watched with fascination as they spilled into the street.

Among the more disturbing sights were lady Democrats
Who dressed up as vaginas . . . others wore their kitty hats.

An incoherent Ashley Judd paraded round a stage

Saying all those nasty women should demand a higher wage.

Then ranting about blood-stained sheets upon those women s bed.

Somewhere a doctor s wondering why he took her off her meds.
Madonna parked her walker to begin her caustic din,

Dreams of blowing up the Whitehouse as senility sets in.

Even in her senior years . . . the party never ends.
She dances round her nursing home in Vera Wang Depends.

The Liberals, you must admit, have done some crazy things.

It s fun to see them come unhinged as Donald pulls the strings.

So, if you feel you need a shot of petulance and mirth,
Sit back and watch the Liberals, it s the greatest show on earth.

Ah, yes, the EU and its many problems, emphasis on Ms. LePen, a woman who wishes to remove ALL symbols of every religion off the face of the planet and is, sadly, backtracking on her promises to end dual citizenship.
If you can translate this, I would be most grateful.

Fake News anyone?:

And they ALL hate Trump. They are all sworn to his destruction asap. Trump needs to bypass these folks and set up his own station where he can hold daily briefings to the people. They will never hear the truth from the JMSM.
I am not sure what the message is here. I have my own interpretation but perhaps the artist is more liberal and empathetic about these things. Me? I see total satire at this whole unnatural process and the ensuing legal problems that go hand in hand with gender based politics. Psychological liberal abuse and medical criminality are hardly amusing, especially to the victims.
Greece is about to have another financial crisis in the very near future as it becomes impossible for this country to meet its EU shares again. More fun for Angela.
This is a little collection called War and Peace:


When this cartoon was originally posted, there was outcry about the breasts on the creature down in the lower right. The aritst has misted them over in compliance, but here you get to see his original interpretation of Teddy Kennedy in hell and happening to possess rather large mammaries.
Some cartoon sites are now beginning to receive complaints about the horrendous hatred pouring out on Donald Trump. Also they are being targeted for the filth of the cartoons, a matter I have mentioned here before. The amount of bodily waste and filth around Trump cartoons has been nauseating and definitely proof of the Judaic fascination with bodily waste that has infiltrated our culture over the past decades. I have already noticed a change in their contents; proof that we can be heard.

To read more: Killing Teddy\’ Kennedy\’s Man-Boobs in Hell

(((Barbara Lerner Specter))) must be so proud of herself!
The world lost a great man when Libya\’s strongman, the visionary Qadaffi, was assassinated. His predictions came true within days of his passing ~ and once he was gone, there was no one left to hold back the hordes that were, in most cases, previously happy Libyans in a beautiful country. Now there is war torn strife and an endless supply of people trying to escape Africa.
I won\’t be watching. The Walking Dead is on and is so much more honest and real than these award shows. Never in my 68 years have I sat through a full award show.
Mr. Trump really is trying to do just this. Why else is there so much effort to destroy him? He has not drained the swamp well enough and is, basically, on his own in a very hateful environment that only wants him dead.
This was before the inauguration. These people have been on a heavy recruiting drive to disrupt and destroy Washington DC on May 1 this year. See the George Takei invitation further down. Seriously that little twerp should have stayed on the USS Enterprise. Like the disgraced Milo, (another twisted victim of pedophilia) he is a vocal proponent of the older man/younger boy relationships.
One person CAN make a difference! Milo was taken down by a young liberal Canadian girl .
Artist Comment: So, Liberals are telling us that the media who lied to us since forever are the friends of the People now, and so are the CIA. OK, whatever, Sparky. Aaaaaaaa-aand, that s all I ve got for you on this hot mess right now, folks.
Artist Dees\’ note: Gold, Silver, Bitcoin: Financial Rockstars Lately?
Artist David Dees commemorates the tragic death of these magnificent beasts.
And then there is the developing Oroville Dam situation in norther California. The ONLY sorta decent thing about this problem is that one cannot blame Trump for the mess.
But President Trump IS in a position to put an end to the chemtrails that are creating many of these disastrous weather problems.
Please enlarge.

Remember Hurrican Katrina? I just stumbled across this old piece from a Louisianna newspaper: Bush Diverted Levee-Building Funds to Iraq War, Tax Cuts

THIS is my favourite of the week. Beautifully detailed, every character tells a complete story ~ each man is fully aware that he is in deep doodoo with the Boss.
Mike Pence is already considering playing LBJ to Trump\’s JFK and becoming #46. This cannot be allowed to happen.
Get back on the Enterprise, Sulu. Set co-ordinates for the nearest Black Hole and dive in.
The tragic thing is, Trump speaks the truth. And now for a section on the incessant war between President Trump and the hateful liberal media.
Nice attempt to blame the Swedish riots on Trump. When he spoke of those riots, I had already been hearing of them taking place.
The word is Obama is behind these disrupted town hall meetings but I have not verified this.
Posted in Uncategorized


Friday, 29 June 2007


This is a short tribute to this beautiful country in which I was fortunate enough to be born. The only thing these pictures have in common is the fact that the new Canada flag, “The Maple leaf” appears in them all. I remember an older Canadian flag, one that has disappeared from Canadian memory. The world is in chaos and as we settle in to holiday the long weekend away, it is important that we remember how fortunate we really are. And to step out of our complacency and become more aware of our position in the world. I\’m not an American! I am a Canadian. I come from a “nice”, thoroughly unrealistic country.~ Matthew Fisher We Canadians live in a blind spot about our identity. We have very strong feelings about who we aren\’t but only weak ones about who we are. We\’re passionate about what we don\’t want to be but oddly passive about what we should be. ~ John Cruickshank (in McLean\’s Magazine) The US is our trading partner, our neighbour, our ally and our friend ~ and sometimes we\’d like to give them such a smack! ~ Rick Mercer The crisis of Canada today is the combination of economic problems facing us and the increasing impotency of governments that lack either the will or the resources to do much about it. The tragedy of Canada today is that just when we need a country that\’s pulling together in common cause, we have one that keeps finding new ways to pull itself apart. ~ Angus Reid Your majesty, I thank you from the bottom of my heart, and Madame Houde thanks you from her bottom too. ~ Montreal Mayor Camillien Houde (in 1939 to King George VI) It is wonderful to feel the grandness of Canada in the raw, not because she is Canada but because she\’s something sublime that you were born into, some great rugged power that you are a part of. ~ Emily Carr I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in our my way, free to stand for what I think is right, free to oppose that which I believe wrong, and free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and mankind. ~ Anonymous Canadians are the people who learned to live without the bold accents of the natural ego-trippers of other lands. ~ Marshall McLuhan The beaver, which has come to represent Canada as the eagle does the United States and the lion Britain, is a flat-tailed, slow-witted, toothy rodent known to bite off it\’s own testicles or to stand under its own falling trees. ~ June Callwood Canada has never been a melting-pot; more like a tossed salad. ~ Arnold Edinborough We are tremendously proud of our cultures, heritage and achievements and we will continue to break new ground. I am proud to be a Canadian and I hope you are too. ~ Philip K. Lee If you don\’t believe your country should come before yourself, you can better serve your country by livin\’ someplace else. ~ Stompin\’ Tom Connors Many Canadian nationalists harbour the bizarre fear that should we ever reject royalty, we would instantly mutate into Americans, as though the Canadian sense of self is so frail and delicate a bud, that the only thing stopping it from being swallowed whole by the US is an English lady in a funny hat. ~ Will Ferguson It\’s going to be a great country when they finish unpacking it. ~ Andrew H. Malcom With or without the Royals, we are not Americans. Nor are we British. Or French. Or Void. We are something else. And the sooner we define this, the better. ~ Will Ferguson Canada is probably the most free country in the world where a man still has room to breathe, to spread out, to move forward, to move out, an open country with an open frontier Canada has created harmony and cooperation among ethnic groups, and it must take this experience to the world because there is yet to be such an example of harmony and cooperation among ethnic groups. ~ Valentyn Moroz As far as I\’m concerned, I wouldn\’t want to go to any other country. It\’s good enough here. ~ Orviel Kruse Canada is one of the planet s most comfortable, and caring, societies. ~ Time Magazine God Bless America, but God help Canada to put up with them! ~ Anonymous Canadians don\’t have a very big political lever, we\’re nice guys. ~ Paul Henderson

Canadians, like their historians, have spent too much time remembering conflicts, crises, and failures. They forgot the great, quiet continuity of life in a vast and generous land. A cautious people learns from its past; a sensible people can face its future. Canadians, on the whole, are both. ~ Desmond Morton

