Netanyahu = Kuta ka Bacha = Kuton ka Baap

Benjamin Netanyahu’s warning reveals his moments of memory loss
By Robert Fisk
Israeli President “Bibi” Netanyahu on Guy Fawkes. The super-terrorist plans to blow up parliament and the King; the very nation will be liquidated. Fawkes was a Catholic rather than a Muslim – though Renaissance Europe was pretty good at bestialising both – but what a cartoon! I loved the curly fuse and the “flashy” bit on the end – Dan Dare versus The Mekon – and the red line drawn on the black line. It was all oh-so-convincing. Ninety per cent convincing.
Not since the last set of cartoons flourished in the UN Donkey House has the world been so gobsmacked. Then it was Colin Powell (I was in the Security Council chamber as a witness to this nonsense in 2003) who displayed his own cartoon of white-coated Iraqi chemists making weapons of mass destruction in a mobile laboratory. It was a railway train, for heaven’s sake. And, unlike Bibi’s bomb and fuse, it was actually meant to be a railway train. Cartoons, you see, can be taken literally or metaphorically. Or just plain insult the intelligence of ordinary folk; like Bibi’s – or cartoons of the Prophet Mohamed, for that matter. They all go “BANG” in the end. And I can see why Israel’s sorrowful defenders had to trash Bibi’s cartoon yesterday. Sure, it was awful – but the MESSAGE, that was the thing. Don’t let the cartoon distract you from the truth (albeit that cartoons are supposed to contain an inner truth, are they not?) and the truth according to Bibi was that Iran could have a nuclear bomb “BY THE MIDDLE OF NEXT YEAR”.
But whoops! Here’s a little downgrading for the reader. “Iran is the centre of terrorism, fundamentalism and subversion and is … more dangerous than Nazism, because Hitler did not possess a nuclear bomb …” Bibi speaking on Thursday? Nope. The ex-Prime Minister of Israel, Shimon Peres, in 1996. And – I’m indebted here to the indispensable Roger Cohen – Peres himself said in 1992 that Iran would have a nuclear bomb by 1999! That’s 13 years ago. And Ehud Barak – now Bibi’s Defence Minister – said in 1996 that Iran would have a nuke by 2004. That’s eight years ago. Maybe cartoons are all that’s left.
Of course, the think-tank loonies waffled on the networks, grinning idiotically over the cartoon but nodding sagely at Netanyahu’s warning – without bothering to recall those utterly false warnings in the past. You can’t cry wolf when the wolf is called Ahmadinejad.
Bloomberg’s columnist, Lisa Beyer, remarked that Netanyahu had noted “rightly, that Israel’s intelligence agencies are superb”. They are not. Israel’s intelligence on Lebanon has been pitiful for two decades, and it was these same “agencies” who assured Powell back in 2003 that Iraq did indeed have weapons of mass destruction. Later, we somehow forgot that little bit of false Israeli “intelligence” input.
Of course, the cartoon managed to distract us from the dignified speech by the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, whose condemnation of Israel’s land theft in the West Bank was infinitely more accurate than Netanyahu’s artwork. But Abbas spoke in Arabic, Netanyahu in American English. Only one man was going to be on the world’s screens yesterday. He did seem oddly hot under the collar about the UN’s almost-forgotten report on Israel’s cruelty during the 2008-9 Gaza war, when Israel’s “surgical strikes” – this is Bibi-speak – killed 1,300 Palestinians, most of them civilians. For a man obsessed with statistics, this one escaped Netanyahu’s memory.
But there you go. Iran is a dodgy place. Ahmadinejad is a crackpot, though he came across, in his new “moody” grey specs, as a bit more laid back than Bibi. Of course Iran’s going to have a nuke. Saddam was making one, too. Wasn’t he?

America – The Grim Truth

By Lance Freeman / Jun 10

Escape from the prison you call home

Americans, I have some bad news for you:

You have the worst quality of life in the developed world – by a wide margin.

If you had any idea of how people really lived in Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and many parts of Asia, you’d be rioting in the streets calling for a better life. In fact, the average Australian or Singaporean taxi driver has a much better standard of living than the typical American white-collar worker.

I know this because I am an American and I escaped from the prison you call home.

I have lived all around the world, in wealthy countries and poor ones, and there is only one country I would never consider living in again: The United States of America. The mere thought of it fills me with dread.

Consider this: You are the only people in the developed world without a single-payer health system. Everyone in Western Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, Singapore and New Zealand has a single-payer system. If they get sick, they can devote all their energies to getting well. If you get sick, you have to battle two things at once, your illness and the fear of financial ruin. Millions of Americans go bankrupt every year due to medical bills, and tens of thousands die each year because they have no insurance or insufficient insurance. And don’t believe for a second that rot about America’s having the world’s best medical care or the shortest waiting lists: I’ve been to hospitals in Australia, New Zealand, Europe, Singapore, and Thailand, and every one was better than the “good” hospital I used to go to back home. The waits were shorter, the facilities more comfortable, and the doctors just as good.

This is ironic, because you need a good health system more than anyone else in the world. Why? Because your lifestyle is almost designed to make you sick.

Let’s start with your diet: Much of the beef you eat has been exposed to fecal matter in processing. Your chicken is contaminated with salmonella. Your stock animals and poultry are pumped full of growth hormones and antibiotics. In most other countries, the government would act to protect consumers from this sort of thing; in the United States, the government is bought off by industry to prevent any effective regulations or inspections. In a few years, the majority of all the produce for sale in the United States will be from genetically modified crops, thanks to the cozy relationship between Monsanto Corporation and the United States government. Worse still, due to the vast quantities of high-fructose corn syrup Americans consume, fully one-third of children born in the United States today will be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at some point in their lives.

Of course, it’s not just the food that’s killing you; it’s also the drugs. If you show any sign of life when you’re young, they’ll put you on Ritalin. Then, when you get old enough to take a good look around, you’ll get depressed, so they’ll give you Prozac. If you’re a man, this will render you chemically impotent, so you’ll need Viagra to get it up. Meanwhile, your steady diet of trans-fat-laden food is guaranteed to give you high cholesterol, so you’ll get a prescription for Lipitor. Finally, at the end of the day, you’ll lay awake at night worrying about losing your health plan, so you’ll need Lunesta to go to sleep.

With a diet guaranteed to make you sick and a health system designed to make sure you stay that way, what you really need is a long vacation somewhere. Unfortunately, you probably can’t take one. I’ll let you in on little secret: If you go to the beaches of Thailand, the mountains of Nepal, or the coral reefs of Australia, you’ll probably be the only American in sight. And you’ll be surrounded by crowds of happy Germans, French, Italians, Israelis, Scandinavians and wealthy Asians. Why? Because they’re paid well enough to afford to visit these places AND they can take vacations long enough to do so. Even if you could scrape together enough money to go to one of these incredible places, by the time you recovered from your jetlag, it would be time to get on a plane and rush back to your job.

If you think I’m making this up, check the stats on average annual vacation days by country:

Finland: 44
Italy: 42
France: 39
Germany: 35
UK: 25
Japan: 18
USA: 12

The fact is, they work you like dogs in the United States. This should come as no surprise: The United States never got away from the plantation / sweat shop labor model, and any real labor movement was brutally suppressed. Unless you happen to be a member of the ownership class, your options are pretty much limited to barely surviving on service-sector wages or playing musical chairs for a spot in a cubicle (a spot that will be outsourced to India next week, anyway). The very best you can hope for is to get a professional degree and then milk the system for a slice of the middle-class pie. And even those who claw their way into the middle class are but one illness or job loss away from poverty. Your jobs aren’t secure. Your company has no loyalty to you. They’ll play you off against your co-workers for as long as it suits them; then they’ll get rid of you.

Of course, you don’t have any choice in the matter: The system is designed this way. In most countries in the developed world, higher education is either free or heavily subsidized; in the United States, a university degree can set you back over US$100,000. Thus, you enter the working world with a crushing debt. Forget about taking a year off to travel the world and find yourself – you’ve got to start working or watch your credit rating plummet.

If you’re “lucky,” you might even land a job good enough to qualify you for a home loan. And then you’ll spend half your working life just paying the interest on the loan – welcome to the world of American debt slavery. America has the illusion of great wealth because there’s a lot of “stuff” around, but who really owns it? In real terms, the average American is poorer than the poorest ghetto dweller in Manila, because at least they have no debts. If they want to pack up and leave, they can; if you want to leave, you can’t, because you’ve got debts to pay.

All this begs the question: Why would anyone put up with this? Ask any American, and you’ll get the same answer: “Because America is the freest country on earth.” If you believe this, I’ve got some more bad news for you: America is actually among the least free countries on earth. Your piss is tested, your emails and phone calls are monitored, your medical records are gathered, and you are never more than one stray comment away from writhing on the ground with two Taser prongs in your ass.

And that’s just physical freedom. Mentally, you are truly imprisoned. You don’t even know the degree to which you are tormented by fears of medical bankruptcy, job loss, homelessness, and violent crime because you’ve never lived in a country where there is no need to worry about such things.

But it goes much deeper than mere surveillance and anxiety. The fact is, you are not free because your country has been taken over and occupied by another government. Fully 70% of your tax dollars go to the Pentagon, and the Pentagon is the real government of the United States. You are required under pain of death to pay taxes to this occupying government. If you’re from the less fortunate classes, you are also required to serve and die in their endless wars, or send your sons and daughters to do so. You have no choice in the matter: There is a socio-economic draft system in the United States that provides a steady stream of cannon fodder for the military.

If you call a life of surveillance, anxiety, and ceaseless toil in the service of a government you didn’t elect “freedom,” then you and I have a very different idea of what that word means.

If there was some chance that the country could be changed, there might be reason for hope. But can you honestly look around and conclude that anything is going to change? Where would the change come from? The people? Take a good look at your compatriots: The working class in the United States has been brutally propagandized by jackals like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, and Sean Hannity. Members of the working class have been taught to lick the boots of their masters and then bend over for another kick in the ass. They’ve got these people so well trained that they’ll take up arms against the other half of the working class as soon as their masters give the word.

