Israeli Group Claims Responsibility for Iraqi Bombings – Sort Of

… by  Gordon Duff,  Senior Editor

Mossad Bombings in Iraq Wrongly Credited to Al Qaeda

The recent round of bombings in Iraq, according to an Israeli source credited with endless false reports, phony bin Laden tapes and videos and numerous other obfuscations yesterday claimed Al Qaeda was responsible for the recent bombings in Iraq.
The organization run by the daughter of a convicted Israeli spy was the only source, no intelligence organization in the world found the website SITE claimed it found.  This is always the case.  Site Intelligence always finds the story Israel or American neocons need, exactly when they need it, always “too good to be true” and, thusly, not true at all.
This is another of those cases, part of a long history of disinformation paid for by the FBI and DOD, the fictional subtext for the war on terror, the needed blame for the Taliban or Al Qaeda even when there were no facts to be found.
There are a few problems with the story.
US counter-intelligence sources in Baghdad indicate there are no Al Qaeda forces in Iraq and, if there were, there would be no reason for them to randomly attack “everyone at the same time.”
On the other hand, Israel has recently moved troops and aircraft into Kurdistan without government approval and is the only possible “player” to benefit from a civil war in Iraq.
Knowledgeable sources have, for years, credited Israel with church and mosque bombings throughout Iraq, attacks on American forces and even video-sniper attacks found, as is always the case, by only SITE Intelligence and not the 16 American intelligence agencies with their tens of thousands of employees, their dozens of satellites and their armies of Arabic speaking operatives that scan the internet day and night.
An Israeli company with 2 employees has, 100% of the time, found the “Al Qaeda” announcements and the carefully time “bin Laden” threats.  From an earlier article commenting on inconsistencies in SITE reporting:

A further abuse, of course, is not only that we are no longer seeing the easily debunked bin Laden doubles whose video tapes were “mysteriously” released by SITE Intelligence, the Rita Katz/Israeli group that seems to find them in trash bins behind delicatessens. The “new” audio tape itself contains statements claiming credit for 9/11 in direct contradiction to the real bin Laden videos, the only ones authenticated.
If you wondered why the FBI doesn’t list Osama bin Laden as a suspect in 9/11, I think you have your answer. If they think the bin Laden “admissions” aren’t credible, I wonder who the FBI is investigating or if they have simply been told to mind their own business.
The terrorist incident itself is the last thing Al Qaeda would ever take responsibility for despite the claims by SITE Intelligence that they found an unnamed and unverified internet site that confirmed this.
Who in the name of all that is holy would want to take responsibility for an idiot who was led onto an American bound plane by passing around searches, customs and passport control in an airport run by an Israeli security company but who carried a “bomb” designed by a three year old.

Bombings such as those in Alexandria, across Pakistan, Iran and Iraq and now Nigeria are signature Mossad “false flag” terror operations.  The rationale is either to start civil war or sell security equipment to the victims.
In every single case, only Israel benefits, no other party.  In fact, whenever SITE Intelligence is tied to reporting a terror incident, it is not unreasonable to assume that Israeli groups are responsible.

Marketing Phony Terrorism

In every single case, only SITE Intelligence is the source of the finger pointing away from Israel.
Tapes and videos submitted by SITE have long been debunked as falsified and counterfeit.  Al Qaeda statements are all assumed to be the same, mythology written in Tel Aviv to cover their operation in Kurdistan and with the PKK in Turkey, taking advantage of the US withdrawal from Iraq.
Sources indicate that Israel already has drones in Kurdistan, put their without the permission of the Iraq government, has moved troops into Kurdistan as part of an occupying force and is operating against Iran from positions in Iraq.
Recent sightings of “non Arabic speaking” troops moving through Jordan recently are now believed to have been Israeli units moving off the Golan Heights in generic military attire.
More bombings are expected in Iraq as are attacks on American facilities inside the Green Zone.  It is expected that SITE Intelligence will, of all the sources in the world, learn that it is “Al Qaeda” that is responsible.

Israeli forces have been active in the Mosul region for years, supporting PKK terrorist cells in Turkey and in orchestrating tensions between the Chaldean Christian community and local Muslims.

Israel considers Kurdistan part of “Greater Israel” and Likudist leaders have indicated a desire to annex Kurdistan.  The more formalized occupation of portions of Kurdistan by uniformed IDF personnel is a significant increase in visibility.
It is also a direct challenge to the government in Baghdad and is likely to exacerbate sectarian violence between Shiites and Sunnis.

How 9/11 was done

Written during November-December 2008 as a result of discussions on Dutch and American internet forums.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

For additional notes see the accompanying blog


Read the following two screens of text to learn what happened at 9/11.

9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad.

Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless dinosaur WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over insured against terrorist acts and hires an Israeli security firm. From that moment on the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the Israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During the weeks before 9/11 these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basements of WTC Twin Towers next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 Israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an Arab owned software company that develops key enterprise software for many government institutions like NORAD and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give Israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of NORAD. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the Israeli stand-ins for the ‘Arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an Israeli firm Huntleigh-USA, a subsidiary of the Dutch based but Israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a colleague of Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of Israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the Israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives (which were not possible anyway). And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground from a war room Israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of American telephone networks by Israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

*** Please save this page to your local hard drive ***
This blog is the verbal expression of an adaptive learning process. Please come back regularly.

Core Argument

Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. It is an attempt to reconstruct the events of 9/11. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelihood more or less did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It’s clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here’s where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal.

In order to prevent that you get swallowed up by yet another 10 meters of screen text here is the core of the argument. The story is based on 2 broadly accepted postulates:

1) WTC was brought down by controlled demolition
2) The ‘dancing Israelis’ on the morning of 9/11 had foreknowledge of things to come

These 2 premises are enough to put the Official Conspiracy Theory (Arabs did it) out of business.

Premise 2 leads to the preliminary conclusion that the Israelis had foreknowledge because they organized the attacks themselves. Since Israelis are not known to commit suicide attacks we have to assume that the airplanes that crashed into their destinations were remote controlled. If one accepts this as a working hypothesis than there is a lot, I mean really a lot, of material that supports this Israeli Conspiracy Theory that replaces the official Arab Conspiracy Theory. We have the dedicated Zionist Silverstein who leases the WTC complex and over insures it against terrorism (leading to a hansom profit); we know that security at all departure airports and ‘arrival airports’ (WTC) was in Israeli hands (Huntleigh-USA and Kroll Associates, resp.); we know that the owner of Huntleigh-USA, Menachem Atzmon, a convicted criminal, had strong ties to Ehud Olmert, that is the highest level of Israeli politics; we also know that the Israeli secret service can eavesdrop on virtually everybody in the USA via Israeli owned companies like Amdocs and Verint which gave the Mossad the possibility to obtain sound samples of future 9/11 passengers to apply voice morphing to in order to make the fake phone calls on 9/11. And of course there is Dov Zakheim, the real mastermind of 9/11 who was CEO of SPC for 4 years prior to 9/11, a company that produces systems for remote control of airplanes. The same Zakheim that was a member of the Zionist dominated PNAC group, that more or less plotted for a global American empire, and suggested that a ‘New Pearl Harbor‘ (page 51) could speed things up a bit; and finally the same Zakheim that 6 months before 9/11 became supervisor of a group of Pentagon comptrollers that had to sort out what had happened to the 2.3 trillion dollars that were missing from the Pentagon books; many of these comptrollers conveniently got killed on 9/11 and much of the financial data went with them. This is the core of the story.

Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control. I do not care about flight77 or 93, those are details to be solved by crime investigators. The most pressing question is that of remote control: how was that done? Were the original flights 11 and 175 remote controlled themselves or was there a plane swap as some have suggested, including Bollyn?

Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog’s intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.
End of Disclaimer


Arab Conspiracy Theory (ACT)
LIHOP Conspiracy Theory (LCT)
Israeli Conspiracy Theory (ICT)
……Motive behind 9/11
……How 9/11 was done
……The main players
……Solving 9/11
Central Story Line
More on the core of the argument
More on 9/11 motives
The fake 9/11 phone calls
Dancing Israelis or Urban Movers planting explosives at the WTC
The link between Olmert and 9/11
Dov Zakheim, remote control and the Pentagon
Who were the plotters?
Blaming the Arabs
Remote Control Scenario
Pentagon attack motive
What happened to flight77 if it did not crash into the Pentagon?
9/11 operational errors
Peer Segalovitz, the demolition man
Visualizing 9/11
Testing remote control: Air Egypt 990
The cost of having other opinions about 9/11
Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky do not care about who was behind 9/11
The 9/11 International Tribunal
Ron Paul provisional government
Additional material
……More on the WTC collapse
……Voice morphing
…….9/11 conspiracy too complex?
…….Plane swapping
……Khalid Sheik Muhamed mastermind of 9/11?
……9/11 war room
……More on remote control
……Prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks overheard in Hebrew
……Lucky Larry Silverstein
……Sibel Edmonds and 9/11-2
……9/11 Commission Report
……On David Ray Griffin’s strategy
……Non-disclosure of Pentagon videos
……Operation Northwood
……PNAC and the New Pearl Harbour
……Bad omens
……Phone calls transcript
……Phone calls from high altitude and high speed in 2001
……Pentagon no-plane theory reservations
……Bin Laden no longer sought after
……More on the dancing Israelis
……More on Israeli eavesdropping
……Attempt to reconstruct
……Interesting additional material, isolated facts, articles, video’s, etc.
……Open questions
……Unprocessed links


Many people realize that the official explanation of the 9/11 events is implausible. Prof. David Ray Griffin for instance has written several books detailing what is implausible about the official story, hereafter dubbed as the Arab Conspiracy Theory (ACT). The aim of this blog will be to present a competing conspiracy theory, dubbed as the Israeli Conspiracy Theory (ICT) to see who might win this competition. I do not claim to present much original material, almost all of the ICT proposed here is based on the work of Christopher Bollyn, see this link for his theory about who was behind 9/11. My added value will be to collect additional material from the net, like Youtube videos and the like and to add some ideas and speculations of my own.

But again, almost all the credit goes to the work of Christopher Bollyn. Please support him. Send a donation by PayPal to:

Bollyn discusses his 9/11 theory and other topics (2006)

This documentary ‘Missing Links‘ is based on the work of Bollyn:


Some of what will be said here will be speculation. Nothing will be ‘proven’ here as such. Amateur detectives like me do not have a forensic apparatus at their disposal like police departments do, I just have a brain, a limited amount of time and an internet connection. Like in a classic whodunnit the aim is to construct a story line that is not in contradiction with the known facts. This is like in real live crime solving: first collect relevant facts, construct a hypothesis and finally test and prove your hypothesis. This blog will be focusing on constructing a hypothesis and thus, as if it were, increase the appetite to get the damned thing solved. The work of Griffin is invaluable in that it is thorough and precise; Bollyn goes further and comes up with an integral story. Bollyn is currently writing a book ‘solving 9/11’ that will, by it’s nature, be confined to letters printed on paper. This blog will be like an (unauthorized) appendix to his work by using the resources only the internet can offer.

The ultimate goal is to increase pressure on authorities in order to reopen the official 9/11 investigation, preferably in an international context to bring the true perpetrators to justice.

Possible suspects of 9/11
There are not many suspects of 9/11. Nobody ever claimed that the Japanese, the Dutch, the Russians, the Hutu’s or whatever were behind 9/11. The only 3 suspects mentioned are: Arabs (46%), inside job (US-gov did it or ‘rogue elements’ within the US-gov, 15%) or Israel (7%). That’s it. The only group known to commit suicide serving a higher (religious) goal are indeed the muslims. In this respect the official story has some benefit of the doubt. Since it is unthinkable that Americans or Israeli are willing to carry out suicide missions the alternative theories have to resort to remote controlled airplanes to explain the events of 9/11. An intermediate version is also possible (and suggested by people like Justin Raimondo) that Israel had foreknowledge of the impending attack but that ‘they’ let it happen on purpose (LIHOP-theory). But this is it. No further scenarios are credible.

First the official story. Since we have been fed this story for 7 years now by the media and government, you might as well skip it.

Arab Conspiracy Theory (ACT)

During the years before 9/11 somewhere in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan the plan was born in the brain of Osama bin Laden and his fellow warriors against the Sovjets to carry out an attack against the Great Satan USA.

Motive: they were jealous at the freedoms the West enjoyed.

4 hijacker pilots: Hani Hanjour, Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Ziad Jarrah plus 15 other hijackers, save one all coming from Saudi-Arabia.

The Mastermind behind the whole operation was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.

Atta and al-Shehhi take up flying lessons at Rudi Dekkers flying school, Hanjour attended several schools in Arizona and Jarrah in Florida (not simultaneously with Atta).

The precise sequence of events is listed here in detail. See this very detailed overview for additional facts.

Additional information about the 4 pilots:
Mohamed Atta, the pilot of flight 11, came from a middle-class household in Egypt. In Hamburg, Germany, he earned his master’s degree in architecture.

Marwan al-Shehhi, the pilot of flight 175, was from the United Arab Emirates and had joined the UAE army. Later when in Germany, he enrolled in a university with a military scholarship.

Hani Hanjour, the pilot of the Pentagon plane, was a son of a businessman in Saudi Arabia. He first arrived to USA already in 1991.

Ziad Jarrah, the pilot of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, was a son of an industrious, wealthy family in Beirut. Jarrah moved to Germany and studied aerospace engineering at the University of Applied Sciences in Hamburg.

15 other hijackers joined the pilots aboard the four airplanes. All but one were from Saudi Arabia, most were from families headed by tradesmen and civil servants, well-off, but not wealthy.

Flight Departure airport Departure time Pilot # hijackers Destination Time of crash
AA11 Boston 7:40 Atta 5 WTC1 (north tower) 8:46
UA175 Boston 8:14 Al-Shehni 5 WTC2 (south tower) 9:03
AA77 Washington 8:20 Hanjour 5 Pentagon 9:37
UA93 Newark 8:42 Jarrah 4 Shanksville 10:05

Detail: UA93 had a 41 minutes delay.
[end of ACT]

LIHOP Conspiracy Theory (LCT)

In principle just like ACT, except that one or more secret service(s)/government(s) were aware of the impending attack and decided not to intervene or did not have enough precise knowledge to intervene. The respected German weekly Die Zeit reported about this possibility in an early stage (‘Door to door with Mohammed Atta’).
[end of LCT]

Israeli Conspiracy Theory (ICT)

Motive behind 9/11

Realization of the goals as formulated in the policy paper Clean Break, as well as the realization of the goals of the Project of the New American Century. It all comes down to the strengthening of the American global supremacy by creating an excuse for obtaining a larger military presence in the Middle East where some 60 percent of the global oil reserves are located (PNAC-goal), as well as improvement of the geostrategic position of Israel by eliminating its most important enemies (Iraq, Iran, Syria –> Clean Break-goal). The link with oil explains why people like Dick Cheney were on-board, somebody who made his career in the oil business and perfectly understood that oil was becoming scarce in the near future (‘peak-oil‘). For the rest it would be a mistake to perceive a too-big-a-difference between the American and Jewish/Israeli interests, since the Jews constitute without competition the dominant class in the US, who hold all the levers to power: the visual and written media, the FED, Wallstreet, think tanks (AEI for instance), Hollywood, plus a large amount of organizations that cement the power of the Jews (AIPAC and ADL as important examples). The circumstance that de facto American politics (Dems plus Reps) is controlled by the Jews was until recently only said aloud by the extreme Right, now this insight starts to be realized by the Left as well, mainly because of the work of Mearsheimer and Walt (in the Netherlands brought under the attention by the leftwing broadcasting organization VPRO, see the English spoken ‘Tegenlicht’ documentary ‘The Israel Lobby‘). That the Iraq-war was initiated by the (Jewish dominated) Neocon-movement, is so obvious that almost nobody denies that anymore.

How 9/11 was done

According to Bollyn 9/11 was concipated in a small network of conspirators in New York, Washington, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. The central figures in that conspiracy were Silverstein, Olmert, Netanyahu, Atzmon, Dov Zakheim (my addition, via Dick Eastman) and many others and was carried out by the Mossad (responsible for the technical realization of the 9/11 operation, consisting in software-manipulation and placing of explosives in the 9/11 target buildings).

For a better understanding of all the links between people and organizations of the 9/11 Israeli crime network in the story that follows right click on the diagram below and open it in a different tab of your browser. Again, the diagram is based on the content of this story by Christopher Bollyn.

I will give a short summary of what Bollyn says about 9/11 and its perpetrators in that article, mixed with some speculations of my own and observations of others. The story by Bollyn is a very interesting read (some 40 page’s if printed out)

The 9/11-plan originated in a handful of Israeli brains: Isser Harel with his fixation on the WTC-towers, Dov Zakheim with his knowledge of remote control and the motive to stop the Pentagon-audit regarding the missing 2 trillion dollar (this idea I have from Dick Eastman, see further below), and Netanyahu and Olmert with their Clean-Break-fixation.

Directly after 9/11 it was the dual passport holder Michael Chertoff, who from his position as Asst. Attorney General within the ministry of Justice could quietly get rid of several suspects of 9/11 and get them out of the country without prosecution. More specifically the Israelis that got arrested near the Holland Tunnel.

The early indications of Israeli involvement followed from the story of the 5 dancing Israelis as well as the Odigo warning messages, addressed at the Jewish WTC-employees.

Main players

PTech was a company whose employees had been present in the basement of the FAA two years prior to 9/11. This enabled PTech like no other to manipulate the software of the FAA

Bollyn discovered in 2005 that PTech was a hidden Israeli intelligence operation. This was a key discovery. It was this discovery that helped to unmask other key figures in the Israeli network

Michael Goff, an Israeli lawyer, was the key person within PTech, when it was founded in 1994. Later Goff worked for Guardium, an Israeli software-firm with links to military intelligence services. This is the crucial connection (PTech –> Goff –> Guardium) that was helpful to uncover the larger Israeli military network that was behind the events of 9/11.

Through the connection that Goff formed between PTech and Guardium we can see how a complex network of senior officers of the Israeli military intelligence service can all be connected with key elements of 9/11. This connection explains also how manipulated software ended up on sensitive American government- and military computer networks.

The role that Goff played within PTech consisted of buying software for PTech and sales of enterprise software developed within PTech. Later Goff joined Guardium, a company that formed a branch of the research and development department of the Israeli air force. Guardium is a spin-off of Log-On Software, founded by major Gil Migdan (Israeli marine) en Joseph Segev (see diagram).

Another founder and director of Guardium is Amit Yoran, an Israeli who became manager for computer security of the Pentagon. After 9/11 he was appointed by GW Bush to cyber security czar for the ministry of Homeland Security. Yoran was charged with the design of a security architecture for the Pentagon. Rather significant: Yoran has carried out doctoral research on the field of Intrusion Detection Technologies. He was therefor perfectly acquainted with the field of spy software.
The link between Goff and the Israeli army dates probably from before 1994, when he suddenly abandoned his lawyer practice and started working for PTech.

In all probability Goff’s relationship with the founders of Guardium was the channel through which Israeli spy software was delivered to PTech. In other words: Goff was the link between the Israelis military programmers and the computer networks of the American army.

At the same time as Goff worked for PTech, did Yoran work for the Pentagon and designed its computer security. From this position Yoran was ideally placed to install the software developed by PTech on the critical hardware of the American army. The links between Goff, PTech, Guardium and Amit Yoran gives a logical explanation for the way Israeli spy software ended up on those systems.

Next Bollyn mentions amongst others that the Israeli firm Amdocs is an example of an Israeli company that is being run by senior officers of the Mossad.

Bollyn mentions the 27-year old Lieutenant Peer Segalovitz as a demolition expert, who supposedly has been the leader of the team that placed the explosives in the WTC-complex.

Another rather crucial connection is the one between Jeremy Kroll, who occupies a position at the advisory board of Security Growth Partners (SGP), led by Elad Yoran. SGP is a venture capital company. This Elad fellow is a brother of Amit Yoran mentioned earlier. Why is this connection crucial? Because with it a link is being established between Kroll Associates, the firm responsible for the security of the WTC-complex and the world of software manipulators via Amit Yoran. See the diagram!

The firm Kroll was hired after the WTC-bomb attacks of 1993 with the goal to reinstall security. A fatal decision. When one accepts that the WTC-buildings were blown up, then it becomes clear that the security of the building complex is high on your suspect list. It was precisely in the computer room of Kroll in the north tower, where the first plane struck (precision guided). The managing director of Kroll was Jerome Hauer and he had this position between 1993 and 9/11. Earlier Hauer was the director of mayor Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), where he was the driving force o build a command bunker for OEM in WTC-7. It is obvious that the explosives with which the WTC-1/2/7 were blown up could never have ended up in the towers if the security had been part of the conspiracy.

Then there is the relationship between Jules Kroll (the father of Jeremy) and Silverstein, i.e. between the security firm and the owner of the WTC-complex. They have known each other from the Citizens Budget Commission of New York. The wife of Jules Kroll knew Silverstein via the United Jewish Appeal Federation of New York, the largest fund raiser for the state of Israel. These are two distinct possibilities of how Kroll and Silverstein could have known each other.

Then comes the last step: the link between WTC security and the demolition experts of the Israeli army. The link between them is Maurice Greenberg. As an aside, this guy Greenberg was in the news last month, when his firm AIG, the worlds largest insurer, acquired billions from his buddies in the government, as part of the overall Wallstreet bailout scheme. To make a long story short, it was through the connections with Kroll and Greenberg that Mossad-demolition experts got control over the WTC en thus were able to carry out 9/11. The planes were hijacked by remote control.

Until here the story as told by Bollyn.

Note that no distinction is really made between the ICT proposed here and the notion of ‘inside job’. America if effectively under Zionist control, meaning that the American establishment can act only in the interest of Israel and Zionism.
[end of ICT]

In our discussion there are only two really distinct ‘sources of motivation’:
1) an Afghan cave with bearded fellows resenting the freedoms the West enjoys
2) PNAC/Clean Break and their backers in Washington and Jerusalem aiming for changing the global geostrategic landscape in favor of America/Israel.

Solving 9/11

As a next step we are going to examine all the ‘snippets of reality’ relating to 9/11 and how they measure up against the conspiracy theories proposed above.

Let’s start with the controlled demolition theory. Here is the testimony of a dutch expert of controlled demolition Danny Jowenko, who is for the first time confronted with the implosion of WTC7:


There is no doubt in his mind: WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition.

Against rumor that Jowenko had retracted his judgment here is proof on the contrary:


That WTC1/2 was brought down by demolition becomes clear after watching videos like these (minute 3:24):


Overwhelming proof (from 2:40) of explosions coming from the towers before the collapse:


On September 12, 2001, Peter Jennings interviews Marlene Cruz, a carpenter injured in one of the pre-collapse explosions in the WTC-sub-basement level B long before the planes hit the towers. She was the first casualty of 9/11 admitted at Bellevue Hospital. Cruz is a living witness whose testimony proves that pre-planted explosives were used to weaken the foundations of the towers as part of a well-planned controlled demolition


Physicist prof. Steven Jones pointed out that the stream of white glowing substance coming out of the WTC tower (minute 0:25) could only be explained by the usage of thermite causing metal to melt:


To get the feeling for what thermite can do to metal watch this hilarious clip:


Here is another short experiment that clearly shows the destructive power of thermite. Note the molten metal at the end of the clip (minute 1:49):


In this dutch video it is shown how thermite is routinely used to bring down buildings. At 0:25 you can see that thermite charges are attached to columns at an angle in order to make the building ‘walk’. The effect is that after the beam/column is cut the building moves somewhat horizontally so it can fall straight down afterwards. At 1:42 WTC columns are shown that are cut at an angle, as is routinely the case with controlled demolition:


This very short clip (37 secs) brings home the same message:


If you really want to go to the core watch this very thorough presentation about the WTC demolitions (2 hours) of Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth:


In my opinion it is the best video about the destruction of the WTC I have seen so far. Some highlights:

16:30 – Dan Rather says that for the 3rd time today a building was deliberately destroyed by ‘dynamite’.
20:00 – the fire fighter about explosions.
39:20 – the WTC twin towers were ‘worthless aging dinosaurs’.
41:00 – cost to tear the WTC down somewhere between 5-15 billion; WTC were ‘condemned structures’; financial gain Silverstein: paid 3.2 billion, got 4.6, on his way to 7 billion.
45:00 – WTC was designed to withstand Boeing impact.
56:00 – orange flashes as proof of explosives.
1:04:00 – all core columns can be accessed through elevator shaft.
1:05:00 – many/all columns found under the rubble were of 30 feet length… ready for shipment (hence the haste and secrecy about this evidence).
1:05:45 – wireless detonation.
1:08:40 – impossible collapse pattern.
1:17:30 – squibs.
1:20:30 – Where is the debris? The pancakes? WTC was fully pulverized.
1:24:20 – the openly lying NIST shill.
1:26:08 – molten iron visible.