I don\’t even know what street Canada is on. ~ Al Capone A Canadian is someone who knows how to make love in a canoe. ~ Pierre Berton The huge advantage of Canada is its backwardness. ~ Marshall McLuhan What is a Canadian? A Canadian is a fellow wearing English tweeds, a Hong Kong shirt and Spanish shoes, who sips Brazilian coffee sweetened with Philippine sugar from a Bavarian cup while nibbling Swiss cheese, sitting at a Danish desk over a Persian rug, after coming home in a German car from an Italian movie ~ and then writes his Member of Parliament with a Japanese ballpoint pen on French paper, demanding that he do something about foreigners taking away our Canadian jobs. ~ Anonymous A Canadian is merely an unarmed American with health care. ~ John Wing When I m in Canada, I feel this is what the world should be like. ~ Jane Fonda Gentlemen, we all must realize that neither side has any monopoly on sons of bitches. ~ C.D. Howe (in Washington to resolve a shipping dispute) The great themes of Canadian history are as follows: Keeping the Americans out, keeping the French in, and trying to get the Natives to somehow disappear. ~ Will Ferguson Canadians have been so busy explaining to the Americans that we aren\’t British, and to the British that we aren\’t Americans that we haven\’t had time to become Canadians. ~ Helen Gordon McPherson Canada is an interesting place, the rest of the world thinks so, even if Canadians don\’t. ~ Terence M. Green We\’ll explain the appeal of curling to you if you explain the appeal of the National Rifle Association to us. ~ Andy Barrie There are no limits to the majestic future which lies before the mighty expanse of Canada with its verile, aspiring, cultured, and generous-hearted people. ~ Sir Winston Churchill In a world darkened by ethnic conflicts that tear nations apart, Canada stands as a model of how people of different cultures can live and work together in peace, prosperity, and mutual respect. ~ U.S. President Bill Clinton Canada is a place of infinite promise. We like the people, and if one ever had to emigrate, this would be the destination, not the U.S.A. The hills, lakes and forests make it a place of peace and repose of the mind, such as one never finds in the U.S.A. ~ John Maynard Keynes

Thursday, 28 June 2007


Peace is not only better than war, but infinitely more arduous. ~ George Bernard Shaw In a democracy dissent is an act of faith. ~ William J. Fullbright Peace is the harvest of love as war is the fruit of hatred. ~ Joan Walsh Peace, like charity, begins at home. ~ FDR The best way to destroy an enemy is to make him a friend. ~ Abraham Lincoln All we are singing , is Give Peace a Chance! ~ John Lennon At the center of non violence stands the principle of love. ~ Martin Luther King Jr. Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today. ~ JFK WE ARE ALL JUST PEOPLE WITH A COMMON ENEMY. AND THAT ENEMY IS NOT EACH OTHER. IT IS THOSE WHO SEEK TO ENSLAVE US ALL, REGARDLESS OF RACE, RELIGION OR PHILOSOPHY.
Posted in Uncategorized

Land Destroyer

US Navy\’s Own Report Indicates Washington is Looking for a Pacific Fight

February 27, 2017 ( Ulson Gunnar – NEO ) – The Pacific Ocean is large. Since World War II, weapon systems operating in this theater have required special provisions regarding extensive range, long duration performance and relative self-sufficiency during operations.

From America\’s Gato-class submarines and PBY Catalina flying boats used to fight the Japanese and reassert American hegemony across Asia-Pacific during WWII, to America\’s continued presence in Japan, South Korea and islands throughout the region, it is clear the lengths the US has gone through then and now to remain “engaged” in the Pacific. More recently, a report by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), commissioned by the US Navy titled, ” Restoring American Seapower: A New Fleet Architecture for the United States Navy ,” obsesses over not how to defend American shores, but how to remain involved in Asia-Pacific despite the immense distances between there, and America. The report\’s introduction includes:

Great power competitors such as China and Russia increased their military capabilities over the last two decades and now appear willing to challenge the international order.

However, the report never addresses Chinese or Russian forces landing on American shores, or even threatening to do so. Rather, the report revolves around maintaining hegemony within spheres of influence much more appropriately (and likely inevitably) Chinese or Russian. The report coins a term, “deny-and-punish” to describe the use of US power abroad to “stop aggression,” not in defense of America itself, but in “adjacent theaters.” Ironically, the report cites Iraq as an example, a nation the US, not China nor Russia, invaded, occupied and destroyed with considerable, unchallenged “aggression.” A more specific point in the 162-page report picked out by The National Interest in an article titled, ” How to Guarantee America\’s Aircraft Carriers Can Fight China in a War ,” involves long-range air sorties of up to 2,000 miles. The article elaborates:

…a 2000-mile mission would strain human endurance and an unrefueled range of more than 10 hours would require an enormous aircraft that might not fit on a carrier flight deck. Thus, the CSBA proposal calls for a smaller aircraft that would be supported by a tanker.

In other words, in order for the US to project considerable force beyond its own borders, across the Pacific Ocean, and within China\’s logical, proximal sphere of influence, it needs not only drone aircraft capable of 10 hour sorties, it needs drone tankers to refuel them.

Defense contractors surely welcome the report\’s findings, since it will require the development of not one new aircraft carrier-based vehicle, but two, including the tanker. The CSBA report concludes by stating:

To be deterred in the 2030s, aggressors must be presented with the possibility that their goals will be denied or that the immediate costs to pursue them will be prohibitively high.

In reality, the “aggression” the United States fears is not the unjust encroachment on other, innocent nations, but rather the undoing of every aspect of its own global order, put together piece by piece through just such aggression. It is an order constructed not within any rational US sphere of influence, rather, one spanning the globe, so far from American shores combat pilots lack the endurance to fly the sorties required to “deter” other nations from reversing America\’s grip upon it.

Human Rights Watch Cites Al Qaeda and Collaborators in Latest Syria Report

February 26, 2017 ( Tony Cartalucci – NEO ) – On the heels of Amnesty International\’s admittedly and entirely fabricated report regarding Syria\’s Saydnaya prison , Human Rights Watch (HRW) has published its own baseless report on Syria – this one regarding alleged chlorine bomb attacks in Aleppo during the city\’s liberation late last year.

In a post on HRW\’s website titled, ” Syria: Coordinated Chemical Attacks on Aleppo ,” it claims:

Syrian government forces conducted coordinated chemical attacks in opposition-controlled parts of Aleppo during the final month of the battle for the city, Human Rights Watch said today.

However, when qualifying HRW\’s accusations, it admits:

Through phone and in-person interviews with witnesses and analysis of video footage, photographs, and posts on social media, Human Rights Watch documented government helicopters dropping chlorine in residential areas on at least eight occasions between November 17 and December 13, 2016. The attacks, some of which included multiple munitions, killed at least nine civilians, including four children, and injured around 200.

Watching the videos and viewing the photographs reveals that none of them actually link any of the alleged “chlorine attacks” to Syrian forces, or even to chlorine itself. The body of evidence presented by HRW also reveals that the interviews they conducted with alleged “witnesses” included almost exclusively opposition forces. Among them were the US-UK funded White Helmets – referred to disingenuously as “Syria Civil Defense” in HRW\’s report – who served as designated terrorist organization Jabhat Al Nusra auxiliaries, often found on the battlefield shoulder-to-shoulder with armed militants.

Image: “Syria Civil Defense,” interviewed by Human Rights Watch, hoisting Al Qaeda\’s flag amid a gang of heavily armed terrorists.

United Arab Emirate-based Al Nusra propaganda platform “Orient News” was also cited, as were other notorious anti-government propaganda networks including the Aleppo Media Center. Not only are these clearly compromised sources of information based on their admitted political alignments, but also because of their respective, systematic fabrications throughout the Syrian conflict. It is telling of HRW\’s systematic bias that it would base an entire report on compromised sources drawn from the opposition, but not even a single report based on government claims. In reality, a truly reputable rights advocacy organization would only report what physical evidence was verified. Human Rights Watch has deliberately avoided doing so not only in Syria, but amid virtually ever conflict it involves itself in. Citing Terrorists and Verified Liars From conflating the number of civilians “trapped” in eastern Aleppo, to attempts to downplay or dismiss the role designated terrorist organizations played in the occupation of Aleppo, the groups and individuals cited by Human Rights have practiced deliberate deceit throughout the battle for Aleppo, and the Syrian conflict at large.

US War on Islamic State Designed to Fail

February 24, 2017 ( Ulson Gunnar – NEO ) – Any US general providing candid views on fighting and winning a war admit the impossibility of victory as long as the source of an enemy\’s fighting capacity remains intact.

In fact, as an excuse for why the US is still struggling in Afghanistan over a decade and a half after initially invading the Central Asian state in 2001, US General John Nicholson blamed outsiders including Pakistan, Iran and Russia for aiding, abetting and harboring anti-US forces. No amount of military might brought to bear on forces fighting the US within Afghanistan\’s borders can disrupt finances, recruitment, training, weapon supplies, logistics and refitting taking place beyond Afghanistan\’s borders and thus beyond the US military\’s reach. The United States suffered a similar problem during its prolonged occupation of Vietnam. North Vietnam, China and neighboring states provided support and safe havens for fighters in the south facing off against US troops and their South Vietnamese counterparts.

