Loonwatch Has Been Warning about an Anders Behring Breivik for Years

Average’s comment: I recommend all you guys to read and participate in Loon Watch at
Original article from :
Posted on 25 July 2011 by Garibaldi
Robert Spencer and his biggest fan: Anders Behring Breivik

Robert Spencer and his biggest fan: Anders Behring Breivik

Anders Behring Breivik is by all accounts an intelligent individual, wealthy and from a privileged background. He believes Europe is under assault, that it is being colonized by the hordes of the evil “green” menace known as ‘Islam’ and that Europe’s leaders are responsible for the onslaught. He believes this despite the fact that there are no Muslim Armies occupying ANY European nation, there are no Muslim Armies that have set up bases in ANY European nation.
How did he come to the irrational conclusion that his very way of life was under imminent threat?
His inspiration can be gleaned from the words of his manifesto, 2083: A European Declaration of Independence. In his own words he was inspired by Andrew Bostom, Robert Spencer, Bat Ye’or, Pamela Geller, Geert Wilders, Ibn Warraq, Serge Trifkovic, the so-called “Vienna School” and a plethora of other Islamophobes and anti-Muslims.
LoonWatch since its inception has been warning about the ever increasing radicalization of the anti-Muslim Movement, its trans-atlantic nature, as well as the eventuality of violence. We documented numerous instances of “inciting violence,” both in the speech of the leading Islamophobes as well as in the conduct and speech of their followers.
One only needs to look at our piece on Pamela Geller, “The Looniest Blogger Ever,” in which Geller engages in all of the well worn conspiracies that we are used to and which Breivik shared, as well as her pronouncements of genocide against Muslims and the “political elites” who enable them.
Robert Spencer’s influence on Breivik’s ideas about Islam, Muslims and the West seems to be greater than anyone else. He cites Spencer numerous times (64) in his manifesto, always glowingly, for instance he writes on p. 754,

About Islam I recommend essentially everything written by Robert Spencer. Bat Ye’or’s books are groundbreaking and important, though admittedly not always easy to read. The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew Bostom should be considered required reading for all those interested in Islam. It is the best and most complete book available on the subject in English, and possibly in any language. Ibn Warraq’s books are excellent, starting with his Defending the West . Understanding Muhammad by the Iranian ex-Muslim Ali Sina is also worth reading, as is Defeating Jihad by Serge Trifkovic.

Like Spencer, Breivik believes in waging a Crusade against Muslims. Spencer declared in his book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), “God Wills it!,” that was the battle cry of the Crusaders. There is more in Danios’ series rebutting The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).
We have been trying to prevent the grisly terrorist attacks that rocked Norway by making people aware of the serious threat from radicals who in the guise of freedom and under the mantle of liberty wish to impose their truly destructive, exclusivist ideology upon the masses.
However, our protestations were generally unheeded. It resulted in the Beslan of Norway and now we have a manifesto from a killer inspired by the extremists who we have been exposing for years. Anders Behring Breivik is the polo sweater wearing anti-Muslim Right-wing nationalist Crusader icon of Islamophobes worldwide, he is their Che Guevara and he will inspire more copycats in his wake.

59 Comments For This Post

  1. Chris Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 1:57 pm You’re absolutely right. What Spencer is running over at Jihad Watch is nothing other than a cult, and an extremely dangerous one at that. As I am sure you are aware, if one tries to say anything that even slightly demurs from The Spencer Doctrine in the comments section of Jihad Watch one is immediately accused of being motivated by the forces of evil, being a debauched enemy of “Judeo-Christian civilization”, and suspected of being either a savage “koranimal”/ “mudslime” / “Mahound” pushing sharia under the cloak of “taqiyya”, or else an equally despicable “leftard” in cahoots with jihadists.
    This kind of hysterical paranoia and irrational hatred has been fomenting in the comments sections of Jihad Watch (and similar sites, such as Geller’s Atlas Shrugs) for years now, where all Muslims and the entire political left are regularly demonised and dehumanised in the most appalling fashion. This hatred and paranoia regularly reaches fever pitch, with calls for the mass deportation of all Muslims, and calls for violence against both Muslims and leftists often being openly expressed.
    While Spencer is quick to point out that he does not himself openly advocate violence (unless it is carried out by Western or Israeli governments against Muslims, of course), there is no doubt that his books and website incite extreme pro-Christian/pro-conservative fanaticism and irrational hatred of both Muslims and anyone with left-wing leanings – and irrationality and hatred, especially when incited by fear-mongering propaganda, soon beget violence.
    Spencer himself has many times argued that the “most determined and implacable enemies” of what he calls “Judeo-Christian civilisation” are not the jihadists but rather those on the left who “facilitate” the “Islamisation of the West” via their pernicious doctrine of multiculturalism and their supposed hatred of “Judeo-Christian values”. According to Spencer, there is a leftist/jihadist conspiracy to destroy the “Judeo-Christian civilisation” of the West, and what is needed is a Christian/conservative “Crusade” against such “traitors”. Indeed, Spencer has published reams of material attempting to justify the Crusades as having been absolutely necessary for the preservation of Christendom, and this material by Spencer is reproduced at great length in Breivik’s manifesto.
    Spencer would have us all believe that we are now living in a time markedly similar to that of the original Crusades, and that just as the latter were necessary to defend Judaeo-Christian civilisation from the Muslim hordes, so now it is imperative to start a “new Crusade” for precisely the same reason. As you point out, one of Spencer’s best-selling books even has the words “DEUS VULT!” (the war-cry of the original Crusaders) as its epigraph. Spencer also regularly states that we are all “at war with Islam”, and that anyone who disagrees is ipso facto a “dhimmi” and a “traitor”.
    Is it really surprising, in view of all this, that one of Spencer’s many fanatical followers would go one step further, setting up an elaborate neo-Crusader cult (hundreds of pages are devoted to this in Breivik’s manifesto), fantasising about himself as a modern-day “Knight Templar” who will one day be revered as a Saint for his courage, and then and go out shooting the people whom the likes of Spencer have singled out as “the most determined and implacable enemy” of “Judeo-Christian civilisation”?