If you want some more proof, watch this documentary, 911 Mysteries Part 1 – Demolitions (90 minutes):


911 Mysteries – Part 1: Demolitions
2:05 – view on two fireballs
2:19 – minute size of the fires inside the towers prior to the collapse
2:58 – see the shadow of the fireball from the 2nd onto the 1st tower: size at least 100 meters.
3:19 – eye-witness with schmug explanation; probably planted
3:29 – another view on the minute size of the fire
3:51 – core of the official theory: ’Fire caused collapse’
4:10 – towers were designed to withstand large airliner crash (B707)
5:00 – denial of official story that the B676 were larger/heavier than the B707’s the buildings were designed for
5:15 – full view on the fireball 2nd tower (5:18 zoomed in)
5:22 – firemen report about the minute size of fires (‘2 isolated fires… able to knock down with 2 hoses’)
5:45 – FEMA report confirmed that most of the fuel was consumed in the initial fireball during the first minutes after impact
5:55 – official story about how the fires supposedly brought down the buildings
6:16 – smoking buildings, meaning oxygen starved fires (like smoking, hardly burning wood blocks in a camp fire)
6:47 – person waving from a smoking story; impossible if there were raging fires.
7:08 – person from WTC Construction & Project Management states that the towers were probably able to withstand several impacts, not just one
7:35 – towers designed to withstand wind gusts of 225 km/h; buildings swing in the wind (the more than 100 meters high Euromast in Rotterdam/Netherlands can have an amplitude of 1 meter at the top during storm!). This kills the ‘trusses broke off due to thermal deformation’; the buildings were flexible enough to withstand a theoretical thermal expansion of a couple of milimeters (if there was any sizable expansion in the first place).
7:50 – no difference between plane impact and a hurricane
8:40 – never in the history of the world has a steel building collapsed due to fire
9:04 – in 1975 there was a fire in WTC north tower that burned for 3 hours on several floors (twice as long as on 911); nothing happened then
9:28 – fires in Madrid (Windsor tower) in 2005; burning for 20 hours, much more severe than WTC; building’s core structure was undamaged
9:43 – comparison Madrid/WTC in 1 shot to see the difference
10:49 – clear impression of structural design twin towers
11:18 – excellent clear view on trusses and floor elements
11:32 – graphical representation of the official story of why the towers fell
11:52 – essence of the official story: ’if you drop your pants your legs will be destroyed as well’. Fortunately this is not true as is confirmed every night as we go to bed. Self defeating explanation: the core remains upright; in reality it came down as well. This can only be explained through controlled demolition of the core.
12:31 – witnesses report that there was no exessive heat inside the towers
12:45 – famous description by firefighters of how the towers came down, by explosions
13:05 – witness reports explosions before collapse
13:20 – other witness: explosions sounded like gun fire
13:27 – 3rd witness talks about explosions observed from 8th floor; several more witnesses report explosions before the collapse. Conclusion: the building was rigged with explosives that went off either unintentionally early or intentionally to pre-weaken the entire structure in preparation for its final collapse
14:00 – eyewitnesses that explicitly state that explosives were planted in the building
14:40 – the sound of explosions reaches us before we visually see the start of the collapse; the sound of imploding floors and trusses should have reached us after it. This is certain proof that explosions preceded and thus caused the collapse.
16:02 – thermal properties of steel; melting point 1500 C or higher (2750 F)
16:29 – open fires never hotter than 650 C. (red orange flames like in the WTC); steel stoves don’t melt even if they are used for months (iron stoves are obviously not cooled like car engines)
17:55 – likewise it is complete impossible that small scattered fires brought down these towers
19:10 – again the official story: a few floors failed and crushed upon lower floors crashing them in turn by their sheer weight and thus causing a domino-effect
19:25 – even if you accept (against all odds; remember the flexibility of the tower) that the fire caused floors to collapse, than the collapse of the core remains a mistery. Even the outer columns/mesh had probably to stay upright while the floors pancaked.
20:00 – collapse WTC identical with controlled demolished buildings
21:13 – metal and concrete is hurled away from the buildings sideways; a 270 ton piece of steel (weight twice of a Boeing airliner!) was hurled away 120 meter into a neigbouring building! Beams where sticking out of several neighbouring buildings.
22:44 – the falling top of the tower all over sudden disintegrating in mid-air!
24:47 – illustration of the free fall speed of the buildings
27:51 – proof that explosions took place in the basement prior to the collaps
28:36 – testimony William Rodriguez
31:00 – testimony of explosives everywhere in the basements of both towers and everywhere else
33:15 – prior to the collapse the building was systematically destroyed in slow pace by numerous explosions causing floors to collapse prior to the final collapse
33:45 – smoke from the tower at street level
35:24 – camera registers several explosions before the collapse
35:53 – squibs (demolition jargon) spraying from the building below the collapse level; well known phenomena during controlled demolitions
37:38 – very clear sqib from the sky-lobby
42:29 – molten metal. 8 weeks after the collapse there were still fires raging with underground molten metal with debrie temperatures of 600 C.
43:15 – Steven Jones stating that the only explanation for the presence of molten metal was that explosives like thermite had been used; thermite has molten iron as an end product, watch this short clip.
45:20 – second product of thermite reaction, aluminium oxide visible as white smoke
45:24 – evidence of thermite usage at 81-floor
46:00 – even the NYT confirmed that sulphur was found on the iron; sulphur lowers the melting point of iron (thermate) and gives even faster results
47:13 – official from demolition industry explains that usage of timers is the reason why it is called controlled (demolition).
47:27 – linear shape charge
47:55 – there are thousands of different types of explosives
49:15 – pre-weakening is standard procedure (hence all these observed explosions before the final blow in both towers)
49:42 – the beams that were found cut under an angle
51:32 – sequence of how the buildings were brought down
53:19 – Giuliani confessing that they knew in advance that the buildings were going to collapse.
54:10 – Silverstein idem dito: the decision was made to pull the building
55:09 – Silverstein, someone with ‘international connections’ (Israel comes to mind)
55:29 – explicit mentioning in the lease contract that Silverstein was allowed to rebuild the buildings in case they were destroyed
55:52 – Silverstein won 7 billion dollar on his initial investment of 15 million dollar (that’s a ROI of 500)
57:20 – WTC3/4/5/6 were infinitely more damaged than WTC7, but did not collapse; WTC7 did collapse
57:45 – construction workers in front of WTC7 who say that ‘the building is coming down soon’!
58:15 – Silverstein caught lying about the meaning of the word ‘pull’. There were no fire fighters to pull from the building. It’s real meaning was to bring down the building. Implying that the building had been prepared long before to come down (it is impossible to decide, plan and implement such an operation in a few hours)
58:42 – witness who says that the WTC7 first floor came down first and the rest followed (classic controlled demolition)
1:00:30 – possible motives for the intentional destruction of WTC7 (destruction SEC fraud records Worldcom and Enron)
1:04:45 – WTC power down weekend (‘South Tower from the 48th floor up‘… “This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) – approximately 30 hours.”)
1:07:15 – the twin towers were big money losers
1:07:50 – WTC asbestos problem: al steel beams had been sprayed with fire proof asbestos; removal was almost undoable; costs expected to exceed 1 billion dollar. The 911 attack provided an opportunity for renewal of the complex (at the cost of european insurers: Allianz, Lloyds, Swiss Re, Zurich FS and others)
1:22:00 – companies were moved within the twin towers prior to 9/11; mysterious construction work was going on in the vacated spaces; people coming to work in the morning noticed that the office spaces were very dusty (implication: construction workers had worked at night ’preparing’ the building)
1:25:40 – view on the size of the fireball in comparison to the entire length of the building: a sphere at least one quarter of the entire building. Note that a second fireball was present at the point of impact.

For people who prefer reading about the collapse of the World Trade Centre here is one of the classic documents about the event from Steven Jones: “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?“.

At this point only one conclusion can be drawn: the WTC-buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. No doubt about it.

Conclusion: ACT can be scrapped from our short list of possible suspects. Unless you want to assume that 19 Arabs not only hijacked 4 planes but also planted charges in the WTC just to make sure that a lot of damage would be created (in which case the whole point of hijacking of planes would be superfluous in the first place) we have to assume that a different scenario took place: inside job. What about the combination of LIHOP and demolition? Like: a government institution somehow knew of the plans of the Arabs beforehand and decided to ‘help’ a bit by planting the charges for them? This would draw a bill on the reliability of the Arabs to ‘stick to their word’ and ‘show up’ in time. Theoretically possible, but not very likely. Much more likely is that both events (planes and demolitions) were controlled by one invisible hand…

So the Arabs are out. Without much ado I present here an ‘educated speculation’ of what could have taken place before and at 9/11 if one accepts the thesis that the WTC buildings were blown up and I will try to back that story up later with snippets of evidence and facts available.This storyline is essentially the same as the attention drawer at the top of this blog plus some added comments.

Here we go…

Central Story Line

It was a masterly plot, carried out by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport ‘Americans’. Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbest the buildings were stuffed with) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over-ensured against terrorist acts, tellingly with a german ensurer, next hires an israeli security firm and in the 2-3 weekends before 9/11 cuts off power in all the WTC buildings with ‘maintenance’ as an excuse, so the buildings are virtually empty and the demolition experts can work undisturbed. At that moment the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During these weekends these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basement of WTC next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the openening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Now we need to get rid of Atta and the other Arabs in order to keep our narrative alive. Although a number of hijackers have been reported to be alive after 9/11 there is no doubt about the existence of a real Mohammed Atta who lived in Hamburg and who disappeared in the summer of 2000. Let’s speculate to see how far we can get (there is no proof for this whatsoever)…

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah, who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

[as an aside: many other scenarios are possible. For instance that the real Atta did indeed make it to America and took up flying courses. What speaks against the real Atta showing up at the flight school though is that the rather boorish behaviour of Atta in America does not match with his polite and shy behaviour in Hamburg. Also there is the incident with dutch flight school owner Rudy Deckers, who learnes that Atta is from Hamburg and starts talking to Atta in german. The real Atta is fluent in german, however this Atta seems to be unpleasantly surprised and walkes away without saying anything. Let’s stick with the Elbe river scenario for the moment until something better comes up.]

Meanwhile the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, using his secure channel with Amit Yoran somehow manages to give israeli army computer programmers access to critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of Norad. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

As an aside Dick Eastman comes with the interesting suggestion that this idea of electronic hijacking of planes has been tested before 9/11 on the Air Egypt 990 machine that crashed ino the Atlantic on october 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the israeli stand-ins for the ‘arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an israeli firm, a subsidiary of the dutch based but israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a collegue with Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became airborn somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes via the transponders, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically te regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to the relatives (the reported phones calls were all fake; more on that later), though they probably were very puzzled to discern the New York sky line all over sudden, but then it was too late. BANG!!

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demoliton experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out according to plan beautifully.

Here ends the overview of an alternative hypothesis concerning the events of 9/11. The remainder of this blog will be used to discussing material of isolated parts of this integral story, like remote control, the fake phone calls, bin Laden, security firms, demolition, etc.

Let’s start building up support for this ICT hypothesis.

More on the core of the argument

‘What proof do you have for your story?’

This is the recurring question adherents of the Official Conspiracy Theory keep asking, implicitly suggesting that they themselves do possess proof of their OCT, which is not the case.

Let’s put it this way…

Suppose you are participating in one of those television games shows where you have to guess a hidden word. On the basis of your efforts in the show you got to the point that you reached this pattern:


You need 4 more letters to know the solution. In theory there are 26*26*26*26 = some 400,000 solutions to the problem. In practice however you can deduce from the context that the second letter almost certainly must be an ‘E’. The fourth letter can only be a C, F, L, M, N, R, S.
With this knowledge in your brain you scan the possibilities and after half a minute or so you will find the most likely solution:


Can you ‘prove’ this? No. But the game show rules dictate that you have to give the answer in 1 minute, so you take the risk and say the solution is DEBUNKER. And the game show host to your relief will tell you that it was the right answer and that you can go home with your 64,000 dollar.

It is much the same with solving 9/11. The ‘9/11 solution space’ seems almost infinite but on closer review it is not. Most sane people without an agenda who give 9/11 a closer inspection come to the conclusion that the OCT does not add up.

It starts with the acknowledgment of the obvious controlled demolition of the WTC. Once you accept this the ‘Arab hijackers’ are almost certainly out. Reasonable follow-up conclusion –> 9/11 = inside job.

Next observation: dancing Israelis who turned out to be Mossad agents. –> Israeli involvement. This is affirmed with the involvement of Silverstein, also by the Israeli firms who handled the security of the departure airports and the WTC, by Zakheim’s role, the Odigo story, etc., etc.

Next deduction: if there were no Arab suicide pilots but that instead 9/11 was an American or Israeli inside job than some form of remote controlled airplanes must have been used. Americans or Israeli do not do suicide missions.

Next deduction: there were said to be phone calls from the airplanes that stated that the planes were hijacked by Arabs with box cutters. This was how the blame was laid with the Arabs. We have already accepted that there were no Arabs, so the phone calls had to be fake. The only way we can explain these phone calls is with voice morphing. The technology was available. Hence the idea of a war room operating on the morning of 9/11.

My whole story presented here is a consequence of 2 observations:

1. controlled demolition of WTC
2. the dancing Israelis

The rest follows by reasonable deduction. This is not enough for conviction but more than enough for reopening the 9/11 investigation (but certainly not by the US-government).

More on 9/11 motives

The essence of the motive behind 9/11 was to copy Pearl Harbor. In the american psyche Pearl Harbor is linked to something positive. Pearl Harbor was the catalyst that helped overcome America’s dominant isolationist tendencies. It represented the mobilisation of the american people to unite in a battle against an external enemy. Pearl Harbor is symbolic for the most glorious victory America ever achieved. It represents the transformation of provincial backwater USA into global super power nr 1.

The idea behind 9/11 was to copy the Pearl Harbor succes story to initiate the final transformation of global superpower into the global hegemon, challenged by none. 9/11 was motivated by nothing less than an attempt to a global coup d’état.

The cynical criminal intent of the zionist 9/11 perpetrators was to create a number of victims comparable to the scale of Pearl Harbor in order to achieve a comparable mobilising effect.

With regard to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 the saying: ‘the first time a tragedy, the second time a farce’ applies unrestricted. Too many people see through the farce that 9/11 was, thanks mainly to the internet, the worst thing ever happened to the American Zionists, since it circumvented their media monopoly, a fact possibly not entirely appreciated in 2001, when the web was only 5 years old. 9/11 will prove to be the turning point in zionist power in America. The open question is how it will come to an end?

Ron Paul put it like this: Amazingly, Ledeen calls Pearl Harbor a ‘lucky’ event. The Project for a New American Century, as recently as September 2000, likewise, foresaw the need for ‘a Pearl Harbor event’ that would galvanize the American people to support their ambitious plans to ensure political and economic domination of the world, while strangling any potential ‘rival.’

It was the zionist Ledeen who proposed that America every now and then should throw a ‘crappy little country’ against the wall to make clear to the rest of the world that America means business.

America is ruled by criminals but not much longer. People like Ledeen better stay clear of massive walls themselves.

The fake 9/11 phone calls

The phone calls supposedly made from the hijacked 9/11 airplanes are an essential part of the ACT, i.e. the Arabs-did-it story. It is from these phone calls that the myth was created that the airplanes had been hijacked by middel eastern looking man with boxcutters. Additionally the story of the heroic ‘let’s roll’ action stems from calls made with passenger cell phones. Regarding the story of the phone calls we basically follow the arguments of prof. David Ray Griffin plus some insights of our own. This is the article, dating from september 9, 2008. please read the chapter:

3. Was Evidence of Muslim Hijackers Provided by Phone Calls from the Airliners?

I am not going to reproduce the chapter here, just give a short summary.

Griffin basically denies that it has been proven that any cell phone calls have been made from any of the 4 airplanes, except, maybe 2 calls from flight93 while the plane was at low altitude, shortly before the crash. Griffin states that at the given height of 30.000+ feet and a cruising speed of say 500 mph succesfully using cell phones from an airplane in 2001 was technically impossible.

There was, however, a big problem with these reported calls: Given the technology available in 2001, cell phone calls from airliners at altitudes of more than a few thousand feet, especially calls lasting more than a few seconds, were not possible, and yet these calls, some of which reportedly lasted a minute or more, reportedly occurred when the planes were above 30,000 or even 40,000 feet. This problem was explained by some credible people, including scientist A.K. Dewdney, who for many years had written a column for Scientific American.

The information about said phone calls was delivered by the FBI. The FBI had a habit of changing it’s story:

This suspicion is reinforced by the FBI’s change of story in relation to United Flight 93. Although we were originally told that this flight had been the source of about a dozen cell phone calls, some of them when the plane was above 40,000 feet, the FBI gave a very different report at the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The FBI spokesman said: “13 of the terrified passengers and crew members made 35 air phone calls and two cell phone calls.”38 Instead of there having been about a dozen cell phone calls from Flight 93, the FBI declared in 2005, there were really only two.

Griffin nevertheless accepts that relatives of the 9/11 passengers did indeed receive phone calls, but concludes that these calls must have been faked considering the high speed and altitude of the planes and the latest data provided by the FBI.

If the truth of the FBI’s new account is assumed, how can one explain the fact that so many people had reported receiving cell phone calls? In most cases, it seems, these people had been told by the callers that they were using cell phones. For example, a Newsweek story about United 93 said: “Elizabeth Wainio, 27, was speaking to her stepmother in Maryland. Another passenger, she explains, had loaned her a cell phone and told her to call her family.”40 In such cases, we might assume that the people receiving the calls had simply mis-heard, or mis-remembered, what they had been told. But this would mean positing that about a dozen people had made the same mistake.

An even more serious difficulty is presented by the case of Deena Burnett, who said that she had received three to five calls from her husband, Tom Burnett. She knew he was using his cell phone, she reported to the FBI that very day and then to the press and in a book, because she had recognized his cell phone number on her phone’s Caller ID.41 We cannot suppose her to have been mistaken about this. We also, surely, cannot accuse her of lying.

This means that somebody else made these phone calls with the intention of setting the myth of the Arab hijackers into the world. This might seem outlandish at first but here is a theory of how it might have been done. What is needed in order to make several phone calls to relatives of people who are on board of a hijacked airplane (either electronically hijacked or hijacked by Arabs)?

– passenger lists of hijacked aircraft
– phone numbers of relatives of some of the passengers
– sound samples of passengers whose voice you want to fake

Griffin says this about faking of voices:

First, voice morphing technology was sufficiently advanced at that time to make faking the calls feasible. A 1999 Washington Post article described demonstrations in which the voices of two generals, Colin Powell and Carl Steiner, were heard saying things they had never said.

Second, there are devices with which you can fake someone’s telephone number, so that it will show up on the recipient’s Caller ID.

Regarding the passenger lists: many people book their flights weeks in advance. This information is stored in the computer of the airline company. This information can be accessed from many sources like travel agencies. This information is not public domain but it is not highly classified information either. Assuming that the date of 9/11 had been set days if not weeks in advance it should not be too difficult for a secret service like the Mossad to retrieve the data of at least a number of the passengers that were to fly on 9/11 on these particular aircraft. But what about the sound samples necessary to fake the voices of the passengers using sound morphing technologies. The answer to that came to me like a flash of insight while reading this.

The article, titled:

‘Trojan horse – How Israeli Backdoor Technology Penetrated the US Government’s Telecom System and Compromised National Security’

…is about large scale israeli infiltration of computer systems of the american government. Although in itself fully unrelated to 9/11, it immediately drew my attention. Said infiltratons had started since the end of the nineties, that is a number of years before 9/11.

Further on in the article the israeli firm Amdocs is mentioned. Amdocs… Amdocs…


I recalled that Amdocs had also been mentioned by Bollyn in his article about the perpetrators of 9/11.

Here is the interesting part:

Guardium is closely connected with other companies of the Israeli military intelligence network in the United States. Some of the key Israeli-run companies linked to Guardium are Amdocs, ViryaNet, Nice Systems, and CreoScitex. Like Guardium, these companies are all run by senior officers of Israeli military intelligence.

That’s it! That’s the link between this infiltration and 9/11! Read this in the article:

Department of Justice, FBI, DEA, the State Department, and the White House. Several of the alleged breaches, these agents say, can be traced to two hi-tech communications companies, Verint Inc. (formerly Comverse Infosys), and Amdocs Ltd., that respectively provide major wiretap and phone billing/record-keeping software contracts for the US government.

What this means is: once the Mossad has a list of future passengers in its possession, it can call it’s buddies at Verint and Amdocs companies with the request of wiretapping the people on the list and to record sound samples that can be used to fake passenger voices.

This is the solution of the 9/11 phone calls, which was essential in getting the Arabs-did-it-deception accepted!

So this is what happened on 9/11: nobody had an idea of what was going on until the planes hit the WTC-towers, except for the airline pilots, who had discovered that they no longer controlled their planes and who frantically tried to regain control, without telling the passengers to avoid panic. In the mean time some israeli agent, feet on his desk, is dialing a relative using his voice morphing device with call-ID-faker, and is telling this person that he cannot talk for long but that the plane he is in, is hijacked. And that he loves her and the kids and that he must hang up. This he repeates several times and then his job is done.

Here is a link to a device that is commercially available with which one can simulate somebody else his cell phone (caller ID spoofing and voice changing). In other words: the receiver sees on his display the number and hears the voice of the familiar person, although this is not the person that really makes the phone call. Something similar no doubt has been used during 9/11 by the Mossad.

P.S. Dutch site that has an interview with David Ray Grifin:

“Maar spraken ze werkelijk met andere mensen. Als je de transcripties leest die ons zijn verschaft, dan lijkt het niet alsof ze een interactief gesprek voeren, het zijn allemaal éénrichting dingen die iedereen kan hebben gezegd, het is meer zoals: “Hallo mam, we zitten achterin het vliegtuig, we maken ons klaar om iets te gaan doen, ik moet nu ophangen, dag.” Ze hadden geen gesprekken waaruit blijkt dat ze echt met hun zoon, man of vrouw spraken. En we hebben een heel goed bewijs dat dat zeker niet het geval is met het bekende geval van Mark Bingham, die zegt: “Hallo mam, dit is Mark Bingham.” Wie heeft ooit met zijn moeder gesproken en daarbij zijn achternaam genoemd? Dat is zo absurd!”


but did they really speak with other people? If you read the transcripts that have been given to us then it seams that they are not having an interactive conversation. It is all a onewaystreet conversation of things that anybody could have said. It is like: hello Mum, we are in the back of the plane and now we prepare to do something; I have to hang up. Bye! They did not have conversations from which it becomes apparent that they are talking with a son, father or mother. And we have very good evidence that this is certainly not so in the well known case of Mark Bingham who said: “hello this is Mark Bingham”. Who ever called his mother and used his lastname? That’s so absurd.

Debunkers like to point to the phone call from Linda Gronlund. She called her sister and told her the secret code from the safe containing her will. How was it possible for Mossad agents to know this code. Her is a possible explanation:

It’s 18:25 as Joe Deluca picks up his cell phone to call his girlfriend Linda Gronlund.

Two seconds after he selects her number from his buddy list a red light starts to blink in a gray office building in Herzliya, Israel. A girl in that office quickly puts on her headset, grabs a pencil and a writing pad and starts to listen attentively. Joe Deluca was put on a watch list after it was known that he had had booked on flight93 to San Francisco.


Linda: hello?
Joe: hi sweetheart, it’s me.
Linda: Oh hi, darling!
Joe: just calling to say that I will be a little late tonight. Did you have dinner?
Linda: no, not yet. I had a busy day. I can wait for you to come home so we can have dinner together.
Joe: fine. Did you go to the notary today?
Linda, yeah, I did. Went very smooth actually. I just had to sign and I could take a copy of my will with me. I have put the papers on the pile of mail on the drawer I have to work through but I am too tired now. I’ll do that after we return from Frisco. I am really looking forward to that trip next week.
Joe: yeah, me too. OK, I have to hang up. I’ll see you in an hour. I have forgotten to bring the keys though.
Linda: Oh, I’ll take a bath first. Just in case I am not ready, you know where to find the key, do you?
Joe: sure, see you later.

In the office the girl puts off her headset and leans backward and muses for 10 minutes and then starts to smile…

On the morning of 9/11 a car is parked 50 meters from Linda Gronlund’s house with a man sitting in it. Although it is still dark, the man is wearing sunglasses and is reading a newspaper with 2 holes in it, just not to draw attention. At 6:05 Linda Gronlund leaves her house. When her car is out of sight, the man leaves his car, walks towards the house with a metal box under his arm.Without hesitation he takes a key from under a flower pot, opens the door and goes in to return after 5 minutes without the metal box. He steps into the car and drives off.

P.S. march 12, 2009. Today a new article from C. Ketcham about Israeli eavesdropping in the US telecom systems. It is clear from this article that long before 9/11 Israel was able to listen in on most of the telephone conversations on US soil. Hence there can be no doubt that the Mossad was able to collect data and sound samples from future 9/11 passengers.

Dancing Israelis or Urban Movers planting explosives at the WTC



A 911 classic: The dancing Israelies. These guys, all Mossad agents, where caught filming 9/11 events, celebrating and high-fiving while the WTC-towers were burning and people in death agony were jumping towards their death. One thing was clear: they were expecting the event and they liked the result. Due to angry residents who made an anonymous phone call to the police they were arrested.

Picture: Urban Moving Systems van.
This minor event and the Odigo messages were early indications for israeli involvement in 9/11. It was this little carelessness that might potentially roll back a zionist power position that was build up in more than a century, but I digress.

Lucky for the detainees the zionist Chertoff, from his high ranking position in the department of justice, was able to get them released so they could leave the country quietly and make the appearance on israeli television. The most crucial question was not asked in that video: how did they know about the inpending attacks? Answer: they organized the event themselves.

According to the ICT the 3 guys shown in the first video from 1:20 onwards are the ones (amongst others) that planted the demolition charges in the WTC-building.

From this article from

The New Jersey connection recalls the infamous incident involving the “dancing Israelis,” arrested on 9/11 when seen leaping and dancing for joy in a park overlooking the Hudson River as the World Trade Center burned. The five detainees were Israeli citizens who worked for a New Jersey moving company, Urban Moving Systems, and were held for months while being repeatedly interrogated as to their knowledge of the events surrounding 9/11. The owner, Dominick Suter, fled to Israel after the feds raided his business, and The Forward speculated that the company was a thinly-disguised Mossad front.

Related to this:

“Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel. In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview… One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations… These Israeli suspects, and others, who had apparently transported explosives in the New York area, were allowed to return to Israel without being properly interrogated or their presence and activities in the United States having been vigorously investigated. ”

This blog entry from june 2008 has some very interesting information about a financial transaction to the tune of $665,000…

Here is the link to the transaction.

So, Urban Moving Systems received a ‘business loan’ from the US-government.

the blog entry ends with:

So, the Dancing Israelis Inc. (TM) received half a million dollars from uncle sam in June of 2001. The owner fled to Israel, rather than be questioned by FBI, and the place was raided by tons of agents after 9/11.


Taking a cue from Dr. Jones, I checked EBay. Thermite is on sale right now for $10/lb.

Assuming a bulk discount more in line with $5/ lb, a half million dollars would buy (correction) one hundred thousand pounds of thermite.

I’m not saying that’s what happened.