If the people cannot make a change, how about the media? Not a chance. From Fox News to the New York Times, the mass media in the United States is nothing but the public relations wing of the corporatocracy, primarily the military industrial complex. At least the citizens of the former Soviet Union knew that their news was bullshit. In America, you grow up thinking you’ve got a free media, which makes the propaganda doubly effective. If you don’t think American media is mere corporate propaganda, ask yourself the following question: Have you ever heard a major American news outlet suggest that the country could fund a single-payer health system by cutting military spending?

If change can’t come from the people or the media, the only other potential source of change would be the politicians. Unfortunately, the American political process is among the most corrupt in the world. In every country on earth, one expects politicians to take bribes from the rich. But this generally happens in secret, behind the closed doors of their elite clubs. In the United States, this sort of political corruption is done in broad daylight, as part of legal, accepted, standard operating procedure. In the United States, they merely call these bribes campaign donations, political action committees, and lobbyists. One can no more expect the politicians to change this system than one can expect a man to take an axe and chop his own legs out from underneath him.

No, the United States of America is not going to change for the better. The only change will be for the worse. And when I say worse, I mean much worse. As we speak, the economic system that sustained the country during the post-war years is collapsing. The United States maxed out its “credit card” sometime in 2008, and now its lenders – starting with China – are in the process of laying the foundations for a new monetary system to replace the Anglo-American “petro-dollar” system. As soon as there is a viable alternative to the US dollar, the greenback will sink like a stone.

While the United States was running up crushing levels of debt, it was also busy shipping its manufacturing and white-collar jobs overseas and letting its infrastructure fall to pieces. Meanwhile, Asian and European countries were investing in education, infrastructure, and raw materials. Even if the United States tried to rebuild a real economy (as opposed to a service / financial economy), do you think American workers would ever be able to compete with the workers of China or Europe? Have you ever seen a Japanese or German factory? Have you ever met a Singaporean or Chinese worker?

There are only two possible futures facing the United States, and neither one is pretty. The best case is a slow but orderly decline – essentially a continuation of what’s been happening for the last two decades. Wages will drop, unemployment will rise, Medicare and Social Security benefits will be slashed, the currency will decline in value, and the disparity of wealth will spiral out of control until the United States starts to resemble Mexico or the Philippines – tiny islands of wealth surrounded by great poverty (the country is already halfway there).

Equally likely is a sudden collapse – perhaps brought about by a rapid flight from the US dollar by creditor nations like China, Japan, Korea, and the OPEC nations. A related possibility would be a default by the United States government on its vast debt. One look at the financial balance sheet of the US government should convince you how likely this is: Governmental spending is skyrocketing, and tax receipts are plummeting – something has to give. If either of these scenarios plays out, the resulting depression will make the present recession look like a walk in the park.

Whether the collapse is gradual or gut-wrenchingly sudden, the results will be chaos, civil strife, and fascism. Let’s face it: The United States is like the former Yugoslavia – a collection of mutually antagonistic cultures united in name only. You’ve got your own version of the Taliban: right-wing Christian fundamentalists who actively loathe the idea of secular Constitutional government. You’ve got a vast intellectual underclass that has spent the last few decades soaking up Fox News and talk radio propaganda, eager to blame the collapse on Democrats, gays, and immigrants. You’ve got a ruthless ownership class that will use all the means at its disposal to protect its wealth from the starving masses.

On top of all that, you’ve got vast factory farms, sprawling suburbs, and a truck-based shipping system – all of it entirely dependent on oil that is about to become completely unaffordable. And you’ve got guns. Lots of guns. In short: the United States is about to become a very unwholesome place to be.

Right now, the government is building fences and walls along its northern and southern borders. Right now, the government is working on a national ID system (soon to be fitted with biometric features). Right now, the government is building a surveillance state so extensive that they will be able to follow your every move online, in the streets, and across borders. If you think this is just to protect you from “terrorists,” then you’re sadly mistaken. Once the shit really hits the fan, do you really think you’ll just be able to jump into the old station wagon, drive across the Canadian border, and spend the rest of your days fishing and drinking Molson? No, the government is going to lock the place down. They don’t want their tax base escaping. They don’t want their “recruits” escaping. They don’t want YOU escaping.

I am not writing this to scare you. I write this to you as a friend. If you are able to read and understand what I’ve written here, then you are a member of a small minority in the United States. You are a minority in a country that has no place for you.

So, what should you do?

You should leave the United States of America.

If you’re young, you’ve got plenty of choices. You can teach English in the Middle East, Asia, or Europe. Or you can go to university or graduate school abroad and start building skills that will qualify you for a work visa. If you’ve already got some real work skills, you can apply to emigrate to any number of countries as a skilled immigrant. If you are older and you’ve got some savings, you can retire to a place like Costa Rica or the Philippines. If you can’t qualify for a work, student, or retirement visa, don’t let that stop you – travel on a tourist visa to a country that appeals to you and talk to the expats you meet there. Whatever you do, go speak to an immigration lawyer as soon as you can. Find out exactly how to get on a path that will lead to permanent residence and eventually citizenship in the country of your choice.

You will not be alone. There are millions of Americans just like me living outside the United States. Living lives much more fulfilling, peaceful, free, and abundant than we ever could have attained back home. Some of us happened upon these lives by accident (we tried a year abroad and found that we liked it), while others made a conscious decision to pack up and leave for good. You’ll find us in Canada, all over Europe, in many parts of Asia, in Australia and New Zealand, and in most other countries of the globe. Do we miss our friends and family? Yes. Do we occasionally miss aspects of our former country? Yes. Do we plan on ever living again in the United States? Never. And those of us with permanent residence or citizenship can sponsor family members from back home for long-term visas in our adopted countries.

In closing, I want to remind you of something – unless you are an American Indian or a descendant of slaves, at some point your ancestors chose to leave their homelands in search of a better life. They weren’t traitors and they weren’t bad people, they just wanted a better life for themselves and their families. Isn’t it time that you continue their journey?

This article first appeared on Information Clearing House and has been reproduced with their kind permission.

Will Israel Blow Up Something and Falsely Blame It On Iran?

israelus2According to U.S. officials, Israel is training and supporting Iranian terrorists who are trying to topple the Iranian government. Those Israeli-funded terrorists have faked documents to falsely indicate that Iran is building a nuclear bomb. 1

Israel has admitted to previous use of false flag attacks to justify war against Middle Eastern nations.

For example,   Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

Numerous high-level government officials have warned that a false flag may be launched against Iran to start a war: 2

  • Ron Paul has warned of a “Gulf of Tonkin type incident” in Iran
  • The highly influential Brookings Institution wrote a report in 2009 called “Which Path to Persia?” which states (pages 84-85):

It would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be.Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. (One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.)

  • A number of very high-level former intelligence officers – including several that personally briefed presidents every day on matters of national security – stated that better communications between the U.S. and Iran were needed to “reduce the danger of … covert, false-flag attack”

One of America’s top constitutional and military law experts – Jonathan Turley – writes today:

Many critics have argued that there is a concerted effort to push the United States into a war with Iran by supporters of Israel. Patrick Clawson, director of research for the highly influential pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank, seemed intent to prove those rumors true this week in comments as a luncheon on “How to Build US-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout.” Clawson casually discusses how to create a false flag operation to push the U.S. into war to overcome any reluctance by the public. We have been discussing how many leaders like Senator Joe Lieberman had begun to use the same rhetoric that led to the last two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how the suggest timing of an attack has been tied to the presidential election.

In his remarks, Clawson helpfully lists a series of historical events used to push the country into war like the Gulf of Tonkin incident that gave us the Vietnam War. Clawson expressed his frustration in acknowledging that it is “[v]ery hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran.” However, there is hope. Clawson explains that the “traditional way” to get the country into a war is through false flags or manufactured incidents where Americans are killed. Thus, he observes, “we are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians, we could get nastier about it. So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war.”

The fact that one of the leading analysis for the WINEP would feel comfortable in making such comments is itself quite chilling. It indicates that such discussions have become sufficiently regular that it has creeped into public discussion. It is a measure of the secret pressure building to push this country into a third major war despite our crippling economic conditions and losses in military personnel. The assumption in Washington is that neither Romney nor Obama could oppose such a war. Even if Obama does not publicly support Israel, the assumption is that political allies of Israel in Washington can guarantee that we would offer extensive military loans and intelligence. Even if there is a delay in such military loans and support, the assumption is that Israel can go to war with the understanding that the United States will cover a significant portion of the costs. Moreover, in his remarkably candid remarks, Clawson shows how the U.S. can easily be forced into direct combat by pushing Iran to simply kill some Americans or sink a few of our ships. Then members would be clamoring for revenge. Notably, the Israelis have been ratcheting up the war rhetoric in pushing Iran, which predictably has now reserved the right to engage in a preemptive strike not just against Israeli but U.S. interests. We would then, again, find ourselves in a war without any public debate or collective decision.

While Clawson adds a passing caveat that he is not advocating such an approach, his remarks are clearly designed to show how the group can get the United States into a war for Israel if only we can get Iran to kill some of our citizens or soldiers. Those people are of course expendable props in Clawson’s realpolitik.

By the way, Clawson has been enlisted to give his insightful analysis at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. He is also a member of the National Defense University’s Institute for National Strategic Studies. The World Bank connection is particularly interesting given the history with Paul Wolfowitz who pushed the U.S. into two disastrous wars in the Bush Administration and was rewarded with being made the head of the World Bank.

It is the callous disconnect that is most chilling in these remarks. Thousands of U.S. soldiers have died or have been crippled for life in these wars that have left the country near bankruptcy (and increasingly hostile “allies” in Afghanistan and Iraq). Those casualties and costs, however, appear immaterial in the discussion of supporting Israel in a war against Iran.