  2. mp11 Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:02 pm Somebody should add “I tried to tell you” as a subtitle…
    btw anyone notice hugh fitzgerald is also referenced in the manifesto?
  3. Webdawah Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:04 pm You guys are doing a great job here on LoonWatch. You are the people we had been waiting for since anti-Islamic bigots started cashing in on anti-Muslim conspiracies/diatribes/misinformation since 9/11.
    Keep letting the world know what they are- Loons.
  4. anj Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:07 pm Hopefully people will begin to wake up and realise MEK linked spencer or should i say oslo massacre related spencer and his ilk are full of hatred and that “hatred will only beget hatred”
    On his now discredited website he has called in his right wing zionist paymaster david horowitz to defend him.
    Oh the irony!
  5. JD Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:14 pm Anders Behring Breivik claims two more terror cells remain at large
    The man who confessed to killing more than 70 people in a bomb and gun massacre on Friday has claimed he belonged to an organisation with two more cells who remain at large.
    At a closed hearing in Oslo, Anders Behring Breivik admitted carrying out the attacks but pleaded not guilty to one of the worst mass killings in peacetime Europe, and told the court he had acted to “save Europe” from Islam.
    Breivik, 32, will be detained in complete isolation for four weeks, with no incoming letters or visitors except for his lawyer, while police investigate his claims to have accomplices. Breivik has previously said he acted alone in the attacks.
    “The accused has made statements today that require further investigation, including that ‘there are two more cells in our organisation’,” said the judge, Kim Heger, who warned that Breivik could tamper with vital evidence if released. He will be held for at least another month after the court-ordered solitary confinement.
    Breivik arrived at court on Monday morning to jeering from a crowd of around 400 people. As a police convoy approached the rear of Oslo’s central court, someone shouted then the crowd surged forward. Bystanders screamed “traitor” and banged on the windows of a police car after one man said he’d spotted Breivik in the back seat
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/25/anders-behring-breivik-terror-cells
  6. JD Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:16 pm and 1000′s of people brainwased by Geller Spencer who have read this guys manifesto and have then it to heart. It also contains blue prints to body armer and Bomb makeing and avalible online by simple searching for it on google. I am sure they are dont hitting there 2nd hand targets and will prob try there main Muslims. Scared yet
  7. mindy1 Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:24 pm This is truly frightening :( how does anyone of any belief system get to such a state, that they think killing the “enemy” is acceptable??? Let’s hope he is lying about the second cell, or it could get worse :(
  8. JD Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:31 pm INDEPENDENCE, MO (KCTV) –
    An Independence man faced a stunning discovery when he walked out to his car Friday morning. The vandalism he saw done to his car prompted him to call the police.
    Imagine you’re getting ready for a job interview. You head out the door and are greeted with bad news. For Fred Soltani and his wife Stacy, Friday was just an ordinary day until Soltani’s wife walked out the door.
    “We were getting ready for work, my wife was getting ready for work and she was about to pull out of the driveway and noticed my car’s windshield had something wrong with it,” said Soltani.
    What she saw included a shattered windshield and a swastika and racial slur aimed at those in the Hispanic community written in white paint on the hood.
    “First reaction was ‘oh my god, this can’t be happening,’” said Soltani.
    Soltani is a first generation Iranian-American and has lived in his Independence neighborhood for several years. He says he hasn’t ever seen this type of activity in the area before.
    “In the neighborhood that we’ve lived here, for about four years, almost four years come November, nothing’s happened that we know about – that is racial profiling like this,” said Soltani.
    After the surprise wore off, Soltani told KCTV5′s Nima Shaffe he felt a combination of emotions.
    “I feel violated at the same time because this is a random act of aggressiveness in that it’s, in my terms, a cowardly act,” said Soltani.
    Now he says it’s time to move on.
    “Whoever done it, I forgive you. That’s one thing about being a good Christian,” said Soltani.
    Soltani tells KCTV5′s Nima Shaffe he filed a police report. Independence Police are now investigating.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    OOPS HE CHRISTIAN REALLY RACIEST PEOPLE BECAUSE HIS NAME IS SOLTANI AND PARENTS FROM ME DOES NOT MEAN HE IS A MOSLEM JUST LIKE SHEIKS ARE ALSO NOT MUSLIM…. IF YOUR GOING TO BEA BIGOT BE A BIGOT TOWARDS THE RIGHT PERSON….
  9. al Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 2:59 pm We see from the dance that lil spency is doing that no amount of distancing and chastisement the Islamophobes have regarding Breivik, will change the fact that theirs is a sinking ship-
  10. Imagine2050 Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:03 pm Let’s not leave the John Tanton Network of anti-immigrant groups out of this discussion. Center for Immigration Studies, after all, gets a citing in his manifesto: http://bit.ly/n2ZbBw
  11. Noor Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:12 pm check this guy he hits the nail on the head! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeoRqZ6mWzQ&NR=1
  12. Mosizzle Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:40 pm Anders Behring Breivik has collected and compiled every piece of Islamophobic garbage about the non-existent “Leftist-Muslim Alliance” in his book, including articles from the Islamophobes that have been exposed here on Loonwatch many times. After his massacre, people around the world will read this book and Breivik hopes some moron will read it and follow his example. He has laid out an entire plan — even how to create more terrorist groups and forge “alliances” with different religious communities to isolate Muslims.
    Spencer, Geller and others have contributed to that book. Their life’s work made that book possible. Every lie about taqiyya, abrogation, dhimmitude and stealth jihad has led up to this and now forms part of that manual that will inspire more morons. It is now more important than ever for Loonwatch to refute the nonsense about Leftists and Muslims that is out there.
    Bat Yeor, who started this Eurabia nonsense, should feel very ashamed now.
  13. Jacob Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:46 pm Ali Sina huh? I knew his views would lead to anti-Muslim violence. This whole situation is tragic and disgusting.
  14. Dane Bargeld Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:55 pm Okay, but as I pointed out in a comment to the previous article, Breiviks main source of inspiration is anonymous Norwegian blogger “Fjordman”, who Breivik praises in his book. Most of the references to Spencer are via Fjordman’s essays. This is Breivik about Fjordman:
    At that time I had researched most of the primary and secondary
    topics for my book. To my great surprise I found that Fjordman had written about many
    of the same topics I was writing about. The only difference being that he was a
    professional essay writer and I was not. Our views are quite similar with the exception of
    me being an actual armed resistance fighter.