I’m not saying it isn’t.

Isn’t the internet fun?


And here a CNN-video of the day of 9/11 itself, with a report that a van full with explosives was detained at the Washington Bridge.

Never heard anything from it again of course.

Unfortunately we are unable to ask the owner of Urban Moving Systems Company, Dominick Sutter, any questions.

He left the country immediately after 9/11.

For Israel.

Here is a scan of a document confirming the transaction plus additional information like this:

On September 10, 2001, the Army School of Advanced Military Studies issued a report written by elite US army officers, which was made public just prior to 9/11. The report gave the following description for the Mossad: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” [Washington Times, 9/10/01]

Ruthless and cunning indeed.

And finally this:

On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, left the country very abruptly after FBI agents indicated that they wanted a second interview with him. According to ABC News’ 20/20 [ABC News 6/21/02], “Three months later 20/20’s cameras photographed the inside of Urban Moving, and it looked as if the business had been shut down in a big hurry. Cell phones were lying around; office phones were still connected; and the property of dozens of clients remained in the warehouse. The owner had also cleared out of his New Jersey home, put it up for sale and returned with his family to Israel.” [New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety, 12/13/01; Gotham Gazette 11/2/01; ABC News, 6/21/02; Forward, 3/15/02]

The five employees that were taken into custody were all former members of the Israeli Army.

So, those 5 guys were all soldiers from the israeli army and were purely coincidentally all working as movers in New York.


It woud be interesting for a 911-researcher to find out where in the US one can buy large amounts of thermite. Probably not with Walmart. Such a transaction should be possible to retrieve. Purchase probably done between june and september 2001 en very likely temporary stored in the shabby premises of Urban Moving Systems inc.

Next, the israeli demolition expert Peer Segalovitz and his team enter the scene to place the charges in the WTC-complex during the weekends when the complex is virtualy empty because the power is switched off due to maintenance work. The charges had been prepared in the warehouse of Urban Moving Systems, prepackaged with a radiographic controlled detonator attached to it. 600.000$ reeived from the US-government should be enough to complete this job. With everything prepared the charges are loaded in to vans, driven into the basements of the respective WTC-buildings, parked next to the elevator shaft. The charges are unloaded into the elevator and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns. It should be possible to complete this job with a crew of 10 in 2 weekends or so. On the day of 9/11 the charges were exploded from a control center located in WTC-7.

Very clever but not clever enough.

It is also clear with the benefit from hindsight why all the WTC scrap metal had to be shipped to China and India, without being subjected to a proper forensic investigation. If the steel had been properly investigated, as it should have been, it had soon become clear that the columns buried under the rubble had been cut in regular distances with traces of thermite and molten steel at the edges. That had to be avoided at all cost and thus the hurry to get the evidence out of the country.

The link between Olmert and 9/11

This is was Bollyn has to say about it:

Olmert, who has a long history of involvement in Israeli financial crimes, was indicted on charges of aggravated fraud, falsifying corporate documents, and violations of the tax code and Party Funding Law from crimes committed when he was the party treasurer for the Likud party in 1988.

Ok. So Olmert is not a guy with high ethical standards. Here comes Atzmon:

The Likud fundraising scandal culminated in the March 1996 conviction of three Likudniks, including Menahem Atzmon, Olmert’s co-treasurer. As the party treasurer, Olmert was indicted in the Likud crimes but received special treatment and was acquitted.

Not a nice guy either. Here comes the link of Atzmon with 9/11:

Menahem J. Atzmon, Olmert’s co-defendant and ally, was convicted in Israel but went on to become the founder and head of International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS). This Israeli-run company is the owner of Huntleigh-USA, the airport security firm that ran passenger screening operations at the airports of Boston and Newark on 9/11.

Just for journalists, give this Atzmon chap a call: ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security) Biesbosch 225 in Amstelveen/Netherlands (020-3471077). Dial 0031 for Holland first. Ask him if he is willing to give an interview to answer akward questions about letting Atta-look-alikes escape from the airport without boarding and if he feels any remorse about the 9/11 massacre.

OK, just kiding.

So in short: here is the link between the highest level of the israeli government and the 9/11 operative level from the departure-airport-point-of-view, so to speak. Case closed. This is an essential element of the 9/11 narrative: Atzmon helped putting the Arabs-did-it-myth in the world by distributing the pictures of ‘Atta’ and others boarding onto the planes. That was why the Boston and Newark airports were chosen as departure airports: it was Atzmon who controlled the security. The other element was the fake telephone calls from the airplanes (‘let’s roll’), more on that later.

The arrival-‘airport’-point-of-view has a similar link: Silverstein and Netanjahu. More on that later as well.

Dov Zakheim, remote control and the Pentagon

The essential element of the ICT proposed here is that the 9/11-planes were electronically hijacked. What evidence or hints of evidence can be produced to back this hypothesis up? For this we have to turn our attention to one of the prime suspects of being the ‘mastermind’ behind 9/11: Dov Zakheim.

Wikipedia has this to say about the ‘bionic zionist’:

From 1987-2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm. One of the products that SPC sells is the Command Transmitter System, a remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles.

It is not entirely impossible that remote control specialist Dov might have been inspired by his job to come up with a certain devious idea.

What more can we find about rabbi Zakheim? This for example:

Not long before Rabbi Zakheim rose to power over the Pentagon’s labyrinthine, bottomless accounts, he co-authored an article entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century” which was published by The Project for a New American Century in September 2000, exactly a year before 9/11; in this article, on page 51, it is stated that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”!‘

The Pearl Harbor idea was his idea! Now, how can we bring about such an Pearl Harbor type of event? Let me see…

And since we are constructing devious idea’s anyway why not go for the gold?

Rabbi Zakheim not only was remote control specialist, he also was very well acquinted with financial affairs of the Pentagon. In march 2001, that is 6 months before 9/11, Zakheim was appointed comptroller at the Pentagon. He was hired to shed some light about some trillions missing in the books. Now is that a coincidence or what! A guy who worked 4 years as CEO for a company specialized in remote control moves to a new job in a new building which gets hit by a plane. Remote controlled as we claim. And where did it hit? At an almost empty, newly renovated part of the Pentagon. So here comes Hanni Hanjour, dedicated to sacrifice his life in his resentment against all those Americans ‘enjoying their freedoms’; he ignores breathtaking targets like the White House or Capitol Hill; he could have nose-dived in a straight line onto the Pentagon. He does not. Instead he makes an almost impossible 270 degrees turn to park his plane into exactly that spot that solved all of Zakheim’s problems. Isn’t that considerate of Hanni! Most members of the recently installed team of accountants and controllers get killed and with them goes a lot of records that should have been used to make clear where those missing millions went. It is not difficult to come up with hypothesis about where that money went. Probably not to Norway. For a good understanding: there was no flight77 crashing into the Pentagon. It was an explosion from inside, possibly but not necessarily and rather unlikely followed up by an impact of a small plane/drone/missile. It was likely that flight77 was destined for Pentagon indeed, but that something went wrong with the remote control, like that the control panel got disabled but that no target or a wrong target made it through the transponder. Since a plane cannot crash on land unnoticed it must have been dived into the ocean, possibly after it was shot down by a fighter jet, just to prevent it would crash in France or Morocco after it had run out of gas.

So much for the motive.

How about the technicalities? Was it possible in the first place, this remote control idea? The first one to come up with the idea that 9/11 was carried out using remote controlled planes was Joe Vialls, as far as I am aware, as early as october 2001, one month after the event:

“In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” [not its real code name] allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means.”

Vialls qualifies himself as ‘a former member of the Society of Licenced Aeronautical Engineers & Technologist, London’.

That could possibly be an explanation of 9/11. If the government can use ‘home run’ to take over hijacked planes and bring them safely down to some airport, the same government (or let’s say the proverbial norwegian hacker) could fly these planes into the WTC-buildings.

What evidence can we find that ‘home run’ was operational at 9/11 in the planes that struck WTC-1/2? Vialls suggests ‘home run’ was operational:

“The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s top secret computer codes would be broken, and the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001.”

Was it operational?

Here is a video about Zakheim:


At 3:25 it gets espescially interesting. According to a brochure of SPC, the company Zakheim was CEO of, SPC was able to deliver systems that were able to remote control as much as eight planes at the same time.

Four would do, thank you.

An indication that all four aircraft were hijacked is this:

Once the correct target aircraft is located by radar, the Home Run duplex data bus “piggy backs” the transponder channel and assumes direct control from the ground. This could explain why NONE of the four aircraft sent the special “I have been hijacked” transponder code (7500), despite _multiple activation points_ for this distress transmission on all four aircraft-and despite being flown by combat-hardened ex-fighter pilots.

Because the transponder frequency had already been piggy-backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first hard proof that the target aircraft had been hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by Arab patsies toting box-cutters.

This is the type of aircraft we are talking about:

Flight Aircraft Type
11 Boeing 767-223ERt
175 Boeing 767-200ER
77 Boeing 757-223
93 Boeing 757-200

Look what we have found here:

“The fully digital FCS-700 triplex autopilot and flight director system, with fail-operational automatic landing capability, was designed for Boeing 767 and 757 transports.”

This implies that all 9/11-aircraft were capable of full-automatic landing capabilities. As a pilot on route from New York to London I can type a target destination into the console and ask the stewardess to wake me up at the end of the airstrip in London and next take a nap. So to speak.

If all this capability is confirmed to be in place then it is only a small step to have an added technical capability of sending a signal with a new target destination and have the console disabled. This explains perfectly why there was no ‘I am hijacked’ signal from all four planes! All flight controls were disabled, including the ‘I am hijacked’ buttons.

Was this added technical capability present or not?

Or alternatively: was it possible to manipulate the control software aboard the airliners to implement an ad hoc ‘home run’-system?

This link provides a hint to an answer.

First a confirmation from what re read earlier in

U.S. federal government and civil aviation industry publications describe the development and implementation pre-September 11, 2001, of state-of-the-art systems capable of facilitating precise automated navigation of the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft used that day to a given destination.


And then it comes:

On October 9, 2001, Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. applied for a U.S. patent that removes control of an aircraft from its pilot and utilizes an aircraft’s auto-pilot system to implement an uninterruptable pre-programmed autopilot flight plan in order to navigate an aircraft to a given destination during an emergency. This would be accomplished through the use of an electronic or mechanical relay or relays, that become activated by pilot operation of an aircraft hijack notification system. Surprisingly to some, none of the four aircraft destroyed on September 11, 2001 are known to have entered unique transponder hijack notification codes, suggesting either modified function or insufficient activation time. One optional feature of the Cubic system is termination of an aircraft’s ability to communicate.

The system also envisions the use of new aircraft flight instructions transmitted by a remote sender, that would override aircraft functions already underway and direct an aircraft auto-pilot system to navigate an aircraft to a predetermined landing destination.[25] A data link interface between an aircraft Flight Management System (FMS) and the Management Unit for the Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS), was developed during the early 1990s. This communication system allows for the update an aircraft FMS in mid-flight.

Here is US-patent 6,641,087, which was filed less than a month after 9/11 and granted on november 4, 2003.

Anti-hijacking system operable in emergencies to deactivate on-board flight controls and remotely pilot aircraft utilizing autopilot.


In an anti-hijacking system for autopilot equipped aircraft, a transceiver communicates with at least one remote guidance facility. A panic button is activated by flight crew in case of hijacking. A manager is coupled to the transceiver and the panic button, as well as existing avionics including the aircraft’s master computer and autopilot. Optionally, a relay is coupled between the pilot controls and selected aircraft flight systems. The manager recognizes predetermined override inputs, such as activation of the panic button or receipt of override signals from the remote guidance facility. Responsive to the override input, the manager deactivates on-board control of selected aircraft flight systems and the autopilot system, and directs the autopilot to fly the aircraft to a safe landing. Flight routing and landing instructions are obtained from the remote guidance facility, or by self-evaluating nearby airports in view of the aircraft’s position and various preestablished criteria.

Here is another pointer towards remote control of airplanes at the time of 9/11:

Here is an old article in the largest German weekly Der Spiegel, published 6 weeks after 9/11.

Title: Entführte Maschinen landen selbständig (hijacked planes land automatically).

A few highlights:

In Amerika arbeiten Ingenieure daran, entführte Maschinen künftig durch einen verbesserten Autopiloten ohne Hilfe des Cockpits auf dem nächstgelegenen Flughafen zu landen – ein Notschalter, von der Crew oder der Bodenkontrolle betätigt, soll dann die Hebel im Flugzeug blockieren und den Entführern die Kontrolle aus der Hand nehmen. (In America engineers are working on a system with which hijacked planes can land at a nearby airport through an upgraded version of the autopilot, without any help from the cockpit, by pressing on an emergency button by the crew or ground control, which will block all controls).


Wie jetzt bekannt wurde, haben Techniker des US-Luftfahrt- und Rüstungskonzerns Raytheon bereits im August ein mit einem speziellen Notlandesystem ausgestattetes Passagierflugzeug sechsmal erfolgreich auf dem Militärflughafen Holloman in New Mexico gelandet ohne dass die Piloten den Flugplatz angesteuert hätten. (It is now known that technicians of US-aerospace and defense contractor Raytheon as early as August 2001 carried out six successful emergency landings on military airport Holloman using a special emergence landing system without the pilot aiming for this particular airport.)

Conclusion: the aerospace industry was actively working on a ‘home run’ system before 9/11. I am not suggesting that the 9/11 planes were steered into their targets by this Raytheon system. I am suggesting though that there probably was an ‘arms race’ going on between several aerospace firms like Raytheon and Boeing and others on the issue of anti-hijack rescue systems.

And nobody else was better placed to know about the state of the art of remote controlled airplanes technology than 9/11 mastermind Dov Zakheim, who at that time had been CEO of SPC that was active in this market for remote control of airplanes.

No longer is there any doubt that tested and working aircraft remote control systems were around at the time of 9/11. What needs to be proven is that those systems were installed on the 9/11 desaster aircraft. Or alternatively that a plane swap took place.

Remote Control Scenario

Here is how remote control could have been carried out.
The plane taxis from its parking position to the start of the runway, meanwhile observed by an agent. On the very moment that the pilot gives full throttle the agent pushes a button. Via a transmitter a timer within the plane is activated. After 20 minutes or so the countdown is completed and a valve is opened of a capsule that was hidden within the air conditioner duct near the cockpit and Kolokol-1, an incapacitating agent is released which makes the pilot unconscious within 1-3 seconds.

Kolokol-1 (Russian: Колокол, eng. bell) is an opiate-derived, incapacitating agent. Although the exact nature of the active chemical has not been revealed, it is a derivative of the drug fentanyl, possibly the extraordinarily potent carfentanil or 3-Methylfentanyl. It takes effect very quickly, within one to three seconds, reportedly rendering its victims unconscious for two to six hours. Little else is known about this agent.

A few minutes later a signal from the ground is send to the aircraft containing an updated flight path.

The modern FMS was introduced on the Boeing 767 (both twin towers planes were B767’s).
The flight plan is generally determined on the ground, before departure either by the pilot for smaller aircraft or a professional dispatcher for airliners. It is entered into the FMS either by typing it in, selecting it from a saved library of common routes or (Company Routes) or via a datalink with the airline dispatch center.

VHF data link: Ground->ACARS->FMC->FCC->Autopilot Servos.
ACARS-FMC-FCC are interconnected via a ARINC databus.

ACARS – Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System
FCC – Flight Control Computer
FMC – Flight Management Computer

This was enough so send the planes on course to New York.

Who could have send the updated flight paths to the doomed airplanes? A possible candidate is the flight controller Pete Zalewski. He ‘handled’ not only both flight 11 & 175, but also Egypt Air 990, that had crashed into the Atlantic in 1999. Some see this event as a ‘dress rehearsel’ for 9/11. His behaviour was peculiar in that he did not follow procedures but spent too much time in trying to contact the airplanes after the transponders had been switched off. Instead he should have warned his superiors that something was wrong. He could have used this time to send an updated flight path to the planes.

Pentagon attack motive

Download this two part interview: part 1 and part 2.

It gets especially interesting in the second part from minute 5:20 on, but the mp3 is interesting in its entirety (1 hour). Here Dick Eastman discusses the intriguing possibility that Egypt Air Flight 990, that crashed into the Atlantic in october 31, 1999, was also remote controlled rather than downed by a suicidal pilot. Interesting detail is that many high ranking egyptian officers were on board. Eastman suspects that Flight 990 served as a dress rehearsal for 9/11.

Further on in the program our old friend israeli Dov Zakheim is mentioned; it get’s interesting from 45:20 (part 2). Eastman explains that 2 groups had recently moved into the renovated part of the Pentagon. The first group consisted in a number of army financial auditors that had started to investigate what had happened to the famously missing 2.3 trillion dollar that had vanished from the Pentagon books.

What happened to them:

From The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, December 20, 2001:

“One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck.”

The Arlington County After-Action Report noted that the

“impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal year and important budget information was in the damaged area.” And Insight Magazine editorialized that “the Department of the Army, headed by former Enron executive Thomas White, had an excuse {for not making a full accounting}. In a shocking appeal to sentiment it says it didn’t publish a “stand-alone” financial statement for 2001 because of “the loss of financial-management personnel sustained during the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.”

Well, that’s an interesting development. And all over sudden it becomes clear why the ‘terrorrists’ chose such a relatively uninteresting target like this largely uninhabited part of the Pentagon; in Washington much more interesting targets were available like Capitol Hill and the White House. Moreover these 2 alternative targets were much easier to hit compared to the very difficult trajectory flight77 had to follow in order to hit were it is said it hit.

What happened to flight77 if it did not crash into the Pentagon?

First of all, solving this question is not essential. The story of what happened to WTC-1/2/7 is much better understood and that is enough to conclude that the Arabs-did-it-myth is from the table. Out of academic curiosity nevertheless some thoughts about the 9/11 events at the Pentagon.

That it is unlikely that a Boeing hit the Pentagon is demonstrated convincingly in the well known documentary ‘In Plane Site‘.

In addition consider this:
Ever seen this video? Probably not.


This video was made with a hotel camera and was confiscated by the FBI just like all the other video’s. After a lawsuit however this particular video had to be released (the judge being a closet 9/11-truther?). Content: there is an explosion but no plane.

It was not flight77 that struck the Pentagon. So much is obvious. The hole in the Pentagon is way too small for a huge Boeing passenger aircraft as is the amount of damage inflicted on to the building:

Conclusion: there was possibly no impact at all, certainly not of a Boeing passenger aircraft. A little drone at most considering the debrie. But we should be open to the possibility that no projectile hit the Pentagon at all and that the explosion originated from inside! This explains a lot. This is why the FBI had to confiscate all those video’s, because it would have made clear that nothing hit the Pentagon at all. And this would have killed the Arabs-did-it-myth. How about this possibility: flight77 was destined for the Pentagon afterall but something went wrong with the remote control. It did not make it to its intended destination. So what happened to the plane? It is impossible to crash on land without being unnoticed. For lack of a better explanation we have to assume it crashed into the Atlantic or was shot down above the Atlantic. An explanation could be that something went wrong technically, that the flight control panel had become disabled but that something went wrong with putting a new target destination into the home run system, that it had missed it’s intended Pentagon target and that it had become a loose canon flying west wards over the ocean. Possibly the military shot it down to prevent it from crashing in France or worse Morocco as it ran out of gas. Crashing in Morocco would have been a particular tough sell for the ‘they did it because they hate our freedoms’ crowd! The alternative that flight77 landed somewhere would imply that all passengers, including the lovely mrs Olson, were shot is somewhat difficult to imagine.

But then there are these eye-witnesses who saw a plane approaching the Pentagon at low altitude. What about this scenario: somebody ordered a large plane (C-130?) to carry out this manouver to resque the fligth77-crashed-into-the-Pentagon story. This plane did not fly into the Pentagon but flew over it at dangerously low altitude shortly after the internal explosion had taken place. In reality flight77 was indeed destined for the Pentagon, but the real aim for this manouver was to get rid of the Pentagon auditors who were trying to find out where the missing trillions had gone. And with the auditors a lot of inconvenient financial records would vanish for ever as well.

Here is a link to the list of Pentagon victims and the list contains many budget analysts and accountants indeed

And here is another link that gives food for thought and contains information about the people that carried out the autopsies.

Finally some additional remarks about our friend, the ‘bionic zionist’ and rabbi Dov Zakheim:

Dr. Zakheim is the recipient of the Department of Defense Distinguished Public Service Medal (1986), the Bronze Palm to the DoD Distinguished Public Service Medal (1987), Congressional Budget Office Director’s Award for Outstanding Service (1979), and the SPC Director’s Award for Outstanding Service (1997).

This informs us that Zakheim was already intimately acquainted with budget matters as of 1979.

Combined with the fact that Zakheim spent 4 years working for the firm SPC, specialized amongst others in remote control of aircraft, we should consider Zakheim as the prime suspect of being the mastermind behind 9/11.

P.S.: this animation could explain the many eye-witness accounts that a plane did indeed approach the Pentagon:

Who were the plotters?

In this interview of Alex Jones with Andreas von Bulow, the former German Defense Minister said that 9/11 had to be carried out by a very small group of people. Alex asked him 100? 40? He said less than that.

let’s start counting:

Highest level:

Mastermind: Zakheim (remote control idea & link between israeli and US-politics)

Israeli government: Olmert & Netanjahu (commanding Mossad).

US government: Cheney; gentile #1 in US-politics; dominates US-government including Bush. Cheney’s role is to convert the 9/11 event into making sure the US invades Iraq & Afghanistan. Cheney is well aware of the impending oil shortages (peakoil) and wants to secure the 60% of the world’s oil reserves, located in the Middle East, for the USA. Here is where American interests go hand in hand with Israeli interests as formulated in the Clean Brake document.

Operative level:

– Silverstein: leasing WTC & hiring Israeli security firm Kroll.
– Jules & Jeremy Kroll: security firm WTC, make sure Israeli demolition team has access to WTC and can work undisturbed.
– Giuliani: WTC7 command & control center; handles aftermath ‘on the ground’ in NY.

lower echelon:

– Goff & Yoran: link between access to production software on sensitive US institutions like NORAD; they enable Israeli software programmers to manipulates NORAD software and proably ‘home run’ remote control system.
– Atzmon: asked by Olmert to handle 9/11 at departure airports.
– Hauer: works for Kroll and ‘does the media’ on 9/11.

These are only 12 people, not counting Mossad agents, who do not need to know the big picture… just change software and plant demolitions charges , kill a few Arabs, take some flying courses and make some fake phone calls on 9/11.

That is, the plot consists of 12 core people plus 20-40 foot soldiers!

Blaming the Arabs

This is how the blame for 9/11 was put on the Arabs:

1. laying a trail to flight course’s; the participants of those courses were israeli stand-ins for Atta and other Arabs. The real Atta was probably killed in Hamburg, by the Mossad, exactly what Atta’s father has stated. Atta’s passport was taken and his body disposed of. That passport was later ‘found’ undamaged in a Manhattan street on 9/11. It is possible that course students and later ‘hijackers’ like Hanni Hanjour were real Arabs and no Israeli stand-ins, who had taken up courses out of a hobby, which proved fateful for them, since the Mossad had found an israeli look-a-like in their own ranks. Hanni Hanjour, according to the ICT got killed shortly before 9/11.
2. The camera pictures on the 9/11 departure airports from airport security firm Huntleigh, a subsidiary of dutch based ICTS, led by the israeli convicted criminal Menachem Atzmon, who as a Likud ex-collegue was very buddy-buddy with Olmert. The only task for Atzmon was to state that the pictures of the israeli stand-ins were in reality of Atta and other Arabs. After the ‘hijackers’ had been captured by the security camera’s the israeli agents left the airport via a side exit and thus did not enter the disaster plane they had boarded for.
3. The fake phone calls. These phone calls were essential in bringing the official ACT story in the world that the 4 planes had been hijacked by Arabs. More on that essential story element elsewhere in this blog.
4. The media did the rest. From the first moment on they put the blame on bin Laden. Key figure was Jerome Hauer, a co-conspirator, who said on the day of 9/11 that ‘the day’s attacks bore “the fingerprints of Osama bin Laden’. Another example of media manipulation was captured on this video that was removed by google.

And a myth was born.

September 19, 2001: Atta’s Father Claims Son Was Framed

Mohamed Atta’s father holds a press conference in Cairo and makes a number of surprising claims. He believes that the Mossad, Israel’s spy agency, did the 9/11 attacks, and stole his son’s identity. Mohamed el-Amir claims that his son Atta was a mama’s boy prone to airsickness, a dedicated architecture student who rarely mentioned politics, and a victim of an intricate framing.

And that’s exactly what happened to Mohamed Atta. His identity was stolen in order to put the blame on him and other Arabs.

9/11 operational errors

From the standpoint of the organizers 9/11 can be considered a huge succes. The ‘Pearl-Harbor-event’ did work out as planned and less than 2 years later a large army invaded Iraq and toppled Saddam Hussein. And almost the whole world bought the ‘arabs-did-it’-story.

Nevertheless a lot went wrong. Only WTC-1/2 were a success. That’s why we had these ‘dancing Israelis’ in the first place, these guys that had spent the weekend before 9/11 planting demolition charges inthese buildings.

Flat-out wrong went flights 77 and 93. That flight77 went wrong was the reason why all these FBI-agents had to confiscate all these video’s recorded by security camera’s in the neighbourhood of the Pentagon. These video’s would have made clear that no plane hit the Pentagon whatsoever and that the exposion had originated from the inside of the Pentagon, which would have killed the Arabs-did-it-myth. If flight77 had made it until the Pentagon than no confiscation would have taken place and we all had seen these impact pictures from years on end just like those from WTC-1/2.

UA93 probably was shotdown in midair. Reason: flight93 had an unforseen delay of 41 minutes. Because of this the other 3 flights got so much of a headstart that by the time that WTC-1/2 had been hit and the explosion at the Pentagon had taken place the whole country knew that the US was under attack. So the surprise effect had gone. The pilot of the military jet probably got orders to shoot the plane down after is was clear that the plane was not responding and had turned into a flying bom.