1  Top American and Israeli military and intelligence officials actually say that:

2   False flag attacks have been carried out against Iran in the past.  For example, the CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister

3 Saudi Arabia has also been supporting terrorists.

Microsoft admits Patriot Act can access EU-based cloud data

Average’s comments:
I know that SOME of you guys have really talked up how wonderful the cloud is. When I said hell no, you all said, “Come on Average, isn’t there one day that you won’t shit in the sunlight?” Well here is the cloud for you…. and enjoy the stink, as you lose your file data… while the government is watching you… and you can’t watch over them….
By Zack Whittaker | June 28, 2011, 8:10am PDT


Microsoft’s UK head admitted today that no cloud data is safe from the Patriot Act — and Microsoft will hand it over to U.S. authorities.
LONDON — At the Office 365 launch, Gordon Frazer, managing director of Microsoft UK, gave the first admission that cloud data — regardless of where it is in the world — is not protected against the USA PATRIOT Act.
It was honestly music to my ears. After a year of researching the Patriot Act’s breadth and ability to access data held within protected EU boundaries, Microsoft finally and openly admitted it.
The question put forward:

“Can Microsoft guarantee that EU-stored data, held in EU based datacenters, will not leave the European Economic Area under any circumstances — even under a request by the Patriot Act?”

Frazer explained that, as Microsoft is a U.S.-headquartered company, it has to comply with local laws (the United States, as well as any other location where one of its subsidiary companies is based).
Though he said that “customers would be informed wherever possible”, he could not provide a guarantee that they would be informed — if a gagging order, injunction or U.S. National Security Letter permits it.
He said: “Microsoft cannot provide those guarantees. Neither can any other company“.
While it has been suspected for some time, this is the first time Microsoft, or any other company, has given this answer.
Any data which is housed, stored or processed by a company, which is a U.S. based company or is wholly owned by a U.S. parent company, is vulnerable to interception and inspection by U.S. authorities.
Last week, Microsoft opened up its Online Services Trust Center which explained in great detail how data was managed, handled and if necessary, handed over to the authorities.
Related content:

Also read ZDNet’s Patriot Act series:

Masons, Cabala and the 9/11 Cabal

By Captain Eric H. May, Ghost Troop CO

Secret societies are a pernicious presence throughout the history of the United States. George Washington, our great inceptor, denounced the dark doctrines of Illuminism, which he believed threatened the Republic:

“The Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism (have) spread in the United States. … No one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.”

Today’s Republican Party is derived from the Whig Party, as many know. Not many, however, know that the Whig Party was derived from our country’s first third party, the Anti-Masonic Party of the 1820′s and 30′s. The party’s opposition to Freemasonry was derived from the murder of William Morgan, ike Washington, a Freemason who was blowing the whistle on what he had come to regard as a diabolic criminal system. The date of Morgan’s murder is chilling: 9/11, 1826.

On 9/11, 1857, a party of Mormons (a cult zealous about Freemasonry), massacred some 120 settlers passing through Utah on the way to California, in what came to be called the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

These Freemasonic cult killings, of course, foreshadow 9/11/01, our New Pearl Harbor, which took place on the 175th anniversary of the Morgan murder and the 144th (12 x 12) anniversary of the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

9/11′s four airplane flight numbers are codes. I present them in chronological order, according to the official 9/11 story:

  • 11 — The key number in most false flag terror attacks since 9/11/01.
  • 175 — A not-so-subtle reminder of the Morgan murder, 175 years earlier, for any potential whistle blowers.
  • 77 — Struck the Pentagon on its 60th anniversary (9/11/41), and foreshadowed the UK 7/7/05 attacks.
  • 93 — Contains day numbers for the 9/11/01 and 3/11/04 (Madrid) attacks — between which there was a span of 911 days.

Since calendar coding is crucial to conspiracies, here are two separate terror timetables, the first anchored by 9/11/01, and the second by 6/6/06. Omit the zeros to see the occult (i.e., hidden) numbers. Ghost Troop was involved in the resistance against italicized items, and readers will find convincing documentation of our role in the Ghost Troop campaign history below the calendar decryption.

9/11/01 Overt Calendar:

  • 3/3/96 (33) — Houston Jews dedicate their holocaust museum.
  • 9/11/1997 (911) — New York City’s Jews dedicate their holocaust museum.
  • 10/12/2000 (1122) — Al Qaeda attacks USS Cole.
  • 9/11/2001 (911) — Al Qaeda attacks Twin Towers, 33 years, 33 days after the 8/8/68 beginning of the construction of WTC 1.
  • 3/20/2003 (3223) — U.S. Invades Iraq.
  • 3/11/2004 (311) — Al Qaeda bombs Madrid.
  • 3/30/2004 (33) — BP Texas City refinery explodes.
  • 9/26/04 (926) — Pipeline explosion/terror attack, New Caney, Texas
  • 3/23/05 (323) — BP Texas City refinery explodes.
  • 7/27/05 (727) — BP Texas City attempts a nuclear false flag.*
  • 1/31/06 (131) — BP Texas City attempts a nuclear false flag.+
  • 2/1/06 — Synthron Chemical, Morganton, NC, attempts a false flag.

911 Covert Schedule:

  • Between the Cole and the Towers: 333 days
  • Between the Towers and the Iraq War: 555 days.
  • Between the Towers and Madrid: 911 days.
  • Between the Towers and Texas City, 3/30/04: 930 days.
  • Between the Towers and New Caney, 1110 days.
  • Between Texas City, 3/30/04 and Texas City 3/23/05: 357 days
  • Between New Caney and Texas City, 7/27/05: 303 days.
  • Between Texas City, 3/23/05 and Texas City, 1/31/06: 313 days.
  • The Synthron Chemical explosion occurred the day after Texas City, 1/31/2006.

L to R: SPC Tillman, SPC Peterson, Rachel Corrie, CPT May, COL Westhusing

666 Overt Calendar:

  • 10/11/2002 (11122) — U.S. Senate passes Iraq War Resolution.
  • 10/12/2002 (11222) — Bali bombings give Australia its causus belli.
  • 4/19/04 (4194) — Attempted terror strike on Sears Tower on the 9thand 11th anniversaries of Oklahoma City and Waco.
  • 7/7/05 (77) — London bombings renew UK zeal for Mideast wars.
  • 5/3/06 (53) — Attempted terror attack on Sears Tower on the 33rd anniversary of its 5/3/73 completion.

  • 6/6/06 (666) — Key reference date is identical with the Sears Tower zip code 60606 (666).
  • 7/11/06 (711) — Mumbai bombings turn India against Pakistan.
  • 7/12/06 — Israel invades Lebanon.
  • 4/19/2009, Chicago Jews dedicate their holocaust museum.
  • 7/30/2009, Obama hosts “Beer Summit” after attempting a false flag against Bryan, Texas.

666 Covert Schedule:

  • The Bali Bombings happen the day after the Iraq War Resolution.
  • Between the Iraq War Resolution and the London Bombings there are 999 days.
  • Between Sears Tower, 4/19/4, and 6/6/06 there are 777 days.
  • Between the London Bombings and 6/6/06 there are 333 days.
  • Between Sears Tower 5/3/06 and 6/6/06 there are 33 days.
  • Between the London Bombings and the Mumbai bombings there are 389 days.
  • The Israeli invasion of Lebanon occurs the day after the Mumbai bombings.
  • Between the dedication of the holocaust museum in Chicago and the Brynn false flag attempt there are 101 days.

* The explosion, fire and HAARP attack against Texas City occurred on 7/28/2005, a day later than the 7/27/2005 scheduled date because of the resistance, led by Ghost Troop.

+The mainstream media reported a WMD “day-after” team alarming Texas City on 2/1/2006, which means that the “simulated” nuclear attack that they were responding to had been scripted for 1/31/2006.

Ghost Troop “9/11-2B” Campaigns:

These are the documented infowar campaigns of Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cyber-Cavalry, and its infowar allies of individuals and groups who have fought before us, with us and after us. I salute them all as part of the extended family of The Holy Horde!

  1. 11/26/10, Portland, OR, “Tree Bomber” false flag attempt
  2. 11/6-11/10: USA, Biden/Netanyahu nuclear reactors false flag attempt
  3. 7/31-8/14/09: Ft Leavenworth, KS false flag attempt against Kansas City
  4. 7/30/09: Bryan, TX, El Dorado Chemical fire — (1) alert (2) analysis
  5. 2 /16-17/09, Chicago, IL, Stimulus Bill false flag attempt
  6. 10/18-19/07: Portland, OR, TOPOFF-4 false flag attempt
  7. 10/18/07: Port Arthur, TX, Dow Chemical explosion
  8. 7/19/05: Beirut, Lebanon, Israeli false flag attempt against Orient Queen
  9. 7/2/06: Baytown, TX, ExxonMobil refinery explosion — the alert
  10. 5/3/06: Sears Tower, Chicago, IL, false flag attempt
  11. 2/1/06, Morganton, NC, Synthron Chemical explosion
  12. 1/31/06: Texas City, TX, BP refinery false flag attempt
  13. 7/28/05: Texas City, TX, BP refinery explosion
  14. 9/26/04: New Caney, TX, pipeline explosion – the alert
  15. 4/19/04: Sears Tower, Chicago, IL, false flag attempt
  16. 3/30/04: Texas City, TX, BP refinery explosion

USA Will Invade And Occupy Pakistan Soon – Ron Paul

Texas congressman and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” predicted the U.S. will invade and occupy Pakistan.
“I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan,” he said. “I think that’s the next occupation and I fear it. I think it’s ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we don’t need to be doing this.”

U.S. Presidential candidate Ron Paul Predicts US Military Involvement in Pakistan
NEW YORK, May 19 2011 —

Congressman Ron Paul sees no way out of the war in Afghanistan

In fact, the Texas Republican, who announced his candidacy for president last week, believes the U.S. is primed to send forces into Pakistan. Appearing on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Wednesday, Paul, who has fervently opposed U.S. military involvement in both Iraq and Afghanistan, said, “I think that we are going to be in Pakistan. I think that’s the next occupation and I fear it. I think it’s ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we don’t need to be doing this.”