  15. eslaporte Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 4:04 pm Have you heard that Glenn Beck has likened the teens killed in the shooting as “Hitler Youth?”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8660986/Norway-shooting-Glenn-Beck-compares-dead-teenagers-to-Hitler-youth.html
  16. NassirH Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 4:04 pm Well said @Chris, although I would like to add something to the following.
    “While Spencer is quick to point out that he does not himself openly advocate violence (unless it is carried out by Western or Israeli governments against Muslims, of course), there is no doubt that his books and website incite extreme pro-Christian/pro-conservative fanaticism and irrational hatred of both Muslims and anyone with left-wing leanings – and irrationality and hatred, especially when incited by fear-mongering propaganda, soon beget violence.”
    While Spencer is keen on claiming that he doesn’t advocate vigilantism (although he does explicitly support a new “crusade” against Islam), his fellow Jihad Watch writers Hugh Fitzgerald and Roland Shirk don’t seem to have any qualms about supporting violence. For example, during the Egyptian protests earlier this year (when Spencer et al. were claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood would replace Mubarak), Roland Shirk called for a “Tiananmen square” style massacre in Egypt — and then invoked Suharto’s purges in the comments section. It lingered on Jihad Watch for some time and then Spencer quietly deleted Roland’s words. However, unfortunately for Spencer, the Internet has a long memory.
    http://www.realcourage.org/2011/01/anti-islam-calls-for-shooting/
    Hugh Fitzgerald is even worse, in my opinion. We gathered a few of his more bigoted articles on Spencerwatch (see the comments section under the article about him). He openly calls for people to rejoice at the news of Muslim civilians dying, calls Iraqis a “hideous people,” calls for a ban on education for Muslims, etc. It seems that those articles are still on Jihad Watch, as far as I’m aware.
  17. eslaporte Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 4:32 pm We all know just how dangerous Geert Wilders is … before the Norway carnage.
    It is an outrage that it takes this kind of carnage to wake people up to this threat.
    We now have reports that confirm that Anders Behring Breivik not only had links to the EDL — he used a visit to London by Geert Wilders to meet with EDL radicals:
    QUOTE: Breivik was understood to have met leaders of the EDL in March last year when he came to London for the visit of Geert Wilders, the Dutch Right-wing politician. Daryl Hobson, who organises EDL demonstrations, said Breivik, who told police there were “two more cells” ready to follow him, had met members of the group.
    Breivik told his Facebook friends he would be coming to London for Wilders’s visit. “I remember he [Breivik] was on Facebook saying that he felt he had to come over. Maybe he thought it was the only chance he’d get to come to a big demo,” said the source.
    “Geert Wilders was a high-profile anti-Islamic politician, coming to Britain. Every­one was raving about it.
    “He [Breivik] was obviously in contact with some of us. If this bloke was coming all the way from Norway the leadership would have wanted to meet him.
    “If there is someone who can put themselves across in an articulate way about the radicalisation and Islamisation of Europe then people at the top of the EDL are very welcoming.”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8661139/Norway-killer-Anders-Behring-Breivik-had-extensive-links-to-English-Defence-League.html
    No matter what Geert Wilders says about his “disgust” about these terrorist attacks in Norway, he cannot distance himself far enough away from this …
  18. Hopper Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 4:37 pm During the years Loonwatch has been warning of an impending attack by a creature such as Breivik, how many Islamic-inspired atrocities have been committed? The answer is thousands; why haven’t the esteemed writers at Loonwatch been warning us of these daily events?
    Further, along with Spencer, Geller, et al, this despicable demon mentions Churchill, Locke, Ghandi, and Jefferson in support of his cause; were all those men intolerant, ignorant, Islamopobes?
    Finally, as far as authorities know at this moment, not a single Muslim was targeted, shot at, or killed during this monster’s rampage; yet Islam, as is customary, is claiming that its glorious Religion of Peace is the main victim. Does this strike anyone as strange?
    Oh, and Garibaldi, please give us the links where we can go to read of Geller’s, “pronouncements of genocide against Muslims and the “political elites” who enable them.” That should make for a fascinating read.
  19. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 5:30 pm Hopper get your ugly ass out of here
  20. Ismail Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 5:38 pm @ Hooper
    We both know the truth of that matter is the people advocating violence aren’t going to say so publicly unless it is legal and safe to do so. For instance a “we should bomb mecca” when “we” means the US armed forces is a legal voicing of support for mass murder and bigotry by Tancredo and commentators on Jihad Watch and Atlas Shrugs. You will not however see them attend a rally and say “you guys in the audience should go plant bombs in mecca”. I am not saying he supports terror, but I know he isn’t stupid enough to support it openly if he did. It would open him up to investigation and prison. The lunatics aren’t going to tell you unless they feel reasonably safe doing so.
  21. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 5:41 pm Loon Watch,
    Juan Cole’s piece below which he links to islamophobia watch, has a good rebuttal to the lie that Daniel Pipes spread about Norwegian rapes being mostly Muslim.
    It’s high time you did an article on Daniel Pipes, I think this one would be a good one.
    ———————————-
    White Christian Fundamentalist Terrorism in Norway
    The Irrelevance of the Knights in a Global Society
    Posted on 07/25/2011 by Juan
    Norwegian right wing Christian terrorist Anders Breivik spoke of being a member of the “Knights Templar,” and if anything is further terrorizing about Friday’s attacks beyond their own horror, it is the possibility that an organization was behind them or that there are other members of it as looney and violent as Breivik himself. Update: : Breivik warned Monday that 2 more cells of “our organization” were organized for further attacks. Is this his “Templars”? The name, of course, refers to the medieval order coming out of the Crusades.
    Breivik visited Malta, where the remnants of the real Knights Templar, having turned their resources over to the Knights of St. John the Hospitaller, had run a pirate mini-state for a few hundred years in the early modern period. Breivik, from a Protestant background, advocated a return to Catholicism, but not to the really-existing current church, rather to a pan-Christian revival of a Crusade theocracy.