Another blooper was WTC-7. There was no reason whatsoever for this building to implode as a result of external damage. More than WTC-1/2 it was obvious to many that WTC-7 had been brought down by controlled demolition. That the BBC brought a story that WTC-7 had collapsed while the building was still to be seen behind the BBC-reported increased the suspicion that WTC-7 had been a staged event. It is not clear why this building had to be brought down. Suggestions were that WTC-7 had served as a command and control center for 9/11. Maybe flight93 or a fifth airplane had been scheduled for WTC-7 but did not make it to the buildings. Or maybe the North Tower was intended to tilt northwards to fall on WTC-7. We do not know.

Peer Segalovitz, the demolition man

Christopher Bollyn points at Peer Segalovitz as the leader of the team that planted the demolition charges into the buildings of the World Trade Center. What can we find about this guy who supposedly is responsible for 3000 deaths?

He already had drawn attention towards him at the strange infiltraton attempt of socalled israeli art students in the offices of DEA.

On March 3, 2001, alerted to the Israeli “art student” invasion, the Orlando office of the DEA took one Peer Segalovitz into custody, and interrogated him for four hours. According to the DEA report:

“Segalovitz was untruthful about his reasoning to be in the United States for approximately the first 3 hours. Segalovitz finally admitted that he was one of approximately 30 Israeli art students who are currently in Florida. Segalovitz would not admit what their purpose was in Florida, but did state that they were not here for legitimate means.”

A 27-year-old officer of the Israeli special military forces, attached to the 650th battalion stationed in the Golan Heights, Segalovitz gave his rank (Lieutenant) and serial number (5087989) and said that he “specialized in demolition.

Here is a list of 125 israeli spies identified by the Orlando D.O. on May 3, 2001:

66. SEGALOVITZ, Peer – NADDIS Negative, White, male, Nationality: Israeli, DOB: 03-16-1974, POB Israel, Address: 8187 N. University Drive Apt. 4129, Tamarac, FL, entered the U.S. on B-2 class visa on January 17, 2001. Former officer in Israeli Special Forces 605 Battalion. Israeli Military ED # 5087989. Encountered May 3, 2001 at the Orlando D.O. Occupation: Israeli Art Vendor/Student. (Identified in Paragraph 96)

And here:

96. On May 3, 2001, the DEA Orlando District Office was visited by an Israeli art student at approximately 1:00 p.m. This subject was detained and identified as Peer SEGALOVITZ (DOB: 03-16-1974). SEGALOVITZ is a 27 year old male that has been in the United States since January 17, 2001. SEGALOVITZ is in the United States on a B-2 (visitation) visa which expires July 17, 2001. INS was contacted and INS requested that DEA detain SEGALOVITZ until they could arrive to take him into custody. FBI SA John Weyrauch also responded to assist with the interrogation. SEGALOVITZ was interrogated for approximately 4 hours while waiting for INS to respond. SEGALOVITZ was untruthful about his reasoning to be in the United States for approximately the first 3 hours. SEGALOVITZ finally admitted that he was one of approximately 30 Israeli art students who are currently in Florida. SEGALOVITZ would not admit what their purpose was in Florida, but did state that they were not here for legitimate means.

97. SEGALOVITZ reluctantly stated that he was an officer of the Israeli military special forces 605 battalion in Golan Heights. SEGALOVITZ has the rank of Leiutenent and his military ID number is 5087989. SEGALOVITZ stated that he commanded approximately 80 men. SEGALOVITZ stated that he had been in infantry, but as a platoon leader he and his men specialized in demolition. SEGALOVITZ then began to explain the various types of explosives that he was familiar with and stated that his main purpose was to clear mine fields for Israeli tanks and soldiers. SEGALOVITZ acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars and anything else that he needed too. SEGALOVITZ further stated that he was very familiar with small arms and had operational knowledge of tanks and other large military machinery. SEGALOVITZ stated that the only thing he was not trained to operate was military aircraft. SEGALOVITZ admitted that he had been in two (2) military actions in Lebanon involving explosives, these missions were to eradicate members of the Hezbolah. SEGALOVITZ asked agents not to divulge this information to Israel because it would lead to his immediate arrest in Israel,

98. SEGALOVITZ stated that he was aware of Israeli Organized Crime, involvment in drug smuggling and weapons smuggling. SEGALOVITZ admitted that he was selling art and working for his brother’s company. SEGALOVITZ identified his brother as Dror SEGALOVITZ with an address of 8187 N. University Drive Apartment 129 in Tamarac, Florida. A search of Peer SEGALOVITZ and his vehicle found numerous deposit slips, paintings, receipts for art sales and art equipment. INS SA’s Nigel Jason and Bill Forester from the Orlando INS Office responded and arrested Peer SEGALOVITZ for violation of his B-2 (visitation) visa by working in the United States.

This could be our man. Needs to be proven of course.

Visualizing 9/11

This is an interesting video that can help visualizing what happened at 9/11. Four days before 9/11 this program was broadcast on tv (X-files spin-off), quit a coincidence! A Boeing gets hijacked and it is attempted to fly the machine into the WTC-towers. Fortunately we are no conspiracy nuts, (thank god we are not like that!) and we will not attempt to read much into this coincidence. Skip the nerd and start watching from 5:30 onwards:


This is how it went: the plane taken over by remote control. Note how the pilot reacted, not trying to cause panic by not saying the (entire) truth. This likely occured on the 9/11 planes as well. Nobody needs a stampeding herd behind you while trying to regain control over the plane. That’s why nobody felt the need to call their relatives (what was not technically possible in the first place anyway).

Testing remote control: Air Egypt 990

Download this two part interview with Dick Eastman:

part 1
part 2

It gets especially interesting in the second part from 5:20 onwards. Here we are being told how EgyptAir Flight 990, with many high ranking egyptian army officers on board, was crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on october 1999 using remote. According to Dick Eastman Flight 990 served as a dress rehearsal for 9/11.

The cost of having other opinions about 9/11

Most people believe the offical ACT. A large minority (30%?) does not believe the official story but is unable to specify how 9/11 was done other than some vague ‘inside job’ notion. The idea that the WTC-towers have been brought down by controlled demolition is central to these ACT-sceptics. There is not a large social price tag attached to having these opinions. The worst thing that can happen to you is being called a ‘conspiracy nut’, wearing a ‘tin foil hat’ or simpy being called a moron.

Within this group of ‘9/11-deniers’ there is small minority who suspect that 9/11 was carried out by ‘the jews’. This is a far more costly opinion to carry around with you. A perfect illustration of the cost of this opinion is the following snippet from a CNN-interview with Bollyn:


This clip gives a good insight in the state of affairs in the US anno 2008 and how the media like CNN treat alternative explanations of 9/11. For a good order, CNN under Ted Turner was the last large network owned by a ‘gentile’ (non-jew). Now it is part of the largest media corporation in the world Time Warner, led by Gerald Levine, who is jewish. The program itself is presented by Paula Zahn; some source claim she is jewish herself. In any case she is married to Richard Cohen, a name we do not have to look up to research for its jewishness. The moral hypocrisy is breath-taking and typical for present day America: it is no problem at all to suppose without evidence that 9/11 was carried out by ‘the Arabs’ (‘islamo-fascists’) and to broadcast that view on a daily basis; however when one utters the possibility that things have happened somewhat differently and that maybe the israeli secret service was involved, then the moral outrage knows no limit and all means of propaganda are being used to vilify and demonise the holder of that opinion: ‘absolutely incredible conspiracy theories’ (as if their explanation of 9/11 is not a conspiracy theory… such a theory is deemed ‘racist’… 1/3 of the Americans believe in an inside-job and a smaller portion of that believes in an even ‘uglier theory’… a Boeing is being shown with a star of David on it… In minute 01:07 Bollyn appears for a brief moment… next the jewish ADL is given the microphone to put Bollyn’s opinions in an ‘antisemitic context’ and to link it to ‘hate’… and then we are being served this nasty fellow of Mark Potok, head of the SPLC (jewish/american antifa organisation); we are not informed that the SPLC/mr. Potok are jewish themselves… finally we are prsented with a little discussion with a jewish mr Gross, + 2 representatives of the so-called minorities, who finish the propaganda job… in the mean time the caption ‘antisemitism & 9/11’ is being displayed prominently… sentences like ‘it makes you sick in the stomach’…’we have been kicked around for 2000 years’…’mentally ill’… ‘jews and other minorities better get scared’… ‘pogroms’… it is a perfect example of pure propaganda. At the end of the program there is a switch to that nice mister Larry King (who is jewish also), shaking his wise head begin confronted with so much stupidity and ignorance with an attitude of moral superiority, mentioning Goebbels en passant.

Propaganda in zionised America 2008. And since all 5 large national tv-networks in America are in zionist hands this is the picture that Americans are fed every day.

Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky do not care about who was behind 9/11

As a little diversion away from the difficult business of proving 9/11 one way or the other, here the opinions of two very prominent American intellectuals: Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky.

These are both left wingers and nobody accused them of being Bush-o-philes.

Nevertheless they came out with the astonishing revelation that they did not really care who committed 9/11.


Howard Zinn in Montreal and Noam Chomsky here. Chomsky ends by saying: ‘even if the conspiracy theories were right… who cares‘ (5:21).

It is very interesting that many truthers are lefties who are very keen on bringing Bush to trial, as Chomsky admits. Chomsky and Zinn however are not interested.

How come? These are very smart guys, much smarter than the average lefty truther. Then why? The answer is that these very intelligent people know who did it or at least suspect who did it. And they would not like to see this become public knowledge. You have to consider the ethnic backgroud of Chomsky and Zinn to understand why they respond to 9/11 as they did.

But it is going to come out anyway. With devastating consequences for the current American power structure. Think of a provisional Ron Paul government after the army intervenes. Think of the events that happened in Moscow when Jeltzin took over from the communists and the Russian White House got under fire. Something similar might happen to America and something positive might come out of 9/11 after all. Let’s hope that the transformation will be as smooth as it did in Russia.

About the so-called “impossibility” of keeping a secret where Chomsky talks about in the video as an argument against the inside-job notion: when Truman became president only then he was informed about the existence of the atom bomb. Up to a million people had worked on the Manhattan project and yet it remained a well kept secret until the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were vaporized by it.

The 9/11 International Tribunal

Here are some of the tasks for a 9/11 International Tribunal:

– subpoena: Dov Zakheim, Ehud Olmert, Benjamin Netanyahu, Larry Silverstein, Dick Cheney, Giuliani, Menahem Atzmon, Pete Zalewski, Peer Segalovitz, Jerome Hauer, Dominic Sutter
– Interrogate engineers from Boeing about remote control
– Find out where in the US thermite/thermate can be bought in large quantities; check if it was bought and by whom

It is obvious that this scenario can only materialize if radical changes in the American power structure will take place. I predict that these changes are coming more or less along the lines as the Sovjet power structure crumbled in 1991. The role Yeltsin played in Russia could be played by Ron Paul supported by elements of the American military.

Ron Paul provisional government

Additional material

More on the collapse of the WTC

Video: ‘Improbable Collapse’


12:55 – No examples of collapse high rise steel frame work buildings due to fire in a period of 100 years.
16:50 – Buildings were totally overdesigned for calamities. Aircraft impact and jetfuel fire was incorporated into the design.
18:30 – The design could withstand a 707 which has more damaging capacity than a 676.
19:50 – NIST needs to resort to loosening of fire coating to explain the collapse. Everything was covered with fire proofing, which was undergoing an upgrade.
20:24 – According to NIST the towers would not have collapse but the impact and subsequent fires alone if the thermal isolation had not been widely dislodged.
21:00 – Deceptive test with shooting bullets at thermal isolation which caused it to dislodge. Not realistic to assume that B676 crash would cause anything similar to the test situation.
22:00 – Denial that wide scale dislodging of thermal isolation took place.
23:00 – According to NIST none of the recovered steel samples was exposed to more than 600 C for as long as 15 minutes. Only 3 of the external panels recovered had reached a temperature of 250 C.
23:30 – Less than 2% of the material from the firezone had experienced temperatures of more than 480 F, which is very low. Way too low to soften the steel.
24:30 – Illustration pancake theory. Rejection of the idea that thermal expension had caused deformation and subsequent collapse of floor panels on the basis of tests.
26:00 – None of the samples displayed signs that they had lost more than half of their strength. Also for unfireproofed steel.
27:30 – No pancaking took place. Nowhere there were piles of floors stacked up on each other to be seen. Nore is there a spindel of core columns left. The only thing to be observed is dust. And if dust is all there is than there is no mass to cause a collapse!
28:25 – Antenna goes first for 12 feet and only then things start happening below. But the plane had not cut all the core columns. It looks like all core columns had been cut.
29:10 – Picture of spire. The spire does not tip over but collapses in itself as if it has been cut into pieces.
29:55 – What can move masses out of the way? Explosives. Who in their turn create dust.
30:30 Steven Jones specialty: molten metal. All three buildings 1/2/7 had molten metal in the basement areas. Official reports say nothing about molten metal. Cannot come from fires. Only explanation is exothermic chemical reaction. Thermite most likely candidate.
32:20 – Thermite can be purchased on Ebay. Aliminium oxide is a byproduct of the thermite reaction and contributed to the dust clouds.
35:50 – Official studies cannot explain presence of sulphur found on debrie samples.
36:30 – Drawn out lawsuit of family members of victims against city of New york caused the release of transscripts of manu dozens of witnesses of explosions within WTC towers.
38:30 – Several people reported red flashes.
39:00 – Several witnesses compare it spontaneously with controlled demolitions as seen on tv.
40:20 – Superiors of firefighters forbid the firefighters to discuss the bombs planted in the buildings.
42:00 – WTC7.
44:50 – NIST admits that the ‘best hypotheses’ they can offer has in reality a low probability. They did not look into the possibility of controlled demolition.
54:00 – Several examples of media obstruction of displaying the collapse video of WTC7. Permission from the highest levels is necessary to get this done.
55:55 – 45 seconds would it have taken for the twin towers to come down on the basis of the law of conservation of momentum if internal resistence had to be overcome.
57:15 – 10 times more dust has been produced by the twin towers than one would expect in advance on the basis of gravitational pull alone.
58:00 – Satellite images taken weeks after 9/11 show hotspots around Ground Zero.
59:00 – NIST states that they do not give an analysis of the structural behavior directly after the collapse.

Voice morphing

Is voice morphing possible? Yes it is, read this article.

By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of Steiner’s voice, scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns and develop an accurate facsimile.

Whereas early voice morphing required cutting and pasting speech to put letters or words together to make a composite, Papcun’s software developed at Los Alamos can far more accurately replicate the way one actually speaks. Eliminated are the robotic intonations.

The irony is that after Papcun finished his speech cloning research, there were no takers in the military. Luckily for him, Hollywood is interested: The promise of creating a virtual Clark Gable is mightier than the sword.

Video and photo manipulation has already raised profound questions of authenticity for the journalistic world. With audio joining the mix, it is not only journalists but also privacy advocates and the conspiracy-minded who will no doubt ponder the worrisome mischief that lurks in the not too distant future.

That was feb 1999. Not a big stretch to assume that two-and-a-half year later real time high quality voice morphing was possible for a resourceful agency like the Mossad based on sound samples acquired via eavesdropping by telco-related Israeli firms like Amdocs or Comverse/Verint.

Let’s recapitulate: according to the ICT on 9/11 there were a group of Israeli agents with a list of telephone numbers and voice morphing devices programmed with sound samples from passengers who were at that moment still alive. These phone numbers and sound samples had been obtained by means of eavesdropping. Earlier from a dutch interview I quoted Griffin saying that the transcripts of all the so-called telephone conversations were one-way, not needing intimate knowledge of the circumstances at home.

To get an impression of realtime voice morphing, see these two videos:

Voice morphing:
First hear the real voice, then:
2:08 – same voice morphed into a child’s voice
2:49 – other man’s voice
2:57 – woman’s voice

Voice morphing applied to singing (‘karaoke’). How to upgrade a horrible voice into something much better.

9/11 conspiracy too complex?

Debunkers I met find that the scenario described in this blog is too complex to realize.

I do not think that 9/11 was that much work, maybe fifty man year or less. And that is not much in the light of what was accomplished with the plot: getting 200.000 man deployed in Iraq with heavy weaponry and all. Nobody denies that that happened. That’s 1.000.000 man year since 2003. At least.

So, by investing 50 Israeli man year or less, Israel gets 1.000.000 man year for free to decapitate Israel’s most important enemies. That’s a leverage of 1:20.000.

Now that’s efficiency!

About these 50 man year, what is the 9/11 to do list?

– Zakheim having an idea based on his experience with Tridata (WTC 1993, WTC construction data), SPC (remote control for planes), his PNAC work (today America, tomorrow ze wurld), his Israeli affiliations (Clean Break document), his appointment in the Pentagon where he needs to destroy evidence of 2 trillion $ missing from the books (for a big part due to gifts of military hardware to Israel by… Zakheim, earlier in his career) –> one night of missed sleep
– software manipulation using PTech as Trojan horse; done in Israel by Israeli military programmers of NORAD software –> couple of man years
– leasing WTC, hire Israeli owned security firm Kroll –> nothing to do with 9/11 directly, normal business operation
– procedure of selecting 3 Arab patsies (finally the Mossad choose the Hamburg 3) –> unclear how much time that costs
– Murder the 3 patsies and dispose bodies –> couple of man day incl. travel from Israel.
– start laying trails at American flight schools with Israeli stand-ins for 3 ‘Arab hijackers’ –> 3 man year
– request ‘business loan’ for UMS –> not much time; authorities very cooperative
– buy thermite and radiographic controlled detonators from many different suppliers with 500.000$ business loan –> 1 man year
– Assemble hundreds/thousands of compact packages of thermite + detonators in UMS buildings in New Jersey. If bored, take a brake, walk to Hudson riverside and enjoy view on WTC for inspiration –> 1 man month
– Buy computer with transmitter to control detonators. Write software in Israel by Mossad/military programmers; put the remaining 4,700$ in old sock –> 2 man months
– drive packages in UMS van to WTC basement (aided by Kroll security) put packages in elevator, put on roof elevator, go from floor to floor and mount explosives to carrying columns –> 60 man days
– On 9/11 go to Hudson, install camera’s en document event, have a little party –> 5 man days
– Due to this stupidity go to jail for 10 weeks –> 1 man year (5 persons)

So the direct effort is only a couple of man year. Obviously you need many man years more for ‘circumstantial labor’ like acquiring voice morphing systems. Say the work of the Q’s, like in James Bond.

P.S.1: again I am not suggesting that only Israeli interests were served with the successful 9/11 plot. Elements within the American government, notably Dick Cheney, also passively supported this action. The idea behind the 9/11 plot and the technical implementation however comes from Israeli sources.

P.S.2: I am glad that I as a Dutch European do not have to pay that tax bill.

Plane swapping

A debunker suggested to me that the only conceivable way to have done the remote control modifications without those potential witnesses noticing would involve physically swapping the planes with identical modified duplicates.

This person might be hitting the nail on the head here.

My blog is mainly based on this article by Bollyn. There is however another article by Bollyn on exactly this issue of swapping airplanes. It is a story about redesigned airplanes by an Israeli company Atasco. And FTS’s mounted on them. This might be a solution for the remote control problem discussed in this thread. I have yet to look into it more carefully.

P.S. FTS = flight termination system, a remote control product from Zakheim’s SPC company.

P.S.2 Atasco was run by a Mossad chap named Gitner. This same Gitner became director of… ICTS, the company that owns Huntleigh, the Mossad run ‘security firm’ that ‘handeld security’ on the 9/11 departure airports. And to repeat, security on the arrival airports (WTC) was also done by an israeli run security firm Kroll associates.

If one accepts the notion of inside job then the concept of remote control of airplanes becomes inevitable. It is clear from news items and a filed patent application shortly after 9/11 that it was an ’emerging technology’ in 2001. It remains unclear how it was done in detail.

Khalid Sheik Muhamed mastermind of 9/11?

Debunkers like to point out that the Americans have Khalid Sheik Muhamed under trial who seems to have confessed that he masterminded 9/11.

The answer to that is that the Americans possess a very efficient way of truth-finding called waterboarding; says Wikipedia:

There have been allegations by Human Rights Watch and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed himself that he was tortured while in custody. On February 4, 2008 it was revealed that he was subjected to the controversial technique of “simulated drowning,” also called “waterboarding.”

CIA admits waterboarding inmates:

The CIA has for the first time publicly admitted using the controversial method of “waterboarding” on terror suspects.

He said the technique had been used on high-profile al-Qaeda detainees including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

About waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed:

The article proceeded with recollections of the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who apparently “won the admiration of interrogators when he was able to last between two and two-and-a-half minutes before begging to confess”

Now, that is efficiency! Chapeau! No unnecessary time wasting, come to the point in 2 minutes.

New Khalid Shaikh Mohammed stunner: “My great-grandpa sank the Maine!”

9/11 war room

I have to postulate the existence of a sort of war room, possibly in WTC-7 or the building of UMS, possibly led by Dominic Sutter (the guy who fled to Israel after a first interrogation). Picture a room with say 3 men and 2 women with head set’s plus some senior advisors. They are watching a large screen connected to a desktop computer (beamer). Information is slowly scrolling by which in it’s turn is partly fed by SMS’s coming in from other Mossad aids at the departure airports; Sutter or an aid copies the text content of the SMS’s into the computer for everybody to see on the screen:

7:40 flight11 started taxiing
7:59 flight11 takes of

etc. see this table.

Let’s assume there is a agreed upon time span between take-off and the time to switch to remote control; not equal for all 4 flights of course to avoid suspicion.

In the same link ‘Phone Calls’ paragraph:

At 8:19 Sutter types in: Sarah –> “Betty Ong”
(Sarah is a female Mossad agent present in the war room); on screen in black font an outline is presented of things that Sarah needs to say. The text slowly scrolls by. When Sutter or other supervisors want to make suggestions they enter text in the stream as well in red font.

8:25 Sutter types: Havi –> “Madeline Sweeney”

The number is auto-dialed, the voices of Sarah and Havi are processed by the voice morphing computer before the modified versions are sent over the telephone line with a modified caller-id.

This is repeated for all the names on the list. When a conversation comes in difficult territory or the Israeli caller does not know what to say, the standard phrase ‘I have to hang up’ is said.

This is how it could have been done on the day of 9/11.

Here is a link to an article discussing the phone calls from the 9/11 planes. What is remarkable is how ‘shockingly calm’ all these phone calls were (with 1 exeption).

More on remote control


Here is an article from the Daily Mail (march 2007) describing the proposeed autoland anti-hijack feature:

The question is: was this kind of system implemented on the 9/11 machines?

Here is an interesting thread from the pilotsfor911truth forum, post #11:

Go to ATA chapter 23 and review B757/B767 SATOM interfaces with the other B757/B767 systems such as Flight Management Computers (FMCs).

Satellite data link to any/all SATCOM equipped B-types is established via the B-type SATCOM antenna mounted on the top of the fuselage near/around the station corresponding with the wing’s trailing edge.

Satellite data/commands are received by the Satellite Data Unit (SDU) located within the aft cargo compartment behind panel rendering it safe/secure from any human/pax/hijacker access.

SDU transmits data/commands via a “back door” connection to the flight deck’s/cockpits CDU. The pilot/co-pilot inputs commands/flight plans for their B-type into the CDU.

Pilots/co-pilots can (and do) manually/physically input flight plan commands to/for their B-type via the flight deck/cockpit’s CDU.

“Unknown” ground controllers who have access to/knowledge of that particular B-type’s assigned/programmed I.D. number can likewise electronically input flight plan commands to/for their “Arab Terrorist Hijacked” B757 or B767.

Who has the the B757 and B767 SATCOM Indentifier Codes for each and every last Boeing production 757 & 767 so as to gain electromic/satellite access to the on-board CDU so as to fly any/all B757s & B767s by remote control from any console linked to SATCOM?

Meet your REAL ‘Arab Terrorist Hijackers’….Boeing, FAA, DOD, United Airlines, American Airlines.

CDU = Central Display Unit. Basically a computer screen where you see your input into the flight computer…
B-Types – Boeing 707s, Boeing 727s, Boeing 737s, Boeing 747s, Boeing 757s, Boeing 767s and Boeing 777s = B707s, B727s, B737s, B747s, B757s, B767s & B777s which all = “B-types” as Airbus 320s, Airbus340s = A320s, A340s = “A-types” as DC8s, DC9s & DC10s = “D-types”.
SATCOM – Satellite Communications Technology
DFDR – Digital Flight Data Recorder

In the meantime I now have a breakthrough: these forum posts led me to the concept of ACARS:

During the late 1980s and early 1990s, a datalink interface between the ACARS MUs and Flight management systems (FMS) was introduced. This interface enabled flight plans and weather information to be sent from the ground to the ACARS MU, which would then be forwarded to the FMS. This feature gave the airline the capability to update FMSs while in flight, and allowed the flight crew to evaluate new weather conditions, or alternate flight plans.

Here I found an arbitrary link from a Baltic airline that operates 2 B757 with ACARS enabled.

So it is now almost certain that remote control is possible for a B757. The only thing that needs yet to be demonstrated is that it is possible to disable the controls. (2007)
The defence technology spin-out company Qinetiq has successfully completed the world’s first flight of a plane remotely controlled by a fighter aircraft.

Pete Zalewski

So who updated the flight path to one with destination New York rather than Los Angeles? Here is a possible candidate: Pete Zalewski. What is extremely interesting about this fellow is that he as a flight controller ‘handled’ 3 (three) hijacked airliners in his life that all crashed: AA11, AA175 and Egypt Air 990. Quite a coincidence!

Here a detailed account of Pete Zalewski’s actions during 9/11.

Here is a German documentary ‘9/11 false flag’ (72 min., English subtitles). In minute 15:00-17:10 the German historian Andreas Hauß refers to Pete Zalewski and the curious fact that he ‘handled’ the 3 flights mentioned.

When one searches a bit deeper into this character Zalewski one will find that he would fit perfectly in my ICT.

Could it be that it was Zalewski who sent an updated flight plan to AA11 and UA175 changing course from Los Angeles to New York? Three crashing planes for this young flight controller is too much to be a coincidence.