Paul said the Obama administration telegraphed its future intentions with the successful raid to get Osama bin Laden, who was living undetected in Abbottabad, Pakistan for the past several years. That mission and other actions, including sending unmanned drones to kill al Qaeda and Taliban members in Pakistan’s northwestern region, are tantamount to creating civil war and violating our ally’s national security, according to Paul, who has promised to withdraw all American forces out of Afghanistan if elected president

US will invade Pakistan
Ron Paul fears
By Jordan Fabian – 18-May-2011
GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul is worried the U.S. could invade Pakistan after Osama bin Laden’s death. “I am absolutely afraid we will be in Pakistan trying to occupy that country,” Paul, a congressman from Texas and a critic of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
Paul acknowledged he has no solid evidence that the U.S. has plans to “invade” Pakistan, but described his observation as being based on American foreign policy over the past two or three decades, and its “unintended consequences.” Paul implied that the Obama administration’s apparent mistrust of Pakistan’s ability to fight terrorism could lead to a full-scale invasion.
While most politicians in both parties have celebrated the mission ordered by President Obama to enter Pakistan and take out bin Laden, Paul has been a critic. He has said he would not have auhorized the mission to kill bin Laden, because of problems with international law. Paul also has said that the killing of bin Laden should convince the U.S. to bring home its troops from Afghanistan.

Ron Paul: We’ll occupy Pakistan, too

By JUANA SUMMERS | 5/18/2011

The helicopters that landed in Abbottabad won’t be the last to put American troops on the ground in Pakistan, says Rep. Ron Paul. Calling the relationship between the United States and Pakistan an “impossible situation,” the Texas congressman and Republican presidential candidate said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that he sees an occupation of even greater scale than Afghanistan on the horizon.
“I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan,” he said. “I think that’s the next occupation and I fear it. I think it’s ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we don’t need to be doing this.” And Paul doesn’t have high hopes for that mission, if it happens. “It will probably be very unsuccessful,” he said. Paul, a noted non-interventionist, said the United States has created a civil war in Pakistan and violated the country’s national security. He also addressed the idea of conspiracy theories popping up about bin Laden and the raid.
“How many stories have we heard already about the killing of bin Laden,” Paul asked. “I mean, people are supposed to know what their government’s doing. If you ask me exactly what happened, I have no idea because I’ve heard so many stories.” Asked by “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski if he had just floated a conspiracy theory himself, Paul flatly said “no.”
“I think the inept policy invites people to think about conspiracy theories because we don’t get all the evidence,” Paul said. “I think there will be plenty of conspiracy theories because we’re presenting facts that we’re changing on almost a daily basis.”

Ron Paul: US-Pakistan relations an “Impossible Situation”
May 18th, 2011
Texas Representative and 2012 Presidential candidate Ron Paul declared Wednesday morning that he considered the relationship between the United State and Pakistan to be an “impossible situation”, and that occupation of the country was one of his fears looking at the next move for the United States after the discovery of Bin Laden’s hide out in the city of Abbottad for the major part of the last decade.
During an interview with MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Paul called the increased tensions between Pakistan and the US “a mess” and said that in the event of an occupation attempt he believed it would be “unsuccessful”. Paul also questioned the number of “stories” he had heard in relation to the raid on Bin Laden’s compound that resulted in the death of the terrorist mastermind and financier. When asked if he was contributing to the number of “conspiracy theories” surrounding the event, Paul claimed that he was of the belief that the public should know exactly how their government was operating, and President Obama’s “inept policy” had proliferated such responses to the account of Bin Laden’s death, commenting that the “facts” given to the media by officials were “changing daily”.
In a related story, Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann, a member of the House Intelligence Committee was part of a group of politicians allowed to view the photos of Bin Laden’s corpse last week in a visit to the CIA offices, and tweeted she was indeed “convinced we got our man”. Paul, who has long touted his anti-intervention stances when it comes to foreign policy, has thrust much of his campaigns spotlight upon the issue of foreign aid to the country, since the raid that killed Bin Laden nearly two weeks ago.

The United States has invested approximately $20 billion in the country, where reportedly almost half of that amount has gone towards “reimbursement” for Pakistan’s military actions supporting our war against terror. Pakistani leadership has repeatedly claimed that they were not aware of Bin Laden’s presence inside the country, and have expressed outrage over the White House’s decision to go ahead with the compound raid without alerting their government. Paul also recently opposed the raid itself, saying that it was not a move that he would have made, had he been President in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City.

Ron Paul: ‘US plans to occupy Pakistan’

May 19, 2011

United States Presidential Candidate and Congressman Ron Paul

A Republican congressman says he fears the US could invade Pakistan, as the controversy over the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden frays ties between the two countries. In an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, 2012 presidential candidate Ron Paul labeled the current relations between Washington and Islamabad as an “impossible situation” and expressed concerns that the US may seek occupation of Pakistan after the discovery of al-Qaeda chief in the country’s soil, Politico reported.

“I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan,” the Texas Republican said. “I am absolutely afraid we will be in Pakistan trying to occupy that country.” He went on to describe his observation as being based on American foreign policy over the past two or three decades, adding that any such move this time in Pakistan will have “unintended consequences.” “It will probably be very unsuccessful,” added the congressman, who is also a critic of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Elsewhere in his remarks, Paul called into question the number of stories surrounding the raid on bin Laden’s alleged compound in the city of Abbottabad, and urged the administration of US President Barack Obama to come clean about its operations at a time when the information fed to the media is changing on a daily basis. “How many stories have we heard already about the killing of bin Laden,” he questioned. “I mean, people are supposed to know what their government’s doing. If you ask me exactly what happened, I have no idea because I’ve heard so many stories.”

The US lawmaker also stated that he would not have given the green light to the mission to kill bin Laden, because of problems with international law, and accused the US administration of violating Pakistan’s national security. Obama announced on May 1 that US forces conducted a military operation in Pakistan without the knowledge of the host country to kill what the US government describes as the ‘most wanted man’ in the world in his compound near the capital city of Islamabad.

Observers ask why the US did not allow for an official identification of bin Laden’s body through a DNA testing before permanently disposing it while a number of former US military officers as well as some Pakistani officials have already asserted that bin Laden was killed during the early stages of the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.

Many Pakistani military and intelligence officials argue that the US falsely claims that bin Laden has been killed as part of a wider scheme to invade the country.

Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich want US Troops Pulled From Pakistan

By Julian E. Barnes, JULY 23, 2010,

Reps. Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are teaming up to force a debate on the House floor next week aimed at compelling the Obama administration to pull U.S. military forces from Pakistan.

Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D., Ohio) and Ron Paul (R., Texas) at a news conference on June 16, 2005, to announce bipartisan legislation calling on President George W. Bush to set a plan for beginning phase-out of U.S. troops in Iraq. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

There are about 200 military personnel in Pakistan, and up to 120 are assigned to train the Pakistani military in the volatile tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that U.S. special operations forces were now accompanying members of the Pakistan military’s Frontier Corps on humanitarian missions.

Kucinich, a liberal Ohio Democrat, said he decided to introduce the resolution after reading the Journal article. Citing the War Powers Act, Kucinich said the Obama administration has failed to properly notify Congress about the U.S. forces in Pakistan.

Congressional leaders would like to avoid a debate on the U.S. presence in Pakistan. But by introducing a privileged resolution, Kucinich was able to force the House leadership to give him time on the floor along with Paul, a Texas Republican who has opposed the war in Afghanistan. The resolution would require the Obama administration to pull U.S. military trainers out of Pakistan by the end of the year.

Earlier this year, Kucinich forced a similar debate on a resolution to withdraw from Afghanistan. That resolution was easily voted down. “Look at the history of U.S. military involvement; we became enmeshed in a war against Vietnam with advisers leading the way,” Kucinich said. “Mr. Paul and I are seeking to nip in the bud an expansion of U.S. ground presence in Pakistan.”

Ron Paul: Obama Is Preparing for Perpetual War

Ron Paul: Obama Is Preparing for Perpetual War 031209RP

Congressman addresses warmongers, directly asks Gates, Clinton if they support Bush doctrine of “preventive war”

Steve Watson,
Dec 3, 2009

In comments before the House and during a televised interview yesterday, Congressman Ron Paul pointed out that with the decision to increase troop presence in Afghanistan and into Pakistan, president Obama is preparing to continue on the path of “perpetual war for perpetual peace”.

“I think it’s a bit misleading.” The Congressman told Fox Business, following Obama’s speech to the nation last night. “I think Obama is actually preparing us for perpetual war. He’s been warning in that speech and elsewhere that we will be going into Pakistan. The idea that we’re going to bring our troops home eventually is just not so.” Paul added.

“There’s no way that he’s going to be able to pay for this. This is going to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and we don’t have the money and it’s going to bring us down if we don’t stop it.” The Congressman continued. “All wars are paid for through inflation, this will just put more pressure on the Fed to create more money, because I don’t believe it would help us one bit to tax the people to pay for the war, they’ll try to, but that would be devastating to the economy.”

In response to charges of advocating a policy of cut and run in Afghanistan, the Congressman pointed out that the Taliban were previously allies, and also that according to the U.S. army’s own reports there are only a total of 100 Al Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan. “We’re following this precept of perpetual war for perpetual peace, and to me it’s perpetual bankruptcy.” Paul said. “They claim they’re not nation building, they claim we’re in there for national security, to destroy Al Qaeda, but our very presence is the motivation for people to join Al Qaeda or the Taliban.”

“How many more people have to die just for us to save face?” The Congressman asked. “The strength that we need is a president who finally resists the pressure by the special interests, the military industrial complex, the bankers and all the people who want these wars.” Paul said.

Earlier in the day, during a a joint hearing on Afghanistan following Obama’s speech, The Congressman had stern words for Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “I wish I could promise you an eloquent statement where I could convert all of you to a non-interventionist foreign policy and a policy where we’re not nation building.” Paul commented.

“I wish that I could come up with some profound questions for the panel so that I could point out the inconsistencies not of the current foreign policy, but of the foreign policy that has been going on for quite a few decades. But all I can think about are some terms that come to mind that I learned all the way back in the 1960s when I was serving as a military officer, an air force officer, for five years. And come up with thoughts ‘quagmire’, ‘perpetual war for perpetual peace’, ‘war is the health of the state’, ‘war is a racket’, ‘truth is the first casualty of war’.”

The Congressman also asked Gates and Clinton “Do you endorse the Bush doctrine of “preventive war”, or do you reject it”, prompting the following response from Clinton: “We were attacked from Afghanistan, so even if the doctrine is or is not an appropriate one, it is not applicable to the situation before us.” “We were never attacked by an Afghani.” Paul rebutted.