    The Crusade, he insisted, was necessary because in ten years Muslims would be a majority in most of Europe and they were raping Christian girls. The fear of brown men raping Norwegian women is of course the ultimate in iconic racism, redolent of Jim Crow in the Old South.
    The myth about rape in Oslo is debunked here. The argument has the form of bad statistics. It is alleged that Muslims are only 4% of the population in Norway but are responsible for almost all the rapes. First of all, the allegation is untrue. But consider this: most rapes happen in big cities, where anonymity affords more opportunity for subsequent escape. Immigrants are mostly in cities and are a bigger proportion of the urban population than they are of the general population. Then, rapists tend to be young, and recent immigrants groups are disproportionately young. Then, rape is more common in low-income areas, and, you guessed it, immigrants are poorer. So if you studied rape among poor urban youth, it may well be that Muslims commit fewer rapes than would be statistically expected, in that demographic group (the relevant one). Moreover, a lot of the victims of rape would also be poor, urban, young immigrant women.
    This wicked fantasy that most European rapists are Muslim immigrants is a staple of the far right, and it has contributed to hatred and violence toward European Muslims. This theme, like many Muslim-hating canards, appears to have been started by McCarthyite Daniel Pipes, a far right Zionist who “watches” American academics that do not toe Breivik’s sort of line at an invasion-of-privacy enterprise ominously called ‘Campus Watch’; and given the turn to violence among people of Breivik’s stripe, it is only a matter of time until Pipes’s organization whips some kindred looney into a homocidal frenzy against those liberal, multi-cultural, Muslim-coddling professors– so like the people at the Labor Party meet on Utoya. And why would Pipes be writing about rape in Scandinavia anyway? It is because people who want to steal more Palestinian land think that they can run cover for the often fanatical and violent West Bank settlers by scaring white people into thinking Muslims in general are a threat and should be discounted, and that if they get kicked out of their homes they’re just getting what they deserve.
    read more here
    http://www.juancole.com/2011/07/the-irrelevance-of-the-knights-in-a-global-society.html
  22. eslaporte Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 5:58 pm While Hopper cites “thousands of attacks,” bet he cannot tell us how many were in Europe?
    We all know about the promotion of the so-called “Leftist/Muslim alliance” to rip up Western Christian civilization and the “land of dhimmitude.” Well – “knitting the threads together” was (well) done by Batty Bat Ye’or who makes accusations against the EC/EU’s relationship with the Arab world which is NOT mainstream and well outside of standard theory for EU relations. When mainstream authors get around to reading Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, this book will be the new “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and is in the league.
    I did my master’s paper on the how EU foreign policy and am well aware of how it got established in 1973 and the oil crisis. Ye’or’s ideas are outside of mainstream and quite kooky!
    This outrageous theory is present in Anders Behring Breivik 1500 page manifesto, which I too have a copy of. This theory of “Lestist/Muslim alliance for dhimmitude” is present in Breivik’s writings and “enabling Muslims and Islam in Norway” is the reason why he attacked the democracy camp …
  23. NassirH Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 6:27 pm Hopper:
    Oh, and Garibaldi, please give us the links where we can go to read of Geller’s, “pronouncements of genocide against Muslims and the “political elites” who enable them.” That should make for a fascinating read.
    The article “Looniest Blogger Ever” has some links to Geller calling for the nuclear destruction of majority Muslim cities: Mecca, Medina, and Tehran. There are also other examples, including her support for Stalin’s anti-Chechen pogroms or her “denial” (i.e. support) of the Bosnian genocide. (Breivik also “denied” the Bosnian genocide.)
    Anyways, I think it’s quite funny how many posts you’ve made attempting to defend your precious Islamophobia after Breivik did what can only be considered the logical “next step” if one actually believes what Robert Spencer et al. claim (remember that at first you thought a Muslim was behind the attacks in Norway). In that sense you’re no different from the loons who inspired Breivik in the first place.
    Finally, as far as authorities know at this moment, not a single Muslim was targeted, shot at, or killed during this monster’s rampage; yet Islam, as is customary, is claiming that its glorious Religion of Peace is the main victim. Does this strike anyone as strange?
    More lies?
    http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/07/25/20110725norway-survivor-afghan-war-zone0725.html
  24. Johnny Knocks Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 6:33 pm I DO NOT attribute the attacks to Pamela Gellar and Robert Spencer. Their idealogy was certainly behind the mindset of this terrorist, but in no way have they expressed their undenying support to these attacks. Regardless, this should make people around them think twice about even considering their hate filled speech as legitimate rhetoric. What they have done is dangerous, and they should really try to reevaluate their goals.
    On a final note, look at one thing Pamela said earlier today – “No dealings, no emails, no nothing,” Geller said. “He mentions me once in a 1,500 page ‘manifesto,’ and this is the tie? Does anyone see how completely ridiculous this whole thing is?”
    Although putting all the blame on Pamela is a bit over the top, her connections cannot be ignored. Then again, it wasn’t her who pulled the final trigger. What I find most funny however is how she thinks that its ridiculous to tie her to the massacre from just ONE mention. This is the same person who called Imam Rauf a Hamas and terrorist sympathizer because his 3rd cousins teachers son was caught in the same photo as some no-name Radical Imam. She is the worst of all hypocrites.
  25. Rob Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 7:14 pm ApolloReaks and Popper are spinning themselves in circles. Just like the rest of the proud internet bigots, they’re in full damage control trying to salvage their already decrepit ship. But it’s entertaining to watch these idiots trying to create new excuses and find different angles to differentiate themselves from this murderer. But they’re all the same right-wing extremist loons who use violence and deception to get their point through.
  26. corey Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 7:31 pm @rob
    don’t worry about those two they’re pissed that the shooter didn’t turn out to be a muslim as jw embarrassingly jumped the gun on and are just trying to save face and also wasn’t jefferson supportive of islam?
  27. Hopper Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 7:31 pm NassirH
    You may be a person I can deal with. You’re absolutely right-Geller does indeed call for the nuclear destruction of Mecca and Medina in the event of an Iranian first strike, and such sentiments are monstrous. Geller should be damned for writing that sentence, and I do damn her without reservation. It would be, as you point out, genocide against people who had nothing to do with the events taking place.
    I apologize.
    That said, can you admit that Hussein Kazemi just happened to be on the island and was in no way targeted? That he was simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time?