Despite killing up to 4 million people and dropping more ordnance on the region than had been dropped during the entirety of World War 2, the US ultimately failed to defeat North Vietnam or prevent the reunification and independence of the Vietnamese people.
Despite both a historical and contemporary example of futile warfare fought out of reach of the source of an enemy\’s fighting capacity, the US is presenting to the American public a “plan” to fight and defeat the so-called “Islamic State” in Syria completely ignoring the terrorist front\’s state sponsors.
The “Plan” To Defeat the Islamic State The plan includes a possible expansion of US troops already operating illegally and uninvited in Syria. In the Guardian\’s article, ” US military will retain core strategy against Isis as Trump mulls escalation ,” it states:

[US General Joseph] Votel, speaking from Jordan on Wednesday, said that one option to speed up a long-signaled attack on Raqqa was to take on a larger burden ourselves . Shouldering more of the task would mean US forces, conventional as well as special operations, bringing more artillery and logistics options to the fight.

Absent from US President Donald Trump\’s “plan,” and from comments made by US commanders, is any mention of the source of the Islamic State\’s fighting capacity. No mention is made as to where they are drawing their fighters from, who is paying for and overseeing their training, arming, outfitting and continuous supplying of when finally they reach the battlefield, or how they have managed to fight the summation of Syrian, Iraqi, Iranian, Lebanese and Russian forces for years now.

Unlike in Vietnam and Afghanistan, two theaters the US desperately sought or seeks victory over indigenous resistance and had openly and repeatedly accused neighboring states of aiding and abetting that resistance, the US has been strangely quiet during both President Barack Obama\’s and now President Trump\’s administrations regarding neighboring states aiding and abetting the Islamic State. However, without addressing the very source of the Islamic State\’s fighting capacity, defeating the terrorist front will be difficult if not impossible.

How Breitbart Got Conservatives to Forget Morality and Embrace Pedophilia

February 23, 2017 (Tony Cartalucci – LD) – Breitbart News is what many on the right side of America\’s controlled political paradigm consider “real news” versus the “liberal media\’s” “fake news.” However, in reality, Breitbart is a textbook case of what is called “cognitive infiltration.” It is the establishment\’s attempt to reassert itself, its narratives, influence, and agenda amid an information space increasingly decentralized and controlled by genuine alternative media.

In order to do this, Breitbart poses as “alternative media” itself, taking on a “conservative” identity to draw in many on the right of American politics. Cognitive infiltrators also target left-leaning Americans. And it has worked masterfully.

It is an amazing feat by the establishment to have first – under the administration of US President Barack Obama – gotten liberals to embrace endless wars of aggression, and now to convince conservatives to defend advocates of child rape and the act of child rape itself.

The basic facts of what Breitbart really is, versus what it claims to be, expose this clearly. While it poses as anti-establishment “alternative media,” it peddles wars and other aspects of the establishment\’s agenda. It is also working diligently to divide and distract their audience, pitting them against other Americans rather than exposing and targeting the special interests who dominate over them all. Agents of Division and Conquest Enter Milo Yiannopoulos, who just recently resigned as a Breitbart News senior editor. He was an obvious provocateur, aiming clearly at dividing and distracting Americans from real issues. He made provocative comments targeting various groups in his and Breitbart\’s efforts to further polarize the American people and lend greater leverage and control to the corporate-financier interests that truly dominate American politics. In his bid to further polarize the American people between “left” and “right,” he characterized the left as condoning and defending pedophilia. In a 2016 article written by Yiannopoulos and published by Breitbart titled, ” Here\’s Why the Progressive Left Keeps Sticking up for Pedophiles ,” he argues:

Today, Salon gave a platform to a self-confessed pedophile to explain his urges in sympathetic terms. I m a Pedophile, But Not A Monster reads the headline. It s a long, self-pitying screed that ends with a call to be understanding and supportive of adults who crave sexual intimacy with children.

Forgive me if I m not first to start the standing ovation. In fact I m pretty sure most people will find the existence on Salon s website of this post both shocking and distasteful.

Yiannopoulos continues by saying:

…progressives who got fired up about whether green and purple was a rapey colour scheme were suddenly fine with discussion of incestuous pedophilia from a 22-year-old in a chat room full of teenagers. It has been a somewhat grotesque spectacle to watch.

He concludes by claiming:

Radical leftists may be planning to make pedophilia another front in their civil rights battles, but it won t happen without a fight. Nor should it.

In the minds of many reading Breitbart News, they envision the American left as advocates of predators who seek to sexually abuse their children. And in many cases, the establishment “left” are just that. But as it turns out, so is the establishment “right.” Yiannopoulos Himself Advocated Sex with Children Clearly the act Yiannopoulos put on during his role as agitator at Breitbart diverges significantly from who he really is and what he really stands for. In an interview with Yiannopoulos on the ” Drunken Peasants Podcast posted on January 4, 2016 , he unequivocally defends grown men having sex with children as young as 13 and claims that pedophilia is only a sexual attraction to a child who has not reached puberty yet. However, regardless of Yiannopoulos\’ opinions on the matter, adults having sex with 13 year old children is most certainly pedophilia.

Clearly, the real Yiannopoulos has nothing to do with the values many who call themselves conservatives, or “right” of the American political spectrum identity with. Clearly, upon watching Yiannopoulos\’ full interview, no “conservative” or “right-wing” American could support or agree with Yiannopoulos or find him anything less than precisely what they allegedly stand against. Yet here is where the system\’s cognitive infiltration has worked so masterfully.

National Security Adviser General McMaster: The War Complex\’ Resident Parrot

February 22, 2017 ( Tony Cartalucci – NEO ) – It was recently announced that US President Donald Trump selected US Army Lieutenant General Herbert Raymond McMaster as his National Security Adviser.

The New York Times in their article, ” Trump Chooses H.R. McMaster as National Security Adviser ,” would report:

President Trump appointed Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster as his new national security adviser on Monday, picking a widely respected military strategist known for challenging conventional thinking and helping to turn around the Iraq war in its darkest days.

In reality, what President Trump has done, is select a man who will bring very little of his own thoughts with him to the position. Instead, he will – verbatim – repeat the talking points, reflect the agenda of, and serve the interests driving the collection of corporate-financier funded think tanks that devise – and have devised for decades – US-European foreign policy. What General McMaster Represents In a talk given at one such think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies – funded by corporations such as ExxonMobil, Hess, Chevron, and Boeing and chaired by individuals including President Trump\’s Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson and representatives from Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Betchel – General McMaster provides a well-rehearsed pitch collectively reflecting the worldview hashed out by not only the CSIS itself, but admittedly the worldview and objectives of the Brookings Institution, the Council on Foreign Relations, and a myriad of other special-interest driven policy think tanks. The talk, published on CSIS\’ YouTube channel in May of 2016 , features General McMaster in his military uniform accusing Russia of “invading Ukraine” and China of “challenging US interests at the far reaches of American power.” When describing China\’s “challenging” of US interests, he presents a map of China itself and the surrounding South China Sea – quite decidedly nowhere near the United States or any logical or legitimately proximal sphere of influence Washington could justify in maintaining.

General McMaster predicates allegations that Russia and China pose a threat to “US interest” abroad – not US national security itself – by challenging the post World War 2 international order – an order admittedly created by and for the US and its European allies, granting them military, sociopolitical, and financial unipolar hegemony over the planet.


Thursday, 30 June 2011



Who or what is this “New Man” as portrayed by Salvador Dali? And what on earth is that bony hard female doing with her apprehensive child?
By Noor Al Haquiqa
June 30, 2011
Re-edited June 30, 9 am.
Recently seen at a Cairo fashion show.
I found this piece which I put together way back about two years ago and for some reason I never posted it! Better late than never I suppose. It is just some of my babbling on fashion, androgyny and the New World Order.

Read this excellent article, Men Should Wear Skirts
By Jay Dezelic (below) who takes men in skirts to
a new masculine level such as the Scots with their kilts. However, it still contributes greatly to the feminization of males no matter how macho this man appears.
It is possible that men are tired of having to dress in a way that signals to women that they are for equality. They believe they are equal. They think they have earned the right to dress in whatever way they want. If women can t see that they don t care too much, because men are becoming like women: these days, they dress mostly to impress other men. ~ Daniel Bjork (The above statement seems to be full agenda as it paves the way for the gay revolution that grips us all today!)
What the fashion designers are pushing at our daughters.
“Fashion is at its best in situations like this. It becomes an arena to explore and examine ideas. What is still interesting with that old wrinkly, windburned masculinity? What is the strong body about in a world where few are involved in manual labour? To what extent should the male body be objectified? Is manliness today more of an aesthetic than a lifestyle?” ~ Stana
If you are not one of the elites you are being slowly murdered by them, by just about everything they introduced into your environment including fashion, music, television, style, entertainment and the things you enjoy.
In 1953, Charles Galton Darwin laid out the plan in his book The Next Million Years . The main problem for him and his aristocratic kind was males , that s men to us of the lower non-Darwin species.
“A numerically small race of high quality
has often been far more important
than a large race of low quality.” Darwin, p.39
And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is a major component of the eugenics/genocide game!