Watch the Congressman’s comments and questions below:

Clinton seems to have conveniently forgotten that the plan to attack Afghanistan was drawn up before 9/11, so her point about the U.S. being attacked first is completely irrelevant. Even if you believe the official story of 9/11, the plot was carried out by Saudi nationals and planned in Europe, it cannot be used as a valid reason for attacking Afghanistan.

Congressman Paul reiterated his earlier comments in remarks on the House floor, calling the U.S. wars “the rule rather than the exception”, adding “Someday we’re going to have to wake up and look at the type of foreign policy that the founders advised us to have, and that is nonintervention.”

“The compassion we impart to those who can give us nothing is the true measure of who we are.”
– Rick Tringale

“A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty – it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.”
– Albert Einstein
“I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, I am ungrateful to these teachers”
– Khalil Gibran
“Music expresses that which cannot be said and on which it is impossible to be silent.”
– Victor Hugo

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
– Francois-Marie Arouet “Voltaire”

“If a man like Muhamed (pbuh) were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness.”
– George Bernard Shaw

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
– George Orwell

“Do not worry that children never listen to you; worry that they are watching you”
– Robert Fulghum

“The accomplice to the crime of corruption is often our own indifference”
– Bess Myerson

“Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty, and dies with chaos.”
– Will Durant

“Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.”
– Will Durant

“Democracy is a form of government that substitutes ‘election by the incompetent-many’ for ‘appointment by the corrupt-few’.”
– George Bernard Shaw

“Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.”
– George Bernard Shaw

“May you live every day of your life.”
– Jonathan Swift

“Pity the nation… that welcomes its new ruler with trumpeting, farewells him with hooting, only to welcome another with trumpeting again.”
– Khalil Jibran

“In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends”.
– Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music.”
– Angela Monet

“Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”
– Jean-Jacques Rousseau

“Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.”
– Voltaire

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.”
– Samuel P. Huntington (author The Clash Of Civilisations)

If you love somebody, let them go.if they return, they were always yours. And if they don’t, they never were.
– Khalil Gibran

A view from no man’s land- 911 Truth Tellers v. Shills

XXXX, Salaam alaikum,

I am going to give you a piece of my mind as a sincere Muslim brother. I don’t want any form of flippant one liners as a response. If you are going to do that, then don’t bother responding to me. I want you to think carefully about your opinions before you even bother responding to me.

A few months back I read an interview with you and Daniel Pipes. I hate to say this but Pipes mopped you up. I am saying this as someone who is true to his Islam, not because he knew what he was saying, but because you either need to bone up on your Islamic knowledge or just get out of the discussion. This is a war not just where lives are lost, and we are losing this battle of lives, but also of the mind.

You are out of your league until you get the facts and know the facts like you know the back of your hand. Until then there is no use in even bothering with a discussion. As an outside of observer of you, I get the feeling that you are being used, it is not that you intend on being used, but that is the fact. For example, in the 911 truth movement, there are a few nuts out there. They believe, for example, that UFO’s attacked. You know what, some of them sincerely believe it. They are being used. They don’t intend on being used, but they are, they are used as a showcase for the rest of us. Some of them actually do NOT believe that UFO’s attacked, but they join right in as well to make, once again, the rest of us look bad.

You are probably sincere, but you don’t seem to understand what is going on with the situation with Islam, 911, Muslims and the West, and even the history of the West and the Muslim world. I could give you the history of the world, but where would it lead.

In the situation that we are living in now, you can not say, “Peace and Pluralism” without compromising the core values of Islam, and I assume that you are a committed Muslim (just out of curiosity are you Ismaili?). There are two ways that Islam is being fought, and it follows the good cop-bad cop routine. The bad cop will use the means of physical, mental, spiritual and psychological force to break people. The bad cop uses the good nature of people to change people. The end result is the same. The end of Islam and Muslims. They might not win, but the damage done, the damage that is being done, is immeasurable. What I am talking about is not something fantastic or crazy, it has happened in history, and people are not learning. The Crimeans, a Muslim people, are EXTINCT. They were destroyed during the Crimean War, killed off or deported to other lands.

Fast forward to the present. Why are concentration camps being set up for Muslims being set up? You will sites that will give their opinions. You can decide to choose that Muslims brought it upon themselves for not condemning terrorism. This plan has been in the works for almost 30 years if not more. Here is more info, and here.

This is in preparation, for at least an attempt on Muslims. When one side says Islam is a problem, Islam = terrorism, get those Muslims, illegally invade Muslim countries, and then asks for loyalty screenings for Muslims, and the other extreme side says let’s all be love and goodness, and embrace Muslims, and the middle side wants an “intellectual analysis” of Islam. Then YOU Johnny-come-lately with your “FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP” stuff. What you have done is play right into their hands. You lend credence to the LIE that Muslims did not condemn 911 “AS A GROUP” until you came along. You lend credence to the LIE that Muslims were silent about 911 until you came along. You helped people believe that until YOU came along there were NO voices because “FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP THAT CONDEMNS TERRORISM” crap because it was you that at least gave voice to the discussion. You got some media attention, the only problem is that you were clearly mopped up and spit out the majority of the interviews. I am sure you wanted to be, and probably think you were, a lone voice in the wilderness. The only problem is that you were used to make the serious people look like complete dipsticks.

Back to the subject of 911. I quote you:

The conspiracy theory sounds very logical but until it is proven, the other story remains in circulation as a fact.

I have to ask you here, how old are you, XXXX? I am sure you are older than me, and I am no spring chicken. What you are saying is that “the conspiracy theory” sounds right, but everyone else believes the other story so its a fact. I retroactively FAIL you in all branches of arithmetic, math, computer science, and logic. This is worse than what my niece said, “its true because mom said so”. You are an ADULT. Think, use your brain, not your PAYCHECK.

I repeat your quote:

The conspiracy theory sounds very logical but until it is proven, the other story remains in circulation as a fact.

YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done.
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! If an evil-liver bring you tidings, verify it, lest ye smite some folk in ignorance and afterward repent of what ye did.
SHAKIR: O you who believe! if an evil-doer comes to you with a report, look carefully into it, lest you harm a people in ignorance, then be sorry for what you have done.

XXXX I don’t want to beat a dead horse, but did you even bother to research this issue, or is ZZZZZ ZZZZZ and her wasted 8 thousand dollars SO CONVINCING (no details provided by her), that she got you hook line and sinker? Why is it that Muslims have been screeching at the top of their lungs to main points:

  • We didn’t do it
  • Islam condemns this

In an ORGANIZED way… Yet you stated categorically “FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP THAT CONDEMNS TERRORISM” 3 to 4 years after the fact? You did not ascertain the truth. You did harm people unwittingly.

Let me digress a moment. Who seem to be your associates in email, ZZZZZ and YYYYY? Let me give you a little history of YYYYY. He is wanted by the ISI for anti-Pakistani pro-MQM activities in Karachi. The American government is paying for his idiocity. On the Pakistani groups he has stirred the pot by posting anti-Pakistani pro-Bangali, pro-Indian propaganda. On the Bangali groups, he has stirred the pot by posting anti-Bangali pro-Pakistani propaganda! I want you to see the archives of the following groups:

  • Pakistan Affairs
  • Bangla Vision
  • Notun Bangladesh

Why would someone do that? Have you read his postings in any detail? Why is it that most of the references for his claims always go back to himself? Why does he rarely provide verification for the things that he writes? He is a fake. You are communicating with fakes. You are having sympathy with fakes.

Here is ZZZZZ, she claims to have been an anti-semitic jew hating “mother”. She never provided, not once, any detail of that. She just says, I did my research, I no longer hate jews. In a discussion about Afghanistan, I made the point clear, and you should know this, that the Taleban single handedly eradicated poppy production in Afghanistan. She changes the subject, and asks who was responsible for the invasion of Afghanistan in 79? I said, Brezhnev. She said THERE WAS NO SOVIET INVASION OF AFGHANISTAN, IT WAS AN INVITATION BY THE AFGHAN COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT. She is using a tac-tic most famously formulated by Colin Powell: shock and awe. It sounds funny, but hey when someone says something that stupid, a sensible guy like me, is stunned into silence.

She claims to have wasted 8 big ones doing 911 research, and in the end she concluded that the news was purveying fact. Did she provide any detail? No. But you are sympathetic to her. With your philosophy of “peace and all sides have a good point”. I am supposed to say its all good, and its all love and candy and all that other feces. XXXX, where do you go from here? Where does your philosophy, especially when over 2 million people have been killed because of 911 take it? Another 2 million will be killed and you will be part of the intellectual machine that purveys that death because you are trying to dilute a stand on truth because your lone voice in the wilderness is saying that WE are the ones who are supposed to talk “peace and pluralism”. Don’t believe your own word when I repeat them? “…FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP THAT CONDEMNS TERRORISM…”

Back to 911 again. Let me ask you XXXX what is your educational background? NNNNN has a degree in Physics. I have combination degree of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, with a separate degree in Biology. We KNOW our science, we KNOW our math. Here are some facts that I want you to consider. Keep in mind CAN NOT question math. It is what it is, and that’s it. The general rule in the world of intellect, is if it is observable, measurable, or MATHEMATICALLY calculated, then it is true. That’s it. I want you to read this article. Near the end of the article it states that the average acceleration of the top of the building to reach the ground was 8.94 m/s2. This means that there was only 8% off from being completely free fall. This means that the whole damn building was destroyed from the inside. You have no room to question that conclusion. It is the math, it is the physics, nothing else. If you do question it, then:

  • You doubt the numbers as presented
  • You can not see beyond what is presented by the news
  • You have a mental problem
  • You are promoting an agenda

If it is the first then I suggest you do your own homework, and ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH. You have not been doing that you have been merely repeating the BS we serious people have been hearing for years “…FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP THAT CONDEMNS TERRORISM…”. If it is the second then you are brainwashed like most of the unthinking public. I doubt you have a mental problem, but there are those, who hold to irrational beliefs regardless of the evidence presented, and that IS a form of psychosis. I don’t want to believe the last option about you. There is another option, and that is a form of mental illness, and yet at the same time it is not. The public, you, others, have been so brain-washed by what people believe to be Western liberalism, and in my case, the the truth of “America” (I was never brain-washed, but I lived in America most of my life), that America becomes a religion, and a vision, and a light, as if it really is a “City upon the Hill”, where the image of America masks the ugliness of people. Such that when the mirror is put in their face they can not accept what they see, and all rationality goes out the door. It leads people to believe when the mirror is put to their face, that America deserves to be master and commander of all that it surveys. That is one way to handle such cognitive dissonance. You can not see what is right in front of your face XXXX.