    If you can admit that, it might be a step towards you, me, and others raising the level of discourse on this forum above the level it now resides. I am not Muslim, I think you may be, but I’m not sure…can we question and probe each other’s beliefs in a coherent, rational way?
  28. eslaporte Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 7:33 pm Breivik also said that the Bosnian Serbs were ridding their country of Islam. the same for the 1999 atrocities in Kosovo.
    He also had an ‘indictment’ of NATO leaders for the “crimes” in the 1999 action against Yugoslavia (Serbia).
    This is a manual that instructs and encourages others to take further violent action against Europe and European leaders who are “enabling Islam.” There are also tacit threats against European leaders and even a form threat letter to send to your local national leaders to “warn them that a Knight Templar was coming to carry out a death sentence.”
    Sites like Loonwatch have done a exemplary job in trying to warn against this type of violent extremism and terrorism. We now have to see these horrible murders before European leaders get up off their lard butts to do anything about it. Too little, too late.
  29. Skhan Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 7:47 pm Geehad Bob and Halal Dork, I still haven’t heard anything from you. Evil Mooslim terrorists got your tongue?
  30. corey Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 9:35 pm @skahn
    yeah why haven’t they said anything on this cause I could use a good laugh, especially halals comments can be comedy gold from thinking robert morey is an intellectual genius, to his cop out responses when he is beaten in a debate.
  31. Jack Cope Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 10:23 pm Loonwatch and others:
    I would strongly advise you *not* to promote this guys book as it contains pages upon pages of very detailed bomb making techniques to say the least. While bomb making guides are readily available online the guides provided in this ‘book’ are very different in that they actually worked and detail his ‘trail and error’ techniques and modifications of the methods you can find online to make the more potent and reliable. There is even a day by day log of how to carry out an attack such as his. As a person with a basic grasp of such things I can tell you that this is a major development from chemists and college kids posting their pyrotechnics recipies online.
    However, we cannot just brush this ‘book’ under the carpet and not let it be read, upon reading it a lot of things become clear regarding the whole ‘Islamaphobia’ thing and the links to mainstream figures such as Spencer.
    With this in mind I have produced a ‘cleaner version’ of the book; deleting bomb making techniques and other such material from the document for use by persons such as yourself. This means that people can study this madman’s thoughts and see how dangerous they are *without* the danger of propagating bomb making manuals.
    A copy is available upon request from jackcope@bandofstrangers.com and I hope to provide an online copy in the next week.
    Jack
  32. NassirH Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 10:49 pm Hopper:
    Geller is not only one who thinks that nuking majority Muslim countries is perfectly acceptable. The list of Islamophobes who agree with her sentiments is long (Walid Shoebat, Michael Savage, Joe Kaufman, etc.). Spencer has never condemned any of these Islamophobes for holding such genocidal beliefs; rather, he claims he opposes nuking Mecca on the grounds that it would give Muslims something to “complain about.” (How dare those Mooslims whine about having bombs dropped on them!) He couldn’t care less about all the civilians who would be killed.
    “That said, can you admit that Hussein Kazemi just happened to be on the island and was in no way targeted? That he was simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time?”
    I doubt Breivik was “targeting” a specific person; it seems clear that he attempted to kill anyone he could find on the island. What is also clear are his motives and deeply held beliefs, both significantly influenced by the usual loons. By his own admittance, he massacred about 90 people to save Europe from the “Marxist-Islamic threat.” And he used the life’s work of Spencer, Bostom, Geller, Fjordman, etc. to buttress his beliefs and justify his actions.
  33. Jack Cope Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 11:08 pm Hopper; where is ‘Islam’, that great monolith that we Muslims seem to be somehow wired into, claiming it was ‘attacked’?
    However I would suggest that you read this guys little (well it’s quite big) ‘book’ for an interesting insight into how things like this will keep happening as long as the hate is spread. Nuking Mecca is just part of it… anyone reading some of these forums or the comments section or websites of people like Mr Spencer and Ms. Geller will find sentiments of this ‘book’ echoed whole heatedly in there, often word for word. Joy, now we get a ‘Christian Al-Queda’…
  34. I have one! Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 11:23 pm Ali Sina, you troll.! Remember the days when Solomon Yedidiyah Tulbure (Sol Tulbure) copied your book and you used to cry like infant in yahoo groups?. ((Same goes to you Spencer.))
    It all started from http://www.faithfreedom.org http://www.nazarene.net http://www.secularislam.org/ .. RAWA.org and humanists.net… All working together in the late 90s and still working.. One thing has changed for assho%$#s like them. Your hate has backfired on you and all the blame for the killings is on YOU now.
  35. khan4 Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 11:30 pm Loonwatch and its members warned us for years what the consequences of Geller’s, Spencer’s, etc’s rhetoric would lead to. Preaching hate can lead to dire consequences. It’s too bad you guys were right.
    I guess it’s time to keep an eye on those Christian fundamentalists. If they have funny sounding Christian names, search them excessively. We need to make sure they are the good Christians and not the bad ones. Let’s pass the Citizen Act and destroy our democracy more.
    BTW, that jerk Bill Maher didn’t even mention the Norway shooting on his show until his overtime segment, which doesn’t air on HBO. If it was a Muslim who did this heinous act, Maher would have gone on a nasty diatribe about Islam and talked about how great Israel is.
  36. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 12:07 am Elsaporte
    We all know about the promotion of the so-called “Leftist/Muslim alliance” to rip up Western Christian civilization
    This makes you part of the plot too :)
    This is why Brievik targeted Norwegians, or rather didn’t distinquish between Muslims and what he described as “marxists”. That is the code word that extreme rightwingers use for the left wing and for liberals.
    Yup, you’re all part of the conspiracy too. It’s sad to see the bereaved families of those killed. May God help them.
  37. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 12:15 am Loon Watch, you got another mention here at this Canadian site,
    Loonwatch warned about the dangerous fools who inspired Anders Behring Breivik
    http://www.straight.com/article-406271/vancouver/loonwatch-warned-about-dangerous-fools-who-inspired-anders-behring-breivik
    by Charlie Smith on July 25,
    The appropriately named loonwatch.com website has offered some insights into why a Norwegian nutbar named Anders Behring Breivik became a mass murderer.