Men would have to be turned against their own natural aggressive, family-protecting and tribal instincts of survival and self-preservation, especially men with leadership qualities. However, the male instincts work differently to the natural female instincts and the elites would use a tried and tested cocktail of secret sciences on both sexes to decimate them and rebuild the gender soup into a controllable unisex homogeneous mass.
Why not just castrate them at birth?! I mean, along with the circumcision, it might just catch on… oooops sorry for the sarcasm.

Pansexuality is also known as omnisexuality or polisexuality and refers to the potential for sexual attractions, desire and love towards people of all gender identities and biological sexes. Many pansexuals identify themselves as gender blind and that sex is irrelevant when attraction to any other person is involved. Gender just does not count so there is room for everyone as an object of love or lust Pansexuality also rejects the gender binary, the concept of only two genders and includes people who are neither male nor female. So it seems that androgyny is rather like the gateway drug to pensexuality. Needless to say this is another huge slap to the concept of marriage and children as, in essence, it is an inward oriented gratification geared to hedonistic satisfaction and rarely would commitment to the point of having children be a consideration in this particular lifestyle.
Magazine entitled Dazed and Confused. Article featured: Transformer! Meet Fashion\’s Boys Who Are Girls and Like Girls to be Boys. Gender lines are blurring and this is the new face of fashion, boys and girls transforming into each other and merging together into one.The cover features one of the hottest male models these days, Ash Stymest with a topless Eliza, who is currently his girlfriend in real life.
Not only that, but they would brainwash the masses into believing that the whole boring standardized phenomenon was a naturally occurring, exciting, and liberating pendulum swing from one drab era to the next New Age of liberation; a grassroots movement occurring naturally. They would borrow from earlier fashions from the 17th-18th century; humans, being the most adaptable of all creatures would behave predictably like all laboratory rats in a well run caged experiment, at the hands of their puppeteers, the scientific elites.

Our most basic self-gratification instincts were to be primed and we were to be encouraged to have unlimited sex, those who didn t were mocked bitterly. Nowadays, virginity is so rare in young people that some young women are able to auction themselves off to the highest bidder, someone willing to pay for the privilege of deflowering her. In the past it was an unscrupulous madam or owner, now the girls do it themselves. So obviously, virginity WAS a thing of value! However today most young see it as little more than an encumbrance, certainly nothing of value. Not all, but the general public is this way.

Actually Darwin was a little behind the times. These things had already been worked out by the Communist Jewish intelligentsia who were the founders of the Frankfurt School.
A few more words on the Frankfurt School. The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural Revolution demolishes from within. Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness . They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture. They came up with the concept of
\’Until now , wrote Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason, nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is?\’
Since Darwin was looking at this from the aspect of population control by numbers, there was one minor hiccup, however babies!
Are You a Boy or are you a Girl? By the Barbarians
This is where the murder and depopulation really comes in. From the time of the writing of Galton Darwin s book, abortion clinics sprang up overnight like mushrooms, by design. Contraception was rampant, as were sexually transmitted diseases, by design. Various tubes got the snip to prevent the scourge of babies, by design. And then there was the introduction of the dangerous movement known as Zero Population Growth, just about the time of the introduction of the new psychological eunuch, er, male.

In the late 1960s Zero Population Growth (ZPG) became a big political movement in North America and parts of Europe, with strong links to environmentalism and feminism. Yale University, one of the many outlets for the dispersion of social manipulation of the culture (as per the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Frankfurt School introduction of corruption into Western society) was a stronghold of the ZPG activists who believed that a constantly increasing population is responsible for many of our problems: pollution, violence, loss of values and of individual privacy. Founding fathers of the movement included Paul Ehrlich who wrote The Population Bomb , and Thomas Eisner .
Ehrlich stated: The mother of the year should be a sterilized woman with two adopted children.

It never occurred to the newly liberated super men and women that if their parents had had that same attitude they would probably never have been born at all. Never mind that though, it s fun, fun, fun; and a rat in a laboratory acts in a predictable way, and that doesn t include thinking, or taking responsibility for anything. It includes eating, drinking, fornicating and being merry.
Feel like a woman. Wear a dress! ~ Diane von Furstenberg
1967, two fashionable young couples. Note how she takes the lead on the right almost leading him like a small child.
The above conditions were sold to my naive generation of baby boomers as free love, part of the plan to destroy the west at its most basic foundation, the family, and ripen it for communist takeover, the main thrust of Talmudic Judaism known as Zionism, or, the New World Order.
Simultaneously, Jewish Bolsheviks, primarily CIA agents, such as Gloria Steinhem and Betty Friedan, were teaching us through unfettered media, about the (dubious) joys of feminism, and playboyism (thanks Hugh and Larry).
God was dead said Time Magazine; find Him within by using recreational drugs. You are your own god, do as thou wilt! As difficult as it is to admit, we bought into their slick societal manipulation without having a clue what was being done to us. Of course, raised in North American innocence, we could never have conceived of the evil cunning that was around us, devouring us, altering the very world that had raised us in such an abundance of the things we are today losing so rapidly.
To the right you find the elegant David Bowie in Ziggy Stardust mode. True to text, the star eventually wed African fashion sensation Iman, a hermaphrodite who finally chose womanhood as her path. Even in a suit, the Great White Duke, reeked of femininity and produced the mandatory child to carry on his genes as have so many other gay/bisexual people of position.
Designer men became more effeminate looking in the 1960 s mimicking their idols. Elite-designer skirts became shorter and shorter using well-paid stooges like Mary Quant and Twiggy as role models for the promotion of seductive tarts. These promoted fashion designers would appear to the gullible public as clever talented innovative fashion icons with an eye for the market. Of course, the real designers were the culture weaponisers pulling the strings and triggers of society and promoting the scam.
The great Twiggy scam. Stick girl Twiggy helped usher in androgyny while making fashionable women want to look like boys, worrying about weight and natural curves, proof that purveyors of fashion have a great role in this push to androgyny. Meanwhile, the Beatles are teaching young men more about long hair, part of their appeal but also a strong part of the feminization of the male.
This promiscuity agenda had all been rolled out decades before in the Roaring Twenties as a distraction from the real eugenic issues behind it all, but the problem of babies had not been sorted out, and the result was an excess of unwanted children and orphanages. Infanticide was kind of politically incorrect.
The elite eugenicists went back to the drawing board and spent some decades financing universities etc. to develop the contraceptive pill, financing abortion clinics and fertility clinics, and the murderous agenda was rolled out yet again in the 1960 s, this time in full force.
Women could now enjoy their liberation and every red-blooded male could enjoy consuming the girls sexually, en route to their next willing delicacy. It was rather like the children having the run of the candy store. Not all fell for it, but the power and propaganda machine of the elite media made things difficult to resist. Family, responsibility, religion and marriage were all flying out the window, by design. Male-female bonding was being brought to an end, as was morality and the nuclear family, by design. The fallout from this bombing is evident everywhere today.

Original copy write with image guaranteed to create disdain for the male gender:
“We\’ve always wondered what it was like to live in a man\’s world. No glass ceiling, emotion-free sex, no more high heel related injuries…the benefits seemed endless! This season, while you may not be able to actually live like a man, feel free to start dressing like one.
This season, designers toyed with perceptions of male and female as they created collections built for a woman, but tailored for a man. The suit was revamped with bolder shoulders and boxier cuts as designers who preferred the tomboy look made a drastic departure from the ultra-feminine ruffles and bows of the past.
While we can\’t guarantee entry into the old boys club just by dressing like one, we hope a few masculine additions to your wardrobe will bring out a little testosterone of the female kind. Oh and in case you\’re wondering, we kept this review short as we know there is no such thing as a male attention span.”
How is THAT for the old ONE TWO punch of man hating brought to the fore. There is no term available other than “man hater” that is the equivalent of “Misogynist” or female hater. But nonetheless, the above final jab was a direct jab at men that helped kickstart the “men are scum” phenomena that is still prevalent today.
In the 1960 s, a book surfaced called The Human Zoo by a staunch well-connected Darwinist called Desmond Morris. Desmond Morris was in the know , so to speak. This revolutionary book should have insulted a generation, but no, it didn t.
The book was the follow up to an equally insulting book called The Naked Ape. Morris was promoted as some kind of humanist guru or genius. We lower humans were stripped of all our sanctity, and clothes, and reduced to being glorified monkeys; fornicating like rabbits in a warren.
This all fitted in with the weaponisation of the culture at that particular time, by design. The Human Zoo openly identified the electric guitar as a phallic object. Morris s predictive programming prepared a generation for the guitar being worn ever lower down around the groin, something which only became commonplace in the 1970 s. He went on to say that homosexuality would come to the fore, as would the wearing of male cosmetics, make-up, and that male clothing would become extremely feminine, as would the male. He even went on to predict other forms of sexuality including bestiality, becoming commonplace. And lo, what is the big sexual thing in the Scandinavian countries besides sado/masochism sex than bestiality, consummated in Barn Brothels!
How could this well-heeled elitist animal behaviourist possibly predict all this, at a time when such things were considered unthinkable and disgusting? The answer is simple. Morris knew the business plan for the future. He got to see the blueprint. Although the attack had begun, a man was still a red-blooded man in the 1960 s.
In came the 1970 s which was the final blow for manhood.
The fashion bombers launched a full-scale culture-weapon attack on manhood. Women were trained to despise the traditional fatherly male through every medium.
Men became glorified Barbie Dolls except for soldiers of course, where male aggression could be harvested to help bring down the population in the old-fashioned way, namely through war.