Interview Tom Brokaw with Pete Zalewski:

Prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks overheard in Hebrew

See Muckraker report:

What the observer of these happenings heard beneath him after the normal niceties were exchanged between the three men alarmed him. The man who arrived in the Town Car said, “The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.” One of the men that had been leaning against the retaining wall expressed concerns regarding whether the upcoming presidential election (November 2000) between Bush / Cheney and Gore / Lieberman could impact the plans. The man that arrived in the Town Car pacified the doubts by saying, “Don’t worry, we have people in high places and no matter who gets elected, they will take care of everything.”
In addition to overhearing in Hebrew, the statements, “The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September”, and “Don’t worry, we have people in high places and no matter who gets elected, they will take care of everything”, the source also reports that he overheard one of the three men in the Gomel Chesed Cemetery say, “The Arabs are so stupid. They don’t even imagine that we are using them.”

Lucky Larry Silverstein

Larry Silverstein began spending every morning at the World Trade Center shortly after he inked a 99-year deal to operate the complex in July 2001. The New York developer would have breakfast at Windows on the World, the restaurant on the 107th floor of the North tower, and then meet for several hours with tenants. But on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, he was at home, dressing for a doctor’s appointment his wife had made for him, instead of at his usual table at Windows. “I had said to my wife, sweetheart, cancel my doctor’s appointment. I have so much to do at the Trade Center,” he recalls. “She got very upset and told me I had to go. As it turns out, that saved my life.”

Lucky Larry decided that a visit to the doctor that fateful morning was probably better for his health and pulled the breakfast. Larry knows instinctively what’s good for him.

But that was not all… both his daughter and son were also absent according to the Observer:

After a last-minute breakdown in the front-running bid, Mr. Silverstein’s team won by a hair. His son, Roger, and his daughter, Lisa, were working for him in temporary offices on the 88th floor of the W.T.C. north tower. Regular meetings with tenants in the weeks immediately following their July 26, 2001, takeover of the building were held each morning at Windows on the World. But on Sept. 11, Roger and Lisa Silverstein were running late. Meanwhile, Mr. Silverstein’s wife of 46 years had laid down the law: The developer could not cancel an appointment with his dermatologist, even to meet with tenants at his most important property. If the attack had happened just a little later, Mr. Silverstein’s children would likely have been trapped at Windows. As it was, Silverstein Properties lost four employees in the attack, two of whom had just recently been hired.

Larry to the doctor and his son and daughter ‘running late’. Quite a coincidence. Anybody who believes these ‘coincidences’?

Not only did Silverstein and his family miraculously survive the ordeal of 9/11; he made a hansom profit from it as well. With remarkable foresight he insured his newly acquired buildings against terrorist attacks. From a mere lessee he morphed into the developer of 3 of the 5 newly build towers, to be completed in 2012.

According to Newsweek: “Since September 11, New York real-estate mogul Larry Silverstein, 70, has been in the headlines as the man who “owns” a 99-year lease on all the space at the World Trade Center and is now at the center of the debate over what to rebuild there. What Silverstein actually owns is an 11 percent share of that lease for which he paid about $14 million. Using cash from other investors (who own the other 89 percent) and hundreds of millions more in borrowings, he bought the lease in late July 2001, from the Port”

So Silverstein initially only paid a lousy $14 million. The NY Post (not really an anti-semitic rag), writes in may 2007: “So far, Silverstein has tapped the $2.55 billion received from insurance money to pay about $700 million in rent due under his lease to the PA.”.

Subtract some $700 million rent, leaving an overall hansom profit of $1.8 billion. And just wait until Lucky Larry receives his future 90 years of revenues, no longer from an asbestos ridden worthless aging dinosaur (quoting Richard Gage) but from a brand new WTC complex.

Regarding the ‘worthless aging dinosaur‘: “In 1989 – there were plans to erect scaffolding and disassemble the WTC towers and rebuild them. Cost projection was around $5.6 billion. One of the architects shows up to work one day and the MIB’s were there – had confiscated all of the plans, specs, details, etc for WTC. They even confiscated their office cubicles and had tape on the floor outlining where they went. Reason – the exterior cast aluminum WTC panels had been directly connected to the steel superstructure of the building, thus causing galvanic corrosion. In short, the “life cycle” of the WTC was not 200 – 300 years, more like 30 years or so.

Sibel Edmonds and 9/11-2
Who is behind DEBKAfile:

9/11 Commission Report

Here is the official report of the 9/11 commission (pdf, 585 pages).

And here a 2 part video in which David Ray Griffin discusses the fraud that the official report is:

On David Ray Griffin’s strategy

The Ultimate 9/11 ‘Truth’ Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi

In this dialog David Ray Griffin makes the following remarks:

In addition to this one-sidedness, there is a second problem with your claim that anyone challenging a theory must have a complete alternative theory: It is false. There are several ways to challenge a theory. You can cast doubt on it by showing that its alleged evidence does not stand up to scrutiny. You can show that a theory is probably false by pointing to evidence that apparently contradicts it. You can positively disprove a theory by providing evidence showing that it cannot possibly be true. The 9/11 truth movement has done all three with regard to the official account.

In my later writings, I emphasized this point — that I am not attempting to provide a complete theory, partly because to do so would require groundless speculation, partly because there is no need. I did, however, state what I found the evidence to show on various matters, such as the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could have come down only through the use of explosives. I also clearly stated, after the first book, that I believed that 9/11 was an inside job, that the Air Force had been ordered to stand down, and that Dick Cheney was at the center of this operation. But this is very different from trying to offer a complete theory.

I have some issues with this attitude. It is OK and well that the leader of the 9/11 truth movement keeps his powder dry and refrains from going into speculations. However this cannot be the last word. If everybody had this attitude the whole situation would end in a stalemate: the government insisting that their story is valid and the truth movement saying it is not. That does not bite. The goal of the 9/11 truth movement can only be: solving 9/11 and bring the perpetrators to justice. How do we do this? We have a perfect model in real crime fighting, what the FBI does on a daily basis. First you collect relevant facts and on the basis of these fact one starts making a theory. And on the basis of that theory one starts to investigate, starts asking questions. This can be a rude procedure, like asking people where they were at the time of the crime, clearly indicating that they are a possible suspect, although no evidence for that has yet been found.

Could it be that David Ray Griffin is avoiding the hassle that comes with theorizing, including pointing fingers are possible perpetrators? Or could it be that he knows who has done it but that he flinches for the consequences in order to avoid a fate that Christopher Bollyn has to endure?

I admire Griffin for the meticulous work that he has done, but we can not follow his advice. In order to bring 9/11 to a close one has to speculate and theorize; there is no way around it. And once a tested theory has been produced the truth movement should go in the attack mode.

Non-disclosure of Pentagon videos

Operation Northwood

PNAC and the New Pearl Harbour

Now let’s open the document:


A Report of
The Project for the New American Century
September 2000

Hmmm, one year before the event we are so cordially discussing in this cozy little trans-atlantic get-together.

Let’s first go to page 51
blader-blader-blader… Ah, there it is:

The chapter is called: Creating Tomorrows Dominant Force.

Hmm. Sounds ambitious. Discussion about how America can expands it’s global leadership.

And then the infamous phrase comes which is the key to 9/11:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

That’s interesting. A New Pearl Harbor.

Now what was Pearl Harbor again? Was it not that act of war that was almost enforced by Roosevelt on the japanese to create an excuse to enter in WW2?

How many dead service men were there to deplore?

Some 2400. This number was sufficient to get a reluctant American population into enthusiastically joining the war effort.


A New Pearl Harbor.

Now how many people died at 9/11?

Some 3000.


Bad omens

We modern people are not supposed to be supersticious. I cannot resist the temptation however to point to two events that can be seen as bad omens for the undertakings of the American administration:

Bad omen 1) here is a Salon interview with Camille Paglia. She points out that on the eve of the Iraq invasion the space shuttle had crashed near the Texas village of Palestine. On board was an Israeli astronaut who 20 years before had bombed the Osirak nuclear power station in Iraq. The catastrophic Iraq invasion will probably cost America its preeminent position in a vanishing unipolar world.

Bad omen 2) Here is the video showing the collapse of U.S. attorney General Mukasey. Bollyn has this to say about Mukasey:

Likewise, two dedicated Zionists-cum-federal judges named Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey have overseen virtually all the litigation from the massive death and destruction of 9-11 as well as the 1993 false-flag incident at the WTC. Small wonder there has yet to be a single trial for any of the 96 families who chose to seek justice through the courts rather than accept the government pay-out for the loss of their loved ones. Less than two months before the 7th anniversary of 9-11, fewer than 7 of the original 96 cases remain to be settled and still no trial is planned for any of the victims of 9-11. This can hardly be called justice for the relatives. As they say, “Justice delayed is justice denied.”

Mukasey is one of the great Zionist enablers of the 9/11 cover-up. His collapse could prove to be symbolic for the coming collapse of Zionism in America as a consequence of 9/11, a position build up over more than 100 years.

Or as the saying goes: “he who dances last dances best”

Phone calls transcript

Phone calls from high altitude and high speed in 2001

Pentagon no-plane theory reservations

Most truthers who read this blog tend to agree with it’s contents but many have issues with the no-plane-hit-the-Pentagon idea. Mike Rivero (*) of is a prominent example. And I agree that site’s like these can make one doubt the no-plane theory. The point I want to make is: don’t let the Pentagon case distract the truthers from what happened at the WTC. WTC, much more that the Pentagon leads directly to the perpetrators of 9/11. In fact if flight77 did indeed hit the Pentagon it would be inconsequential for the theory presented here (Mossad inside job, mastermind Zakheim, remote control, PNAC/Clean Break motive). It simply means that a remote controlled airplane did hit the Pentagon. The reason why I think a plane did not hit the Pentagon is because of the little damage that was done (hole too small) and the outright suspicious behavior of the FBI in confiscating all the video evidence. But if somebody can prove that a plane hit the Pentagon after all, then that’s fine with me.

(*) This is what Mike Rivero/ had to say: “Good summary here. Except for the claim that there was no plane at the Pentagon, of course.“. (Scroll to 7 november 10:28).

Bin Laden no longer sought after

Confirm that he confessed once and denied twice (Richard Gage).

The Justice Department is no longer looking for the guy from whom you say confessed 9/11 !!! How do you explain that? That’s a MEGA-fact! For years we heard about bin Laden all day. And now he went quietly down the memory hole. Bin Laden served his purpose as an excuse to invade and to conquest and now he is obsolete. Der Moor hat seine Pflicht getan, der Moor kann gehen.

I’m sure someone already posted a response to this, but I have to ask were you’re getting this information?

FBI homepage. Lower right corner, “most wanted”. Top list Most Wanted Terrorists. Top of that list bin Laden. Top Ten Most Wanted list bin Laden and note the little part at the bottom of the page.

He already was on the most wanted list for the embassy attacks in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam. There’s no mention of the Cole or 9/11. So does that mean the Cole bombing was a Mosaad false flag operation too?

More on the dancing Israelis

This was THE smoking gun that pointed early on at Israeli involvement in 9/11. The debunkers are going to great lengths to minimize the significance of this event: They argue that the Israelis arrived later at the waterfront than in reality was the case. They even suggest that it was not the burning twin towers they were cheering for.

Let’s go back to see what Fox News had to say:
The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards.
But we do not need the New York Times; see what Counterpunch has to say:

Law enforcement officers across the New York-New Jersey area were warned in the radio dispatch to watch for a “vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack”:

White, 2000 Chevrolet van with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.

This was the content of a so-called FBI BOLO (be on lookout) sent out on 3:31 pm. There can be no doubt, the Israelis were at the water front with film camera’s installed waiting for an anticipated event to occur before the first impact. Not that it matters much. Even if they had been spotted first after the second impact (which is not the case), that had been more than enough proof of advance knowledge. It is simply impossible for 3-5 Israeli ‘movers’ to infer from 2 planes crashing into the twin towers, that it had been Arab hijackers who had done so. And that as a consequence the US would invade the Middle East to fight a couple of wars in Israel’s interest. They were cheering because the plan they had helped to bring about had succeeded magnificently. And to make the case for the debunkers worse, a couple of hours later the Israeli movers were caught. Dogs sniffing for explosives responded positively. How much more proof do you need? Movers better not use explosives if they are keen on being paid for their services. And they had 4,700$ in a sock! What kind of movers keep so much money in a sock? It is obvious that they had not earned any money that day since they had been too busy ‘documenting events’. These 4,700$ were leftovers from this 500,000$ ‘business loan’ Urban Moving Systems had received from the US-government and in fact had been used to buy radiographic controlled detonators and thermite or whatever explosives were used to bring the towers down.

Debunkers like to point out that the Israelis in the end were released and deported, because the FBI found no evidence against them.

The real reason why the Israelis were released was because of higher circles intervening, much to the frustration of lower ranking FBI-officials: Around this time intense political pressure is put on US officials holding five Israeli men arrested for suspicious behavior at the time of the 9/11 attacks (see 3:56 p.m. September 11, 2001). According to the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and two unidentified “prominent New York congressmen” lobby heavily for their release. According to a source at ABC News, well-known criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz also becomes involved as a negotiator to help get the men released. (Dershowitz will later refuse to comment on the matter.) [CounterPunch, 2/7/2007] ABC News will later report that was “high-level negotiations between Israeli and US government officials” over the five men, resulting in a settlement.

Like with the USS Liberty cover up, the American establishment does everything to keep Israel free of blame in connection to 9/11. Now, what says that about the American establishment? Who is the dog and who is the tail?

It’s a rethorical question. I know the answer.

Attempt to reconstruct

Speculate on the timeline of preparation:

– Summer 2000: Zakheim gets his grand 9/11 idea when he is confronted with this New Pearl Harbor notion in the PNAC policy paper.
– Summer 2000; Zakheim contacts either Netanjahu or Olmert
– Summer 2000: Netanjahu/Olmert instruct Mossad to start preparations, i.e. selecting suitable muslim individuals for identity theft
– Summer 2000: Netanjahu contacts his buddy Silverstein
– July 2001: Silverstein finally acquires the WTC complex; hires Kroll Associates for security
– August 2001: Dominic Sutter and his crew start buying thermite and radiographic controlled detonators

More on Israeli eavesdropping

The good people of Malta had some trouble convincing themselves that they should give a contract to Verint/Comverse for delivery of eavesdropping facility. Reason: Malta was afraid that Israel could listen in also.

A major Israeli telecommunications company is to provide the Malta Security Services (MSS) the technology for its lawful interception system, in a controversial contract award which has landed the Malta Communications Authority in court.

New York-based Verint Systems, a subsidiary of Comverse Technology, was chosen late December 2005 by the MCA to provide an interception system for the MSS.
Concerns over the choice of Verint have sparked alarm over its parent company’s notorious link to a major espionage investigation after the September 11 attacks, raising eyebrows over the company that will have its eyes and ears on practically all Malta’s emails, and mobile telephony and VoIP exchanges.

Parent company Comverse, which has close links to the Israeli government, was suspected to have been used by Israeli military spies who had been monitoring al Qaeda terror suspects prior to September 11, without informing the US government of their actions.

No they did not, there was no Al Qaeda. They were eavesdropping on future 9/11 passengers.

According to the report, the system was prone to interception by unauthorised, non-law enforcement parties because Comverse had continued access to the system.


The FBI had already conducted investigations on Amdocs over security breaches after it suspected that records of calls in the US were falling into the hands of Israel. Concerns about the vulnerability of the system operated by Amdocs grew because of a 1997 drug trafficking case in Los Angeles in which telephone information was used to compromise the communications of the FBI.

And what about all those American politicians that are now prone to blackmail because of the spy activities of our valiant little ally in the Middle East.

The roots of the suspicions harked back to 1997, in the bust-up of a major Israeli organised crime network trafficking cocaine and ecstasy. According to investigators, criminals had access to a database through which they got the phone numbers of investigating officers, using them to avoid arrest.

Isn’t that nice. A telecom system not protected against usage by the Israeli maffia.

More info:

How Israel Helps Eavesdrop On US Citizens

An essential element of my theory is that the Mossad could easily eavesdrop on the future 9/11 passengers. Here is a one month old review of a brand new book by James Bamford about just this: “The Shadow Factory”.

From the review:

After the 11 September 2001 attacks, the United States government launched a massive program to spy on millions of its own citizens. Through the top secret National Security Agency (NSA), it has pursued “access to billions of private hard-line, cell, and wireless telephone conversations;

Bamford casts light on this effort, including a detailed account of how spying on American citizens has been outsourced to several companies closely linked to Israel’s intelligence services.

It is well-known that the two largest American telecom companies AT&T and Verizon collaborated with the US government to allow illegal eavesdropping on their customers.

What is less well-known is that AT&T and Verizon handed “the bugging of their entire networks — carrying billions of American communications every day” to two companies founded in Israel. Verint and Narus, as they are called, are “superintrusive — conducting mass surveillance on both international and domestic communications 24/7,”

Virtually all US voice and data communications and much from the rest of the world can be remotely accessed by these companies in Israel, which Bamford describes as “the eavesdropping capital of the world.”

Israel’s spy agencies have long had a revolving-door relationship with Verint and Narus and other Israeli military-security firms.

Interesting additional material, isolated facts, articles, video’s, etc.

  • David Ray Griffin is the leading person within the 9/11 truth movement. A few pointers to his work:

  • Video: 9/11 contradictions
  • Overview of most articles by David Ray Griffin.
  • Information regarding structural design, dimensions, floor plans, elevators, external facade, trusses, foundations, map of complex, etc. of the Twin Towers.
  • Video: The Air Traffic Controllers of 9/11 (52 minutes). Aired on NBC the first anniversary, listen to the ATCs describe how they tracked the entire path of the planes, despite what the 9/11 Commission tells you, that they lost the planes after the transponders were turned off.
  • Material on the alleged phone calls from airplanes

  • 911Research: overview
  • 911Research: Details
  • David Ray Griffin: Reported Cell Phone Calls from the 9/11 Planes
  • Then there’s the February 1975 North Tower fire that everyone seems to keep forgetting… The fire burned for 3 hours.

    So, this was a very serious fire which spread over some 65 per cent of the eleventh floor (the core plus half the office area) in the very same building that supposedly “collapsed” on 9/11 due to a similar, or lesser, fire. This fire also spread to a number of other floors. And although it lasted over 3 hours, it caused no serious structural damage and trusses survived the fires without replacement and supported the building for many, many more years after the fires were put out.

    That the 1975 fire was more intense than the 9/11 fires is evident from the fact that it caused the 11th floor east side windows to break and flames could be seen pouring from these broken windows. This indicates a temperature greater than 700°C. In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C.

  • Then there’s the interesting quote from the Opinion Journal:

    Larry Silverstein began spending every morning at the World Trade Center shortly after he inked a 99-year deal to operate the complex in July 2001. The New York developer would have breakfast at Windows on the World, the restaurant on the 107th floor of the North tower, and then meet for several hours with tenants. But on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, he was at home, dressing for a doctor’s appointment his wife had made for him, instead of at his usual table at Windows. “I had said to my wife, sweetheart, cancel my doctor’s appointment. I have so much to do at the Trade Center,” he recalls. “She got very upset and told me I had to go. As it turns out, that saved my life.”

    Lucky Larry decided that a visit to the doctor that fateful morning was probably better for his health and ‘pulled’ the breakfast. Larry knows instinctively what’s good for him.

  • You are doubting the official conspiracy theory? You are not alone! Scores of high ranking people don’t buy the story either.
  • Alternative integral theories

  • Ghost Riders in the Sky
  • Operation Pearl
    1. Four commercial passenger jets (American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 and United Airlines Flights 93 and 175) take off and shortly after the pilots are ordered to land at a designated airport with a military presence.
    2. Two previously-prepared planes (one a Boeing 767, painted up to look like a United Airlines jet and loaded with extra jet fuel) take off and are flown by remote control to intercept the flight paths of AA 11 and UA 175 so as to deceive the air traffic controllers.
    3. These (substituted) jets then fly toward Manhattan; the first crashes into the North Tower and (eighteen minutes later) the second crashes into the South Tower.
    4. A fighter jet (under remote control), or a cruise missile, crashes into the Pentagon.
    5. Back at the airport the (innocent) passengers from three of the Boeings are transferred to the fourth (UA 93).
    6. This plane takes off, flies toward Washington, and is shot down by a U.S. Air Force jet over Pennsylvania, eliminating the innocent witnesses to the diversion of the passenger planes.
    7. Under cover of darkness later that evening the other three Boeings are flown by remote control out over the Atlantic, are scuttled and end up in pieces at the bottom of the ocean.
  • Flight Of The Bumble Planes
  • Scenario 404
  • Israel has a long history in false flag operations, the most famous one being the attack on the USS Liberty. Here is a recent example: “Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence.”… “A terrorist cell was arrested and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services,” Mr Saleh told a gathering at al-Mukalla University in Hadramawt province. “Details of the trial will be announced later. You will hear about what goes on in the proceedings,” he added. The 17 September attack was the second to target the US embassy since April. Militants detonated car bombs before firing rockets at the heavily fortified building.
  • Link to an FBI interrogation report of Deena Burnett, whose husband died in UA93. Deena reports of cell phone calls from her husband while the plane was at 35,000 feet or higher.

Open questions

– Have you ever seen or heard documentaries or testimonials involving victims’ relatives?
– Why has there never been any time change out parts from any of all the four airplanes crashes provided as proof to belong to said aircrafts?
– Why will the FBI not release the serial numbers to the black box so we can know they belong to said airplanes?
– Why did NIST lie to the American people saying they did not look in to explosions at the WTC saying there were no eyewitnesses?
– Why has there never been a video or photo of an airplane hitting the pentagon?
– Why was a Federal crime scene at the Pentagon front lawn disturbed with in minutes of the explosions at the Pentagon? Photos of people with garbage bags picking up debris and putting in garbage bags. Talk about disturbing crime scene evidences!
– Why did BBC announced the WTC 7 had already fell 20 minutes before it fell? Meaning who told BBC the WTC 7 was going to come down.
– Are there videos from interviews with relatives of the people that died? This to confirm that the 4 flights really existed?
– Why are there no Arab names on the passenger lists?

Unprocessed links
Proof of pre-9/11 eavesdropping of israeli telcoms.