    Part of the reason that this “intelligent individual, wealthy and from a privileged background” acted this way because he was inspired by other nutbars that Europe is being taken over by Muslims.
    “He believes this despite the fact that there are no Muslim Armies occupying ANY European nation, there are no Muslim Armies that have set up bases in ANY European nation,” the website states.
    In his 1,500-page manifesto, Brievik states that he was inspired by various Islamophobes, notably Andrew Bostom, Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and Geert Wilders.
    The loonwatch site has been warning about them for quite some time.
    Here’s just a tiny slice of what Brievik wrote: “Unfortunately for us, more than 95% of today’s Journalists, editors, publishers are pro-Eurabians (support European multiculturalism). The same goes for 85% of Western European politicians and more than 90% of EU parliamentarians.”
    So therefore, in his twisted world, they must be executed.
    Loonwatch.com predicts that he’ll spawn copycats.
  38. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 12:23 am Loon Watch,
    Juan Cole from Informed Comment, has written some good pieces about Briekvik. He also unravelled how Daniel Pipes lied about the Norwegian rapes being comitted by Muslims mainly. This has been propogated by the likes of Robert Spencer. He links to a site (Islamophobia Watch) which has the figures and shows how Daniel Pipes twisted them. It was also a lie that Pat Condell propogated.
    It’s about time you did a piece on Daniel Pipes too. Could you follow this up with an article?
    ———————–
    The Irrelevance of the Knights in a Global Society
    Posted on 07/25/2011 by Juan
    The myth about rape in Oslo is debunked here. The argument has the form of bad statistics. It is alleged that Muslims are only 4% of the population in Norway but are responsible for almost all the rapes. First of all, the allegation is untrue. But consider this: most rapes happen in big cities, where anonymity affords more opportunity for subsequent escape. Immigrants are mostly in cities and are a bigger proportion of the urban population than they are of the general population. Then, rapists tend to be young, and recent immigrants groups are disproportionately young. Then, rape is more common in low-income areas, and, you guessed it, immigrants are poorer. So if you studied rape among poor urban youth, it may well be that Muslims commit fewer rapes than would be statistically expected, in that demographic group (the relevant one). Moreover, a lot of the victims of rape would also be poor, urban, young immigrant women.
    This wicked fantasy that most European rapists are Muslim immigrants is a staple of the far right, and it has contributed to hatred and violence toward European Muslims. This theme, like many Muslim-hating canards, appears to have been started by McCarthyite Daniel Pipes, a far right Zionist who “watches” American academics that do not toe Breivik’s sort of line at an invasion-of-privacy enterprise ominously called ‘Campus Watch’ and given the turn to violence among people of Breivik’s stripe, it is only a matter of time until Pipes’s organization whips some kindred looney into a homocidal frenzy against those liberal, multi-cultural, Muslim-coddling professors– so like the people at the Labor Party meet on Utoya. And why would Pipes be writing about rape in Scandinavia anyway?
    It is because people who want to steal more Palestinian land think that they can run cover for the often fanatical and violent West Bank settlers by scaring white people into thinking Muslims in general are a threat and should be discounted, and that if they get kicked out of their homes they’re just getting what they deserve.
    read more here
    http://www.juancole.com/2011/07/the-irrelevance-of-the-knights-in-a-global-society.html
  39. safak Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 1:57 am “Anders Behring Breivik is the polo sweater wearing anti-Muslim Right-wing nationalist Crusader icon of Islamophobes worldwide, he is their Che Guevara and he will inspire more copycats in his wake.”
    Well now that Spencer and Geller and other loons have worked overtime to distance themselves from Breivik and strongly condemned him and called him all sorts of names, do you think those other cells Breivik alluded to (if they exist, and I hope to God they don’t) will start calling Spencer and Wilders sell-outs and traitors if they surface in the near future, and maybe even target them eventually if they’re allowed to grow to Europe’s version of Al Qaeda proportions?
  40. marco Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 2:26 am @Hopper
    Pam Geller supports genocide. 1stly, she has defended the likes of Milosvic & Radovan Karadic. She denies they did anything wrong, their only crime according to her was fighting war with war. She supports the Bosnian genocide.
    She supports the genocide Stalin committed against Chechan muslims shortly after WW2, when he mass deported them to Siberia – and many died.
    She called for the destruction of the Al-Aqsa mosque and later deleted the page and denied she ever said such a thing ( thank God for Webarchive)
    No where has it been claimed Islam or Muslims are the victims here. Its being pointed out, hatred of Islam & leftists that defend Muslims – as preached by these loons is 1 of the major reasons why this happenned.
    The fact is, i personally believe – such an attack like this will happen again, and this time It’ll be against muslims.
    Last year, a Jacksonville, Florida mosque was spared such carnage when a pipe bomb was set off just outside – when people inside were praying.
    It could have been castrophic had it gone off inside. Luckily, no one was hurt and it never even amde the news.
    If the Park-51 islamic center gets built, taht will be a definite target – because of the hatred and hysteria Pam Geller & Spencer have whipped up against Imam Rauf, his wife and the people behind it.
    Other mosques will be targetted, and more and more muslims will be violently attacked, and eventually there will be a massacre.
    All it’ll take is 1 massacre done by a nutjob, that read Geller or Spencer’s websites or books and those 2 are done for.
  41. marco Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 2:46 am Oh this is just perfect. This is going mainstream media.
    In The New York Times, Rob Spencer and his co-scumbags are all being cited
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/25/us/25debate.html?_r=2&hp
    Pam Geller is complaining about how she and Spencer have been swamped by phone calls
    “eedless to say, I have been fielding calls from an agenda-driven media hellbent on destroying the freedom-loving voices on the right with the acts of a lone psychopath. NBC Nightly News is calling (that’s a first). And Robert Spencer is besieged with media requests. NY Times, “Killings in Norway Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S.”
    Instead of mourning the 91 victims of this horrible tragedy, the media is wielding it like a club to bludgeon the voices of freedom.”
    Couldn’t happen to anyone better. Serves that evil Harpy right. As time goes on, she and her buddy Spencer will be linked to more people who carry out acts of violence against Muslims – and then the heat will really be on these 2 scumbags.