I give you the numbers again. The acceleration of the top of the building to the bottom was at 8.94 m/s2:- virtually no resistance reaching the bottom. The building was destroyed from the inside XXXX. Do numbers lie, XXXX? Can you stand in front of Allah and say “2 plus 2 is 5” read 1984, XXXX. I repeat your statement:

The conspiracy theory sounds very logical but until it is proven, the other story remains in circulation as a fact.

Let me state it in yet a different way.

The math and physics force me to believe in one conclusion, but the other story remains in circulation as a fact.

Can you hear me laughing at your insanity XXXX(please read above)?

In response to 911 the US government wanted Osama bin Laden extradited from Afghanistan. The Taliban said fine, just offer us proof. The US provided nothing. The “evidence” we had seen in the news about OBL’s involvement were passport and ID papers that survived the wreckage of the 911 collapse. The passports were fresh, and about 20 meters away from 2000 degrees of molten steel. Let me do the physics for you, XXXX. Someone dropped it there. Now it is possible that in the plane the dudes passport could have survived to fly outside the window or some broken part of the fuselage. It is also possible that it could have MISSED the building, or hit the building gently and fallen somewhere away from center of the rubble due to some form of turbulence. All that is possible, BUT NOT WITHOUT THE PAGES BEING BENT!!!!!!!!

The math and physics force me to believe in one conclusion, but the other story remains in circulation as a fact.

Now we can get into more detailed discussion about what physics professors found using mass spectrometry, but unless you understand the science, it will just go over your head. But I will put it in this way. Let me repeat what I said above:

The acceleration of the top of the building to the bottom was at 8.94 m/s2:- virtually no resistance reaching the bottom. The building was destroyed from the inside XXXX. Do numbers lie, XXXX?

You can not argue against this conclusion, unless you have one of the problems mentioned above. The building was destroyed from the inside. Guess what was found in the wreckage, XXXX? I am not talking about a “conspiracy theory [that] sounds very logical”. I am talking about pure numbers, observable facts, and measurable results. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you believe the news, XXXX? I do, but only 2 percent of it.


Never mind THEORIES about who benefitted. Let’s talk about again, about observable events. What did former Israeli PM Netanyahu say? Why would he say it?

I will leave it here, because you can do the research yourself. In the end, when the biggest power in the world has it in for Islam, peace and pluralism, merely helps the people that want to get rid of Muslims, because if they can get rid of Muslims by making them compromise on beliefs and action, which is what this form “peace and pluralism” does. Then they have won their war against Islam and Muslims. What stand needs to be taken, if you are a true believer in Islam is to fight, either physically, mentally, or spiritually against those that are fighting against Islam. You DO NOT have room to say its all good and love and peace. I wish XXXX you take the stand that you are obliged as a Muslim to take, NOT the one you are already taking. If not that, then please keep quiet, and don’t say a damn thing. XXXX I am telling you I don’t want a one liner response. I don’t want a response which says let’s agree to disagree, I don’t want a response that says let’s pray for peace, or ANYTHING like that. If you are going to take a proper stand let it be a justification for siding with ISLAM supporting its battle against these people in the manner of Quran and Sunnat, and nothing else, that is the only kind of stand that is acceptable religiously, and intellectually otherwise please keep quiet, disband your organization that was “…FINALLY A MUSLIM GROUP THAT CONDEMNS TERRORISM…” and step aside.


Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:44:55 AM
Subject: To: XXXX


The official fiction peddled to the masses about 9/11 will go unchallenged and treated as fact just as the belief in the world being flat was accepted as fact before scientists challenged it and proved the world was round. Both the official fiction about 9/11 and what you call “conspiracy theory” cannot be right at the same time. What I presented is a small sample of evidences that dispells the official fiction about 9/11. There is much, much more. Here are two videos that present more. One deals with the forensic evidence about 9/11 presented by Theologian David Ray Griffin and the other deals with the political, historic and “cui bono” evidence pointing to the Israelis and corrupt elements in our government perpetuating 9/11. I stronly believe that if the masses were exposed to this evidence and more they will put down the official fiction, as masses did throwing away the earth is flat theory, and pick up evidences proving 9/11 was done by Israeli and corrupt government officials. Each scientist joining the Scientists for 9/11 truths and each architect joining the Architects for 9/11 truth did. These are people who have been trained to objectively look at evidence especially evidence dealing in their specific fields. Everytime presentations are made pointing out the evidence more and more scientists and architects join. Not only from those two disciplines but from all disciplines.

Here are the two videos. They are interesting to watch and I stronly advise that you do check them out and share them with others. Let’s not continue to be fooled by the Al-Qaeda did it myth and respond to any media propaganda claiming statements from “Al-Qaeda” henchmen:



Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:38:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [bangla-vision] Re: Obama, you plain goofed up, don’t tease that dog


It is always good to know both sides of an issue as you have so eloquently said. The conspiracy theory sounds very logical but until it is proven, the other story remains in circulation as a fact. The only difference is the belief, which one do you believe? Both sides have their own justifications. Neither one is wrong, only facts will change that, if the theory gathers momentum and reaches the critical mass then many a people will move to the other facts. Let’s not dislike others for what they believe.

Speaking up is always the right thing to do.. Keep it up.


In a message dated 11/22/2008 1:27:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, NNNNNg@ writes:

The question that each individual needs to answer is what should we do as thinking, rational and reasonable people? Should we give into the herd mentality and continue to blindly believe the mainstream media version of events or should we act like truly reasonable, rational and thinking people and examine the evidence on both sides in order to ascertain the truth? After all someone had to question and and break from the herd perception and look at evidence to ascertain that the world was not flat!

I have written this essay to present both views — the mainstream media version that led us to believe that OBL and Al-Qaeda did 911 versus the version based on uncovering facts surrounding Israeli and American government involvement. I want you to objectively look at both and think deeply about what is being presented. Go to the links and investigate further. Then make a decision for yourself regarding which is more credible. You will find the facts I present to be unquestionably true but my comments biased. I hope that won’t bother you. I am definitely of the opinion that it was Israelis along with corrupt elements in our government who were responsible for doing 911 as most of you reading this essay may believe about OBL and Al-Qaeda doing it!

1. The Mainstream Version

Let me share with you mainstream media “evidences” used to link 19 Arabs to doing 911. Besides this, there is the “so-called” proof that President Bush claim to have that was never shown to the American people but supposedly shown to Musharraf in Pakistan, who now publicly states that he has doubts. Here is a list of the evidences we were made to believe was sufficient proof linking OBL and Al-Qaeda to 911:



Like assailants who, in their preparations, leave tracks behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants?

The 911 hijackers made payments with credit cards with their own names; they reported to their flight instructors with their own names.

They left behind rented cars with flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo jets. They took with them, on their suicide trip, wills and farewell letters, which fall into the hands of the FBI, because they were stored in the wrong place and wrongly addressed.

Clues were left like behind like in a child’s game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed!

One writer wrote the following about the discovery of Mohammed Atta’s passport for a domestic flight for which a passport was not necessary.

The Magic Passport Theory

We can now add Mohamed Atta’s reality-defying passport to the Arlen Specter Gallery of Improbable Projectiles. This incriminating item was thrown intact from a cataclysmic fireball and miraculously plucked from 1.6 million tons of debris in a matter of hours. The corporate media rarely mention the unlikelihood of this.. Many in the alternative press, though, are unafraid to draw an obvious, albeit taboo, inference: that the Atta passport is planted evidence. According to Washington, DC, peace activist John Judge, other potential plants include the Arabic-language flight manuals left in one of the hijackers’ cars (with note: The discussion of the flight manuals begins at around 13:30). These manuals could serve no useful purpose at such a late stage unless the hijackers planned to finish learning how to fly during a half-hour ride to the airport. But as deliberately placed articles, they are as if a signed diary called “My Plan to Kill the President” had been unearthed in Lee Harvey Oswald’s flat. Also high on the possible planted evidence list is a spiritual manifesto for the Al Qaeda kamikaze pilots, which, to journalist Robert Fisk, sounds an awful lot like it was written by a God-fearing Christian.


Wow!!! I guess somehow Mohammed Atta was able to open a window on the plane and throw out his passport at the right time so that it won’t be destroyed as the plane’s black boxes were. Such accuracy and precision to let the world know of his guilt is truly amazing.

Then there are the Bin Laden videos. How convenient! We happen to be living in a video-centric world. Most of what people are exposed to and believe comes from watching TV. How wonderful and convenient it must be to find out that Bin Laden left proof of his guilt on video for consumption by a video-centric world. I guess if we were living in a world where smoke signals was the primary means of communication we would have found the correct smoke signals left by Bin Laden to correctly identify him as the perpetrator of 911.

But alas the Bin Laden videos were proven to be fake! But our honest media that made such a big fuss about showing the false videos never went back and told the American public that they had shown the world fake videos. Nawww, they did not want to because it did not serve their purpose. Here is what some Professionals who examined the videos wrote about them:



Professor Gernot Rotter, scholar of Islamic and Arabic Studies, Asia-Africa Institute, University of Hamburg: “Regardless of the question if bin Laden personally was actively involved in the organization of the attacks or not: This tape is of such poor quality that many passages are unintelligible. And those that are intelligible have often been taken out of context, so that you can’t use that as evidence. The American translators who listened to the tape and transcribed it obviously added things that they wanted to hear in many places. Things that can’t be heard – never mind how often you listen to it.

”Guilty or not guilty? If the US government wants to find bin Laden guilty of the deed, they have to come up with better evidence.

“And look: the English translation that the US government presented to the world is not only manipulated in parts, but even contains mistakes. A report from Ekkehard Sieker and Georg Restle.”

Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini, scholar in Arabic culture/language: “I carefully checked the Pentagon translation. The translation is very problematic. The passages that are the most important, the ones that are supposed to prove bin Laden’s guilt, are not identical to the Arabic sound.”