————————- THE END ———————————


Organized Political Terrorism: The Norwegian Massacre, the State , the Media and Israel

07.30.2011 :: Analysis

The Lone Assassin: A Fascist Superman Travels Faster than a Speeding Bullet Versus the Police Moving Slower than an Arthritic Turtle

“So let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionist,s against all cultural Marxists/Multiculturalists”.
Anders Behring Breivik’s Manifesto
“. . . two more cells exist in my organization”. . .
Ander Behring Breivik in police custody (Reuters 7/25/11)

The July 22, 2011, bombing of the office of the Norwegian Prime Minister, Labor Party Jen Stoltenberg, which killed 8 civilians, and the subsequent political assassination of 68 unarmed activists of the Labor Party Youth on Utoeya Island, just 20 minutes from Oslo, by militant neo-fascist Christian-Zionists, raises fundamental questions about the growing links between the legal Far-Right, the ‘mainstream media’, the Norwegian police, Israel and rightwing terrorism.
The Mass Media and the Rise of Rightwing Terrorism:
The leading English language newspapers, The New York Times (NYT), the Washington Post (WP), the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and the Financial Times (FT), as well as President Obama, blamed “Islamic extremists”, upon the first police reports of the killings, publishing a series of incendiary (and false) headlines and reports, labeling the event as ‘Norway’s 9-11’,in terms, which echoed the ideological motivation and justifications cited by the Norwegian Christian-Zionist political assassin, Anders Behring Breivik himself. The July 23/24 front page of the Financial Times (of London), read “Islamist extremism fears: Worst Europe strike since 2005”. Obama immediately cited the terrorist attack in Norway to further justify his overseas wars against Muslim countries. The FT, NYT, WP and WSJ trotted out their self-styled “experts” who debated over which Arab/Islamic leaders or movements were responsible – despite Norwegian press reports of ‘the arrest of a Nordic man in police uniform’.
Clearly, the US mass media and political elite were eager to use the bombing and assassinations to justify ongoing overseas imperial wars, ignoring the burgeoning domestic extremist rightwing organizations and violent individuals who are the outgrowth of official Islamophobic hate propaganda.
When Anders Breivik, a known neo-fascist extremist, handed his weapons over to Norwegian police without resistance and claimed credit for the bombing and massacre, the second phase of the official cover-up took place: He was immediately described as “a lone wolf assassin”, who “acted alone” (BBC July 24, 2011) or as mentally deranged, downplaying his political networks, his American, European and Israeli ideological mentors and commitments, which led to his acts of terrorism. Even more outrageous, the media and officials ignored the fact that this complex, multiphase terrorist attack was beyond the capacity of one ‘deranged’ person.
Anders Behring Breivik had been a dues-paying member of a Far-Right political party, The Progress Party and a collaborator and contributor to an overtly neo-Nazi web site. He frequently focused his hatred on the ruling Labor Party for its relative tolerance of immigrants. He despised immigrants especially, Muslims, and was an ardent Christian-Zionist supporter of Israeli repression and terror against the Palestinian people. His criminal action was political in essence and embedded in a much wider political network.
The political elite and media have scrambled to deny the overlapping links between ‘legal’ ideological Islamophobes, like the American Zionists Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, the Dutch far-right Party of Freedom led by the hate-monger Geert Wilders and their counterparts in the Norwegian Progress Party who rail against the “Muslim threat”. The “direct action” terrorists take their cues from electoral parties, like the Progress Party, who recruit and indoctrinate activists, like Behring Breivik, who then leave the ‘electoral road’ to carry out their bloody carnage, allowing the ‘respectable’ hate-mongers to hypocritically condemn him… after the outrage.
The Lone Assassin: A Fascist Superman Travels Faster than a Speeding Bullet Versus the Police Moving Slower than an Arthritic Turtle:
The case for the “lone wolf terrorist” defies credence. It is a tissue of lies used to cover up state complicity, intelligence malfeasance, and the sharp right-turn in the domestic and foreign policies of NATO countries.
There is no basis to accept Breivik’s initial claim that he acted alone for several outstanding reasons: First, the car bomb, which devastated downtown Oslo, was a highly complex weapon requiring expertise and coordination – the kind available to state or intelligence services, like the Mossad, which specialize in devastating car bombs. Amateurs, like Breivik, with no training in explosives, usually blow themselves up or lack the skill required to connect the electronic timing devices or remote detonators (like the unsuccessful ‘shoe’, ‘underpants’ and ‘Times Square’ bombers have proved) . Secondly, the details of (a) moving the bomb, (b) obtaining (stealing) a vehicle, (c) placing the device at the strategic site, (d) successfully detonating it and (e) then gowning up in an elaborate special police uniform with an arsenal of hundreds of rounds of ammunition and driving off in another vehicle to Utoeya Island, (f) waiting patiently while armed to the teeth for a ferry boat, g) crossing with other passengers in his police uniform, (h) rounding up the Labor youth activists and commencing the massacre of scores of unarmed youth and finally (i) finishing off the wounded and hunting for those trying to hide or swim away – is not the activity of a lone zealot. Even the combination of Superman, Einstein and a world class marksman could not perform those tasks.
The media and NATO leaders must view the public as passive morons to expect them to believe that Anders Behring Breivik “acted alone”. He is willing to take a 20 year prison sentence if it means, as he maintains, that their collective action is the spark that ignites his comrades and advances the agenda of the violent and legal far rightwing parties. Facing a Norwegian judge on July 25 [2012], he publically declared the existence of “two more cells in my organization”. According to witness testimony on Utoeya Island shots from two distinct weapons were heard from different directions during the massacre. The police say they are… “investigating”. Needless to say the police have found nothing; instead they put on a “show” to cover their inaction by raiding two houses far from the massacre and quickly released the suspects.
The most serious political implication of the terrorist action, however, is the conspicuous complicity of top police officials. The police took 90 minutes to arrive at Utoeya Island, located less than 20 kilometers from Oslo, 12 minutes by helicopter and 25 to 30 minutes by car and boat. The delay allowed the right wing assassins to use up the ammunition, maximizing the death toll of young, anti-fascist activists and devastating the Labor youth movement. The police chief, Sveinung Sponheim, made the feeblest excuse and cover-up, claiming “problems with transport”. Sponheim argued that a helicopter “wasn’t on standby” and they “could not find a boat” (Associated Press, July 24, 2011). Yet a helicopter was available; it managed to fly to Utoeya and film the ongoing slaughter, and over half of Norwegians, a seafaring people for millennia, own or have access to a boat. A police force, faced with what the Prime Minister calls the ‘worst atrocity since the Nazi occupation’, moving at the pace of an arthritic turtle to rescue youth activists, raises the suspicion of some level of complicity. The obvious question arises as to the degree to which the ideology of right wing extremism – neo-fascism – has penetrated the police and security forces, especially the upper echelons? This level of “inactivity” raises more questions than it answers. What it suggests is that the Social Democrats only control part of the Government – the legislative, while the neo-fascists influence the state apparatus.
The plain fact is that the police did not save a single life. When they finally arrived, Anders Behring Breivik had run out of ammunition and surrendered turning himself over to the police. The police literally did not fire a single shot; they did not even have to hunt or capture the assassin. An almost choreographed scenario: Hundreds wounded, 68 unarmed, peaceful activists killed and the Labor youth movement decimated.
The police can claim “crime solved” while the mass media prattles about a “lone assassin”. The far right has a “martyr” to mask a further advance in their anti-Muslim, pro Israel crusade. (It is reminiscent of the celebrated Israeli-American fascist mass murderer, Dr. Baruch Goldstein, who slaughtered dozens of unarmed Palestinian men and boys at prayer in 1994).
Only two days before the political murders, the head of the Labor Party Youth Movement, Eskil Pederson, gave an interview to the Dagbladet, Norway’s second largest tabloid, in which he announced a “unilateral economic embargo of Israel from the Norwegian side” (Gilad Atzmon, July 24, 2011).
The fact of the matter is that the Norwegian military has no problem promptly dispatching 500 troops to Afghanistan, half way around the world and providing six Norwegian Air Force jets and pilots to bomb and terrorize Libya. And yet they can’t find a helicopter or a row boat to transport their police a couple hundred yards to stop a domestic right wing terrorist – whose murderous rampage was being described second by second by the terrorized young victims on their cell phones to their frantic parents?
The Imperial Roots of Domestic Fascism: Conclusion
Clearly, the decisions of Norway and other Scandinavian nations to participate in the US imperial crusades against Muslim and especially Arab people in the Middle East have aroused and energized the neo-fascist right. They now want to “bring the war home”; they want Norway to go further, to ‘cleanse the nation’ by expelling Muslims. They want to “send a message” to the Labor Party: Either it must accept a full neo-fascist pro-Israeli agenda or expect more massacres, more elected fascists, more followers of Anders Behring Breivik.
The “Progress Party” is now the second largest political party in Norway. If a “conservative” coalition defeats Labor, neo-fascists will probably sit in the Government. Who knows, after a few years of good behavior, they might find an excuse to commute their ex-comrades sentence . . . or proclaim him mentally rehabilitated and freed.
Clearly what is needed is the immediate withdrawal of all troops from imperial wars and a systematic, coherent and organized fight against domestic right-wing terrorists and their intellectual godparents, in America, Israel and Europe. Labor youth must go press on with their demand that the Labor Government, under Prime Minister Jen Stoltenberg, recognize the nation of Palestine and implement a total boycott of Israeli goods and services. A national and international political-educational campaign must be organized to expose the links between respectable electoral fascists and violent terrorists. The Labor Youth martyrs of Utoeya Island should be cherished and their ideals taught in all the schools. Their far-right enemies and supporters whether overt, covert or directly complicit, should be exposed and condemned. The best weapon against the renewed neo-fascist onslaught is a political and educational offensive, taking up the anti-fascist, anti-Quisling (Norway’s notorious Nazi collaborator) fighting traditions of their grandparents’ era. It’s not too late – if the Labor Party, the Norwegian trade unions and the anti-fascist youth act now before the flood of resurgent fascism.

GOP Speaker Cuts Off C-SPAN Cameras When Dems Attempt to bring Vote: GOP plays scrooge to the People and Santa to the Banksters

Lying republicans have been all over the media claiming they want democrats to work with republicans.  But the video linked below proves otherwise.

They’ve been all over the media trying to put on a happy face on the fact they won’t get the damn bill passed in the House that already passed in the Senate.  They keep talking about and spinning a tale of how democrats need to come to the table to negotiate, when factually it was republicans who adjourned in the House without getting approval of the membership AND doing so to cut off debate by democrats.  Meanwhile republicans ignore the inconvenient truth that their own party members in the Senate already voted for the legislation WITH DEMOCRATS, and now both republican Senators McCain and Corker have come forward saying this makes the GOP look bad, which of course explains all the GOP attempts to sway the media and viewers.  So turning off microphone and then the cameras is all just part of the GOP propaganda fascist techniques.  HItler burned the Reichstag.  Maybe republicans will burn the Capital Building.  Watch the video if you think you can stomach the truth.

Speaker Cuts Off C-SPAN Cameras When Dems Attempt To Bring Vote On Payroll Tax Cut

By Alex Seitz-Wald on Dec 21, 2011 at 12:00 pm

During a quick pro-forma session of the House this morning, Republicans rebuffed a Democratic attempt to force an up-or-down vote on the Senate-passed payroll tax holiday extension, which Republicans have thus far refused to allow. Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA), who was serving as the speaker pro-temp, ignored shouts of “Mr. Speaker!” from Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), quickly adjourning the House.  (POSTER’S NOTE:  This really was the “nuclear option”.)

Hoyer continued talking undeterred, saying, “You’re walking away, just as so many Republicans have walked away from middle-class taxpayers [and] the unemployed.” “We regret, Mr. Speaker, that you have walked off the platform without addressing this issue of critical importance to this country,” Hoyer added.
Moments later, the mic appeared to cut out. A few seconds after that, the video feed switched away from the House floor to a still image of the Capitol Dome. It appears someone in House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-OH) office cut the feed, as C-SPAN tweeted afterwards: “C-SPAN has no control over the U.S. House TV cameras – the Speaker of the House does.”
Watch it:

You cannot have high quality infrastructure, schools, and public services with low taxes, but you CAN have low quality infrastructure (potholes), schools (chaos), and few public services with low taxes.

ISRAELI (not American) firm will count the votes in Iowa (adios Ron Paul)

The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies The Iowa Caucus

By Christopher Bollyn

The Iowa caucus is only a few days away and the nation’s attention will be directed to the results, which signify the beginning of the U.S. presidential race. But does anyone watch who tallies the results of the Iowa caucus?
The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company that is headed by a man whose company was bought by Elron Electronics, the Israeli defense firm. I suspect that it will be the same this year. Don’t expect to see any grassroots political activists doing the tally in Iowa. The Israeli defense establishment takes care of that part of the American “democratic” election process.
In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology tallied the Iowa caucus results.
The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided by a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based in Orlando, Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind of those familiar with Orlando and electronic vote fraud history. See Bollyn article on Wang below.)
The calls from the nearly 2,000 caucus centers in Iowa went to a Voxeo call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
On January 31, 2005, I wrote to Michelle Bauer, Iowa’s Secretary of State with some questions about the use of Voxeo, a foreign company located in Florida, to tally the results of the Iowa caucus:
Subject: How was the Iowa Caucus Tallied?
Dear Sirs,
When I visited the headquarters of the Democratic Party in Des Moines last summer, I learned that the tally of the Iowa caucus had been “out-sourced” to a company in Atlanta, Georgia.
What this means is that the tallying of the Iowa caucus results was done over the telephone, using the touch-tone buttons, to enter the results from each caucus locationS
I am interested in how this was done, and why. Why did the Democratic Party allow the crucial tally of the caucus results to be done by a company in Atlanta? Don’t they trust their own math skills?
Can any of you provide any information about this matter?
Kind regards,
Christopher Bollyn
A person named Mike Milligan wrote back on behalf of Secretary of State Bauer:
Mike Milligan wrote:
Dear Christopher:
The Secretary of State forwarded me the email you sent to then on Monday, January 31, 2004 [sic] regarding the Iowa Caucuses.
Unfortunately, you either received some incorrect information in your travels or are confused. The Iowa Democratic Party completed all of the caucus night tabulations in Iowa, in the Des Moines/Polk County Convention Center, which was the Caucus night HQ. In fact, our tech staff wrote the software that tabulated the results.
To answer your second to last question, we feel we have a comfortable grasp of mathematics.
Mike Milligan,
Executive Director Iowa Democratic Party
(515) 244-7292 ex. 676
I wrote this note back to Mr. Milligan:
Dear Mr. Milligan,
I am responding to you about how the caucus results for the Iowa Democratic Party were tallied on the night of the nation’s first caucus. After checking my sources, I can assure you that it is correct that an out-of-state telephone/computer system tallied the Iowa precinct results.
The system used was provided by Voxeo Corporation based in Orlando, Florida. The calls went from Iowa to a call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
This information was first provided to me last August by John McCormally, Communications Director for the Iowa Democratic Party in Des Moines, Iowa.
Today I called Voxeo (800) 305-5771 in Orlando and although I didn’t go into detail, the receptionist confirmed that Voxeo had conducted the telephone tally of the Iowa Democratic Caucus results.
How is it that you don’t know that?
McCormally told me that chairmen were selected in all 1,993 precincts and these chairmen called in on touch-tone phones and after giving their PIN number, were able to enter the results from their precinct using the touch-tone number pad.
I’m not going to go into great detail at this point, but this procedure of using an out-of-state computer company to tally the precinct results for the Iowa Democratic Caucus lacks the transparency and openness that one might expect in this exercise in grass-roots poll.
Clearly, if someone wanted to adjust the results, it would be the easiest thing to do to do it through this computer system in Orlando, Florida. The Democrats in Iowa would never be aware of it, regardless of their math skills, unless the paper results were carefully audited in an open and honest manner.
Christopher Bollyn
Now, who really is Voxeo, and why are the Iowa caucus results tallied by them? I don’t know if the 2008 Iowa results will be tallied in the same way, but I wouldn’t doubt it.
Voxeo is headed by Jonathan Taylor, who is the company’s President and CEO. This is what his Voxeo webpage says about him:
Jonathan combined his experience in both business operations and technology innovation to found Voxeo in 1999. Under his guidance, Voxeo has seen triple-digit revenue growth for four consecutive years and has been profitable since January, 2004. Prior to Voxeo, Jonathan founded and helped bring three additional software and infrastructure service companies to profitability.
“From 1995 to 1997, Jonathan was the founder and President of InterResearch and Development Group (IRdg), Inc. IRdg created and licensed iPost – the first internet powered OEM unified messaging solution – to leading telecommunications providers including Ericsson,
Motorola and Unisys. IRdg was acquired by Elron Electronic Industries (Nasdq: ELRN) subsidiary MediaGate in 1997.”
There you have it. Jonathan Taylor’s company, which he founded, was taken over by Elron Electronic Industries, the Israeli defense high tech company:
In its early days, Elron focused on defense, particularly electronics and avionics, as well as the emerging medical and technology sectors. In 1966, Elron founded Elbit, which combined the expertise of the Ministry of Defense-Research Institute in special computer design with Elron’s experience in electronic product design, manufacture and management. Source:…
This is important information that Americans need to know and which they will not find in the Zionist-controlled media in the United States. It needs to be understood that the entire election process in the United States is a fraud. More than that, it is a fraud that is being perpetrated by the Israeli defense establishment on the naïve and gullible American public.
The sine qua non of an honest and transparent election process is the open counting of the votes by the voters themselves in each polling station in front of the open eyes of other citizens and members of the media. Any compromise in this most fundamental and essential process which acts to remove the citizenry from the vote-counting process simply cannot be accepted.
This is what Americans MUST get back to, in every polling station in the nation: paper ballots that are hand counted in front of the public.
Nothing else will do to protect their democratic franchise in the United States – NOTHING.
* * * * * * *
Christopher Bollyn is an independent journalist who needs the support of his readers. If you value his research and writing, please send a donation via PayPal to: bollyn @ or shop @
Recommended Reading:
“Florida Election Stolen — Computer Programmer Reveals Scheme to Steal 2000 Vote” Christopher Bollyn, 21 December 2004…
Reporter Chris Bollyn Proves Why WE Must Watch and PUBLISH Iowa Count! December 31st
This article focusus on the DEMOCRATIC PARTY process in 2004, which probably explains how John Kerry went from no where to “winner” in the Iowa Caucus that year.
Bollyn’s article is shocking, and he and his family are now in hiding outside the USA after being tasered for no reason by two Homeland Security-trained plain clothes policemen in Hoffman Estates, Illinois (near Chicago) in 2006. Also see Bollyn’s article, “How a Private Company Counts our Votes on Election Night” linked on the home page of in the lower left hand blue box.
This excellent reporting underscores why all Iowans and NH voters must support Watch the Vote 2008 and the newly up tally board at: — In-home correspondents will be listed for each county in Iowa. Now all we need is for the Iowa Caucus goers to do one more thing before they go home on Jan 3, Iowa Caucus nite: make a cell phone call to the in-home correspondent assigned to your county at — and report the eye-witness results you saw at your caucus. This is how to checkmate any chicanery in the GOP Iowa Caucus (or the Democratic).
(The list of in-home correspondents assigned to your county should be up anytime on There will also be an open nationwide conference call on Iowa Caucus nite so people can call in and ask questions anytime throughout the nite if there is any uncertainly on what to do or who to call on the actual Caucus nite.)
It is important to note that has set up a system that goes live IMMEDIATELY on the internet, with updated tallies. The plan announced by Ron Paul HQ in Iowa appear useless, as Drew Ivers and the other decision makers there are planning to keep the tally secret. Without going public — what keeps the Iowa GOP and the Big TV Network consortium (now called National Election Pool, formerly Voter News Service) honest?

Little Girl Mutilated by Obama’s Drone Warfare Comes to U.S. For Surgery

| December 22, 2011

Shakira was one year old when Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Obama ordered the 2009 drone strike in Pakistan’s Taliban-infested Swat valley that nearly killed her. With two other burned little girls, she was put in a trash bin to die. A volunteer doctor with House of Charity discovered the three babies and attempted to save them. Two of the little girls died from their injuries, but Shakira, who is now four, lived to be disfigured.
CNN reports that Shakira arrived in Houston last week with her caretaker for a series of surgeries that “will make it easier for Shakira to grow older.” (“She will never look fully normal,” CNN adds.)
More from that story about Hashmat Effendi, the woman who became Shakira’s caretaker:

She was only a year old, Effendi guessed, but small for her age. She was skinny. Dirty. Very bloody. She had fresh burns all over her face, her scalp and on her arms.
Effendi began searching for the little girl’s family. She needed their consent before doctors operated on her. But when no one stepped forward, doctors proceeded anyway to treat the burns. Otherwise, they would have to amputate her arm. Otherwise, she might not survive.
Effendi named her Shakira.
“Life,” she said, “was a gift for her.”
Effendi continued to look for relatives, even scattered posters of Shakira everywhere and solicited the help of the Pakistani army and a government official. But still, no one claimed her.
Shakira was finally taken to Shalimar Hospital in Lahore, where she spent the next three years in a charity ward. Until last week.
Effendi was finally able to bring Shakira back to Houston, where Effendi lives.
When the Qatar Airways flight landed, Shakira turned to Effendi, whom she calls Mummy.
“Are we in America?” she asked.
“Yes,” Effendi replied.
Shakira put her hands together and clapped.

Just to put this in context: In August 2010, TIME magazine featured a mutilated Afghanistan woman on its cover to illustrate the misogynist horrors visited on Afghan women by the religious zealots in the Taliban. The story made the explicit case that U.S. troops were necessary for protecting women from the Taliban. How things have changed since then! “Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That’s critical,” Vice President Joe Biden recently told Newsweek.
Perhaps TIME should plaster Shakira on its cover—alongside sixteen-year-old Muhammad Tariq, the Pakistani anti-war protester who was killed in a U.S. drone strike in late October—for a story about Pakistani children and the horrors of murder-drones. Or does that not fit the liberation narrative?

Brooklyn D.A. Refuses To Name Child Sex Abusers

85 Arrested, But Charles Hynes Won’t Say Who They Are

By Paul Berger

Published December 14, 2011, issue of December 23, 2011.

Law enforcement officials, legal experts, advocates and politicians have questioned why Brooklyn’s District Attorney arrested 85 Orthodox adults on child sex abuse charges but refuses to release their names.
In just three years, District Attorney Charles Hynes has arrested 83 Orthodox men and two women on charges including sexual abuse, attempted kidnapping and sodomy.

Unnamed: District Attorney Charles Hynes, center, says that a state law prevents him from giving up the names of those arrested. Legal experts disagree.

Kings County District Attorney’s Office
Unnamed: District Attorney Charles Hynes, center, says that a state law prevents him from giving up the names of those arrested. Legal experts disagree.

But when asked to reveal names — even of the 14 abusers who were convicted of sex crimes — Hynes refuses.
“Under the Civil Rights Law of New York State, we cannot release the names of any victim of sexual assault or any information that would tend to identify them,” said a spokesman for Hynes’s office. Yet, on December 14, Hynes issued a press release announcing the sentencing of Gerald Hatcher, 47, to 72 years in prison for raping his girlfriend’s 11-year-old daughter. Hatcher “was living with his girlfriend and her daughter in their Bedford-Stuyvesant home,” the D.A.’s statement said. The neighborhood is largely non-Jewish.

Sex abuse specialists say prosecutors often withhold names because crimes involve family members, and naming the abuser may inadvertently reveal the identity of victims.
But Jeff Anderson, a lawyer who specializes in sex abuse cases, said the D.A. has arrested too many people for that to be the sole reason to maintain the Orthodox abusers’ anonymity.
“Something else is going on here that I don’t understand and I can’t quite explain,” said Anderson, who has worked on numerous clergy abuse cases and who recently filed a civil lawsuit in the Penn State University sex abuse case.
The Forward has pressed Hynes for weeks to confirm the stunning number of arrests of members of Brooklyn’s ultra-Orthodox communities, first reported in the Forward on November 11. But the D.A.’s spokesman has not returned phone calls or e-mails requesting comment.
Instead, Rhonnie Jaus, the head of the sex crimes division in the District Attorney’s office, confirmed a figure of 85 arrests to the New York Post on December 11.
The arrests are a sharp contrast to a decade ago, when it was noteworthy if Hynes prosecuted any Orthodox sex abuse cases. In October 2009, Hynes made headlines after announcing the arrest of 26 Orthodox abusers over two years.
Hynes attributed the recent dramatic increase in arrests to Kol Tzedek, a hotline for Orthodox survivors to anonymously report abuse that he launched in January 2009.
Observers within and outside Brooklyn’s ultra-Orthodox communities agree that the religious culture of its residents confronts law enforcement authorities with special challenges in bringing sex abuse cases to justice. Leading rabbis may invoke Judaic religious laws such as mesirah — a prohibition against informing on a fellow Jew to secular authorities — and the prohibition against lashon harah, evil gossip, as justification for not reporting abuse to law enforcement officials. Community members often feel religiously obligated to heed their rabbis, or face communal ostracism if they don’t.
Ocean County prosecutor Marlene Lynch Ford, whose jurisdiction includes the heavily Orthodox enclave of Lakewood, N.J., said she was impressed that Hynes had persuaded so many victims to come forward. “I think it’s a very positive thing,” she said.
But she added that it was unusual to withhold the names of accused molesters. Once a person is arrested, Ford said her office treats each case as a public matter.
“While we would not release names of people merely being investigated for any criminal charge,” Ford said, “once somebody has been charged it’s certainly something that is a matter of public interest.”
“I don’t know that we’ve ever kept the name of a defendant in a case [secret],” she added, unless it is to protect the name of the victim.
Legal expert Marci Hamilton said Hynes’s refusal to release the names of the accused abusers is “shocking.”
Critics have long accused Hynes of being at the mercy of Brooklyn’s powerful rabbinic leaders and their bloc-voting Orthodox voters.
“Obviously, it has something to do with politics and being an elected official,” said Hamilton, a law professor at Yeshiva University, “but it’s just wrong.”
She added: “Arrests are public information. At least, if the names of arrested individuals were public, parents would have a better shot of protecting kids than they do now, even if there weren’t a conviction.”
New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind said the spike in arrests is a sign that progress is being made in combating abuse in a community that has been in denial for so long.
But Hikind added that he would like Hynes to release more information. “It isn’t like this is secret stuff,” Hikind said. “Why this is not public, I personally don’t understand.”
The Forward sent Hynes a list of questions on December 12, asking for details of the arrests and convictions and for clarification of his stance toward the Orthodox community’s reluctance to report abuse cases. Hynes answered only about half of the questions.
He supplied a list of 14 cases that ended in convictions, listing charges and sentences — ranging from one month to 20 years in jail — but not the names of those jailed.
Because 10 of the 14 pleaded guilty, it’s possible many cases were adjudicated away from the media spotlight.
In addition, 24 people were released on probation after pleading to reduced charges, or after their cases were dismissed. Again, it is likely these cases were not reported in the media.
Last month, the Forward combed through news reports and interviewed people who specialize in sex abuse cases, trying to piece together how many arrests there had been in recent years.
During the past two years, the Forward was able to find only nine reported arrests and three convictions of Orthodox men.
Of the 85 cases the D.A. has pursued, 47 remain open.
Again, the D.A. has withheld the names of the accused.
Hynes said that seven of the 85 accused had to register as sex offenders and that a further six will have to register upon release from jail. Again, he did not release the names of those offenders.
A search of the New York State sex offender registry revealed the names of at least six Orthodox men living in or near Orthodox communities in Brooklyn. But at least four of those six men were convicted of abuse before Kol Tzedek was launched.
Hynes declined to tell the Forward how many of the sex abuse cases closed so far involved plea deals to less serious charges.
He also declined to comment on the policy of Agudath Israel, the ultra-Orthodox umbrella organization that insists that anyone who suspects but has not actually witnessed sexual abuse of a child must consult a rabbi before reporting to the secular authorities.
Under such guidelines, a parent whose child tells them they have been abused must consult a rabbi before contacting police.
Rabbi Avi Shafran, a spokesman for Agudath Israel, said in an e-mail: “I have little doubt that if the recounting is credible and the child is not prone to lying or fantasizing, a consulted rabbi (with experience in such matters, which is specified as an important factor) would not hesitate to tell the parents that their child’s account should be acted upon.”
Community pressure is often seen as a major factor in families backing out of going to trial.
In a recent case in Lakewood, a family that brought charges against a camp counselor, Yosef Kolko, was subjected to a campaign of intimidation. A proclamation signed by nine Lakewood rabbis claimed the family had violated Jewish law by circumventing the rabbis and appealing directly to the secular authorities. As reported in the New York Jewish Week, a leading Brooklyn rabbi, Yisroel Belsky, published an open letter urging Lakewood residents to persuade the family to “retract their terrible deeds.”
Last year, Ford charged a Lakewood man, Shaul Luban, with witness tampering after he sent a text message to members of the community urging them to pressure the victim’s father not to co-operate with police. Luban ultimately paid a fine and had to perform community service.
The Forward asked Hynes whether he had done anything to combat witness intimidation. While admitting intimidation was a factor in some cases not going to trial, he said that “shame, embarrassment, fear of testifying at trial and the desire [of victims] to put the abuse behind them” are also factors.
“In addition, many parents do not want to put their children through the ordeal of testifying in a public trial,” Hynes said.
Survivor advocate Ben Hirsch said many of the families he speaks with are determined to take their cases to trial. But the D.A. often tries to persuade them to let perpetrators plead to lesser crimes.
“They do terrible, terrible plea deals,” said Hirsch, president of Survivors for Justice. As evidence, Hirsch pointed to Yehuda Kolko a teacher accused of molesting boys at Yeshiva Torah Temimah, in Brooklyn.
Kolko, the uncle of Lakewood’s Yosef Kolko, was charged with sexual molestation of his students. But in April 2008, Hynes allowed Kolko to plead guilty to a lesser charge of child endangerment. Kolko ducked a jail sentence and avoided having to register as a sex offender. Some of Kolko’s victims are now pressing ahead with a civil case against the school, whose administrators, they allege, dismissed them when they sought to tell school authorities about being abused by him.
“We understand the difficulty the D.A. sometimes faces because it is true that many families are intimidated by rabbis and others,” Hirsch said. “What the community needs from the D.A. is a commitment to vigorously pursue those who would seek to intimidate victims and their families.”
In response to the Forward’s question about intimidation, Hynes said that any evidence his office received regarding any form of witness intimidation “is immediately pursued and investigated vigorously.”
The Forward knows of no cases in which the D.A. has prosecuted members of the Orthodox community for intimidating witnesses.
Contact Paul Berger at Follow him on twitter @pdberger.