Beloved pacifist singer songwriter, hero of millions, John Lennon did what he was told and was paraded as the first proud house husband while his wife was promoted as the shrewd brains and role model behind the new woman.
The whole androgynous performance was stage managed by the elites. The Human Zoo predictions became a nightmare reality. Since the 1970 s, women have been told by the mass media that they are all gorgeous, intelligent goddesses and men have all been portrayed as blithering idiots.
The elites trained women not to have babies or stable families in this way.
Liberated women were now militant tax slaves for the elites. In one generation, they charged from a gender that wouldn t be seen dead in a trouser suit to a gender that wouldn t be seen dead in a skirt. Men were left all at sea.
Charles Galton Darwin blatantly called it sterilizing. Thanks to the brainwashing, nobody saw through it.
With paedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, and every other sickening perversion being openly promoted today, we have been successfully debased to a level, way below that of the human zoo, with Lady Ga Ga and her dead animal costumes on stage, promoting dilated pupil contact lenses for sale, and dead bodies on stage.
With art galleries of human corpses hanging or wires posing as art , animals sawn in half in formaldehyde in glass tanks, severed heads of animals crawling in flies and maggots. Only one word describes what the elites have made us sick.
Here s what the elites are now pumping into your children s brains while you are trying to bring them up sanely.
This is an excerpt from role model band Garbage, and that s exactly what the elites think of us commoners, the great unwashed masses, garbage.
When everything is going wrong
And you can t see the point in going on
Nothing in life is set in stone
There s nothing that can t be turned around
Boys.. Boys in the girls room
Girls.. Girls in the men s room
You free your mind in your androgyny
Boys.. Boys in the parlour
Girls.. They re getting harder
I ll free your mind and your androgyny
The birds and bees they hum along
Like treasures they twinkle in the sun
Get on board and have some fun
Take what you need to turn you on
I ll free your mind
I ll free your mind
I ll free your mind
I ll free your
Boys.. Behind closed doors and under stars
Girls.. It doesn t matter where you are
Boys.. Collecting jewels that catch your eye
Girls.. Don t let a soul mate pass you by
Boys in the girls room
Girls in the men s room
You free your mind in your androgyny
Boys in the parlour
They re getting harder
I ll free your mind
I ll free your mind
There s your New World Order right there! The new normal. This is how far the planned and designed generation gap of the post-WWII period has sunk. Anything goes!
The next stage is murder as entertainment, and the one being tortured to death could be YOU. You can t blame the pop stars and artists, they do what they are paid to and trained to do, they take their money and they run.
No doors are opened for musicians, artists or actors unless they are gender-neutral doors, promoting androgyny or debasement.
As for the banksters and promoters at the top of all this filth, I know the Oscar I d give them. I d give them a pair of handcuffs, a straight jacket and a muzzle.
I know the Grammy Award I d give them. I d give them life in a secure unit for the sadistically and criminally insane and keep them out of harm s way. I d take a ship to the open sea and throw away the key.
The point is the psychopathic elites own, and run the weaponised culture in which we live. We have been squeezed and shoehorned into a dependent lifestyle with no access to land, pure water, or food. They call it interdependence.
In a word, we are serfs, slaves.
They own us.
You have to hand it to them they ARE clever.
Why would the elites want to do this, to expunge the natural instincts of both men and women and turn us into non-men and non-women?
They do it to sterilize us, both male and female, to stop us having children, and educating them about the elites plans to reduce the world s population to a size manageable, by them, the world control-freaks.
When men protect women and women support their men, that s a natural way to live, and two people living together in such a loving strongly-bonded symbiotic relationship is a force to be reckoned with, which is a damn nuisance, an annoyance to the New World Order plans.
Standing together, standing up for, and fighting to protect each other and for family, friends and tribe means survival and strength.
This is why we had to be re-engineered into the androgynous mass. We needed to be weakened, and broken down like wild horses in need of domestication. The elites of course will not alter themselves, as they need to retain their wildness, to be our masters, and lord it over us all and domesticate us into total obedience.
This is what sustainability really means.

They want to retain and sustain their superiority over us and have us believe we are nothing more than animals, insects or as some say, maggots. The sanctity of human life has been knocked off its pedestal, kicked off its perch. This debasement means life is no longer sacred and genocide is acceptable and can proceed as normal .

The elites push homosexuality and same-sex marriages to justify in-vitro fertilization, the real purpose of which is to justify designer baby production, to produce obedient, non-complaining happy designer slaves to use for their own purposes in their coming New World Order New Age utopia.
The futurists are now upgrading us as slaves for their trans-humanist and post-humanist world order.
The New Man of course will be a self-fertilizing, self-birthing hermaphrodite.
Genetics is good old-fashioned eugenics, nothing more, nothing less. The great sales pitch is equality, liberation, human rights. It is a lie.
The elites want to depopulate the world so that we cannot give our children a proper education on the subject of survival and our most basic birthright ~ access to land, clean water, pure food and fresh air.
Who gives them the right to dictate to us how many or how few children we should have?
It s none of their damn business.
This gender modification and sterilization has to stop right now.
Homosexuals and lesbians should be up in arms ~ not about equality and openness. The elites are playing them like a violin on that one, separating them for divide-and-rule purposes, as they do with all margin groups. They should be furious about what the elites are deliberately doing to them deliberately as should we all. I call it gender modification.
If you haven t seen the CBC film The Disappearing Male have a good hard look at it now.
The elites must keep us distracted, entertained, ambitioned, sterilized, fluoridated, vaccinated, dumbed-down, irradiated, under surveillance, GMO d, chemtrailed, pesticised, brainwashed, indoctrinated, propagandized, amused, bemused, blamed, moneyed, sexed-up, drugged down, pumped full of Bisphenol A, Pthalates, Melomines, medicated. Why? Because if enough of us woke up from our induced coma, including military police and lawyers etc., and got wise to our mass-extermination through the weaponisation of culture by the psychopathic elites, guess what!
We might just all join forces, gang up and go after them!

Wednesday, 29 June 2011


On June 27, its press release headlined, “GAZA, WE ARE COMING. Despite pressure and threats of violence, flotilla will sail.”
On June 27, A US Boat to Gaza Audacity of Hope press conference reiterated a determination to sail despite threats, pressure and other measures used to stop it.
Participants on board all 10 ships haven\’t come this far to turn back or let imperial viciousness deter them, especially when their mission is vital and just.
In response to spurious claims that passengers may have chemicals to attack Israeli commandos, perhaps the same ones responsible for the May 2010 Mavi Marmara massacre, Flotilla participants signed a declaration of nonviolence. Spokesman Dror Feiler told Army Radio that if Israel has other information, it should inform Flotilla organizers.
He responded to IDF spokesperson Major Avital Leibovich, citing intelligence reports that dangerous chemicals may be used as weapons, and that extremist passengers were heard threatening “to spill the blood” of Israeli soldiers. .
In Greece, Alice Walker, author,
speaks on why she had to be part of this flotilla.

According to an unnamed defense official,

“The picture emerging here is that some of the flotilla participants clearly intend a violent clash,”
when, in fact, he knows this is a bald faced lie, an Israeli specialty, regurgitated by major media flacks, while suppressing Israel\’s intention either to block or confiscate vessels it interdicts and all passenger possessions as it did against Flotilla I.
According to Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman, Israel may establish a special naval court to do it, Barak saying:
“There\’s no doubt that impounding vessels is a deterrent measure that could prevent the need to use force against future (flotilla) violations.”
Destroying them works better, what Dror Feiler disclosed, saying a scuba diver examining one of the boats discovered its propeller shaft cut off. It was deliberate sabotage that can be fixed but may take time.
lists a Gaza Flotilla 101 section, vilifying humanitarian activism with vicious disinformation. For example, it says:
Flotilla I “participants came aboard armed, with some declaring they were prepared for martyrdom; the same is expected this year.”
It describes organizers as a broad coalition and umbrella organization of pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas participants, as well as an officially designated “terrorist organization,” the Turkish IHH charity Ankara pressured not to come; it also cited Israeli intelligence saying the Free Gaza Movement includes “dangerous organizations with terrorist links.”
It listed a litany of lies about Gaza, including life there now eased, saying:
“Israel now permits almost all goods (in) except items it fears could be used to stage attacks.”
It said many 2010 Mavi Marmara participants came armed with “guns, knives, metal pipes and chains ~ not humanitarian goods There was no humanitarian aid on the (ship), and organizers stated their violent intent on the record.”
It claims “international legal authorities consider (Israel\’s) blockade legal” during an armed struggle Israel instigated and sustains, blaming Gazan victims for its own crimes, including the lawless siege.