Never mind also that in Bin Laden’s last interview for the BBC with Carol Valentine, he denounced the attacks and stated that he had nothing to do with the killing of innocent people on 911. But since this was a story that had to be read most people don’t know about that because it did not come in the form of “smoke signals” — sorry I mean videos. I elaborate more about this below.

All of what is stated above was reported in mainstream media as “evidences” linking the 19 Arabs to 911. This is what most people were told and from this type of evidence most people believe OBL and Al-Qaeda did 911. I welcome anyone reading this article who have more to go on than what was presented above that causes them to believe that 911 was done by OBL and 19 Arabs to please share it with us?

Now let’s compare this to the mountain of evidence below implicating the Israelis and corrupt elements in our government.. After doing so ask yourself seriously which is more believable. Again, I have references from main stream media sources to everything listed below. If you question anything please let me know and I will point you to the source.

2. Israelis and Corrupt Elements in the US Government Guilty Version

Here is a partial listing and involvement with events surrounding 911 that Israelis were involved with that no other country or organization in the world including the U.S. can match. Not only numerous but each involvement is quite significant in importance:

1. It was Israelis who were caught watching the WTC burn and crumble and celebrating it with joy. When the Lakers beat Sacramento for the NBA crown they celebrated. Why? Because their efforts were successful! The event, which was the championship game, they won. The Israelis, according to eye witnesses who saw them on top of the van were ecstatic. They were joyful and why you ask? Because of America’s misery, America’s lost and thousands of innocent lives perishing. But to the Israelis this was success. They were ecstatic with joy because they too won the championship game!

Even when these Israelis were in FBI custody they failed numerous lie detector tests. In fact they did not pass a single one.

To show that this joy was not local only to the 5 Israelis, look at what was said by and about their leaders:

Reactions from the Israeli side to the September attack:
Ehud Sprinzak, terrorism expert at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said “From the perspective of Israelis, it is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor.”

The attack “was good for the Israelis,” “It is very good”, said Benjamin Netanyahu…before he caught himself and amended his statement.

In an interview with Le Monde, Ami Ayalon, former Head of the Israeli Militia for Israel, stated: “Since September 11, our leaders have been euphoric.”

The reason why the Israelis failed lie detector tests is because the truth that they could not admit was we planned this. We pulled it off. We successfully created a Pearl Harbor incident to get the stupid goyim fully in bed with us. And just like we did in the time of Christ we are going to do today. We will get our media fully in bed with us to blame someone else for the crime.. Yeah we were caught in the Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, etc. But we are ready now. The stakes are too high..

2. It was Israelis whose van was stopped and maps and other paraphernalia were found leading the FBI to believe that they had definite involvement with 911.

3. It was the Israeli owner of the Moving van company that immediately shutdown his business, put his house up for sale and fled to Israel when his employees were caught. Aren’t these drastic actions and shouldn’t we want to know why the owner behaved that way?

4. It was Israelis who were caught spying on the US and lived in the same vicinity as the supposed “hijackers”.

5. It was Israelis who were about 200 spies in a spy ring that Carl Cameron reported about in FOXX News saying that government officials stated that they had “tie-ins” to 911. By the way this news was suppressed and the story taken off the Foxx News website. The people responsible for that were JINSA (the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs). JINSA President and CEO David Steinmann is also a director of CAMERA (Committee for Accurate Middle East Reporting in America), the group that actually staged the e-mail, fax, letter, and phone call mobilization that squeezed Fox TV, to the point that they removed the transcripts of the four Carl Cameron segments from their own web site. I wonder why these American Israelis were interested in doing such a thing?

The FOX series and other mainstream news media sources revealed that many of these Israelis were army veterans with electronics and explosives expertise. Many of them failed lie detector tests. Dr. Steven E. Jones, professor of physics at BYU and Kevin Ryan, former lab manager and scientist at Underwriters Labs — the company that tested the steel used in the World Trade Center buildings, and fired Kevin Ryan when he went public with information about a cover-up – have shown conclusive proofs that the collapsed of the WTC buildings were due to thermite and explosives and NOT as a result of the planes crashing into them. Could it be that these scientists have uncovered in later years one of the real purposes for the Israeli spy network presence in the US in 2001?

6. It was Israelis who the following was reported about by U.S. government authorities when the Israeli spies were found: “An Israeli government spokesman reported a few days ago the news of arresting a number of Israelis by the US intelligence bodies in Florida. This might seem strange but what is more significant is the deliberate ignorance by the Israeli government of the reason for the arrests. The Israelis did not even mention the reason or the case for which their subjects were detained. The point is that a big quantity of the Anthrax germ was held with the Israelis when they were arrested. Moreover, the detainees had 15 charts of the New York Trade Center and eight charts of the Pentagon building which were attacked on September 11th. This is in addition to other six charts of the White House, which was among the would-be targets of the September 11th attacks. According to discreet US reports, the charts found with the Israelis had accurately drawn the Pentagon building and the World Trade Center and defined their geometric projections, as well as, precisely depicted the many floors. Further, some data included in the charts define the itineraries of civil passenger planes and their destinations!!!…”

7. It was Israelis who the Jerusalem Post on September 12, 2001 reported 4000 missing or expected to be dead as a result of doing business and working at the WTC on 911.

8. It was the Israeli general counsel Alon Pinkas who reported that out of the 4000 Israelis dead or missing actually only one was killed, a visitor. The statistics of this happening is IMPOSSIBLE. The only reason this could happen is if somehow Israelis were warned ahead of time about the planes crashing into the WTC. The natural question to ask is, are there any evidence of prior warnings of the impending WTC attacks given to anyone in the world? If there is let’s narrow the list down to see if any warnings happen to be given to Israelis. Well it just so happens that there were prior warnings and the only people in the world to receive them were Israelis!!!!

9. It was Israelis who received Odigo warnings two hours before the planes struck the WTC buildings. This was reported both in the Ha’aertz and Washington Post newspapers. This is proof positive that someone who cares for the lives of Israelis knew that planes were going to be crashed into the WTC ahead of time and wanted to make sure Israelis were not killed. I am sure the identity of that person was not Bin laden. This succinctly explains why only one Israeli got killed on 911 although the number was expected to be as much as 4000.

10. It was Israelis who were armed with 9mm pistols, nine grenades, C-4 explosives, three detonators and 58 bullets and caught in Mexico in an attempt to blow the Mexican Congress up on October 10, 2001, one month after 911. Curiously these Israelis were found with Pakistani passports in their possession. The Israelis were booked for conspiracy to destroy a building by means of an explosive by the Mexican police. If they were successful in blowing up the Mexican Congress — leaving the Pakistani passports where they could be found by the authorities — would like 911, have been blamed on Muslim terrorists. They got caught red-handed here and only G-d knows how many other incidents innocent Muslims are being blamed for that were really done by Israelis.

11. Pakistani General Gul, who at one time was a close ally of the U.S. and a staunch supporter of Western values — who could have blamed 911 on his Russian or Indian enemies — instead chose to blame 911 on Israelis. This former director of the Pakistani Intelligence Service said un-categorically about 911 that “The Israeli Mossad and its American associates are the obvious culprits.” Why did he just happen to also blame Israelis? Why didn’t he blame India or Russia who were far worse enemies to Pakistan than Israelis? This was a man who was close to the American Secret Service leaders and their ally. How come he seems to know what Vreeland and other CIA operatives worldwide knew about 911?

12. The news about the impending attacks was known by even low ranking CIA agents like Delmart Vreeland. To prove it he wrote what was going to happen in August, 2001 in a sealed envelope while in prison in Canada and had his guards open the envelope on September 14th… Lo and behold he accurately predicted the attacks of 911. If he knew about this I am certain that many others in the CIA especially at higher levels knew about it also. As such this was a deliberate planned action set up to create a Pearl Harbor type event to cause the American government to take actions that the planners of this event wanted. With the complicity of the Israeli controlled news media the finger was solidly pointed on OBL, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. They did not allow any suspicion to be pointed anywhere else. How convenient!!!

As an example of the many reports throughout the world implicating Israeli involvement in 911, here is a partial text of one from Canada’s Stern-Intel on September 17, 2001:

”A US military intelligence source revealed details of an internal intelligence memo that points to the Israeli Mossad intelligence service having links to the World Trade Centre and Pentagon attacks.”

13. A report from the German external intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) states the following: German intelligence detected plans for an attack on the United States, to take place on September 10 or 11, 2001. Israel was aware of the plans and wished the attack to take place without hindrance.. The German ambassador informed the President of the US of the impending attacks. He thanked the ambassador and said that he already knew. Subsequently, his administration urgently requested the suppression of information on this warning.

14. The U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), wrote this about the Israeli Mossad which was reported about on September 10, 2001 one day before 911:

“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

BINGO! The very next day an “Arab act” took place against the U.S. and no suspicion or investigation was done based on this credible report from SAMS. As I said the finger was so firmly pointed against Bin Laden that even intelligent people were so suffocated by the Israeli controlled press that no other questions were entertained.

15. It was a Zionist owned company, Metals Management, and a life time Zionist Mayor of N.Y. who was responsible for so quickly removing the steel evidence from the WTC such that no investigation could be done on whether or not the WTC steel beams melted from heat or due to bombs going off that caused the WTC to crash. Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the University of Maryland told the New York Times: “I find the speed with which important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling.”

16. Although the planes used to crash into the WTC could have flown from La Guardia, Kennedy, or some nearer airport, they chose to fly from Boston’s Logan airport which was much further away from the WTC.. Doing this lengthened the time to the destination making it easier for NORAD to intercept the planes. Why this was done? It was because an Israeli company, ICTS International, controlled airport security at Boston Logan airport.

17. An abnormal amount of put stock options were purchased against United and American Airlines right before 911. Gee whiz I wonder why British Airways, Southwest Airlines, Continental or other Airlines did not have abnormally large amounts of put stock options purchases also? Why did it just so happen to be from the two airlines that were involved with the 911 incident? It was reported that many Israelis and even an ex-CIA director from Deutsche bank made huge profits on the purchase. One person made as much as $2,500,000.00 on the deal and when last reported did not come to pick up his money. How did all these people know that American and United Airlines stocks will drop so dramatically in value the next day???