JEWISH CONFESSIONS of Ritual Murder: Der Sturmer, May 1934, Part II of II

Earliest surviving recorded by Apion in pagan Greece in the 1st century bce. Since then they been alleged in: Romanian, Ukrainian, Israel, Germany, Italy, Poland, USA, Egypt, Syria, Portugal, Jordan, France, Russia, Austria, England and Spain. Jewish Vicky Polin (now a campaigner against sexual & ritual abuse) admitting her family & SOME other Jewish families have been involved in human sacrifice for centuries on the Oprah Winfrey Show in 1989
Ms Polin’s website:
  • 2 Chr 28:1-4
    “…He [King Ahaz] burned sacrafices in the Valley of Ben Hinnom and sacraficed his sons in the fire..”

    2 Chr 33:1-6
    “..He [King Manasseh] sacraficed his sons in the fire in the Valley of Ben Hinnom…”

    2 King 23:10
    “..He [King Josiah] desecrated Topheth, which was in the Valley of Ben Hinnom, so no one could use it to sacrifice his son or daughter in the fire to Molech..”

    Jer 7:30-31
    “The people of Judah [infiltrated by Edomite Jews] have done evil in my eyes, declares the Lord….They have built high places in Topheth in the valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire – something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.

    But interesting thing here is that the Valley of Ben Hinnom (which is in Jerusalem) is also known as Gehenna. “Gehenna” in the New Testament is translated as “hell”!!

    Read on for the condemnation of Gehenna…

    Jer 7:32-34
    “So beware, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when people will no longer call it Topheth or the valley of Ben Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter, for they will bury the dead in Topheth until there is no more room. Then the carcasses of this people will become food for the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth, and there will be no one to frighten them away”.

    Also Jer 19:1-15 and Jer 32:35 are similar.

    Now, after the Lord’s return, during his 1000 year reign, the evil ones will be cast to “hell” (Gehenna)

    Matt 23:33
    “You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell [Gehenna]?”

    Isaiah 66:24 [in reference to good times under His rule, but then…]
    “..all mankind will come and bow down before me”, says the Lord. “And they will go out and look upon the dead bodies of those who rebelled against me; their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind”.

    In this context, Gehenna Hell is a literal, physical place, just outside Jerusalem, where those rebelling against the Jesus-Yashua-Joshua-Issa at his return, are put to death and their bodies tossed on the heap.

Source(s): The Bible. – Similar
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts. ….. Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show Chicago Tribune, 5/7/89…Cached
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
8 posts – 5 authors – Last post: Oct 15, 2009
They like to sacrifice christian children…. we’re like pigs to them. Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show Chicago Tribune, Mat 7 1989
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
May 23, 2011 – HOprah Watch: Oprah Wants You to Know Jews Sacrifice Their First talk show this week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. – Similar  Translate this page
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
2 posts – 2 authors – Last post: Oct 16, 2009
Jewish child sacrifice and Satanic ritual abuse General Discussion Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show Chicago Tribune, May 7 1989
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
10 posts – 7 authors – Last post: Oct 14, 2009
Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show Chicago Tribune, Mat 7 1989 New York Times News Service “Hundreds of television viewers and
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
Mar 31, 2009 – Polin told Oprah that she witnessed babies sacrificed and Her mother is “on the human relations commission of the town that she lives in, and typical of most Jews, the B’nai B’rith-ADL attacked the show as “anti-Semitic.…/Jewish…/Jewish_Occult_Murder.htmlCached
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
Jump to A Jewish woman admitted participating in a human sacrifice on ‎: On May 1, 1989, Oprah Winfrey had an interesting show
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
Oprah Winfrey herself claimed this was the first time she had heard of Jews allegedly sacrificing children. This is remarkable indeed and shows what a law
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
“Rachel” said she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a Within hours, Jewish groups rose up in condemnation, and Oprah’s show
From: David
Subject: JEWISH CONFESSIONS of Ritual Murder: Der Sturmer, May 1934, Part II of II
Begin forwarded message:
From: Linda
Hi Skip,
Well, I just got through reading Part II of The Stormer’s series on Jew blood ritual murders. I feel sick to my stomach. My eyes are blurred with tears. Sometimes I notice I’m not even breathing. Though this is not my first exposure to reading documentation exposing this devilish cruelty and violence (I’ve read Fox’s Book of Martyrs and had the same reactions.), still, the impact of looking it in its evil face again feels just as horrible as the very first exposure to it. I say to the Lord, “Master, if I feel this horrible and grieved and pained and sickened by just gaining some knowledge of these diabolical crimes committed against innocents, I cannot imagine how those innocents suffered. Please show my Your purpose in bringing me to this knowledge. Let Your purpose be to use me in bringing about the destruction of the destroyers and the cleansing of Your people and your planet, for Your pleasure and glory.”
I think now to mention the distinctive ‘Jewishness’ of the forms of torture practiced by the ‘Holy Roman Empire’ for about 1000 years. They too devised new and novel forms of torture that featured new depths of cruelty and pain for their victims. This evidence just adds to my conviction that the HRC was nothing more than a false Christian front for the Christ-hating Jews to control and destroy Christ’s people. The crimes of the Roman Catholic hierarchy have the fingerprints of the pharisees and rabbis all over them and what the HRC has done fits with the cabbalism of the Talmud.
I pray and hope the end of this wicked world comes before I die of a broken heart. Or if this wicked word is allowed to go on much longer, I hope to die of a broken heart soon. I suppose that a part of ‘bearing your cross daily’ is ‘knowing the Truth’ and allowing your heart to be broken by the Truth that has also grieved the Lord’s heart. May He and we SOON know eternal relief and be forever finished with all that is evil and anti-Christ.
Anyway, here’s what I ‘read for breakfast’. I pray the saints worldwide are brought to the knowledge of the Truth about the Jews’ blood ritual murders and that knowledge ignites such a fire in the hearts of all the Lord’s people and we become one gigantic lynch mob to purge the earth of the Jewish plague, once and for all; that we may finish the job that David left incomplete. In Jesus’ Name and for His honour, will, and glory.
(Here is a excerpt from Part II below that is crystal clear as to ‘who’ is behind the Jew and Who it is they are attacking every time they slaughter one of His children.)
The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slain on the 21st of March, 1475, on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town wanted to celebrate Passover in their own way;…Finally, the torturers imitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body upside down and the arms outstretched and during this horrible act they spoke the following:
“Take this, crucified Jesus. Just as our forefathers did once, so may all Christians by land and sea perish.”
Der Sturmer, May 1934, Part II of II

Of Ritual Murder


Further and irrefutable proofs of the existence of Jewish ritual murder are the numerous Jewish confessions. They come from trials, voluntary statements and from confessions by former Rabbis. The confessions were made in two court cases. One of them took place in Trent in 1475, and the other one in Damascus in the years 1840-1842. The voluntary statement was made by the young Jewess Ben Noud, who made it to the French Count Durfort-Civrac. The confessions were made by the following Rabbis who changed over to Christianity: Drach and Goschler, Fra Sifto of Siena, Paolo Medici, Giovanni da Feltre and by the former Chief Rabbi Neofito, who later changed his name to Teofito and became a monk. These men more or less confirmed the existence of ritual murder. In 1803 the former Rabbi Neofito published a sensational book in the Moldavian language. In it he gives details about the terrible Jewish secret of the blood mystery. This book was translated in 1843 into Greek and later in 1883 into Italian, under the title ‘Il sangue cristiano nei riti ebraici della moderna Sinagoga,’ causing the Jews to become very excited the world over.

On page 19 of this work the Jew Teofito confesses how he was initiated into the knowledge of ritual murder, and how the Jews for thousands of years have concealed it from the Gentile world. Teofito writes:

“This secret of the blood is not known to all the Jews, but only to the Chakam (doctors) or the rabbis and the scholars, who therefore carry the title ‘Conservators of the mystery of the blood’. They pass it on by word of mouth to the Jewish fathers. They in turn reveal it to their sons who regard this as a great honor. At the same time they make terrible threats of punishment if one of them betrays this secret.

“When I was thirteen years old,” recalls Teofito, “my father took me aside, led me into a room, where nobody could listen, and after he described to me the hatred of Christians he taught me that God ordered the Christians to be slaughtered and to collect their blood….‘My son,’ he said (as he kissed me), ‘With this confession I have placed my trust in you.’ With these words, he put a crown on my head and explained to me the Blood Secret, adding that Jehovah had revealed it to the Hebrews and commanded them to practice it…I was, in the future, the possessor of the most important secret of the Hebrew religion.

“…Thereafter followed the curses and threats of punishment if I should ever reveal this secret to anyone, neither my mother nor my sister nor brothers or future wife; but only to one of my future sons who was the most wise, eager, and most suitable. In this way the secret shall be inherited from father to son until the farthest descendant.”

This is a part of the monk and former Chief Rabbi Teofito’s confession. From other confessions and admissions there is a remarkable agreement on the following points:

1. The laws demand the Jews to butcher non-Jews from time to time. (of The Laws of the Talmud and Human Sacrifice)

2. The sacrifice shall take place chiefly:

a) at the Purim Festival, and

b) at the Passover Festival

It is demanded of the Jews to butcher an adult non-Jew for the Purim and to butcher a child for the Passover. The child must not be over seven years old and MUST die IN AGONY (!!!)

3. The blood of the victims must be violently drained. It is to be used at Passover in wine and in the Massen (bread). What this means is that a small part of the blood is mixed into the dough and the wine. The procedure is to be performed by the Jewish father.

4. The procedure takes place in the following manner: The father pours a few drops of fresh or dried or powdered blood into a glass, dips a finger of his left hand into it and sprinkles (blesses) everything which is on the table, saying: “Dam Issardia chynim heroff Jsyn porech harbe hossen maschus pohorus.” (Erod. VII, 12) “We therefore beg God to send down the ten plagues upon all the enemies of the Jewish religion.” (This means the Christians.) With this they dine and afterwards the father cries: “Sfach, chaba, moscho kol hagoym!” “Thus (like the child whose blood has been mixed in the bread and wine) may all Goyim burn in hell!”

(This wicked Jewish ritual is suspiciously similar to Christian Communion. In this the wine is taken in place of blood and the bread as the body. What Christians do symbolically, the Jew does in reality – this is the unique difference!)

5. The ritual blood is also used in other ways:

a) The young married couple is given a hard boiled egg which is seasoned with dried blood which has been pulverized.

b) It is also given to pregnant women in the same way in order to ease their child birth.

c) It is mixed with egg-white, put on a linen cloth and placed on the chest of dead Jews so that they will enter heaven without atonement.

d) At circumcision powdered blood will be sprinkled on the wound so it will heal quickly.

The blood can also be used in its liquid state:

e) If you dip fruits or vegetables into it and then eat them (Talmud – Schuldran aruch, Orach cajjim 158,4) or

f) If a dying or decrepit Jew can be saved with it. (Jore deah 155,3). (The Jews have a superstition which originates from the Orient. They believe that old people can become younger by drinking the blood of young children.)

6. The remainder of the blood is preserved with the greatest of care by the local Rabbis and sold in small bottles by appointed wandering Jews at neighboring synagogues. This same Rabbi certifies that the blood is genuine pure Christian blood.

7. The ritual murder and the Blood Mystery are acknowledged by all Talmudic Jews, and practiced whenever possible. The Jew believes that he will be ‘atoned’ by it.

These seven Jewish customs and regulations were established not only in the trials from Trent and Damascus, but in various trials and court cases which took place in different parts of the world throughout history. And of course they were completely independent of each other. This proves beyond a doubt their truth and validity.


The ritual murder at Purim is committed against adult Gentiles. Fresh strong men and women are preferred. The Purim festival is celebrated annually by the Jews in February or March. It is in commemoratiion of the 75,000 anti-semitic Persians murdered by the Jews. This massacre occurred under the Persian King Ahasueros (Xerxes). He had a minister (Haman) who recognized the Jewish danger and wanted to expel the Jews. The King’s Jewish whore Esther persuaded him instead to hang Haman and his ten sons. After that came the murder of the 75,000 anti-semitic persians under the leadership of the Jew Mordecai. The following day the Jews celebrated with joyous festivities which are observed as the ‘Feast of Purim’ even today.

At this festival the Jews usually become completely drunk. This occurs particularly at meetings of Orthodox Jews. During these orgies, plays are staged in which the murder of Haman is re-enacted by the Jews. An effigy of ‘Haman’ is put on the stage and is hanged while the Jews curse and cast spells (directed against the ‘Goyim’). The Talmud commands the Jews to cry out aloud: “May Haman and the Gentiles be cursed. May Mordecai and all the Jews be blessed.” (Talmud: Orach cajjim 690, 16). Finally the Jews throw stones at the effigy and stab it with knives.

In Palestine and in some areas of Russia the Jews hold their processions in public. At the head of the procession the effigy of Haman is carried, and is stoned, stabbed with knives, and beaten with sticks. In 1764, the Jews of Monastyr (Russia) celbrated Purim with a live ‘Haman.’ The Jewish inn-keeper Moscho from Michalowetz had brought the drunken farmer Adamko to the festival in his wagon. The Jews took off his clothes, celebrated their festival, dressed him as ‘Haman’ and gave him a savage beating. They also burned him on the back. Adamko arrived home totally drunk, complained of severe pains and died the next day. The Jew Moscho poisoned him so that he would never tell about the Purim Feast. The case was brought to trial, and the Jew Moscho was sentenced to death. (The documents from this trial were kept by the authorities at Kammetz until the Bolshevik revolution. They were then destroyed by the Jews. – Ed.)

Even today the Jews are celebrating similar Purim festivals throughout the world.


This happened in Damascus at the beginning of February of 1840. The Jews were preparing for the Purim feast which was to take place on February 5th, 1840. On the afternoon of February 5th the Capuchin Priest Thomas was sent for to attend a sick child. The Priest was a great healer and physician. He was respected and loved as a saint. On the way back from the child he was invited by his friend (!!) the rich Jew Davud Arari to come to his home. Father Thomas accepted. When he arrived the Jews immediately attacked, gagged and bound him up. They then dragged him into a secret room, and sent for the Jewish barber Soliman. The Priest was laid on a table and his head was held over a copper bowl. The barber seized the old priest by the beard, the Jew Aaron Arari held his head, and his brother Davud Arari (the Priest’s friend!) slit his throat. The blood was collected in the copper bowl and filled into bottles.

Shortly afterwards the Priest’s servant Ibrahim Amara appeared in the Jewish ghetto. The Jewish Arari brothers, who were standing in front of the house, said to him: “Come on in, your Master is with us.” Ibrahim Amara was butchered in the same way as his master Father Thomas. The next day the Priest was missed and a search was made for him. The barber Soliman was suspect due to papers which were found on him belonging to the Priest. The French Consul, Ratti-Menton, under whom the priest had served, and the Sherriff Pascha led the investigation. Soliman made a full confession and was convicted. Traces of blood were found and pieces of the priest and his servant’s body were found in the sewer. After this all the Jews that took part in the murder were arrested, and three of them confessed to the crime in detail. They were Mourad el Fath’al, the Gentile servant of David Arari, and the Jews Aslam-Farkhi and Monca Abou el Afieh. The latter was a Rabbi. He confessed that he himself had carried the blood that had been collected in bottles to the grand Rabbi Yakoub el-Antabi. After a thorough investigation the three Jews who confessed were pardoned. Ten others who took part in the murder were sentenced to death. Their names were Davud Arari, Aaron Arari, Isaac Arari, the Rabbi Bokhor Youda (called Salonikli), Mechir Farkhi, Mourad Farkhi, Aaron Stambouli, Isaac Picciotto, Tacoub Abou-el-Afieh, and Youcef Menakem Farkhi.

In the meantime the murder and the trial were publicized by the press throughout Europe. Instead of Jewry condemning this savage murder, and demanding a thorough investigation and just punishment, it did the very opposite. Jewry joined with its racial comrades and gove them its complete support. Collections were organized and TWO MILLION FRANCS were raised. The Jew Cremieux, who established the ‘Alliance Universelle Israelite’ and who made the remark “All Israel goes to bail for one another,” led a large retinue to Mehemed Ali, the Viceroy of Egypt. His retinue included the Jews Munck and Moses Montefiore. And, of course, the two million francs. Mehemed Ali let himself be bribed to issue the following order:

“Due to the suggestions of the gentleman Moses Montifiore and Cremieux, who came to us as delegates of all European Jewry [!!-Ed.], we have recognized that they wish to see the liberation of the Jews who were arrested because of the disappearance of Father Thomas. As it would not be wise to refuse their request, due to their large population, we order that the Jewish prisoners be set free.”

The Jews were released. All Israel had gone to bail for them. But the remains of Father Thomas were buried in the cemetery at Damascus.
Upon the gravestone, in Arabic and Italian, was inscribed:

“Here lie the remains of Father Thomas of Sardinia, Capuchin missionary, assasinated by the Jews, February 5th, 1840.”

(The transcripts of this trial are in the Paris Archive. The French Orientalist Achilles Laurent duplicated the transcripts and published them in his book: “Relation historique des affaires de Syrie depuis 1840 jusqu’en 1842.”)

This trial proves that Jewry acknowledges and tolerates ritual murder. That it conceals ritual murder from the public and protects its criminals. The Jews, by any method possible, without regard for the consequences, will attempt to set Jew criminals free; despite the fact that they are guilty. The Jews have proven in the case of Father Thomas that they are nothing more than a well-organized gang of criminals and murderers.


Three Jews, the junk-peddler Leopold Hilsner of Polna and his racial comrades, Erbmann and Wassermann, on March 26th, 1899, (at the time of Purim) enticed a 19-year-old seamstress, Agnes Hruza, into the Brezin Forest near the town. Her body was found April 1st, 1899. She was half naked and completely drained of blood. Her neck had a horrible gaping wound. Leopold Hilsner was arrested on suspicion of murder. He later made a full confession. He explained how he had chained the girl, with the help of the Jews Erbmann and Wassermann, and cut her throat. The blood was collected in a bucket. One of the helpers carried it away by train where it was used for ritual purposes. Hilsner first made a confession to one of his fellow prisoners, then to Inspector Misska, and then to the trial judge Baudisch. He repeated this confession over and over. The jury in Kuttenberg sentenced him to death by hanging. As in the case of Father Thomas, the Jewish press began to rave and scream during the trial and demand that Hilsner be set free. However, their attack failed against the incorruptibility and integrity of the appeals court judge, Dr. Schneider. With a will of iron he conducted a completely impartial trial.

Hilsner and his Jewish lawyers appealed the sentence. The government, which was influenced by the press and bribed by Jewish money, granted a new trial at Piseck. During this new investigation it was discovered that Leopold Hilsner had committed a second ritual murder. On July 17th, 1898, he had butchered Marie Klima, a Gentile girl, in the same way. Leopold Hilsner was tried for this murder. The jury in piseck confirmed the Kuttenberg death penalty. However, Jews have a powerful and strong arm. It reached out to protect the endangered racial comrade. The government (Kaiser Franz Josef) commuted this ritual murderer’s sentence to life in prison.

This, however, was not the end of this extraordinary case. In 1918, Marxist Jews under the leadership of the Jews Viktor Adler, Otto Bauer, and Julius Deutsch revolted. The Jews remembered their racial comrade Hilsner. The prison doors were opened to him and the murderer and human butcher was joyously greeted and put into a Jewish old folks home (!!) Several years later he died and was buried in an honorary grave in Austria at the ‘Central Israelite Cemetery.’ In this case, which was proven beyond any doubt, the Jews proved themselves to be in support of ritual murder. Yes, besides that it HONORED the criminal! Once again Jewry proved itself to be nothing but a gang of organized criminals!


On the night of the 22nd to the 23rd of March, 1928 (it was the time of the Purim Festival) a shocking murder happened in Gladbeck, Westphalia. The young 20-year-old Helmuth Daube had passed his final exams in high school. He celebrated this event on the evening of March 22nd. He left for home at two o’clock in the morning. At five o’clock his parents found him lying dead in the street in front of his house. His throat had been cut down to his spine and his genitals had been removed. There was almost no blood found. The hands of the unfortunate youth were hacked to pieces and his abdomen showed several knife wounds.

There was no doubt that this was a case of ritual murder. The experts stated in court that the throat wound was an artistically performed cut that went in a circular form from ear to ear. It is very possible that Helmuth Daube was circumcised before the butchering. (There are ritual-murderers who circumcise their victims before the butchering. -Ed.) Since the circumcision would have proved that ritual murder had been committed, the genitals of the victim were completely removed.

The Jewish press distracted the public’s attention from this Purim murder and wrote that it was a sex murder. It directed suspicion toward the young friend of Daube, Huszmann. The public prosecutor in this case was Rosenbaum, a Jew!! Huszmann was indicted. The investigation was not carried out by the Gladbeck police, but instead detectives were sent for from Berlin. They were under the command of the Jewish (!!) police commissioner Dr. Bernhard Weiss. Of course they did not find a ritual murder, but found that it was a sex murder. When the trial came up, the Jewish press from all over Germany appeared. The trial proceeded under their control. The public prosecutor Rosenbaum made himself and the entire court look ridiculous with his charge against Huzsmann. One exposure followed another, but he maintained the accusation regardless. An acquittal naturally followed. The fact was: due to the numerous Jewish editors present, no one dared to speak of ritual murder. Only the Bochumer Abendblatt in its edition No. 251 noted the similarities between this case and the ritual murder of the schoolboy Winter in konitz. The Stormer wrote about ritual murder and explained that from this point of view the case was completely understandable. This issue was confiscated and banned; its editors were prosecuted and sent to prison. The ritual murderer of Daube was never prosecuted and is still walking around free.


In Paderborn, Martha Kaspar was the Gentile servant in the home of the Jewish butcher Moritz Meyer. She was an honest and hard-working peasant girl. The old Jew Meyer (about 60 years old had a son, Kurt Meyer, 24 years old. One day he attacked the unsuspecting girl in the hayloft and raped her. He sneaked into her small room, which could not be locked, whenever he felt like it. Martha Kaspar became pregnant and demanded that the Jew Kurt marry her. She, of course, was not aware that while the Talmud permits the Jew to use the non-Jewess as he pleases, it strictly forbids him from marrying her. To keep her quiet, The Jew Kurt Meyer promised to marry her, but secretly the father and son decided to murder the troublesome girl. It appeared that they made the necessary arrangements with the local Jewish ‘Masters.’

The Purim feast was approaching. Then one morning Martha Kaspar disappeared. This was on March 18th, 1932. Six days later, on March 24th, the Feast of Purim took place. Early on the morning of March 18th the girl was seen in the courtyard. She had been ordered by the Jew to sharpen a knife. While she was sharpening the knife she said to neighbors: “A calf is going to be butchered here today.” She was never seen again. It struck the neighbors as odd that Martha Kaspar was not to be seen any more. They discussed it among themselves and the rumor spread all over Paderborn: “Martha Kaspar was butchered by the Jews.” It was reported to the police that she was ‘missing,’ but they didn’t search the Jew’s house. However, the disappearance of the girl was brought to the public’s attention in the most shocking manner. A young couple went for a walk outside Paderborn on Sunday, March 20th, 1932. In the middle of the road they found what appeared to be a piece of meat. On closer examination they discovered that it was the genitals, which had been expertly removed, from a female body. (The same as with Helmuth Daube. -Ed.) It appeared that it had been purposely placed there with the intention of leading the public to believe: “This is a sex murder.” The young couple reported their horrible finding to the police. Promptly the Jewish press began to cry that “Martha Kaspar was the victim of a sex murder,” and promptly the police fell for it.

The police began a thorough search of the house and discovered the bloodstained clothes of Kurt Meyer and traces of blood in the hay-loft. Kurt and Moritz Meyer were arrested. At first Kurt Meyer denied everything, but his mother demanded that he take all the guilt upon himself so that his father would be set free. So that the main danger which faced the Jew could be avoided the father began to talk like a lunatic. Due to constant pressure by the Jewish lawyer, Dr. Frank, he was put into an insane asylum (!!) and then set free. He immediately fled abroad. (This acquittal is so shocking and unbelievable that one can only understand it if he knows that at this time the entire government and legal system was Jewish through and through. -Ed.) Moritz Meyer’s son then made his ‘confession’. He claimed that he had “attempted an abortion,” and, as a result, Martha Kaspar had bled to death. (He explained to the court that he had attempted this abortion without any instruments, and that he had done it several times to cows (!!) with success.) Afterwards (because he was a butcher) he had dismembered the body. In the meantime, pieces of the body were found everywhere. The Jew had cut Martha into pieces of flesh, which weighed about a pound each, and together with his father had scattered them throughout Paderborn. They were found in a small wood, in meadows, in willow stumps (!!), in a pond, in a brook, in a sewer (same as Father Thomas), and in a manure pile!! Her breasts, which had been sliced off, were found in the hayloft. The Jew fed her intestines to the pigs!!!

The most peculiar thing was that no blood was found anywhere. A small pool of blood was found in the hayloft and at most contained only half a pint. It turned out that all the pieces of her flesh were completely drained of blood. The police detectives and an expert German doctor testified during the trial that several quarts of blood had disappeared. One detective said that he believed it was carried away in bottles (!!)