Ann Wright, Past American Ambassador, also in Greece taking the flotilla to Gaza ride for the second time, a survivor of the Mavri Marmara assault. All the above claims are maliciously false. The section, in fact, supports Israeli crimes of war and against humanity by substituting brazen lies for vital truths.

On June 28, Israeli Foreign Minister/Deputy Prime Minister Avigdor Lieberman included his own, saying participants plan “confrontation and blood,” adding:
“They are clearly there to create a provocation, looking for confrontation and blood and for many pictures on television screens hard core terror activists” are among them.
At the same time, his Foreign Ministry and Israeli security and defense officials told a June 26 cabinet meeting that no information indicates terrorists or anyone affiliated with terror groups participating.
Those coming, they said, include EU, US, and Canadian human rights activists, not bomb-throwing, gun toting, knife wielding, chemical carrying extremists planning violence. Moreover, they added that peaceful participants present a “more difficult public diplomacy challenge” if clashes with Israel soldiers occur.
Lieberman, however, implied that Israel exerted enormous pressure on foreign officials to deter the mission. Responding, French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero called the flotilla:
“a bad idea that can only exacerbate tensions and we don\’t need more reasons for conflict at the moment,”
omitting that French aircraft slaughter Libyan civilians daily, while adding:
“We don\’t have the legal recourse to stop boats leaving, but with others, including the UN Secretary-General, we have made clear we are against this.”
On June 28, Israel National News writer Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu headlined, “Flotilla for War or Peace? Charges of Plot to Kill,” saying:
“Israel is in the midst of a massive diplomatic and (dis)information campaign to scuttle the planned attempt to break the maritime embargo .”
In fact, it\’s using whatever it takes to do it, including agitprop, sabotage, political pressure, the Israel Law Center Shurat HaDin filing irresponsible lawsuits, and military interdiction in international waters, perhaps a repeat of 2010 if things get out of hand.
According to Jerusalem Post writer Yaakov Katz in his June 28 article headlined, ” Analysis: A season of flotillas and marche s :”
Better prepared this time,
“Navy commandos have developed new techniques on how to fast-rope onto the ships\’ upper decks quickly. They also have new equipment such as water cannons, attack dogs, (and) riot control specialists from the Prison Service\’s elite Masada Unit.”
At the same time, Israel hasn\’t “formulate(d) a clear strategy or policy” to “handle” the media other than steady disinformation to discredit the mission and its participants. The message long ago wore thin.
Medea Benjamin, seems to be everywhere. It always makes me wonder to be very honest why, despite her arrests she seems to be free for so many demonstrations and never prevented from traveling. But here she is in Greece. The pro-Israeli Stand With Us organization launched a new site, accessed through the following link:
Maliciously misstating truths, it says:
“Flotilla Violates International Law, Intends to Provoke Violent Confrontation;
these flotillas are anti-peace;
international pressure should be placed on the terrorist group Hamas which rules Gaza;”
In 2010, “anti-Israeli extremists and Turkish jihadists organized a flotilla to violate Israel\’s naval blockade ;”
Mavi Marmara “jihadists brutally attacked (Israeli commandos) with knives, metal bars, and guns. Nine jihadists were killed.
This year, the same anti-Israel extremists are planning another international flotilla battalion .purportedly to bring humanitarian goods to Gaza.”
The site also includes a section called ” Facts ~ 2011 Flotilla II: 9 Basic Facts , ” regurgitating brazen Israeli lies, suppressing truths it\’s too cowardly to state. .
Activist Gabriel Matthew Schivon chews his Star of David,
waiting for the boat to be released in Greece.

Notoriously, America\’s Anti-Defamation League also dispenses pro-Israeli propaganda and smear campaigns against Israeli critics, under the guise of fighting anti-semitism and supporting human rights equitably.

On June 24, its web site ( headlined, “Background on the 2011 Gaza Flotilla,” saying:
Anti-Israeli, anti-Zionist, pro-Hamas participants are coming, including the Free Gaza Movement, allied with others responsible for violent 2010 clashes. Omitted was explaining that Israel instigated violence against unarmed, peaceful activists.
Israel\’s “blockade is primarily a defensive measure (against) the ongoing barrage of rockets targeting Israeli civilians and the kidnapping of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.” In fact, Shalit is a war prisoner, victimized by IDF aggression against Gaza civilians. Moreover, Hamas homemade “rockets” respond to Israeli attacks using sophisticated terror weapons.
“Israel enables the flow of goods into Gaza each day, and particularly ensures the transfer of food, medicines, fuel and electricity.”
In fact, siege restrictions eased modestly. Shortages of everything exist. Poverty, unemployment and deprivation are extreme. Most construction materials are banned, deterring rebuilding Cast Lead destruction, and a recent report indicated critical shortfalls of medicines and other medical supplies because Israel blocks them.
“There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza.” In fact, it\’s been ongoing for years, exacerbated by Israel\’s longstanding slow-motion genocide policy ADL chooses to ignore.
In May 2010, “Israel and the IDF made several attempts to avoid confrontation with” Freedom Flotilla I vessels.
In fact, IDF commandos rehearsed a well-planned terror attack, using photos of targeted Turkish activists on board the Mavi Marmara mother ship to murder them in cold blood, forensic evidence showing them shot multiple times at close range, including in the head.
Nonetheless, Israel\’s
“independent panel of inquiry, the Turkel Commission .investigate(d) and assess(ed) Israel\’s action. (It) found that the Gaza blockade and the use of force during the (interdiction) were legal under international law.”
It lied, whitewashing Israeli crimes against humanity against nonviolent participants in international waters.
Like 50 other US Zionist organizations, ADL is an Israeli front group, demagogically supporting its worst crimes and spreading malicious Islamaphobic hate-mongering, including smear campaigns against pro-Palestinian groups, supporting liberation and justice.
In a June 4 letter The New York Times disgracefully published, ADL called it:
“an abomination for American (Flotilla) participants .to liken themselves to the Freedom Riders who challenged segregation in the American South .(They) were pacifists who were on the right side of history; the flotilla organizers (challenge Israel and) align themselves with Hamas,” a Palestinian “terror(ist)” organization.
In fact, Flotilla activists indeed are modern-day Freedom Riders, coming by sea and/or land, courageously challenging Israeli terror against besieged Gazan civilians, under the government they fairly elected, maliciously called a terrorist organization.
They\’re coming like others earlier and many more until Gaza\’s siege ends and all Palestinians are liberated on their own land, in their own country, free from occupation.
Neither ADL hate or Israeli terror will stop them.
On June 29, Haaretz writer Amira Hass said the French ship “Dignity” and Irish one “Freedom” set sail to rendezvous at sea with others delayed from departing Greece, one needing its sabotaged propeller repaired.
On June 28, New York Times writer Scott Sayare headlined, “Israeli Advocacy Group Helps Delay Departure of Gaza-Bound Flotilla,” saying:
The pro-Israeli Shurat HaDin “suggest(ed) that seven of the ships might be lacking insurance or were improperly registered.” Laughably calling itself a “civil rights organization,” it also threatened 30 maritime insurers, warning that covering the vessels leaves them vulnerable to suits for “aiding a terrorist organization.”
On June 27, Max Blumenthal explained that pro-Israeli, Islamophobic hate-monger Pastor John Hagee is one of Shurat HaDin\’s major funders. His ideology, in fact, includes a totalitarian Christian ethic, white Christian supremacy, racial hatred, gay-bashing, male gender dominance, and waging preemptive war against Islam.
Nonetheless, Shurat HaDin gratefully takes his money, suggesting perhaps they\’re soul mates, for sure behind efforts to prevent humanitarian aid from reaching Gazans.

* Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at . Also visit his blog site at and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon.
Last 5 posts by Stephen Lendman
Breaching Gaza\’s Siege ~ June 27th, 2011
Posted in Uncategorized


Friday, 4 December 2009


Benjamin Freedman receiving the service award from the Polish American anti-Communist federation in 1972. His wife, Rose (Miryam Schoendorf), is on the far left. Jews hate this guy for spilling the beans in a big, BIG way.