  42. Link182 Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 2:56 am Beivik explictly stated that his actions were motivated by a desire to save Europe the Muslims and that slaughtering Labour party recruits was necessary to stop Muslim immigration. Where did he get this kind of nonsense into his head? From reading Geller, Spencer and co.
    Given that this atrocity was clearly islamaphobically motivated, and given that Islamaphobes clearly influenced this man, I think it’s reasonable that Geller, Spencer etc be arrested to prevent them doing further harm.
  43. Farlowe Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 3:39 am I disagree. Spencer has never said to kill anyone. Neither has Mohammed in his Quran. It is the same type of logic to blame Spencer for the deaths of innocents and to blame Mohammed for the deaths of innocents. Mohammed never endorsed bombings yet there are people who say they are following Mohammed’s Quran. Mohammed was never a fan of unbelievers. Spencer was never a fan of believers. But neither of them endorsed killing of innocents.
  44. safak Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 4:25 am @Farlowe
    So why does Spencer blame Mohammed for the deaths of innocents?
  45. safak Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 4:29 am @Farlowe
    Or rather, why is that distinction not being made when it comes to Islamic terrorists? Islamophobia has become part of the mainstream, just look at how several GOP presedential candidates freely engage in bigotry when it comes to Islam in order to push their campaigns. Why are we now drawing a line when its anti-Islam personalities that are the source of the inspiration? Would the same courtesy be extended to Muslims if this had been an attack by Islamic terrorist groups, quoting out of Islamic texts or the works of current Islamic writers/personalities?
  46. banglapaddy Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 7:04 am So have we heard from this fjordman character?
    The american loons interest me less at the moment. It’s clear that fjordman has quite the ego-stroking (and possibly lucrative) niche as a “yurpean who gets it” among the americans writing the 21st century protocols. But someone who’s practically a neighbour, who has everything in common with you, spending years citing you and your fellow travellers and going out and massacring 80-odd people in your home town must be a massive, massive shock to the system. Imagine stress and worry comparable to that endured by those of us who lived in NYC after 11 Sept combined with the knowledge that your writings inspired the perpetrator? Plus his anonymity must be at risk.
    This is real what-is-the-man-made-of time for fjordman and co and I’m creepily interested to see how he emerges. I mean, I understand that they’re not going to accept a share of the blame – I sure as hell wouldn’t either and the knowledge that someone in their circle isn’t “all blowhard” like 99.9% of those “brave” keyboard warriors must be shocking! But if it’s with the conspiracy theories and childish defensiveness and the “yeah, but mulsims are worse!” that the american bloggers are coming out with and no change in tone it will prove for sure he’s just a bad, bad person. If it’s with honesty, reflectiveness and some measure of changing the language and what’s acceptable in comments etc he will have a certain amount of my respect.
  47. JD Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 7:25 am /\really all you have to do is go thru his archive 2003 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
    The Mafia don also does not call directly for violence also but when he says Go handle john what do you think that means
  48. GreatSentinel Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 7:36 am It looks the Western Evangelicals are getting obsessed with Islam or Muslims, no wonder why they always claim this stupid myth “Islam will take over Europe” which in fact the more they talk about Islam, the more obsessed they become, then more they will naturally convert to Islam. At the same time, the Arabs and the Muslims in the Middle East are now struggle to wage war against Salafists and the Islamists who are targeting their religion and their new democracy.
    Although I show condolences to the people of Norway, but this terrorist attack will show two things to the Islamophobe Westerners:
    1) Do not just focus on Islamists extremists, but also focus on homegrown Christian extremists. I have also warn many people in the West not to support the far-right Christian extremists, but yet they won’t listen to me, as if they believe “It’s better to side with the Christian extremists than siding with the Muslim extremists”. I can’t tell how many of them were brainwashed but almost all these people believe the Evangelicals are “protecting white beautiful and hot Christian European girls” from being “raped by degenerated Muslims and immigrants”. And look now what happen when you side the Evangelicals, your girl ‘guardian’ has killed more Christians than Muslims!!! After this attack, this will debunk the stupid statement “Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly ALL terrorists are Muslims”
    2) That how it feels like if a Christian commits a terrorist attack, will the whole religion Christianity is to be blamed? Today many Muslims (I’m not Muslim) has suffered many Muslim deception from the people like al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden who hijacks their religion, and those stupid Islamophobe who blames “Allah the Satan”, “Mohammad the ‘sick evil pedophile homosexual’” or “Shit Quran teaching believers to kill infidels” all these nonsense. Thank God, most Muslims ain’t stupid (except the radicalized Pakistanis and the Afghans) enough to criticise Christianity as the ‘root cause’ of the terrorism.
    Muslims should stay out of Salafism, Wahhabism or Qutbism, while Christians must stay out of Evangelicalism, if the followers wants to save their image of religion from these hijackers or politicians.
  49. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 10:18 am Did anti-Muslim U.S. bloggers inspire the Oslo massacre?
    A Norwegian who allegedly murdered nearly 100 people cited several American writers in his lengthy anti-Muslim, anti-immigration manifesto
    read more here
    http://theweek.com/article/index/217611/did-anti-muslim-us-bloggers-inspire-the-oslo-massacre
  50. How Islamic inventors changed the world www.1001inventions.com Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 10:22 am Oslo Killer Posted On My Site
    Nils August Andresen
    How did this worldview of war, death and destruction arise in my peaceful, my beloved country of Norway? What is the relationship between a demonizing political debate and violence? Are regulations, laws or a stricter editorial policies part of the solution?
    After the excruciating, but ultimately unanswerable, questions that all Norwegians have asked themselves over the last few days, about an evil that we cannot understand, these thoughts have plagued my mind since Friday. I have asked myself these questions because they are of importance to us these days; but also, more personally, because I, as editor of the conservative Norwegian website Minerva, have been forced to confront the fact that Anders Behring Breivik, the mass murderer of my countrymen, has visited our website, and posted comments in our forum.
    =========
    We know that, among the websites Breivik expressed some admiration for, Document.no was by far the most moderate. He mainly sought what he thought to be likeminded people outside Norway, in websites such as JihadWatch, Gates of Vienna and The Brussels Journal. Absent global Internet censorship, the consequences of pushing these views out of the daylight, might be dark indeed. For some, retaining some minimal level of engagement with the lamestream media might give useful alternative input.