The trial lasted from Sept. 13th until Sept. 16th, 1932. Kurt Meyer sat shamelessly in the courtroom. In contrast to the Gladbeck murder trial the Jewish press was not represented, because, this time, a racial comrade was on trial. The big newspapers, which had earlier carried large reports on their front pages about the trial of the Gentile Huszmann, reported absolutely nothing about the trial of the Jew Kurt Meyer. “All Israel goes the bail for one another.”

It was established during the trial that the ‘confession’ of the Jew about an attempted abortion was a lie. This was proven by the pieces of flesh that had been found. The Jew finally admitted tearfully that he had beaten Martha Kaspar to death in a “fit of rage.” The court accepted this second ‘confession’ with gratitude. They were noticeably relived that the question of ritual murder had not arisen. The state prosecutor accepted ‘manslaughter.’ Kurt Meyeer was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
In reality the whole trial was a comedy, which challenged the credibility of the judicial system. The murder of Marth Kaspar was obviously a Purim butchering. It was established that, shortly before the murder, people has gathered in secret at the Jew’s house, and then disappeared the day of the murder. It was also proven that the old Jew Moritz Meyer went to the Synagogue (!!) immediately after the murder. It is also known that the entire Jewish Meyer family left Paderborn and Germany shortly after the National Socialists were elected to power.

The truth in this case is as follows: Kurt Meyer, together with his father and most likely other Jews (Rabbis?) butchered Martha Kaspar. He butchered her in the attic, her head was held over the trap-door by the Jews and her blood was collected in a bucket. The two assistants carried the blood away and the old Jew went to the Synagogue where he either reported the deed or prayed to his Devil-God. The body was then dismembered so that the ritual cut would not be discovered.

In this trial, too, The Stormer pointed out that a ritual murder had taken place. The consequence of this action was: confiscation and banning of The Stormer, and the start of legal action against its editors.

The Jew Kurt Meyer accepted the judgment of the Paderborn jury with obvious enjoyment and gratitude. He did not appeal. The Supreme Court, for its part, did the same. It approved the verdict at Paderborn and with that there was one more ritual murder, which went unrecognized and unpunished.


Ritual murder at the time of Passover is similar in certain respects to the Purim feast. The Purim feast commemorates the day of the Persian murders, while the Passover commemorates the day when Christ was murdered. At the Purim feast the Jews murder an adult Gentile as a replacement for Haman, while at Passover they murder an innocent Gentile child as a replacement for Christ. Purim murder is usually a plain and simple butchering, but, on the other hand, the Passover murder is usually a tortuous death. In both cases, however, the object is to obtain blood, which is used for ritual purposes. And both crimes occur out of a desire to murder and torture and from a hatred for Gentiles.

The sacrifice, however, of a human being on Passover has existed not only since the murdering of Christ. It is as old as the Jewish race itself. For centuries it was their custom to sacrifice a lamb, a cock, or a monkey at this festival in place of a Gentile human. The lamb is used as a substitute for an innocent Gentile child.

Typical examples of ritual murder at Passover are:


Ben Noud, born in Aleppo, confessed to Count Dufort-Civrac that at the age of seven (in 1826), she traveled from Iattakia to Antioch. And, while she was staying there in a Jewish home, she witnessed the Jews hanging two children from the ceiling by their feet. One of those children was about 5 and the other was a 12-year-old. Frightened by this spectacle she ran to her aunt and told her what she had seen. The aunt laughed at her and explained that it was probably only two naughty boys being punished. To get her mind off it, Ben Noud’s aunt sent her to the ‘Bazaar.’ When she returned the two bodies had disappeared, but she noticed a brass vase on the floor, which the Arabs call “laghen,” completely filled with blood.


As early as the year 1600, there were people who defended the Jews. They took the Jews under their protection and wrote books in their favor. Dr. Eck, the opponent of Martin Luther, wrote in reply to these defenders of the Jews. The latter wrote a treatise in which it was maintained that there was no such thing as ritual murder, and that a grave injustice was being done to the Jews. Dr. Eck’s book, written in reply to this, was entitled Ains Judenbuchlein Verlegung. It was printed by Alexander Weissenhorn at Ingolstadt in 1541. In it, Dr. Eck published a confession by a Jew who converted to Christianity. Dr. Eck writes:

“Because he [the pro-Jewish author -Ed.] makes the claim that no baptized Jew has ever acknowledged such a crime on the part of the Jews, I am replying: It is not true that no baptized Jews have ever acknowledged a child murder. For example, Emanuel (baptized in the Year of our Lord 1456), son of the doctor Solomon of Genoa, testified to the martyrdom of two Christian children after he had become a Christian. One of these cases was reported second-hand. He related how master Simon from Ancona, a doctor by profession, had beheaded a small child. The child’s head was then dragged outside into the street by a dog. Officials followed the bloodstains and discovered the child’s body in the Jew’s house, lying in a tub. The Jew, however, escaped across the sea. The other murder he saw with his own eyes in Saona, a province of the Republic of Genoa. He stated: My father led me into a house where eight Jews were assembled. They took a sacred oath that they would rather suffer death or kill themselves before they would confess to the deed they were going to commit. After that, they brought in a two-year-old Christian child. One Jew held its right arm, another his left arm, and the third one held his head so that he formed the shape of a cross. The fourth violator had a long, sharp, pointed needle or scalpel in his hand. With it he stabbed the child from his stomach to the heart. He quickly pulled the needle back and stabbed once more so that the blood began to flow freely from the wounds into a basin held beneath. This was repeated until the child died. They then threw the child’s body into a secret chamber. Afterwards, they dipped slices of apples, pears and other fruits into the blood and ate them. He, Emanuel, ate some of them himself. This made him so nauseated that he was unable to eat for two days. He felt as if his bowels wanted to come out of him. He stated he felt this way before as well as after his baptism that took place at Valle, in Castile. He made this confession before the Master Garsias of Boamon, Bishop of Lucena; before Master Peter Basques, dean of Compostella: before Peter Vela, Quardian; and before Peter Martin of Gnetario, notary public and secretary to the Bishop. This story was proven true by documents preserved by the Franciscan monks. At his baptism Emanuel was Christened ‘Francisco.’”


In the second chapter, Dr. Eck writes:

“So that the believing reader will not be hindered by further discussion, and the defenders of the Jews will not be able to say that Dr. Eck has no proof for what he says; I would like to report an account of ritual murder. I did not learn of this from hearsay, but from having seen the victim with my own eyes. in the year 1503, when I traveled from Cologne to Freiburg, because of my studies, I received the information that a child was missing from a farm at Langendentzlingen.

“A neighbor found the body in the woods, after his attention was brought to this horrible discovery by the lowing of the oxen. Shortly afterwards, the child’s father was arrested on suspicion of robbery and was taken to Buchen near Freiburg. He was questioned about the murder of his child, but he claimed that he knew nothing about it. Afterwards the murdered child’s body was brought into him and he confessed without painful questions (meaning ‘without torture’ -Ed.), that he sold his four-year-old child to two Jews from Waldkirchen.

“They assured him that they did not want to kill the child; only take some blood from him. He regretted that things had gone awry, and that his child had died as a result of being bled. I have seen this small child’s wounds with my own eyes, and have touched and examined the wounds. I was also present when the father was executed at Buchen. He maintained his innocence even to the executioner and went calmly to his death. The Jews had gestupft his child to death. (gestupf means: to torture to death by pricking with a needle. -Ed.)

“In this case the slanderer of Chistians cannot say that the actions of the authorities were due to their desire for Jewish property. Chief among these authorities was Herr Konrad Sturtzel of Kinzingen, under whose jurisdiction Buchen came; a man who was known in the four counties of Alsace, Breisgau, Suntgau and Tirol as a man of honor, who, with manliness and diligence maintained his loyalty at all times despite offered bribes and gifts, to his prince Duke Sigmund of Austria, and who never was led by threats to forsake his lord or his honesty and faithfulness. Furthermore, I have seen the Christian who received the child’s blood from the Jews of Waldkirchen so that he could carry it to the Jews of Alsace.

“This Christian was executed at Breisgau by the judgment of the noble and honorable council of Freiburg. Despite the certainty of a death-sentence he confessed that he had brought the child’s blood for the Jews from Buchen to Alsace. This confession was heard not only by me, but it was heard by many hundreds of people who saw how the criminal calmly went to his deserved death. There were, from both districts, a great number of people present at the site of execution.

“All this, my Jew-defender, is certain; it is evidentia facti. For everyone saw the child. One could see and touch the punctures and wounds. Even though the Jews did not torture this child as unmercifully and horribly as they did the child of Sappenfeld here in the bishopric of Eichstadt, the facts of the case remain the same. Furthermore, I have not yet finished, and will sing many a song to the defenders of the Jews until their ears are ringing!”

The Stormer also has not yet finished. Its battlecry shall ring all over the world in the ears of the Jews and their defenders.


The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slain on the 21st of March, 1475, on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town wanted to celebrate Passover in their own way; so they secretly abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew Samuel. During the Holy Week, on the day before Passover, about three hours after supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his parents’ house. Neither his father or mother were home at the time. It was at this time that the Jew Tobias approached the child, who was not quite 30 months old, and while speaking kindly to him, picked him up and carried him at once to the house of the Jew, Samuel. When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias, Vitalis (Veitel), Moses Israel and Mayr, undressed the little boy and unmercifully butchered him. While Moses strangled him with a handkerchief as he lay across Samuel’s knee, pieces of flesh from his neck were cut with a knife and the blood collected in a bowl. At the same time, they punctured the naked offering with needles and murmured Hebrew curses. They then cut pieces of flesh from the boy’s arms and legs and collected the blood in pots. Finally, the torturers imitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body upside down and the arms outstretched and during this horrible act they spoke the following:

“Take this, crucified Jesus. Just as our forefathers did once, so may all Christians by land and sea perish.”

They then rushed to their meal. When the child had died they threw his body in the river that flowed by their house. After this, they joyously celebrated Passover.

The case was prosecuted by Bishop Hinderbach, and the Jews sentenced to death. Immediately, all the Jews in the area protested the sentence and succeeded in gaining a new trial for the accused. It was tried before Guidici of Ventimiglia, and he confirmed the sentence. Again, because of Jewish protests, the case came before the court of Pope Sixtus IV. He commissioned the greatest and most famous professor of law at that time, Panvino, to serve as Chief justice. Assisted by six Cardinals, he too confirmed the sentence. the court stated:

“The Hebrews killed the little boy Simon, in order to obey a rabbinical religious law; their motive being to serve a most wicked piety and devotion by obtaining Christian blood for their celebration of Passover.”

The records of this trial were originally kept in the secret archive of the Citadel of St. Angelo and were then transferred to the Vatican, where they are now available for examination. They were disclosed by Pope Benedict XIV; Pope Clement XIV as legal counselor for the Holy Office, before he became Pope, verified the murders of both St. Simon and St. Andreas of Rinn as cases of ritual murder almost 300 years later, in 1770. The boy who was tortured to death at Trent was canonized by Pope Sixtus IV.


On April 22nd, 1823, on Easter Sunday, 2½-year-old Feodor Jemeljanov of Welisch (Russia), the son of a soldier, disappeared without a trace. His body was found one week later outside of town in a condition that left no one in doubt that the child had been tortured to death by the Jews. The whole body was covered in abrasions, as if it had been rubbed with a rough object. The fingernails were cut off, and over the whole body were small wounds as if made with a needle. The suffusion of blood to the feet indicated that there had been tight bandages put on below the knees. The nose and lips were pressed flat by tight bandages, and finally the Jewish circumcision (!!) was performed. The doctor testified under oath that the child had been deliberately tortured to death. This savagery was carried out on the child while he was naked. The body was then washed and dressed again, because the clothes showed not the slightest trace of blood. From the carriage tracks found nearby you could see that a two horse carriage had been turned off of the road and driven to a suitable spot. From there the body was carried a little further and thrown down at the edge of the swamp.

The case was investigated. After years of investigations and hearings, the crime was solved. A large number of Jews were arrested. They were: Channa Zetlin, Slavka Berlin, Mirka Berlin (Jewesses), Schifra Berlin, Jossel, Orlik, etc. (Jews). Three Russian women converted to Judaism (Terentjeva, Maximova, and Koslovskaja) made a confession from which the following facts were established:

During the great fast of 1823, one week before the Jewish Passover, the tavern proprietress Channa Zetlin (the Zetlins were highly-respected and rich Jews in Welisch) got the Russian woman Terentjeva drunk, gave her some money and asked her to bring her a small boy. On Easter day Terentjeva spotted the boy Jemeljanov by a bridge. Terntjeva took the child and Channa Zetlin met them in the street in front of her house. Terentjeva then took the child to Mirka Berlin (the Berlins were also influential Jews who controlled large amounts of property). She took the child to her daughter Slavka’s room, where already a large number of Jews were assembled; the child was then taken into a small chamber.

On Monday of the following week, the Jewess Channa served the two women with wine and took them to the Berlins, where numerous Jews had met with Slavka Berlin. Mirka gave them more to drink and asked them to throw the boy’s body into the river at night. They then brought the little boy out of the chamber, undressed him at a Jew’s command and laid him on the table. One Jew performed the circumcision while Schifra Berlin cut his finger-nails down to the flesh. At this time the woman Koslovskaja came back from the tavern. Slavka met her in the front room, and when she realized the woman had seen something, she led her into a chamber where the Jews threatened that if she revealed what she had seen, they would do to her what they had done to the little boy. She swore to remain silent. The Jews began their incantations and Terentjeva held the child over a bowl while Maximova washed it.

Afterwards he was put into a barrel from which the bottom half was removable. After Jossel had put the bottom half of the barrel back together again, he began, with the help of Terntjeva, to roll it about on the floor. Then all the others joined in and helped, working in pairs, they relieved each other every two hours. The child was removed very red, as if he had been scalded. (This agrees completely with the testimony given by the doctor). Terenjeva wrapped him up in a cloth and laid him on the table; all three women dressed themselves in Jewish clothes and carried the child to the school. the Jews followed behind them. At the school there were already a number of Jews, who laid the boy into a trough on the table which was lined with nails. Terentjeva tied the little boy’s feet together below his knees. Then a large, sharp nail was given to Terentjeva, who was ordered to stab the boy in the temple and sides with it. All the Jews, one after another, did the same. Orlik twisted and turned the child back and forth in the trough. At first he screamed, then he was quiet, looking at everyone and breathing very heavily. He soon bled to death and gave up the spirit. The women Terentjeva and Maximova then carried the body into the woods.

After the women left, Jossel poured some blood into a bottle and ordered Koslovskaja to carry it to Slavka Berlin; the rest being left in the little trough at the school. When Terentjeva and Maximova returned from the woods, they met Jossel and a second Jew in a carriage pulled by two horses. (Seven witnesses stated under oath that they had seen the carriage rushing there and back at dawn). They had driven out to supervise the women. Jossel stepped down and inspected the spot where the body had been hidden. The Jews then drove back into town. Mirka gave both women plenty of wine to drink; Slavka gave them money and warned them not to tell anyone what they had done, because the Jews would deny everything and they alone would be the guilty ones. The Next day, Fratka, the wife of Rabbi Orlik, gave Terentjeva a drink of brandy, dressed her in Jewish clothes and took her to school where the same Jews, along with Koslovskaja, were present. The little trough containing the blood was still on the table, and next to it were two empty bottles. (A third bottle had already been taken to Slavka Berlin the day before.) Channa Zetlin arrived with Maximova, who brought yet another bottle, a funnel, and a jug. Terentjeva stirred the blood with a small spatula and Jossel poured it into the bottles. A piece of linen was dipped into the excess blood. Jossel then cut this into little pieces. (Orlik dipped the nail in what was left of the blood, put a drop on each piece of linen and drew various figures on them.) A piece was given to each person present, including the three Russian women. They then left.

The trial went before the Imperial Council at St. Petersburg. In all previous instances the Jews had been found guilty, but the Imperial Council did exactly the opposite. With their judgement of January 18th, 1835, the three Russian women were sent to Siberia and the Jews were set free! Jewry returned its thanks for the compliance of the government 82 years later, when it overthrew the House of Romanov, established Bolshevism, and committed mass murders, mass tortures, and mass ritual murders in such horrifying ways that all previous efforts (including the torture death of Feodor Jemeljanov) were put in the shade.


In Lower Franconia, near Hofheim, lies the village of Manau amid lovely countryside. Here is where the Kessler family lived. They were humble people with four children. The youngest was the little boy Karl Kessler. He was a lively, well-developed, blond-haired five-year-old boy. On March 17th, 1929, at five o’clock in the afternoon, Karl Kessler walked down the road towards Walchenfeld, where his sisters were celebrating the end of the school term. From that moment on he was never seen alive again. He did not come home in the evening. The village became alarmed, and then his body was found in a small wooded area not far from Manau. The corpse was fully clothed and had one large wound, consisting of a deep incision in the neck that had severed the artery. From the broken branches lying around it was evident that the boy had put up a struggle.

The knife had been used several times. Near the throat artery smaller stab wounds were found. Also a light incision had been made across thye throat from ear-to-ear. It looked exactly like a ritual cut except that it was only skin-deep. The murderer had committed ritual murder symbolically, then, like a ritual murder, caused the victim to bleed to death by slicing the throat artery. Technically it was a ritual slaughter in the “lawfully valid manner” prescribed by the Jewish law of Human Sacrifice. The child’s body was completely drained of blood. On the right thigh and right forearm there were marks of where pressure had been applied. This indicated that the boy must have been held upside down for a while to insure that he bled to death quickly. There was no blood found at the scene of the murder. Also, the killing occurred just before Passover. It was suspicious that the day after the murder a Jewish butcher from Hofheim disappeared forever.

The body of Karl Kessler was examined by the coroner, Dr. Burgel of Bamber. After noting the characteristic marks he stated: “We are dealing here with a ritual murder.” The entire populace was of the same opinion. “A child murdered before Passover–the throat cut through–the blood drained–the Jews had done it!” This opinion spread like wildfire throughout the entire region. An intense bitterness and animosity seized the Gentile community. The crime was taken up by The Stormer, meetings were held by the National Socialists, and anti-Semitism made tremendous strides.

Immediately all of Jewry began to howl. They began to agitate within their political parties, and send delegates from one official to the next. The Jews threatened the governing party (Bavarian National Party). It promptly took action. The police, the court, and the public prosecution all received similar instructions. The public prosecutor’s office was forced to issue a statement saying that the case was not one of ritual murder, even though the proceedings were still pending and the facts were not all clear. Teachers were given orders to instruct their children that ritual murder did not exist and belonged in the realm of fantasy. The affair came up in the diet. The Culture Minister Goldenberger (Bavarian National Party) intervened on behalf of his “Jewish national comrades” with suspicious fervor. In Wurzburg the ‘Central Organization of German Socialists of Jewish faith’ held a mass meeting and invited the National Socialists to debate. They broke it up. Throughout the nation the Jews wrote newspaper articles until they had writer’s cramp. In one of those articles the Berlin police President, Dr. Bernhard Weiss, called the editor of The Stormer, Julius Streicher, an “evil instigator.” In all the newspapers, large amounts of space were bought to run ‘declarations.’ One of them ran the following


“The loathsome crime of the child murder at Manau is again giving unprincipled instigators the welcomed opportunity to spread among the populace the tale of ritual murder, branded countless times as a lie.

“This infamous charge was raised equally unjustified against the Christians in the first centuries of Christianity, just as it is now raised against the Jews.

“We feel it a disgrace that Judaism is forced to defend itself against such a scandalous charge which must appear to even the most superficial reader of the Bible as a deception based on hatred.

“Herewith we declare most solemnly:

“The sources of Jewish teaching, especially the Talmud, contain no word which could even remotely be interpreted in the sense of this devlish accusation.

“Also, no sect or ‘tribe’ of any kind, as maintained in anti-Jewish statements, has ever advocated such an hideous doctrine or been guilty of such a deed.

“This solemn declaration is fully endorsed by the fundamental works of the most important Christian scholars, of the Catholic Priest, Dr. Frank of Konigshofen, and the Protestant Professor and Privy Councillor Strack of Berlin.

“The ritual murder lie is a product of dark hatred, a defamation of our faith which we repudiate with the deepest indignation. We are prepared to prove the truth of this declaration against all defamers before every court.

“(Signed) The Governing Committee of the Bavarian Rabbinical Conference Rabbi Dr. Freudenthal, Nuremberg; Rabbi Dr. Stein, Schweinfurt; Rabbi Dr. Baerwald, Munich; Rabbi Dr. Hanover, Wurzburg; Rabbi Dr. Solomon, Bayreuth; Rabbi Dr. Wohlgemuth, Kitzingen; and District Rabbi Dr. Ephraim Burgpreppach.”

The Stormer replied to this declaration. It was confiscated and banned. The laughable author of the Jewish government of that time and certain bureaucratic creatures went so far, that a high court judge explained to the press: “The acceptance of a ritual murder charge is absurd and ridiculous.

The boy most likely accidentally hit a tree-branch (!!) (The stab wound was 12 inches deep!-Ed.) or was attacked by a hungry deer.” (Thus, the high court judge, to please the Jews, excluded the deer from the ranks of the herbivores and ranked it under the carnivores and beasts of prey! Besides, in March the deer do not have antlers (with which Kessler’s throat was supposed to have been pierced), but only a very sensitive and soft, so-called ‘bast.’

The ‘child murder of Manau’ passed, as was expected, into obscurity. The perpetrators were never found. Unatoned, the spilled blood screams heavenward!

-Julius Streicher
The Stormer, May, 1934


“Shakira means thankful” – A little girl who can still smile – Texas doctors to operate on girl burned in U.S. drone strike

By Moni Basu, CNN
December 22, 2011 — Updated 1315 GMT (2115 HKT)
Drone strike victim treated in Texas

(CNN) — She has eyelashes but no eyebrows. She has all her fingers but is missing four nails. Her skin is so taut now that she can no longer frown.
But she can still smile.
Her face tells a story of suffering. Her name, Shakira, tells a story of a new journey.
Shakira means thankful.
Last week, 4-year-old Shakira arrived in the United States for what her caretaker, Hashmat Effendi, hopes will be the start of the rest of her life.
Shakira, believed burned in a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan, will undergo reconstructive surgery in January.
She will never look fully normal, but Effendi hopes the surgery will make it easier for Shakira to grow older and help others see what Effendi has seen all along: an effervescent bundle of love.
In 2009, Effendi was on a medical mission with Texas-based House of Charity in Pakistan’s Swat Valley. The region’s natural beauty was once compared to Switzerland’s, but by then it was a Taliban-infested area rife with violence.
One of the doctors found three little girls left in a trash bin. They’d suffered horrific injuries.
“Who are they?” the doctor asked.
Nobody knew.
Where were their parents? Where were they from?
All anyone could say is that there had been a U.S. drone attack. The girls were likely hurt in the strike.
The doctor, who was traveling with House of Charity, took them back with him. They were in grave condition. Two of the girls died, but the littlest one had a chance of making it if she were treated right away.
She was only a year old, Effendi guessed, but small for her age. She was skinny. Dirty. Very bloody. She had fresh burns all over her face, her scalp and on her arms.
Effendi began searching for the little girl’s family. She needed their consent before doctors operated on her. But when no one stepped forward, doctors proceeded anyway to treat the burns. Otherwise, they would have to amputate her arm. Otherwise, she might not survive.
Effendi named her Shakira.
“Life,” she said, “was a gift for her.”
Effendi continued to look for relatives, even scattered posters of Shakira everywhere and solicited the help of the Pakistani army and a government official. But still, no one claimed her.
Shakira was finally taken to Shalimar Hospital in Lahore, where she spent the next three years in a charity ward. Until last week.
Effendi was finally able to bring Shakira back to Houston, where Effendi lives.
When the Qatar Airways flight landed, Shakira turned to Effendi, whom she calls Mummy.
“Are we in America?” she asked.
“Yes,” Effendi replied.
Shakira put her hands together and clapped.
On the plane, Shakira had learned to count from 1 to 27 in English. It was a good start, Effendi thought.
House of Charity has helped thousands of children with congenital birth defects or those who have been disfigured in war, but Shakira was special.
Effendi raised three sons, who are grown. Her house once again filled with the mirth of a youngster.
“She’s like my tail,” Effendi said. “She follows me around all day.”
She took Shakira to McDonald’s. Shakira gobbled up chicken nuggets. She learned that in America, chips were called French fries and tomato sauce was ketchup.
Effendi was ironing her clothes Tuesday when Shakira ran up to her.
“Mummy, do you love me?” she asked. “How much?”
“This much,” Effendi said, gesturing.
Shakira ran into the bathroom, stood in front of the mirror and started screaming.
It was then that Effendi realized Shakira was overwhelmed.
She had gone that day to meet her doctor, Robert McCauley, at the Shriners Hospital for Children in Galveston. He volunteered to do the reconstructive surgery.
Shakira arrived in a turquoise striped dress, black leggings and white lacy socks. She wore beads around her neck and a big pink ring that House of Charity volunteer Larry Maxwell gave her. She called him “Nana,” the Urdu word for grandfather.
At the hospital, Shakira touched McCauley’s coat buttons; the nurse’s stethoscope. She referred to McCauley as her doctor and understood as best a child could that he was trying to make her well.
“It’s not easy and it’s not a single-day procedure,” McCauley said about the surgery. He will start January 16 with her right hand.
He will never be able to give her eyebrows or restore the missing nails on four of her fingers. Sometimes, when Shakira eats spicy food, her flesh feels raw and irritated. She will have to always be careful about that.
He will never be able to fix the severe discoloration on her forehead. But he hopes to reconstruct her nose, fix her eyes.
Shakira took it all in stride at the hospital. But it was that sense of belonging and being loved that was alien for her, Effendi realized. It was overwhelming.
“She needs security,” Effendi said. “Yesterday was a very emotional day for her.”
Effendi had been working with children for 25 years. But Shakira was teaching her new things.
Effendi hopes Shakira will be adopted by a family in the United States. It would be unfair, she said, to send Shakira back to Pakistan. She has no one there.
For now, Shakira will adjust to life in America in Effendi’s home.
Effendi may never know where Shakira came from or who claimed her as a daughter.
But she knows she was able to give Shakira new life — and a name that could not have been more fitting.