Although I have put up this article before, I do so a second time because the words of this man must be heard. A self-made wealthy Jew who worked and associated with the highest circles of Zionist and elitist America and Europe, he speaks with authority and clarity. Please take time to listen to this speech. Turn it on while you iron, cook dinner, whatever. Just listen. And then listen again as if your life depends upon it. Because it just might. Hear the truth from a Jew, not someone of another race or creed.

Zionists Declared war on Hitler in 1933, Least we forget.

A Jewish Defector Warns America

Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism

He left the Zionist movement, changed his name from the Jewish spelling (Friedman), and exposed the diabolical plots that helped set the stage for WWI and WWII.

Freedman was born on October 4, 1890 in New York City Freedman was present at the 1912 presidential campaign as an assistant to Bernard Baruch, and regularly sat at meetings with presidential candidate Woodrow Wilson. He affirmed in his speech that he was a liaison between Rolla Wells and Henry Morgenthau, Sr.

Here are the Video and transcript of his speech.

Introductory Note ~ Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century.

Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman s essential message to us ~ his warning to the West ~ is more urgent than ever before. ~ K.A.S. ~



Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This speech is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United States into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a large group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. Both the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two long-playing records which you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community. The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker s platform to present Benjamin Freedman.


[Freedman\’s speech]

What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I m not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I m here to tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians.

Now, first of all, I d like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 ~ that was shortly before elections ~ Senator Kennedy, who is now the President of the United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist Organization of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form, he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now in occupation of that area.

In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes, away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes. And these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon the Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.

Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were transplanted there from Eastern Europe when that happens, the United States will trigger World War III.

You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty between France and Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move these people back into their homes, and when they do that and President kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we will trigger World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one nation in the world that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a cause.

I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United Nations ~ and of the ninety-nine nations there, I ve consulted with maybe seventy of them ~ and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we re not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.

And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days after President Kennedy ~ or he was then Senator Kennedy ~ made that statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists.

Not only that they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world to lead these people back to their homeland. With them, they have as their allies all the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of the world s total population. Eighty percent of the world s population. Four out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and they are the non-Caucasians the non-white nations of the world, and that s what we face.

And what is the reason? The reason is that here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this ~ time I ll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement ~ the Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.

Now, you say, well, that s a very broad statement to make , but let me show what happened while you were ~ I don t want to wear that out ~ let me show what happened while WE were all asleep. I m including myself with you. We were all asleep. What happened?

World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened?

Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week s food supply facing her ~ and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn t want to play war anymore, they didn t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Now Germany ~ not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: Let s call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.

Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and ~ I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn t believe what I m saying is at all possible ~ the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: Look here. You can yet win this war. You don t have to give up. You don t have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.

The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.

In other words, they made this deal: We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It s absolutely absurd that Great Britain ~ that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine ~ should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.

However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that ~ I don t know how many here remember it ~ the United States, which was almost totally pro-German ~ totally pro-German ~ because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.

The Jews didn t like the Czar, and they didn t want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers ~ the German-Jews ~ Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent! But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they d been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies hands. And they were no good.

Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: Go to work on President Wilson. We re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war. And that did happen. That s how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.

Now the war ~ World War One ~ in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there ~ we were railroaded into it ~ if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into ~ that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened?

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war. Because they didn t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration .

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don t think I could make it more emphatic than that.

Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it s history. You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened?

The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, How about Palestine for us? And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, Oh, that was the game! That s why the United States came into the war. And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.

Now, that brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.

You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd s and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers ~ the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt: Well, that was quite a sellout.

It was a sellout that I can best compare ~ suppose the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: Well, let s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let s forget the whole thing. And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man s imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese? I don t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn t be lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that s how the Germans felt towards these Jews. We ve been so nice to them ; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called Jewish commonwealth.

Now, Nahum Sokolow ~ all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today ~ they, in 1919, 1920, 21, 22, and 23, they wrote in all their papers ~ and the press was filled with their statements ~ that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them.

The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn t that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.

Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said Shema Yisrael or Our Father. No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was started against Germany for no reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.

You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 ~ three hundred! ~ small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between the period of. . . between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world s great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain s, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: We must slap down Germany , because there isn t one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. Now, what happened after that?

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.

They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn t want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They. . . shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn t know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany: You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was. You can t treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you. Well, the Germans told them. . . you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?

They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to people here. . . (You want to ask a question? ~ Uh, there were no Communists in Germany at that time. they were called Social Democrats.)

Well, I don t want to go by what they were called . We re now using English words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material. . . but they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for safety and for security.

Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former ~ their status ~ and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without hurting a hair on anyone s head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists, fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn t fight one another with pistols, they did it every way they could.

Well, that s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews. . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had come in and with cheap money ~ you know the way the Mark was devalued ~ they bought up practically everything.

Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came back to the United States ~ who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference ~ and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said:

The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany s food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany s population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population.

Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page ~ a whole page ~ in the New York Times on August 7, 1933 , Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that: this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA . [National Recovery Administration] ~ which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.

Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn t find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words made in Germany on it.

In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked made in Germany, they were picketed with signs: Hitler , murderer , and so forth, and like ~ something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked made in Germany . Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years, because since I ve been observing women s legs in the last twenty years, I haven t seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying MURDERS and HITLERITES , and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Now, that. . . naturally, the Germans said, Why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us? They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.

Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

Herschel Grynszpan under arrest in Paris, France , after he assassinated a German official Ernst vom Rath, at close range on November 7, 1938.

That continued for some time, and it wasn t until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now, for anyone to say that ~ I don t like to use the word anti-Semitism because it s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I ll have to use it ~ the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three ~ did I say for World War One, they were responsible? For the boycott ~ and also for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. It s going to be Christian or it s going to be Communist. And the Germans decided: We re going to keep it Christian if possible . And they started to re-arm.

And there intention was ~ by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 ~ the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: Well, our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong. The same as we in this country are saying today, Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.

And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for defense, they say. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other governments of the world.

Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million tons of TNT is a megaton.

Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place? It will take place because Act III. . . the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here have read it, and it s known all over the world.

Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son s. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don t know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren t permitted to know it.

Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other s knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.

I was confidential man to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson s brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that s how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.

Now, at this moment at this moment they may be planning this World War III, in which we don t stand a chance even if they don t use nuclear bombs. How can the United States ~ about five percent of the world ~ go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground? How can we do it send our boys over there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their commonwealth ? They ve fooled you so much that you don t know whether you re coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony. That is correct. I don t know from what state you come, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his testimony.

Now, what are the facts about the Jews?

The Jews ~ I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don t call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn t a Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.

Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe ~ and to reduce this so you don t get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe ~ they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe ~ so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That s how big and powerful they were.

Now, they were phallic worshipers, which is filthy. I don t want to go into the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.

Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith ~ either Christianity, Islam ~ the Moslem faith ~ or what is known today as Judaism ~ really Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out eeny, meeny, miney, moe, he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people ~ 800,000 thousand square miles ~ and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There wasn t one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:

Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God s chosen people to their Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It s your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we re Jews.

Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish [were converted]. And it s just as ridiculous to call them people of the Holy Land, as it would be. . . there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty four million! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born. . . imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves Arabs . Imagine! Why, you d say they re lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants that were Christians. They weren t different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns. . . they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith ~ Talmudic faith ~ they had no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody ~ they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system ~ so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!

Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. . . for the great Christian countries of the world to say, We re going to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God s chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.

Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?

And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language . . . so naturally you d believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn t call black black anymore ~ you d start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe ~ World War I and World War II ~ if it wasn t possible for them to live in peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living in the United States, what were the two wars fought for? Did they have to ~ like you flush the toilet ~ because they couldn t get along, did they have to say, Well, we re going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us ?

I can t understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that I m telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed their mouths with money, and now. . . I don t care whether you know all this or not. It doesn t make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I ve got, in my family, boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don t want them to go and fight and die like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they ve died all over the world. For what?

To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State ~ the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote? which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance of power?

In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don t blame Mr. Kennedy. I m fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he s a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows. He s playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing, you ve got to play with the fish. Let em out and pull em in. Let em out and pull em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy s father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his father, I don t think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.

But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian , every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that they communicate ~ not with their congressman, not with their senator, but with President Kennedy. And tell him, I do not think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen . I think everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write.

Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I have just asked you to do. But I don t think it s necessary to do that. You re above the average group in intelligence and I don t think it s necessary to impress this any more.

But. . . I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about Oh, the Jews. Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion . But do you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day and I was one of them! This is not hearsay. I m not here to be a rabble-rouser. I m here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand ~ and it s the only prayer for which you stand ~ and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre . In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months ~ any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and void.

The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.

And further than that, the Talmud teaches: Don t forget ~ whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge ~ remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that .

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

And we re going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason. You can t depend upon something as insecure as the leadership that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go on and recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your time, and you want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow s going to be a long day.

The tape runs out here. But please keep reading!