Not only airline stocks but according to the Barnes Review, “ Between August 26 and September 11, 2001, a group of speculators, identified by the American Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as Israeli citizens, sold “short” a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be expected to fall in value as a result of the pending attacks. These speculators operated out of the Toronto, Canada and Frankfurt, Germany, stock exchanges and their profits were specifically stated to be “in the millions of dollars.”

I ask the same question as Michael Shore does in the following paragraph, Why? Also why did this story just drop from the media and no follow up was done? Another example of the media in cahoots with the planners of 911 to deflect attention from the obvious and keep the Americans firmly fixated on OBL/Al-Qaeda as the only possibility for 911..

”It would seem easy enough for the FBI and CIA to go to the stockbrokers where these trades were made and find out who made them. This is probably the closest link that can be established to someone who was involved in 911 but neither the FBI nor CIA is, apparently, pursuing this. Why?”

18. When Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah and other Palestinian groups commit acts of freedom against the brutal Israeli regime, no matter how small the numbers they kill of the enemy they take responsibility for it. That has been their pattern for a long time. Now the largest attack killing the most amount of “the enemy” Americans, instead of OBL boasting about it and even cheering like the Israelis did at the WTC he said the following: “I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks….The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. ”

This is quite significant because as successful as this act was it would have been something for OBL to boast about but instead he condemns it and distances himself from it. Very unlikely behavior for someone guilty and who would normally gloat at such a major accomplishment. The U.S.
government claimed that it had proof which they never showed any of us.

They claimed that they showed it to the Pakistani President but he also came out with a statement claiming that he believes that there is no way that OBL could have pulled off 911 alone. What happened to the proof?

19. Financially it was Israelis who profited handsomely from the destruction of the WTC. Larry Silverstein, a Zionist Jew whose company acquired the 99 year lease for the WTC got an insurance payment for more than 4.6 billion dollars for 2 attacks on the WTC on 911. Incidentally he acquired the lease 6 months before the 911 attacks and just “happened” to fully insure it against terrorist attacks.

Another Israeli by the name of Frank Lowy, chairman and founder of Westfield Holdings, had recently acquired the 99-year lease for the 425,000 square foot retail portion of World Trade Center before the WTC attacks of Sept. 11, according to The Jerusalem Post . He too also fully insured his lease against terrorist attacks and will also be paid billions. So in regards to 911 we find Israelis involved with many things. Strange wouldn’t you say that we don’t find Russians, Saudis, Italians, Pakistanis or even Africans involved with events related to 911 as Israelis. Isn’t it just coincidental that the people involved just happens to be Israelis.

With all this evidence of Israeli involvement, corrupt U.S. government officials involvement and media complicity in covering and even dropping information that should be pursued and thoroughly investigated I ask the question why, why in the hell is any of this not being investigated? This is a mountain of evidence. Other evidence not discussed but also valid is the many reports showing evidence that the WTC was blown up from within explaining how the buildings fell, no video or stills of any of the hijackers at Logan Airport, how did the U.S. government identify so quickly the identities of the hijackers and was able to fix the blame on OBL just a few hours after the event, the fact that 7 of the hijackers identified are still alive today, the many false reports about terrorists identities like the one of a Pakistani man who never left Pakistan in his life having his picture publicly broadcasted in the media, and I could go on and on.

The only logical conclusion that a reasonable person can arrive at is this: The 9-11 attacks, the anthrax murders, and numerous other foiled terror plots, were planned, orchestrated, financed, carried out, and covered up by the forces of Israel. What other logical explanation can there be?

What we have been told officially about 911 has more holes in it than aged cheese. It just does not add up. Yet serious actions are being taken against innocent Muslims and thousands of lives are being lost and even more are being harassed and persecuted. Why isn’t our government investigating the huge pile of evidence pointing to the Israelis and why aren’t relations between the U.S. and Israel cooled? Why? Why? Why?


US scientist who tried to spy for Israel: I won’t end up like Pollard

Former NASA scientist Stewart Nozette faces a third count of attempted espionage after Attorney’s Office files superseding indictment claiming he tried to pass classified information about US Navy to a man he thought was Israeli Intelligence officer

Ynet and Reuters

Published: 04.07.10, 12:57 / Israel News

Former NASA scientist Dr. Stewart Nozette, who was charged with trying to pass classified information to a man he thought was an Israeli Intelligence officer, told an undercover FBI agent that he does not want to “end up like Pollard,” the fox news network reported Tuesday.

In a newly filed search warrant affidavit the FBI says:

“When the (undercover FBI agent) asked Nozette if he was willing to give classified information to the Mossad, Nozette replied, “I just don’t want to end up like Pollard (meaning convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard). I’ll show you mine, you show me yours.”

According to the report, the FBI recorded several conversations with Nozette which have been revealed in court papers. In a conversation with the undercover last fall, Nozette said:

“I’m just wondering what was behind, whether (an Israeli aerospace company) was a vehicle for others to get to me. I never knew what was going on, you know, up the chain and you know I was a little frustrated that they didn’t act on a lot of the things I gave them.”

Nozette, 53, of Chevy Chase, Maryland, is facing a new charge of attempted espionage. According to the Fox report, the US Attorney’s Office in the District has filed a superseding indictment claiming he tried to pass classified information about the Navy to a man he thought was an Israeli Intelligence officer.

Nozette is already facing two other counts of attempted espionage for passing secret and top secret information to an undercover FBI agent. Nozette thought he was being recruited by the Mossad, the Israeli spy agency.

$2,000 in cash

According to an FBI complaint filed in October, 2009, Nozette worked as a technical consultant for for Israel Aerospace Industries between 1998 and 2008.he was paid a total of $225,000 during this period.

Nozette has worked for various government agencies, including the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

He worked at the White House on the National Space Council in 1989 and 1990, developing a radar experiment that helped discover water on the south pole of the moon.

Nozette then worked at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from 1990 to 1999, designing highly advanced technology.

He became president of the Alliance for Competitive Technology, a non-profit corporation where he had access to classified information.

According to court documents, Nozette was contacted by telephone on September 3 by an undercover FBI employee. Nozette met the agent that day and discussed his willingness to work for Israeli intelligence.

Nozette agreed to provide information to the employee and asked for an Israeli passport, according to FBI officials.

FBI agents asked Nozette to answer a list of questions about US satellite information and also provided him $2,000 in cash, they said.

On September 16, Nozette was captured on videotape leaving a manila envelope in a designated post office box in Washington. The envelope contained answers to the list of questions, the officials said.

They said the FBI agents then asked Nozette to answer another list of questions about US satellite information and left a cash payment of $9,000 in the post office box.

On October 1, Nozette was filmed leaving a manila envelope in the post office box. It contained classified information on US satellites, early warning systems, means of defense or retaliation against large-scale attack, communications intelligence, and major elements of defense strategy, the officials said.

If convicted, Nozette faces up to life in prison.


By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

August 29, 2010 Islamabad, Pakistan (Veterans Today exclusive) Informed sources in the Government of Pakistan have told Veterans Today that they are developing “hard evidence” indicating the Air Blue Airbus 320 that crashed July 28th outside Islamabad was a terrorist hijacking tied to rogue American security forces operating inside that country.

Sources indicate that the plane crash was an unsuccessful hijacking attempt intended to crash into the nuclear weapons facility at Kahuta, outside Islamabad. Such an attack may have been blamed on India and would likely have led to retaliation which could easily have escalated to a nuclear exchange between these two nations that have spent decades at each other’s throats.

Suspicions were raised inside Pakistan’s military and intelligence organizations when American military contractors employed by Blackwater/Xe showed up on the scene immediately after the crash, seizing the black box and “other materials.” There is no confirmation that parachutes or electronic equipment had been removed when Blackwater/Xe security relinquished control of the crash scene to Pakistani investigators.

Royal Television in Islamabad, owned by the brother of the head of Pakistan’s powerful JI (Jamate Islami), the Islamic political party, has reported that investigations are underway tying American based contractors to the planning of the attack.

Pakistan’s ISRP (Inter-Services Public Relations) has failed to confirm this but private sources indicate that an active investigation of these allegations is, not only underway but has established ties between an American group and the hijackers.

Military and intelligence officials inside Pakistan, in concert with the American embassy, are withholding all official details of the investigation and are likely to continue doing so.

This same facility had been the subject of an armed penetration by American contractors, believed to be employed by the State Department, in 2009. Four Blackwater employees, armed and possessing explosives were arrested outside the Kahuta nuclear facility in 2009. The four, driving a Jeep 4×4 and possessing advanced surveillance and jamming equipment of Israeli manufacture, were intercepted 1.5 miles from the Kahuta nuclear facility.

The four spoke fluent Pushtu and were dressed in a manner as to resemble Taliban fighters. The order for their release, given by Minister of the Interior Rehman Malik, is an issue of considerable controversy between the civilian government in Pakistan and the powerful military.

The passenger jet with 152 on board slammed into a hillside in what was believed to be Pakistan’s most serious air crash. At least 2 Americans were believed to be on board but, a month later, the US Embassy in Islamabad has left this unconfirmed. Reports received today, however, confirm that at least 5 Americans, military contractors said to be employed by Xe, may also have been on the craft but could not be identified as they had been traveling in local garb and had boarded with false identification.

Xe is an American based military and intelligence contracting firm formerly known as Blackwater and has been the subject of considerable controversy for activities inside Pakistan.

Scene of July 28 Air Crash Outside Islamabad, Pakistan

Sources indicate that the attackers stormed the cockpit in a hijacking attempt. The pilot is said to have jammed the flight controls, careening the Airbus 320 and all aboard into a hillside rather than allowing the plane to be used in a “9/11″ type attack inside Pakistan or flown into Indian air space for a repeat of the 2008 Mumbai attack.

Pakistan has, at times in error, referred to American contractors employed by the Departments of Defense, State or the Central Intelligence Agency as Blackwater. However, it is believed the majority of such employees are, in fact, members of that organization or is derivitive, Xe.

The same group, often criticized for irregularities in Iraq, has been contracted by the Central Intelligence Agency to operate Predator drones inside Pakistan, operations that have resulted in a significant number of civilian deaths and said by political leaders of several factions to do little but recruit terrorists.