    Furthermore, reading postings of extremists might sometimes be useful. As editor of Minerva, I have frequently despaired reading posts in our forum. However, in some regard, it is also useful. It is useful because when we discuss immigration, culture and religion, it is necessary to remember that we speak to many who share at least some of the narratives. Though it often feels exceedingly futile to try to debate these people on the Internet, the effort of learning to debate immigration and religion in a way that addresses a broad range of legitimate concerns while remaining tolerant is necessary, and will become increasingly so in the years to come.
    read more here
    http://www.frumforum.com/oslo-killer-posted-on-my-site
  51. Mosizzle Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 10:44 am Bat Ye’or claims the attacks are “suspicious” because the authors mentioned in the document are those that the “Norwegian Leftist Government” wants to “silence” and is seriously considering the possibility that the document was faked.
    In other words, there is a “Leftist-Muslim Alliance” trying to silence Islamophobes. Is anyone surprised that Breivik was inspired by her? Well, somehow, she is:
    “This sudden smear campaign and accusations against authors who live in different countries miles away from Norway, authors that governments want to silence, is very suspicious. Now more things are known: the text of the man could be a fabrication put together at the last minute; the police knew the criminal, yet he could buy all this ammunition and do this massive massacre by himself. And now, authors, writers and politicians disliked by the Norwegian Leftist government are accused of having inspired, by their democratic criticism, this massive crime that the police should have prevented, because this is their duty to do so. Something smells in all that. Is this a new tactic to suppress free thinking and free culture? Universities? Books that displease the regime? Are we going back to dictatorial Nazi or communist regimes, burning books and fabricating proofs to label people?”
    Although she doesn’t directly say it, it’s clear she is suspecting the Norwegian government of involvement and the police of deliberately letting this happen — just because those pesky Leftists want to silence her.
    This is exactly the kind of thinking that led to this massacre.
  52. Perseveranze Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 11:07 am Norway killing then EDL leader being arrested… This has been such a horrible week for Islamaphobes LOL.
  53. Khushboo Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 11:26 am Why are we comparing out beloved prophet to hideous Spencer?! Spencer is full of hate and obsessed with demonizing Muslims which has influenced crazies to verbally and physically attack innocent Muslims and innocent non-Muslims (i.e. Norway).
    Our beloved prophet (pbuh) has spread Islam peacefully and never hated anyone but instead forgave those enemies who attempted to kill him and asked for forgiveness. The Quran mentions how those enemies broke their treaties and then, only then, were they killed which happens in this country as well. It’s called Treason! Also, any enemy who tries to kill you should be killed, no? Does that really make you a warrior?
    Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was against oppression, but after 13 years of aggression from his brutal enemies, he finally learned to fight.
  54. Peakofelephants Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 11:51 am Since the send-a-tip section of the site seems to be continuously broken…
    Great piece from the SPLC here:
    American Anti-Muslim Activists Throw Devoted Follower Breivik Under Bus
    http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/07/26/american-anti-muslim-activists-throw-devoted-follower-breivik-under-bus/
  55. Khushboo Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 11:59 am ^hilarious! However, if he killed innocent Muslims instead, these Islamophobes would be cheering him on!
  56. Dawood Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 3:29 pm I seem to remember an interview (well, so-called “debate”) that Spencer did a while ago with one of his teachers regarding Islam, where both basically agreed that it was modernity and its associated attitudes, politics and views that were the greatest enemy to Christianity rather than Islam per se, in other words “leftism”. Does anyone else remember this? It was covered on Spencer Watch if I remember correctly.
  57. corey Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 4:18 pm @dawood
    http://spencerwatch.com/2010/11/09/robert-spencer-v-peter-kreeft-the-only-good-muslim-is-a-bad-muslim/
    talking about this one were it looked like it was just a setup to make himself look good to his fans hell his fans bought it if you read the comments on jw were you can find it there.
  58. corey Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 4:34 pm @kushboo
    actually as I have said before they are completely indifferent to anything bad that happens to muslims because they think its either an act or they somehow think they deserve it if you remember how jw reacted during orange county they with the exception of one “kingdom key” were on board with it, then there was the incident with the two imams kicked off a plane http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/05/us-airways-captain-on-flying-imams-incident-i-can-promise-you-the-captain-didnt-throw-those-people-o.html they made the pilot a hero and made the two imams public enemy for daring to board a flight at all, so with that they will probably say somthing along the lines of “now those mooslims have something to whine about even though there co religionists slaughter Christians in the middle east everyday” just a guess but I don’t think its far off.
  59. Khushboo Says:
    July 26th, 2011 at 7:30 pm ^oh yes indeedy, I remember! That’s exactly what they say and will continue to say, not a guess.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Anders Behring Breivik is by all accounts an intelligent individual, wealthy and from a privileged background. He believes Europe is under assault, that it is being colonized by the hordes of the evil “green” menace known as ‘Islam’ and that Europ Says:
    July 25th, 2011 at 3:34 pm […] Loonwatch Has Been Warning about an Anders Behring Breivik for Years Share/Bookmark Posted on 25 July 2011 in Loonwatch.com | No Comments Tags: 2083, A European Declaration of Independence, Anders Behring Breivick, Anti-Muslim, Beslan of Norway, Breivick, Islam, Islamophobia, Loonwatch, Muslims, Norway, Oslo, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Terrorism, Utoeya […]

One comment on “Loonwatch Has Been Warning about an Anders Behring Breivik for Years

  1. All is not what it seems, Breivik is a patsie for sure. We need to dig deeper, much deeper. Muslims need to understand that the jew Bankers World Order are using Breivik to demonize Christians, Whites, and Nationalists, who if not subverted, will offer real opposition to the World Order. The World Order also demonize Muslims as racist and fanatical and ploting to overthrow European Christian societies, which they are not. It is very important that Whites and Muslims understand that it is the World Order jew that is setting the stage for violence. The World Order will set Muslims and Christians against each other, divide and conquer, to achieve their Talmudic agenda. IMO. if we all use common sense, a Christian/ Muslin alliance against the jew puppet masters is needed.