Now I want to say one thing. You ask me. . . well, you think to yourself: well how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it. Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and tried to tell the American people what I m telling you. And one newspaper after another refused the advertisement. And when I couldn t find a newspaper to take them ~ I paid cash, not credit ~ what happened? My lawyer told me, There s an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take your announcement . So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and that s how I met him.

So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: Well, I think he s a little anti-Semitic. I don t know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.

Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without any reservations. And I say it without any hesitation. . . if it wasn t for the work that Mr. Conley McGinley did with Common Sense ~ he s been sending out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year ~ if it wasn t for the work he s been doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the other active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through Common Sense .

Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I m not as flush as I was. I cannot go on spending the money. . . I m not going to take up a collection. Don t worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)

I haven t got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr. McGinley, when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally. So I said, With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good job . So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies, a quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there s always a bottom to the barrel. I suppose we ve all reached that at times.

I m not so poor that I can t live without working and that s what worries the Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a job or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He s sick and he s going at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want to close up Common Sense more than any other single thing in the whole world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.

So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of Common Sense . The reason they do that is to discourage the people in the United States: don t send any money to Common Sense. They don t need it. They ve got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That all has strategy. They don t want to advertise me so that people that have real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me.

They just want people to lay off Common Sense . And all I m telling you is, I do try to help him, but I haven t been able to. And I will be very honest. One thing I won t do is lie. In the last year I ve had so much sickness in my family that I could not give him one dollar.

How he s managed to survive, I don t know. God alone knows. And he must be in God s care because how he s pulled through his sickness and with his financial troubles, I don t know. But that press is working. . . and every two weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of Common Sense go out with a new message. And if that information could be multiplied. . . if people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don t know which will take root, but for God s sake, this is our last chance.

[Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary purchases to \’buy more stuff\’, play golf, etc., and use the money to keep “Common Sense” going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.)


{Question inaudible]

Freedman: All right, I ll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all have a very high degree of intelligence, so I m going to make an attempt. In the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for a Judean.

Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as j , and the first syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts ghu . Now, when the Bible was written, it was first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic all those languages. Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn t exist. Judea was the country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only as a Judean. I ve seen those early the earliest scripts available.

In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.

There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as gyu , jew . At the time, there was no printing press.

Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that word passed through so many changes I have them all here. If you want I can read them to you. I will. That word gyu which was in the Wycliffe Bible became. . . first it was gyu , then giu , then iu (because the i in Latin is pronounced like the j . Julius Caesar is Iul because there is no j in Latin) then iuw , then ieuu , then ieuy , then iwe , then iow , then iewe , all in Bibles as time went on. Then ieue , then iue , then ive , and then ivw , and finally in the 18th century jew . Jew.

All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no such thing as Jew , and any theologian ~ I ve lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in Europe ~ there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was gyu ~ Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as we call a laboratory a lab , and gasoline gas a tendency to short up.

So, in England there were no public schools; people didn t know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can t harm the Jews, is just ridiculous. I d like to know where in the scriptures it says that. I d like to know the text.

Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called Jews ~ the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers ~ they weren t Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who d been converted to Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible]. No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn t exist. They pulled it out of the air. . . a meaningless word.

Just like anti-Semitic . The Arab is a Semite . And the Christians talk about people who don t like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn t one Jew who s a Semite. They re all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern European Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this reverend who told you these things, I ll convince him and it ll be one step in the right direction. I ll go wherever I have to go to meet him.


Yes, ma am. Well I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong. Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many that they create the impression that they are the Jewish race ; that they are the Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow it like a cream puff.

But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over the world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.

The Eastern Europeans said, What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre? That gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise so they can tell the Christians, Go to hell. We ll make any deal you want , but they don t have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people . So, they re not so united, and if you knew the feeling that exists. . .

Now, I ll also show you from an official document by the man responsible for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization in New York City, and in it is the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who ~ on behalf of the British Cabinet ~ negotiated the deal with these Zionists.

And in here he says that all the Jews in England were against it. The Jews who had been there for years, the [inaudible ~ probably Sephardim], those who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry who were monotheists and believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about a Christian race ? or a Christian religion? or are the Christians united?

So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I ll show you in this same document that when they went to France to try and get the French government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal

[Question inaudible] Freedman: You know why? Because if they don t, they re decked up. They come around and they tell you how much you must give, and if you don t . . . oh, you re anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends will have anything to do with them, and they start a smear campaign. . . and you have got to give.

In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the United Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, When you come into that building to call on someone and they haven t got a gold star, tell them that you won t buy from them until they have the gold star . BLACKMAIL. I don t know what else you can call it.

Then what do they do? They tell you it s for humanitarian purposes and they send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if they hadn t sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens? That seven billion dollars deficit ~ that air pocket ~ the gullible Christians have to make up.

They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to pay the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you let these people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their ancient homeland? And you say, Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no place to go and they ve been persecuted all their lives . They ve never been persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for their religion.

Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years there wasn t a Jew. But do you know why they were driven out? Because in the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it s a sin to charge rent for the use of money. In other words ~ what we call interest [usury] is a sin.

So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest, and when the Lords and Dukes couldn t pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made himself their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders. So the king finally said ~ and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your library.

When the king found out what the trouble was all about, and how much money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the revenues of the British Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews.

But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes kept killing the money-lenders, the King then said, I declare myself the heir of all the money-lenders. If they re killed you have to pay me, because I m his sole heir . That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the money with an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went across to Ireland, and that s how Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom.

When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a Jew was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never happened. It s always their impact on the political, social, or economic customs and traditions of the community in which they settle.


[Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by hearsay understood, what was happening in Europe.

When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to Western Europe and brought with them the very things to which you object and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the instincts with which they were endowed.

When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that s the name that they went by, and when the Christians first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia ~ who they were ~ that they had practiced this Talmudic faith ~ the Christians in Western Europe said, They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!

And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that ~ and he s probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every word of it is true they say it themselves.

I can give you half a dozen books they ve written in which they say the same thing: When they have money they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they become ruthless. They re only barbarians. They re the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.

What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did? The Czar had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need for them. . . they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn t want that. When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union.

There was no need for that. But they thought, Now is the time , and if you you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word Bolshevism , you ll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful revolution. One of them is, Wait for the right time, and then give them everything you ve got . It would pay you to read that.

You d also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been printing it.

[Question inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can t advocate that you do anything that s criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement: Mr. Kennedy s office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his office ~ was in his office ~ and gave me this. He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:

For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th . Israel is here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation .

Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that? Suppose three million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed ~ the Texans were disarmed ~ and one night they drove them all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What would the United States say?

Would we say it s aggression for these Texans to try to get their homes back from the Mexican thieves? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these people, the whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes?

Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, No, those Negroes now occupy them! Leave them there! , or No, those Mexicans are in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them there. You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else .

Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to go back to their homes? So now, you ve got to write to President Kennedy and say, We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the word, if these people want to return to their homes as the United Nations ~ fifteen times in the last twelve years ~ called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes and farms .

[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley\’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense .] Source

US Presidents, Jewish Pawns The Truth about Khazars His speech in 1974

After World War II The Morgenthau Plan was put into motion. It was a horrible plan. Many innocent people died because of it.

The Allies were no better then Hitler s Nazis. Something they neglected to teach us in school.

The Morgenthau P l an


World War I Approximately 16 million deaths.

World War II Approximately 60 million deaths.

The country that lost the most people during WW II was China, 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 perished. Civilian deaths in China 7,000,000 to 16,000,000.

The warning should have been taken seriously.

Seems Mr Freedman was right to warn Americans.

Related Articles

We will have to kill them all : Israeli Effie Eitam

West Bank Rabbi: Jews can kill Gentiles who threaten Israel including Children and even Babies

Who Benefited the most by J.F. Kennedy s Death?

Why: War in Iraq and Afghanistan

Rabbi s are just as abusive as those from any other Religions

Israel s Dirty Nuclear Secrets, Human experiments and WMD

Gaza (1): A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words

A very interesting Read.

The Great Zionist Cover Up

The UN as did J F Kennedy wanted inspectors in Israel. To this day inspectors have never been allowed in. WHY?

Resolution 487 (1981)Israel to place its nuclear facilities under IAEA/Refrain from Acts or Threats

Posted in Uncategorized


Friday, 28 November 2014


Application of Agenda 21
(See YouTube video to the upper Right for explanation of this controversial Canadian cartoon)
My personal favourite of the week.
This really did make me smile.
Oh, Canada!

Right down to the Kabalist red string around the wrist.
The victims of the Ukraine.
Chris took another wrong turn somewhere along the route.
This is NOT a gender specific image by a long shot.
The above and below are concerned with automobile terrorism in Israel. There is not a word about the Palestinians run over by mad colonists… er, settlers.

This is why we struggle
Amazingly there was a COPYRIGHT on the above. I nabbed it.
(By Jewish cartoonist Eli Valley)
The Jewish poison in Ireland, a truly Roman Catholic country at one time. My saintly Grandmother would be appalled!
Posted in Uncategorized